Werewolf: HBO's Deadwood

Steve WW wrote: »

I was in work yesterday, I only got to come on on my lunch and break and there wasn’t a group consensus on who we were voting for when I was on my break and as I hadn’t been on, didn’t have a good read on anyone so wouldn’t have been fair to vote.

I will be voting tonight though.

Reads a bit like looking for a bandwagon and then playing safe when you couldn't see one.

Steve WW wrote: »

“Miss Alice Isringhausen - Every second night from Night 0, the soft-spoken, cunning secret agent can seduce a target into forgetting what their role in Deadwood is. As a result, any due power or action from her target will be blocked. Her block also gives her the ability to expel villagers from any behind-the-scenes quarters they may be plotting in with other villagers“

Sorry I can’t quote on mobile. Will this be happening tonight then? The wolves could have killed Frank in the munch this morning if they suspected him of being the seer and then use this power tonight on their next suspect?

This makes Brendans reveal all the more damaging. Alice has one less NRV to not waste her power on. .

Mary WW wrote: »

Ok, do we have a strategy and names as necessary for gold rush?

Phil
Steve
Des
I can go on there aswell

Holly WW wrote: »

Anyone else not on yesterday's top 4 even around for the next hour?

I'm available until 1 but have an interview at 1 so will be missing for an hour then back then another interview so in and out.

Desmond WW wrote: »

Wait, was the sheriff our vig?

Ok I might take a step back from here. I’m not on my game today.

I will be in list 1-5 if needed but suggest somehody gets the numbers together.

Oh jesus, I too was playing under the assumption Frank was seer, not vig. lol whoops.

Unforuntately, that unclears you a bit on my list though :pac:

Holly WW wrote: »

You can send at 12.30 and if your back on at 2ish to let us know if you won

Ok, will do

Wait, did Steve not say he wasn't around for today, but was for the next two days?

I'm here for next 20 mins or so.

What number do you want me on

Conor WW wrote: »

Reads a bit like looking for a bandwagon and then playing safe when you couldn't see one.

Just got on the computer, figure it will make things easier.

Not at all Conor, I made it clear from early on yesterday that I would be in work so I didn't have my head in the game. That isn't going to happen today rest assured

Phil WW wrote: »

Right, I was working off....

Apologies if that wasn't clear, I was saying that I said that yesterday. So I wasn't available then but am today and tomorrow all day

Desmond WW wrote: »

I was in the shower thinking about my strategy. Part of the problem is if the wolves are in 1-4 they block us.

I was trying to come with an alternative plan. 5 people are dead so 15 left.

Max numbers that can be doubled up on are 8. So everybody picks between 1-8.

I’d suggest at least one villager picks 1,2,3,4, 5 which means wolves prob have to block vote first 5. I’m trying to think how we can use that to win the prize.

4 wolves means providing villagers stick to 1-5 and don't double up ourselves, the wolves can't win.

(This, btw, is all presuming we actually have the mechanics right. I can imagine the mods looking at us wondering what the hell we're doing.)

Desmond WW wrote: »

I was in the shower thinking about my strategy. Part of the problem is if the wolves are in 1-4 they block us.

I was trying to come with an alternative plan. 5 people are dead so 15 left.

Max numbers that can be doubled up on are 8. So everybody picks between 1-8.

I’d suggest at least one villager picks 1,2,3,4, 5 which means wolves prob have to block vote first 5. I’m trying to think how we can use that to win the prize.

We just stick with the 1-5. And you should win if the wolves block the first 4 and you aren't a wolf

Brendan 6 and Mary 7 anyone else can pick any number outside 1-5 thst they want really

Holly WW wrote: »

We just stick with the 1-5. And you should win if the wolves block the first 4 and you aren't a wolf

Brendan 6 and Mary 7 anyone else can pick any number outside 1-5 thst they want really

I'd prefer to be higher up given I know I'm a villager and haven't a clue about the rest of youse but 6 it is I suppose

Vote for 2 sent!

Desmond WW wrote: »

If the wolves block the first 4 I can’t be a wolf!

Problem like I said is if a wolf is in the first 4 we are giving up our gold rush chances.

Too late for my other suggestion for this GR but let’s see how this plays out.

That's what I meant as in if they block 4 your not a wolf

Not sure on your other suggestion, I'll have a read over lunch, just in a meeting for next few mins! I've sent my PM

Yes

Was also wondering who was was

I’m here if needed but from reading up I should plan just vote no.8 or something

Number 1 sent

4 sent

So the top 4 votes are in. Which means if the 4 wolves block those votes then it has to go to Desmond. Unless one of those 4 is a wolf in which case it will still be blocked from village but we will have more information

I went for 8.

Ok so if this doesn’t work out here’s a plan for goldrush 2 later today:

2 people are assigned numbers 1-5 Everybody else votes 6 or 7

If everybody plays their part wolves can win prize. Hard to coordinate but less likely to lead to a wolf win. The 1-4 is good for actually flushing out wolves as we know there’s one in that list if we don’t win. But we can’t win gold rush if there is even one wolf in that group.

#1 Desmond , Phil
#2 Mary , Conor
#3 Gertie , Holly
#4 Abigail , Brendan
#5 Steve , Teagan
angus , ewan Katie , Wendy vote 6 or 7 or 8

There’s 4 wolves and 10 villagers. There is more then likely at least 2 wolves on the 1-5 list which means they can only potentially vote 6 or 7. Even at that there’s a good chance a villager may forget to vote which could mean one of the earlier voters wins.

My concern is that we keep allowing wolves to block our chances.

With 1-7 having confirmed they pmd their numbers in I don't really see a point in doing a higher number. Am I wrong? here in case someone realizes they messed up at the last minute and someone else needs to cover a number though

We should either get a prize or gt some more information here at the very least. Most likely a village prize for Des if he's team village

Killed/Dead list:

Monday
10:01 - Derry WW killed (NRV)
13:39 - Barbara WW killed (calamity Jane)
15:08 - Orla WW killed (SK)
15:22 - Eva WW killed (Doc - healer)
21:00 - Vernon WW killed (NRV)

Tuesday
10:00 Frank Killed ( Sheriff)

Left alive:
10 Villagers and 4 wolves
Abigail WW
Angus WW
Brendan WW
Conor WW
Desmond WW
Ewan WW
Frank WW
Gertrude WW
Holly WW
Katie WW
Mary WW
Phil WW
Steve WW
Tegan WW
Wendy WW

Monday Vote Results:

Vernon WW (6) - Wendy WW, Angus WW, Katie WW, Conor WW, Holly WW, Phil WW
Desmond WW (3) - Abigail WW, Brendan WW, Tegan WW
Brendan WW (2) - Ewan WW, Frank WW
Ewan WW (1) - Mary WW
Holly WW (1) - Vernon WW
Wendy WW (1) - Gertrude WW
Mary WW (1) - Desmond WW

Did not Vote - Steve WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Ok so if this doesn’t work out here’s a plan for goldrush 2 later today:

2 people are assigned numbers 1-5 Everybody else votes 6 or 7

If everybody plays their part wolves can win prize. Hard to coordinate but less likely to lead to a wolf win. The 1-4 is good for actually flushing out wolves as we know there’s one in that list if we don’t win. But we can’t win gold rush if there is even one wolf in that group.

#1 Desmond , Phil
#2 Mary , Conor
#3 Gertie , Holly
#4 Abigail , Brendan
#5 Steve , Teagan
angus , ewan Katie , Wendy vote 6 or 7 or 8

There’s 4 wolves and 10 villagers. There is more then likely at least 2 wolves on the 1-5 list which means they can only potentially vote 6 or 7. Even at that there’s a good chance a villager may forget to vote which could mean one of the earlier voters wins.

My concern is that we keep allowing wolves to block our chances.

This is interesting. If I get it fully you’re basically switching things around so that if a wolf doesn’t go with their pairing a villager will win. Otherwise it runs past 5 to the single number votes. Couple of things I might be missing so give me a steer here.

1. I think we need everyone around. Correct?
2. If two wolves are paired we’ll lose I think
3. Why do we stop pairing at 5? Presumably if we had a lock villager we could pair off pretty much everyone bar them?

(Part of my reason for asking is some 3 way groups might be possible to manage people’s availability)