Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid19 Part X - 1,564 cases ROI (9 deaths) 209 in NI (7 deaths) (25 March) *Read OP*

1162163165167168329

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭otnomart


    BoatMad wrote: »
    We don’t , each country has to take account of demographics and pop density etc , Dublin may need more extreme measures, but Ireland has a tiny fraction of the population density the UK has. We need to take account of national circumstances rather then just simply aping others


    I think social distancing in Dublin is a real challenge, because (together with London) it must be the European capital with the highest number of accomodation sharing.

    In other European cities, people live with the families (as mentioned already for Italy and Spain) or on their own.

    If you take a house share with 4 flatmates from 4 different Counties, they have close contacts not only with each other, but also with 4 different workplaces and then with 4 different sets of friends and 4 different families.

    I think there should be a Gov plan of requisitioning Hotels and using them for the quarantine of positive cases - as it is already happening elsewhere.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Really? Is that true? I mean that they said it.

    That's what they consider contact worth recording in the contact tracing..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    I'm not picking on you here MOR316 but it is alarming that this is not general knowledge at this stage and may help explain why we continue to have so many in the country flout the recommendations made by the HSE et al.

    This added to the questionable statements about wearing masks, the 15 minute nonsense, and no highlighting of the potential for aerosolised transmission could be doing untold damage in this country

    Yes the thing about many people displaying no symptoms at all but being inadvertent carriers was big news in the first stages of this in UK. But this seems to have completely disappeared from the public discourse - exactly what we need it front and centre!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭cdgalwegian


    Really? Is that true? I mean that they said it.
    Normal conversation from 2 metres away, with someone not coughing; 15 mins deemed exposed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    wakka12 wrote: »

    Was posted earlier on, great news in the long run if true. The death rate reduces drastically if correct.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    BKtje wrote: »
    A friend has it and she lost her taste. A colleague opposite me has lost taste and smell but is fine apart from that. Not recognised at symptoms here so no home office for him. We're in IT for a food giant so limited on site support is required.

    Heard about that about 4 days ago, bbc or sky it was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,018 ✭✭✭kingshankly


    Spain figures are heart breaking


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 332 ✭✭deathbomber


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Was posted earlier on, great news in the long run if true. The death rate reduces drastically if correct.

    old news, for all countries,long known infection rates are 10 or 20 x what is known


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,102 ✭✭✭Lavinia


    Virus can spread by infected surfaces eg person sneezed or coughed on some surface and virus is now on that surface
    virus can survive up to 3 days on surfaces like plastic and stainless steel
    it does deteriorate with time but still if other person touches that surface then touches their face eg mouth or eyets they can get infected.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 332 ✭✭deathbomber


    Lavinia wrote: »
    Virus can spread by infected surfaces eg person sneezed or coughed on some surface and virus is now on that surface
    virus can survive up to 3 days on surfaces like plastic and stainless steel
    it does deteriorate with time but still if other person touches that surface then touches their face eg mouth or eyets they can get infected.

    coronavirus can survive for nearly up to a month on metal and hard plastic surfaces, indeed the majority of the virus dies but active cells are still present, dependent on temperature and humidity etc, any fluctuations ii.e. parcels travelling through different climates will eradicate the virus


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    old news, for all countries,long known infection rates are 10 or 20 x what is known

    Lets hope its 100 or 200 times what is known. This will be over faster than we think if that is the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭otnomart


    The numbers testing positive isnt a good thing to compare countries with at all. The numbers hospitalized, the amount in ICU and the number of deaths are the only things that matter.
    And the lenght of time in ICU.
    "With the coronavirus, they're in ICU an average of two or three weeks, as can be seen in other countries"
    From a Netherlands source: https://nltimes.nl/2020/03/24/coronavirus-keep-icus-busy-months-patients-risk-brabant-doctor-says


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    By the way may i ask a question?

    It might be stupid....but

    Why is it numbers went down three days in a row in Ireland from 196 to 191 to 126 to 102 then went up again? Was it different testing?

    Also why when the numbers in Italy went down for two days did people think this was a sign of a turn around so quickly but they didn't here?

    They had changes in Italian testing recently too.

    I am not a statistician but why the difference in reaction?

    Is it just because we have accepted the surge is going to come etc?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    sadie1502 wrote: »
    Like what? Be more specific

    Most public spaces, beaches, parks and so forth being closed.

    Again, take it with a pinch of salt, but tbh these would be people who would deal in that area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Normal conversation from 2 metres away, with someone not coughing; 15 mins deemed exposed.

    Oh yes i think my mother is still following that.

