Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XV - 15,251 in ROI (610 deaths) 2,645 in NI (194 deaths) (19/04) Read OP

15657596162319

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    Lockdown will be lifted on a phased basis from May 5th regardless of the status of Covid.

    The Economy needs to be kick started.

    There was an interesting question program on nhk news channel a member of the imf , person from who , EU diplomat and a person from the federal American bank, talking about the world economy and the affects on health systems also.
    Long story short they all agreed that indefinite lockdowns are not viable and could not continue.
    It boils down to controling the virus and getting economy's stimulus rolling and people back to work


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    woohoo!!! wrote: »
    Apart from the fact that you've gotten everything wrong, you're right.

    What parts have I got wrong?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭scamalert


    There will not be a lockdown until vaccine. Have you not read anything?
    I'll give you a direct quote from Harris,

    "In relation to the roadmap, there is going to be a point in this country where we will have to live alongside the virus, for want of a better phrase, where sadly people will still get sick and sadly some people will still die but it is at a rate that is sustainable for our doctors to manage,"

    That's clearly been the objective since the start, they wont be waiting for a vaccine. No country will be, it's not sustainable
    thats accurate think mention was to get it down to 5-10 daily deaths that would be acceptable outcome, in grand scheme virus isnt going anywhere, but once supplement pay is gone people will be out themselves and it will be worse since with little jobs going we will face 2 disasters at the same time for hell knows how many years to come.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,855 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    Where can I help the Sierra Leone Covid Pandemic, was watching the Late Late Show the other night and the African country only has 2 ventilators which is shocking, was looking at Trocaire but you can't choose the specific country, I want my money to specifically go to Sierra Leone for the Covid Pandemic. If anyone can direct me to that particular charity. I have tweeted Ryan Tubridy as he was the one that mentioned it.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    ChikiChiki wrote: »

    Jesus wept.

    No he didn’t, he never existed IMO.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    scamalert wrote: »
    thats accurate think mention was to get it down to 5-10 daily deaths that would be acceptable outcome, in grand scheme virus isnt going anywhere, but once supplement pay is gone people will be out themselves and it will be worse since with little jobs going we will face 2 disasters at the same time for hell knows how many years to come.

    No death is really acceptable but this cant go on until a vaccine is found. Longer a shutdown goes on, the worse the economic effects and the domino effect then on other services including even more pressure on health in time to come.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    kwestfan08 wrote: »
    No there wont be lockdown until a vaccine. Why would you put out such scaremongering horse****.

    FFS.

    7500 Irish lab cases.
    1000 German lab cases.

    25,000-30,000 of a backlog to be processed.

    Assuming a 10% positive rate thats 2500-3000 more positives.

    Thats a total of 11000 - 11500 positives. Holahan and Nolan said they expect to only find half of cases.

    So multiply by two we currently have 22 000 cases at a minimum.

    With an R0 of 1. That means 22000 becomes 44000 in about 2 weeks time. And by may 5th may it will likely be 50000 cases in reality.

    Thats before we ease restrictions. If we ease restrictions the R0 will likely jump hugely.

    There's no stopping this until a vaccine.

    All of these stats are not mine - they're government figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    BanditLuke wrote: »
    They are off their rocker if they think they will be flying again anytime this summer. Without a vaccine airlines as we know them are finished for the foreseeable.

    There will be un certainty about flights for the rest of the year, no argument there. But in the next year or 2 they will resume and i will bet everything i have they will. Sorry if that disappoints you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    What parts have I got wrong?

    You already know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 180 ✭✭Lord Fairlord


    Corriere Della Sera saying that in Treviso, for the first three months of 2020, hospital deaths are in line with previous years.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    FFS.

    7500 Irish lab cases.
    1000 German lab cases.

    25,000-30,000 of a backlog to be processed.

    Assuming a 10% positive rate thats 2500-3000 more positives.

    Thats a total of 11000 - 11500 positives. Holahan and Nolan said they expect to only find half of cases.

    So multiply by two we currently have 22 000 cases at a minimum.

    With an R0 of 1. That means 22000 becomes 44000 in about 2 weeks time. And by may 5th may it will likely be 50000 cases in reality.

    Thats before we ease restrictions. If we ease restrictions the R0 will likely jump hugely. There's no stopping this until vaccine.

    All of these stats are not mine - they're government figures.

    You already know the above is bullsh1t don't you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Lundstram


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    No he didn’t, he never existed IMO.
    An edgy athiest, just what we need. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,749 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    No death is really acceptable but this cant go on until a vaccine is found. Longer a shutdown goes on, the worse the economic effects and the domino effect then on other services including even more pressure on health in time to come.

    At the end of the day, we live with the annual consequences of the flu.

    Not saying that they are the same but living with sometimes deadly viruses isn't anything new.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,116 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Rvsmmnps wrote: »
    There may never be a vaccine, this could be similar to a common cold issue. Except with worse effect

    The most important thing is that this never happens again.

    What if this was 20 times as deadly a virus?

    It is frightening how the world allowed China to turn a blind eye to dangerous customs in parts of their country time and time again that puts the whole world at risk (and it's not only China) then they go on to try and cover it up.

    I hope that this is the end of that but I'd say we all have our doubts.

    The world needs to lean on China after this.

    It's too dangerous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,021 ✭✭✭jackboy


    As soon as the restrictions ease, infections and deaths will rapidly rise. So easing the restrictions is going the herd immunity route that Boris was mocked for.

    Don’t for a minute think that low level social distancing and hand washing will stop this virus exploding. That would be no more than wishful thinking.

    There would be very little difference ending the restrictions today compared with ending them in a few weeks time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    easypazz wrote: »
    You already know the above is bullsh1t don't you.

    We've known for a while your a FG bot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭woohoo!!!


    What parts have I got wrong?
    I think the vast majority of the world were not in any way prepared for a pandemic of this nature, bar some Asian countries. I think european countries have had varying degrees of successes and failures. Above all, who knows how long a viable vaccine is away from mass production.

    I understand your frustration, I do. We are winging it largely down to the issues raised in the paragraph above. So the real question is how are we doing it on a largely winging it approach? I'd say, good on some aspects and not so good on others. Reliable testing seems to be the key and after a decent start, there has been a very disappointing lag. But this is a marathon I think and it's proper scientific understanding of this thing, which takes time, before we can come out the other side.

    Hindsight is great but neither do we have a crystal ball.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    Corriere Della Sera saying that in Treviso, for the first three months of 2020, hospital deaths are in line with previous years.

    With no numbers I expect you can say whatever you like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,615 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Source

    Limited supply of proprofol, fentanyl and noradrenaline, all used for patients on ventilators, reported in the UK today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭kwestfan08


    FFS.

    7500 Irish lab cases.
    1000 German lab cases.

    25,000-30,000 of a backlog to be processed.

    Assuming a 10% positive rate thats 2500-3000 more positives.

    Thats a total of 11000 - 11500 positives. Holahan and Nolan said they expect to only find half of cases.

    So multiply by two we currently have 22 000 cases at a minimum.

    With an R0 of 1. That means 22000 becomes 44000 in about 2 weeks time. And by may 5th may it will likely be 50000 cases in reality.

    Thats before we ease restrictions. If we ease restrictions the R0 will likely jump hugely.

    There's no stopping this until a vaccine.

    All of these stats are not mine - they're government figures.

    With those figures you are assuming that no one since the outbreak started has either gotten better or died from the virus. Cases that started 4-5 weeks ago the vast majority will have recovered so they cannot still be infecting people.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    We've known for a while your a FG bot.

    Nobody is falling for your efforts.

    Report card: Needs to try a lot harder.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,196 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    FFS.

    7500 Irish lab cases.
    1000 German lab cases.

    25,000-30,000 of a backlog to be processed.

    Assuming a 10% positive rate thats 2500-3000 more positives.

    Thats a total of 11000 - 11500 positives. Holahan and Nolan said they expect to only find half of cases.

    So multiply by two we currently have 22 000 cases at a minimum.

    With an R0 of 1. That means 22000 becomes 44000 in about 2 weeks time. And by may 5th may it will likely be 50000 cases in reality.

    Thats before we ease restrictions. If we ease restrictions the R0 will likely jump hugely.

    There's no stopping this until a vaccine.

    All of these stats are not mine - they're government figures.

    Your figures are wrong. 25,000 to 30,000 tests went to Germany but about 16,000 are already back. The positives from those 16,000 cases are included in your figures already. The German tests have only had a positive rate of about 6% (1000 / 16000 * 100). If that rate stays the same for the rest, then we're talking about an extra 1,000 cases there at the most. Also, some of those positive cases are already recovered or dead and not spreading anymore. So, your figures for growth are off as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    kwestfan08 wrote: »
    With those figures you are assuming that no one since the outbreak started has either gotten better or died from the virus. Cases that started 4-5 weeks ago the vast majority will have recovered so they cannot still be infecting people.
    Your figures are wrong. 25,000 to 30,000 tests went to Germany but about 16,000 are already back. The positives from those 16,000 cases are included in your figures already. The German tests have only had a positive rate of about 6% (1000 / 16000 * 100). If that rate stays the same for the rest, then we're talking about an extra 1,000 cases there at the most. Also, some of those positive cases are already recovered or dead and not spreading anymore. So, your figures for growth are off as well.

    He either knows all that or he is the village idiot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,615 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    jackboy wrote: »
    As soon as the restrictions ease, infections and deaths will rapidly rise. So easing the restrictions is going the herd immunity route that Boris was mocked for.

    Don’t for a minute think that low level social distancing and hand washing will stop this virus exploding. That would be no more than wishful thinking.

    There would be very little difference ending the restrictions today compared with ending them in a few weeks time.

    Unless it gives us time to ramp up capacity for testing, contact tracing and ICU capacity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭Nermal


    No one is arguing for an indefinite "lock down".

    No one says it, but the suppression policy amounts to the same thing.

    Just look at Singapore. A highly compliant population finding that testing, tracing and wearing masks is not sufficient. They have to be accompanied by lockdowns that are totally intolerable even in the medium term.

    We need to recognise that suppression is a failure and move to mitigation.

    And we need to do it now, before what remains of our economy is thrown on the bonfire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Lundstram wrote: »
    An edgy athiest

    Athiest? Yes correct because i’m smart. Edgy? Wrong. More incorrect assumptions on this thread ;-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭poppers


    This thread has virtually turned into thesoccer forum
    "My team can do no wrong your team is doing everything wrong"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,021 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Unless it gives us time to ramp up capacity for testing, contact tracing and ICU capacity

    Testing and contract tracing will not slow down the virus. ICU capacity will help but will quickly get overwhelmed and there is a high death rate in ICU. We need a better plan than easing restrictions in a few weeks time because that won’t work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    Nermal wrote: »
    No one says it, but the suppression policy amounts to the same thing.

    Just look at Singapore. A highly compliant population finding that testing, tracing and wearing masks is not sufficient. They have to be accompanied by lockdowns that are totally intolerable even in the medium term.

    We need to recognise that suppression is a failure and move to mitigation.

    And we need to do it now, before what remains of our economy is thrown on the bonfire.

    The policy can only change if the number of new cases and deaths consistently fall for at least a week, and ideally a fortnight, otherwise the resultant spike on a return to normality would require a second lockdown.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,615 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Athiest? Yes correct because i’m smart. Edgy? Wrong. More incorrect assumptions on this thread ;-)
    More edge...

    If you had any more edges, you'd be a circle


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement