Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

new coronavirus outbreak China, Korea, USA - mod warnings in OP (updated 24/02/20)

1308309311313314331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Ahem 0.01%

    Depends on the figures used...did a rough calculation using CDC figures for the states. Got this from a Google, but I am agree that it 0.1% would be high for influenza.

    In the study published Feb. 18 in the China CDC Weekly, researchers found a death rate from COVID-19 to be around 2.3% in mainland China. That's much higher than the death rate linked to flu, which is typically around 0.1% in the U.S., according to The New York Times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭Sean 18


    This is no way like the flu younger people are dying from this you don't hear of young people dying from the flu except in rare cases


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,748 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭laurah591



    Those China figures look off - or old, no new deaths/limited cases from lastnights update which is odd as the SK, Japan & Italy figs look ok


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,067 ✭✭✭Ficheall




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,193 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    Austria restarts train services to with Italy (Irish Times). Of course the two tested negative and I suppose they may test positive when they reach the other side.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭laurah591


    Ficheall wrote: »
    BNO is more up to date.

    I gather figures have not been released locally yet - i wonder will they stop altogether... now that we have cases emerging elsewhere


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    a) I know b) flu is a serious illness and anyone who doesn't treat it as such is an idiot. When most people say they had the flu, they had a cold c) based on what? d) you're comparing serious cases of a newly developing virus to something we've been handling for years. The vast majority of cases are most likely only producing mild symptoms.

    I'm not saying this isnt something worth worrying about, it's clearly a serious illness. But to read some of the posts on here youd swear we were dealing with something closer to Ebola than the flu.

    WHO chief said it was worse than Ebola in almost every aspect though. And how deadly it is not the only problem, if it transmits sufficiently more but has a lower death rate then overall more people die for example. Rightly or wrongly every government that gets a dose starts shutting things down, and very few lockdowns have been lifted, usually being continuously extended.

    95% Fortune 1000 companies are reporting supply chain disruption as well. No big deal for now, but not forever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭all about the mane


    Dave0301 wrote: »
    Depends on the figures used...did a rough calculation using CDC figures for the states. Got this from a Google, but I am agree that it 0.1% would be high for influenza.

    In the study published Feb. 18 in the China CDC Weekly, researchers found a death rate from COVID-19 to be around 2.3% in mainland China. That's much higher than the death rate linked to flu, which is typically around 0.1% in the U.S., according to The New York Times.

    Chances are the death rate from c19 is way lower than what people think.
    Many cases are going undetected or people are lying about it. The opposite happens with flu. Every second person who has a cold, claims to have the flu. Very few voluntarily stepping up with this new virus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot



    In their non peer reviewed report

    The study also suggested that human-to-human transmission might have already started in November.

    Not. Sure if they are intentionally trying to confuse things or if that’s a serious suggestion that this virus has been around longer then we thought


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭all about the mane


    WHO chief said it was worse than Ebola in almost every aspect though. And how deadly it is not the only problem, if it transmits sufficiently more but has a lower death rate then overall more people die for example. Rightly or wrongly every government that gets a dose starts shutting things down, and very few lockdowns have been lifted, usually being continuously extended.

    95% Fortune 1000 companies are reporting supply chain disruption as well. No big deal for now, but not forever.

    Worse than Ebola...Jesus wept...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Where’s the poster called Martina? She seems to have the inside scoop and her silence is worrying me.
    Holla! I've no scoop but I'll see if there's any update or see what people are saying tomorrow. None of my colleagues at work or in other hospitals were too worried yet.
    Opinions may change after the outbreak in Italy.
    I'd imagine we will close borders or take precautions like that when the UK do.
    Wonder who the 65 were and why they were chosen for testing.
    I would guess those 65 had flu like symptoms but more importantly i would say they also had recently been travelling internationally.


    If cases do appear here, our ability to test suspected cases will be severely lacking. There is only one lab that facilitates testing in Ireland. They will likely not have the staff or resources to keep up. Testing may be limited to those displaying symptoms and not the asymptomatic population.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    Worse than Ebola...Jesus wept...
    I said in most aspects



  • Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Actually. Worry level is back down to 2/10 now that it was fake news that the 38 year old died. There are particular people posting on this thread who seem to be more interested in spreading fake information/panic than actually dealing in facts. Be very wary of everything in this thread unless it's peer reviewed.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    A lot of 'not in my backyard' in the US in relation to housing evacuees and infected. Trump has cancelled another site in Alabama.

    Viruses are people too.

    Make America Virus Free Again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭all about the mane


    I said in most aspects, talk to this lad:


    Worse than Ebola ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭all about the mane


    Actually. Worry level is back down to 2/10 now that it was fake news that the 38 year old died. There are particular people posting on this thread who seem to be more interested in spreading fake information/panic than actually dealing in facts. Be very wary of everything in this thread unless it's peer reviewed.

    It’s all about the drama.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    Worse than Ebola ;)

    That's not what I said. There's multiple dimensions to an outbreak. He says they have to take this more serious than Ebola. I didn't say it's more deadly.


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Actually. Worry level is back down to 2/10 now that it was fake news that the 38 year old died. There are particular people posting on this thread who seem to be more interested in spreading fake information/panic than actually dealing in facts. Be very wary of everything in this thread unless it's peer reviewed.

    That's what happens when boards.ie policy is that people should just know better in this particular forum and there are no repercussions for spreading fake news, but there are infractions if you call one of them a clown for doing it.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Unconfirmed reports of a case in Belfast. 65-year-old had travelled through Korea in recent weeks.


  • Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    givyjoe wrote: »
    Because a) this isn't flu b) if People associate this as just being a flu, they wont take it seriously c) it's not comparable in terms of mortality rates, not even close.

    D) flu does not even come remotely close to putting that many/% people into a serious condition.

    Where's your peer reviewed evidence of this? If there was no influenza vaccine. The numbers may be very similar. The flu vaccines reduces the prevalence by 40-60%.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,980 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    I'm hearing its spread to at least quarter of a million people as of a minute ago

    The voices in your head are not a reliable source!


  • Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm hearing its spread to at least quarter of a million people as of a minute ago

    Thank god for that hard border. #blessed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    Ebola has a fatality rate of up to 90% by the way, for anyone who thinks comparing the two in terms of impact to human life is remotely comparable.

    Can you interpret why the WHO Chief said this is more serious (which I have stated is not in terms of death rate)?

    What's your take on how he compared them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,980 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Can you interpret why the WHO Chief said this is more serious (which I have stated is not in terms of death rate)?

    What's your take on how he compared them?

    He never said that, he said it is more contagious.


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ebola would a bigger problem if it didn't kill people so quickly. It's too lethal for its own good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭all about the mane


    Can you interpret why the WHO Chief said this is more serious (which I have stated is not in terms of death rate)?

    What's your take on how he compared them?

    If you don’t stop moving those goalposts you’ll put your back out. Worse than Ebola ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    I assume he was referring to the fact ebola is generally confined geographically while this isnt.

    I suspect he would have said similar about any virus with the potential to spread globally.

    It's interesting you only mentioned the fact you obviously weren't talking about death rate after being called out on the comparison.

    I have never hyped the death rate of this so I don't understand why you would think I was saying the death rate was comparable.

    If Ebola is much easier contained than this, and this goes on to cause the problems it has worldwide compared to Ebola, more deaths, disruptions etc. overall it's worse.

    If you limit it to just the health outlook for an individual of course they're obviously not comparable.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 58 ✭✭H.20v3


    Think I seen someone with the virus today

    Couldn't be 100% it was a corona


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement