Do you blame him or not, MP manhandles woman protester

Danzy wrote: »

John Prescott hit a protester a left hook that would rattle a Wall and he was lauded for it.

He didn't and rightly didn't apologize.

Being a protester dies not make one immune from response.

The 2 situations are not even comparable, and I'm sure you know it.

Mad_maxx wrote: »

Two jags punched a bloke

So.

Did you think that Fields should have punched her instead of being restrained in removing her?

Well, I do blame him for treating a citizen this way, he is supposed to be a representative of the people.
But it was very well deserved for a trespasser, especially the particularly obnoxious waste of air kind that the green activists are.

Tell me how wrote: »

All terrorists are not men. To suggest they are is nonsense.
It is nothing to do with your ability to argue/discuss.

I just feel sometimes i can't keep up with you. And you used my lack of intelligence against me. I wanted to show you it affects me. Not just in this thread but makes me think differently about myself.

It also makes our interaction more heated which is not good. We should be friendly kinder.

I am not saying 99% of men are terrorists I am saying 99% of terrorists are men.

Oh come on don't be coy. Women and men are different.

Even in Isis men and women play different roles.

Its much much rarer for women to be terrorists.

I know you all want to be metro 21st century men or women whatever you might be but is that really reality?

Do you really think men and women are the same? I certainly don't. I think there are certain traditional truths.

That is not a bad thing. I admire men a lot. They have honor. Stoicism. etc. Those are very good things.

Women are different we have other things.

Cordell wrote: »

Well, I do blame him for treating a citizen this way, he is supposed to be a representative of the people.
But it was very well deserved for a trespasser, especially the particularly obnoxious waste of air kind that the green activists are.

It doesn't matter his politics or hers, when your trespassing and charging high profile targets, at the least you can expect to be restrained.

To the modern generation of " don't you know who I am" activists this would be an outrage.

It was mild and controlled.

Man this thread just goes to show how many snowflakes and sjw warriors there are these days. Come outside of your bubble once in a while.

Talk about selective viewing to suit your agenda.

She got removed with minimal force, no he did not "drag her by the throat.

Everyone crying assault needs to get a life

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

I just feel sometimes i can't keep up with you. And you used my lack of intelligence against me. I wanted to show you it affects me. Not just in this thread but makes me think differently about myself.

It also makes our interaction more heated which is not good. We should be friendly kinder.

I am not saying 99% of men are terrorists I am saying 99% of terrorists are men.

Oh come on don't be coy. Women and men are different.

Even in Isis men and women play different roles.

Its much much rarer for women to be terrorists.

I know you all want to be metro 21st century men or women whatever you might be but is that really reality?

Do you really think men and women are the same? I certainly don't. I think there are certain traditional truths.

That is not a bad thing. I admire men a lot. They have honor. Stoicism. etc. Those are very good things.

Women are different we have other things.

This thread is weird.
Many of the views you have expressed in this post would probably be also held by many of the people who you are arguing against in this instance. I have no interest debating them today.

I responded to what you said. You said all men are terrorists, not most men as you are now saying.

Strumms wrote: »

He didn’t. The force he used was in proportion to the perceived threat. No way would a court convict anyone for what we have seen.

Do you think this will end in court? It's not even relevant. Average age of tory voter went from 40 something under Cameron to 50 something. They are loosing voters and this will not help.

Danzy wrote: »

John Prescott hit a protester a left hook that would rattle a Wall and he was lauded for it.

He didn't and rightly didn't apologize.

Being a protester dies not make one immune from response.

John Prescott had a man violently had a man smash an egg on his face.

Mark Field had a women walk past him.

Tell me how wrote: »

This thread is weird.
Many of the views you have expressed in this post would probably be also held by many of the people who you are arguing against in this instance. I have no interest debating them today.

That is very interesting. Perhaps we would agree on many other things? I dont know.

I actually HATE arguing though. So avoid those threads and just be silly on here

I get upset easily. I prefer to talk generally. And i don't like to upset people.

meeeeh wrote: »

Do you think this will end in court? It's not even relevant. Average age of tory voter went from 40 something under Cameron to 50 something. They are loosing voters and this will not help.

It won't end in court, the moment The charge was decided on her Counsel would have informed her it would not be entertained, it is for PR purpose, that is understandable and for her cause the right course of action.

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

If she has a husband he should go and beat up Mark Fields!

That would be premeditated assault, and her husband could do jail time for it.

Danzy wrote: »

It won't end in court, the moment The charge was decided on her Counsel would have informed her it would not be entertained, it is for PR purpose that us understandable.

It doesn't matter. I presume he is in politics long enough to know he can only loose from encounter like this. She doesn't need to go to court, she got all attention she needed.

Who do you think tory leadership are angry at this morning? The protestor or Rambo?

NIMAN wrote: »

That would be premeditated assault, and her husband could do jail time for it.

:rolleyes:

What is the world coming to? A guy assaults your wife and you can't punch him even once??
This is ridic.

meeeeh wrote: »

It doesn't matter. I presume he is in politics long enough to know he can only loose from encounter like this. She doesn't need to go to court, she got all attention she needed.

Who do you think tory leadership are angry at this morning? The protestor or Rambo?

He is more like Bambi gone wrong ...but you are right. He acted like a schoolchild.

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

:rolleyes:

What is the world coming to? A guy assaults your wife and you can't punch him even once??
This is ridic.

Unfortunately thats the law.

If a guy assaults my wife, I mean proper assault and not like we seen in this video clip, then her/my first port of call should be the Gardai.

If I go and get tooled up and batter the guy, then I could be done for assault.

I'm with you, I know its not fair, but thats how the law works I'm afraid.

Cryptopagan wrote: »

Were any of them armed?

Should we just take the chance that security has massively failed and been compromised but they managed to check for weapons successfully, just did everything else a bit ****?

tritium wrote: »

Should we just take the chance that security has massively failed and been compromised but they managed to check for weapons successfully, just did everything else a bit ****?

The building i would imagine has metal detectors on the entrance.

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

The building i would imagine has metal detectors on the entrance.

You’d imaging or you’d know?

Would metal detectors pick up a bottle of acid for instance?

Which entrance did all the protestors use?