Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part IV - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

1102103105107108325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭the corpo


    The whole social distancing is basically a load of rubbish anyways. Its impossible to ever enforce. You can have a queue of 200 people spaced 2m apart. If 1 person then walks alongside the queue all the way to the back, they've potentially contaminated every single person. Almost everyone I know is reporting that social distancing currently isn't working anyways. And yet there are no spikes in cases.

    Afaik, this isn't correct. Luke O'Neill explained it as if you pass someone briefly with Covid you most likely will be fine. It's continued exposure, say 5 minutes having a chat, with an infected person, within your 2 metres that puts you at risk. That's why social distancing in any public place matters.

    Where I live in Dublin, most people in shops/parks etc are definitely still practicing social distancing measures. After three months of practicing it and getting used to the habit, I don't see why people expect it to suddenly fall apart, unless willfully done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Well well

    THE GAA FEEL they can accommodate a crowd of 21,000 in Croke Park under the current two-metre rule in place for social distancing and temporary seating in Hill 16 may be an option that they pursue.

    https://www.the42.ie/gaa-croke-park-fans-covid-19-5117166-Jun2020/

    Brilliant. Imagine the numbers if its 1.5 metres or 1 metre.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,140 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    So if you live in County Louth you are only 'allowed' to travel 20km but if you live in say Mitchelstown Co Cork you are 'allowed' to travel as much as 140km if you wanted to visit scenic west Cork :confused: Has some 'study' come to the conclusion that those living in Co Louth are more likely to have this virus?
    The govt and the 'experts' are just making it all up as they go along.

    It was explained at the briefing. The idea is that they don't want people from counties where there's still infection moving en masse to counties where there is no longer infection. The regulations also have to be written into legalisation, to they have to be expressed in a way that is only open to the most limited interpretation. The physical distance you can travel is nothing to do with it – they had to find a way of expressing the wish for people to be able to increase their movement locally without it becoming a free-for-all nationally. As Leo admitted, there’s no perfect way to do this, so any way of restricting movement is an imperfect compromise. It's really nothing to do with anyone making it up as they go along.

    And any time I see the word experts written in quotes, I'm reminded of Michael Gove. Which is not a compliment.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    road_high wrote: »
    Never look for sense in this insanity. Just go wherever you want now. Enough of this crap.

    How did you feel about the smoking ban when that was brought in back in 2004? Was that "crap" too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,060 ✭✭✭skallywag


    Bear in mind Denmark are 1 month now with 1 metre social distancing and the "enormous risk" just hasnt materialised there?

    And, you know, theres Italy and a host of other countries who are at 1 metre now. For 4 + weeks now.

    I have been out at the weekend in a region where the 'official' distance has been reduced to 1m, and the bars are all open. I say 'official' as in reality there was no distancing at all, whatsoever.

    People have a few drinks and everything just goes out the window, nobody bothers caring less. Same with the pools and sports grounds which have opened, nobody is taking any notice any more. It is strange how quickly public perception can change. Only a few weeks ago the police were coming down hard on groups gathered together. Eaten bread is soon forgotten I guess.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭storker


    And any time I see the word experts written in quotes, I'm reminded of Michael Gove. Which is not a compliment.

    Wasn't it Gove who said "We're sick of experts!"? Ah the modern age...when thanks to the Internet anyone's ignorance is just as good as someone else's knowledge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,890 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    How did you feel about the smoking ban when that was brought in back in 2004? Was that "crap" too?

    I love the smoking ban yes and think it's great- but fail to see what that has good to do with non sensical Coronabollix. I'm sure you can enlighten us?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,462 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    NDWC wrote: »
    I just heard it mentioned on the radio that "if the R0 goes above 1, restrictions will be reimposed". I'm not sure where that's coming from but I can't see them being reimposed at any stage regardless of what happens.

    R could well reach 1. Lower your cases are the higher it will go, perfect example Switzerland last week reported R at just over 1, simply because of such a low number of cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    skallywag wrote: »
    I have been out at the weekend in a region where the 'official' distance has been reduced to 1m, and the bars are all open. I say 'official' as in reality there was no distancing at all, whatsoever.

    People have a few drinks and everything just goes out the window, nobody bothers caring less. Same with the pools and sports grounds which have opened, nobody is taking any notice any more. It is strange how quickly public perception can change. Only a few weeks ago the police were coming down hard on groups gathered together. Eaten bread is soon forgotten I guess.