    I mean she is social distancing but walking away after 15 mins. I won't be able to stop her. :o Its best not to try.

    So its not true then? You can stay at this distance for longer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭otnomart


    Spain figures are heart breaking
    and the French as well, they do have a high number of deaths


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    coronavirus can survive for nearly up to a month on metal and hard plastic surfaces, indeed the majority of the virus dies but active cells are still present, dependent on temperature and humidity etc, any fluctuations ii.e. parcels travelling through different climates will eradicate the virus

    Do you have a source or report link to justify this claim?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 332 ✭✭deathbomber


    Renjit wrote: »
    Do you have a source or report link to justify this claim?

    this has been discussed before and is well known, google it if you must!

    * actually i just did again and new studies are out and indeed the time frame is a lot shorter, however to be sure, i would take th month as it is in the same family as SARS andd tests were done on this and were found to be circa 30 days survival, just be careful


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    TBH i think they will put Ireland into lockdown from social pressure. I wish there was as much pressure on them for testing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    Distribution of laboratory confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the EU/EEA and the UK, as of 24 March 2020 @ 08:00 hrs.

    novel-coronavirus-cases-EU-UK-2020-03-24.png?itok=o8qfxeqU

    The barchart seems to have leveled off a bit for daily cases in Europe over the last 5 days.

    Perhaps the mitigation measures are showing an effect, but it is far too early to be sure.

    Larger clickable version of the barchart here :- https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/cases-2019-ncov-eueea


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    By the way may i ask a question?

    It might be stupid....but

    Why is it numbers went down three days in a row in Ireland from 196 to 191 to 126 to 102 then went up again? Was it different testing?

    Also why when the numbers in Italy went down for two days did people think this was a sign of a turn around so quickly but they didn't here?

    They had changes in Italian testing recently too.

    I am not a statistician but why the difference in reaction?

    Is it just because we have accepted the surge is going to come etc?

    Well on the Italy side of things, its because they introduced their lock-down about 14 days ago so it would make sense for numbers to be dropping, also the death rates dropped 2 days in a row which is a better indication than positive tests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,820 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Jake1 wrote: »
    Just curious as to how others feel about people dropping leaflets in door's, during this time.

    We had a milkman put a leaflet through the door. I was furious, my partner not so much. Think's the man was doing no harm.

    I think it’s wise that people don’t involve themselves in actions that are not necessary. Leaflet dropping is unnecessary. Be it in relation to products being sold, services rendered or charity organizations... whatever... people need to be responsible and stay the fück home and leave people alone in these worrying times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    otnomart wrote: »
    and the French as well, they do have a high number of deaths
    They don't. They have 800 dead.

    Italy has 6000 dead with a population of 60 million.

    Whereas China has 3000 dead with a population of one billion. Let that sink in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,645 ✭✭✭RollieFingers


    Hopefully we don't need a full on lockdown, city centre is grand at the minute, not many around and majority are social distancing. I'm on my break from work before anyone asks why I'm there :)


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,917 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    By the way may i ask a question?

    It might be stupid....but

    Why is it numbers went down three days in a row in Ireland from 196 to 191 to 126 to 102 then went up again? Was it different testing?

    Also why when the numbers in Italy went down for two days did people think this was a sign of a turn around so quickly but they didn't here?

    They had changes in Italian testing recently too.

    I am not a statistician but why the difference in reaction?

    Is it just because we have accepted the surge is going to come etc?

    It may be to do with an increase in tests feeding into that jump. (I can't confirm or deny that by the way, haven't done the research)
    Also exponential curves tend to jump every third day. If I remember my maths correctly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Are we expecting more test results for today compared to yesterday?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    By the way may i ask a question?

    It might be stupid....but

    Why is it numbers went down three days in a row in Ireland from 196 to 191 to 126 to 102 then went up again? Was it different testing?

    Also why when the numbers in Italy went down for two days did people think this was a sign of a turn around so quickly but they didn't here?

    They had changes in Italian testing recently too.

    I am not a statistician but why the difference in reaction?

    Is it just because we have accepted the surge is going to come etc?

    The model for us was for 30% increase but not necessarily a flat 30%, some days might be higher some lower. So far we are below that but we may well get that 30% at some point. They expect to see the effect of the current measures in the next week and hopefully signs of that curve flattening they want to achieve.
    In Italy there is hope that they may have peaked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Thank you to both posters who answered my question. Niallo and Shesty.
    Are we expecting more test results for today compared to yesterday?

    I would expect so.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,878 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    4th death here in the North

    ******



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement