Is Organised Child Trafficking in America for Real?

thecretinhop wrote: »

i wonder who got caught taking kids out of Haiti.
start off on that.
i can go on.

From memory, that was an American "Christian" adoption agency...

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

An extract;

"The Adoption and the Safe Families Act, set in motion by President Bill Clinton, offered cash “bonuses” to the states for every child they adopted out of foster care. In order to receive the “adoption incentive bonuses” local child protective services need more children. They must have merchandise (children) that sell and you must have plenty of them so the buyer can choose. Some counties are known to give a $4,000 bonus for each child adopted and an additional $2,000 for a “special needs” child."

On one occasion when asked to travel to Washington she insisted on heavy security or she would not travel.

If any links are not working let me know. Someone is making them hard to access.

You realise that there are literally thousands of children in U.S. fostercare, too many for the system to cope with, and that the American fostercare system has really bad outcomes for kids? Which is why they introduced this incentive - to get more (slightly older, more likely to be non-Caucasian) children adopted from the system rather than have Americans adopting white babies from Russia and eastern Europe?

Are you really just taking a long, long time to work around to posting about the pizzagate conspiracy theory?

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Yes I know the system is overburdened. I found the figures for Arizona and was amazed at the increase since 2002. Those figures showed a general decrease for the States as a whole.
I copied the graph in picture form but still have not found a way to upload it here.

On the incentives, you do realize that is only an extract from a longer document that has credence?
http://fightcps.com/pdf/thecorruptbusinessofchildprotectiveservices.pdf

" By 2007, the state required mandatory ultrasounds before women could have an abortion. Abortion became illegal in Arizona in April 2012 after week 20. Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) existed by 2013. Republican Representative Michelle Udall in Arizona's House with 20 other co-sponsors to provide $2.5 million annually for a period of three years to anti-abortion women's reproductive clinics as part of efforts to defund Planned Parenthood.

The total number of abortion clinics in Arizona have been declining for years, going from thirty-seven in 1982 to twenty-eight in 1992 to nine in 2014. In 2014, there were 12,914 abortions in the state. The next year, there were 12,644 abortions. In 2010, there were fourteen publicly funded abortions in the state. Abortion and religion have intersected in the state, particularly in the case of Sr. Margaret Mary McBride, R.S.M., a Sister of Mercy. The state also has an active abortion rights community, with women participating in #StoptheBans movement in May 2019."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Arizona

Something I've been harping on my Congressman for years: he wants abortions outlawed but has never lifted a finger or mentioned a word about foster care. Due to TRAP laws and even more recent "Trigger" laws, abortions are on the decline and adoptions are up, because many people aren't given the choice.

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

That could certainly account for the above average increase of 80% in AZ.
However, other States still show big increases of around 40%, NV,UT,AK,MS,IA and IN.
Have they also had the same bans put in place? The figures that I've seen are from the DHHS and cover 2002 to 2012.

I'm happy to email you the graph. Being a bit of a Luddite I haven't figured how to upload it.

Well you did list Conservative states that tend to vote-in Republicans with a mandate to curtail or ban abortions.

Can we get an overview of the conspiracy here

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I may have found something of a conspiracy.
The witness William Fain, was the one who provided the reasons (which were used officially by the police and media) as to why he thought Bear, Nancy Scheafer's husband, had shot her in the back as she lay in bed and then himself.
I have some information that he had spent the week prior to the murder around Nancy's house and therefore knew of Nancy's intentions.
She was due to give congressional testimony days after her murder.
She reported receiving many threats that week.
The house had security cameras, the tapes seem to have disappeared.

Fain, who had been taken into Nancy's confidence and was due to release a film which included hidden microphone and camera footage of the most serious kind of pedophile abuse, he provided a description, subsequently never did produce it.
He had solemnly promised her husband that he would, having been told by Bear that it was the most important thing in the world to Nancy.

I would appreciate any info that anyone may have.

Okay, and what is the source (or sources) for the above?

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I have asked both you, twice, and a Mod once, to remove that quote above as it contains inaccurate information about a living person.
Due to the silence and inaction I have to assume some collaboration.

William Fain was not the source. Their daughter found the bodies on Friday, he corroborated the 'suicide' note on the Monday when he returned to the house.
The Police have never released the note, causing suspicion and leading many to question their inaction.
William Fain has never released the film. The contents of which he had described in harrowing detail.

You do understand, compromising info must be preserved. I'm just the messenger.

Conspiracy .... Confirmed!

https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/10/28/elected-arizona-official-accused-of-selling-babies-suspended/