    Thats what i see in my area in Dublin too. Lads keep gathering drinking cans outdoors 0 social distancing. It seems like a lot of people are making an effort to ignore Simon we are not there yet Harris.

    My local Aldi people climb all over each other lol noone has time to stand there and wait for a shopper to finally pick out pack of mince that expires at the latest date....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    road_high wrote: »
    I love the smoking ban yes and think it's great- but fail to see what that has good to do with non sensical Coronabollix. I'm sure you can enlighten us?

    The point is that they are both entirely sensible public health measures brought in for the good of the general public but then I`m sure that deep down you already know that despite your constant claims otherwise.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,890 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    R could well reach 1. Lower your cases are the higher it will go, perfect example Switzerland last week reported R at just over 1, simply because of such a low number of cases.

    Business will be (rightly) extremely resistant to any re-imposition of insane closures- tbh I can never see this happening again. The experience has left a very bad taste- shambolic political leadership and hiding behind Nphet have seen to that. Why would you close again without any clear direction or timelines and basically be left high and dry?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,487 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Was that George Lee?

    It was Neil Prendeville, I assume it was nonsense but he stated it as if it were fact. I hadn't heard it before. The R number is so sensitive to relatively small changes particularly with low case numbers that it makes zero sense to base restrictions on it. Which is why it's probably exactly what we'll do


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,689 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    NDWC wrote: »
    It was Neil Prendeville, I assume it was nonsense but he stated it as if it were fact. I hadn't heard it before. The R number is so sensitive to relatively small changes particularly with low case numbers that it makes zero sense to base restrictions on it. Which is why it's probably exactly what we'll do

    K is the new R apparently


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,890 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    The point is that they are both entirely sensible public health measures brought in for the good of the general public but then I`m sure you already knew that despite your protestation of confusion.

    Lol- so i can go 50 km and stay within "my home county" but can't go 50 km to bring me into the next next one :pac:. I'm sure there's logic there for the lockdown fanatics. I'm going wherever I want in the country, county borders mean nothing to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,140 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    IQO wrote: »
    IKEA queues

    I fully agree with shops opening up with social distancing, etc.

    And I know that the queues seem longer because of the 2m distancing.

    And I know it's the first day, and things will settle down.

    And I have plenty of Ikea furniture, and have a list of stuff I want to get at some point.

    Buy why, WHY would someone put themselves though standing in a queue of any length in order to shop there on the very first day of restrictions actually easing? Even on a good day, shopping in Ikea is the most dismal experience you can have. Imagine that being the first place you decided to go to with your new found freedom of going anywhere in your county or 20km from your home.


  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A lot of people don't really know how big 2m is. Which isn't exactly surprising unless you walk around with a measuring tape or a metre stick.
    Peter Crouch is 2M tall. That big massive lank of a man that used to play for Liverpool.
    There are a lot of pubs and restaurants that I think will find it impossible to put that sort of space between people. Most people's houses will make it impossible to have visitors and keep 2m distance.
    Schools won't be able to properly reopen with a 2m distance.

    Unless an actual deadly virus comes along and kills off humans in actual huge numbers, 2M distance is impossible to maintain between people.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    road_high wrote: »
    Lol- so i can go 50 km and stay within "my home county" but can't go 50 km to bring me into the next next one :pac:. I'm sure there's logic there for the lockdown fanatics. I'm going wherever I want in the country, county borders mean nothing to me.

    So do you also feel the same way about the laws about road tax, insurance, NCT etc. Do following those rules also mean nothing to you when it suits you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,740 ✭✭✭Naos


    The vast majority of cases were (obviously) from Dublin.

    Those outside Dublin stated it was unfair that they should have to abide by the same rules, they should be allowed to roam their county etc.
    They asked for county wide restrictions instead of arbitrary 2km or 5km restrictions.

    Now they have it and there are still complaints about why someone in Cork can now travel further than someone in Louth. No matter what this Government do, it'll never be enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,752 ✭✭✭Mr Blobby


    Been trying to get in contact with our local gym to open the 5 aside pitches. No word if they're gonna open.


  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Naos wrote: »
    The vast majority of cases were (obviously) from Dublin.

    Those outside Dublin stated it was unfair that they should have to abide by the same rules, they should be allowed to roam their county etc.
    They asked for county wide restrictions instead of arbitrary 2km or 5km restrictions.

    Now they have it and there are still complaints about why someone in Cork can now travel further than someone in Louth. No matter what this Government do, it'll never be enough.

    There should be no travel restrictions at all!
    I don't think any other country in the world is doing this.....


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    Naos wrote: »
    The vast majority of cases were (obviously) from Dublin.

    Those outside Dublin stated it was unfair that they should have to abide by the same rules, they should be allowed to roam their county etc.
    They asked for county wide restrictions instead of arbitrary 2km or 5km restrictions.

    Now they have it and there are still complaints about why someone in Cork can now travel further than someone in Louth. No matter what this Government do, it'll never be enough.

    Indeed. Whingers will always whinge I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    There should be no travel restrictions at all!
    I don't think any other country in the world is doing this.....

    I think France was the last one to lift their 100km restriction.

    2nd last that is. We are last?:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    paw patrol wrote: »
    a vaccine? how long will you wait for a vaccine? years? What happens if they can't make one?

    what happens if the infection goes away - will you still insist on us maintaining distance till a vaccine (which may never come)
    Vaccines are on target for 2021, and for some countries possibly even earlier. There's also other things in the pipeline which can be used to treat the illness e.g. monoclonal antibodies, which should be available this year.

    Sure if these things run into trouble and it turns out we have to wait years the calculation will change, but we're not there yet. There's a reasonable amount of time we can wait for a vaccine and/or a treatment before we decide we need to let the disease run its course through the population.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    NDWC wrote: »
    I just heard it mentioned on the radio that "if the R0 goes above 1, restrictions will be reimposed". I'm not sure where that's coming from but I can't see them being reimposed at any stage regardless of what happens.
    We can't let our hospitals be over-run if a second wave comes. Restrictions will be imposed if it needs to happen - that's a certainty, it's not an opinion.

    It's why most countries are taking a cautious approach to re-opening, because they want to avoid the need to impose something as damaging as another lockdown if cases spike.


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hmmm wrote: »
    Vaccines are on target for 2021, and for some countries possibly even earlier. There's also other things in the pipeline which can be used to treat the illness e.g. monoclonal antibodies, which should be available this year.

    Sure if these things run into trouble and it turns out we have to wait years the calculation will change, but we're not there yet. There's a reasonable amount of time we can wait for a vaccine and/or a treatment before we decide we need to let the disease run its course through the population.

    There is a possibility of a vaccine in 2021, and even then it will likely only be for front line health workers. I would very much doubt that there will be a vaccine for the general population until 2022, and there is a high possibility that there will never be one.

    There are promising treatments however, which will give the confidence that the virus can be allowed to run through the population through 2021, with the knowledge that hospital treatment will have better and faster outcomes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    hmmm wrote: »
    Vaccines are on target for 2021, and for some countries possibly even earlier. There's also other things in the pipeline which can be used to treat the illness e.g. monoclonal antibodies, which should be available this year.

    Sure if these things run into trouble and it turns out we have to wait years the calculation will change, but we're not there yet. There's a reasonable amount of time we can wait for a vaccine and/or a treatment before we decide we need to let the disease run its course through the population.

    Totally on target :rolleyes:

    Coronavirus 'disappearing' so fast Oxford vaccine has 'only 50% chance of working'
    Professor Adrian Hill describes the efforts to create a vaccine as a "race against the virus disappearing, and against time".


    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-disappearing-so-fast-oxford-vaccine-has-only-50-chance-of-working-11993739


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,150 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    Nice to see the playgrounds still closed today after the completely moronic comments to come out of the Dublin Council over the weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    Mr Blobby wrote: »
    Been trying to get in contact with our local gym to open the 5 aside pitches. No word if they're gonna open.

    Probably waiting on the FAI advice re: return to football.

    As a contact activity, 5 a side wont start for 3 weeks minimum I'd imagine, probably longer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,740 ✭✭✭Naos


    There should be no travel restrictions at all!
    I don't think any other country in the world is doing this.....
    I think France was the last one to lift their 100km restriction.

    2nd last that is. We are last?:rolleyes:

    My point is, no matter what is called for in this thread (bar complete reopening), when it comes to fruition, the same people that called for it just ignore it and move on complaining about the next thing.

    It's getting tiresome.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Naos wrote: »
    My point is, no matter what is called for in this thread (bar complete reopening), when it comes to fruition, the same people that called for it just ignore it and move on complaining about the next thing.

    It's getting tiresome.


    And addicting! You keep coming to this thread :cool:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement