Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mass shooting New Zealand Mosque - MOD NOTE POST #1

1121315171847

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 564 ✭✭✭Checkmate19


    Death penalty would not deter this kind of mass shooting. Alot of mass shooters end up killing themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,553 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    ClanofLams wrote: »
    If you did hear it, it was incorrect.

    The minority government in control is a left wing alliance comprised of Labour and the Greens.

    Not quite incorrect.

    Yes Labour and Greens are in the coalition.

    But the other coalition partner is Winston Peters (I'm not sure what his party is called now). He was acting PM while Arden took maternity leave. And he certainly comes with anit-immigration policies, which can be seen im the restrictions on foreigners buying property.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Death penalty would not deter this kind of mass shooting. Alot of mass shooters end up killing themselves.

    Depends on the mass murderer and his intentions. I imagine this guy like Breivik had no real intention of going out in a haze of bullets.

    Breivik actually phoned the police to surrender a couple of times and was found lying face down with his arms around his back.

    Whether the death penalty would have deterred it or not is probably impossible to say.

    I don't know if there is any data in the States that suggests their is more mass shootings in states without the death penalty.

    I think your point in general is fairly sound though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭Tacklebox


    Death penalty would not deter this kind of mass shooting. Alot of mass shooters end up killing themselves.

    True absolutely true, and they're more than likely dead inside anyhow.
    I cannot get my head around these mass killings, the observation of who's to blame run's very deep and in my opinion it's nothing to do with politics, religion or society.

    It's more to do with the someone's neuro linguistic programming, maybe some day science will be able to test newborns DNA and see if they have that destructive gene or pathway.

    But nowadays people just want to blame politics and Religion, not everyone has that bridge in their psyche that enables them to cross the Rubicon of inflicting unwarranted pain and death on innocence.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    Death penalty would not deter this kind of mass shooting. Alot of mass shooters end up killing themselves.

    A lot of them do end up killing themselves, but not all. Some will give themselves up when cornered instead of fighting it out with armed police because they are essentially cowards.

    My point is if the death penalty deterred at least one mass shooting, then lives would be saved. And that makes it worth it, in my opinion.
    I do understand though that it is a contentious point.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭98q76e12hrflnk


    So the killer was indeed a lefty.

    Hated Trump
    Eco-fasist
    Loved communism

    Why are people trying to link him to the extreme right when hes more like extreme left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Didn't see a mod note or a usual bold font here so I assume you're speaking as a regular poster.

    The above is quite harsh and very condescending (dolphins and mole people) given it's a mass shooting and the NRA are forever commenting on those. What's wrong with making a point regarding that here?

    Sure we don't live in America but we don't live in NZ either yet we're discussing it here. Topics evolve and gun control has always been a major part of this topic and any mass shooting threads in general on here. It's relevant enough I'd have thought?

    Mod

    Apologies for confusing you. I'll edit in a mod tag for your clarity.

    This tragedy happened in NZ, of course we are discussing NZ. That makes sense. If it happened in the US, would you come in saying 'oh what do the Argentinians have to say about this.'

    Some people want EVERYTHING to come back to what's happening in the US. Frankly what the US gun control people on either side of the debate have to say about NZ gun control is hugely irrelevant.

    It's off topic lads. If you want to discuss gun control in the US, go for it elsewhere. This human tragedy is still only 1 day old and as I have warned before, if you can't stick to the topic at hand without bringing in irrelevant side discussions, then don't post. I don't think i could have been clearer on this. STOP BRINGING THINGS BACK TO US POLITICAL POINT SCORING.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭Tacklebox


    Pter wrote: »
    Mod

    Apologies for confusing you. I'll edit in a mod tag for your clarity.

    This tragedy happened in NZ, of course we are discussing NZ. That makes sense. If it happened in the US, would you come in saying 'oh what do the Argentinians have to say about this.'

    Some people want EVERYTHING to come back to what's happening in the US. Frankly what the US gun control people on either side of the debate have to say about NZ gun control is hugely irrelevant.

    It's off topic lads. If you want to discuss gun control in the US, go for it. This human tragedy is still only 1 day old and as I have warned before, if you can't stick to the topic at hand without brining in irrelevant side discussions, then don't post. I don't think i could have been clearer on this. STOP BRINGING THINGS BACK TO US POLITICAL POINT SCORING.


    Nothing worse than putting the US or any other country or leader on an almighty pedestal to gain points in a discussion about something which happened thousands of miles away.

    Politics and these atrocious acts don't mix

    Well not in my head anyhow, I look at it more scientifically.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'll respond as you've quoted me and then I'll leave the thread as I don't think open discussion is really being encouraged. Very blurry lines in that mod note. If we're going by that rule, surely all talk of the Australian Senator's statement is irrelevant too. Who cares what some American/Australian/Argentinian politician thinks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Tacklebox wrote: »
    Nothing worse than putting the US or any other country or leader on an almighty pedestal to gain points in a discussion about something which happened thousands of miles away.

    TBF we all ready had a comparison between New Zealand and Australia on gun control, they are thousands of miles away from each other.

    Gun control is part of the story, it's highly relevant, we know this because the PM stood up yesterday and said that gun control laws will change and how do countries sometimes legislate on certain things?

    They look to other countries who adopted similar methods.

    That said musing what the NRA in America thinks of it, is not relevant. Who cares what they think TBH.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,371 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    declan2693 wrote: »
    So the killer was indeed a lefty.

    Hated Trump
    Eco-fasist
    Loved communism

    Why are people trying to link him to the extreme right when hes more like extreme left.
    This is the most extreme cherry picking from his 'manifesto'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    Yeah another country changing their gun laws after a mass shooting. Still bemused as to why the greatest country in the world won't change theirs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,050 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    RasTa wrote: »
    Yeah another country changing their gun laws after a mass shooting. Still bemused as to why the greatest country in the world won't change theirs

    'greatest'!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    Omackeral wrote: »
    I'll respond as you've quoted me and then I'll leave the thread as I don't think open discussion is really being encouraged. Very blurry lines in that mod note. If we're going by that rule, surely all talk of the Australian Senator's statement is irrelevant too. Who cares what some American/Australian/Argentinian politician thinks.


    I agree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,664 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    RasTa wrote: »
    Yeah another country changing their gun laws after a mass shooting. Still bemused as to why the greatest country in the world won't change theirs

    Ireland is fine the way it is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    interesting discussion on LBC on what motivates these white supremicist/ISIS fruitcakes.
    basically they are mirror images of each other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/zealand-terrorist-attack-suspect-grins-court-190316011147796.html
    He flashed an upside-down "okay" signal, a symbol used by white power groups across the globe.
    Lol, this is what happens when you use idiots as reporters. Or maybe they are just not in touch.
    https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1249757-ok-symbol-%F0%9F%91%8C


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    Considering the island of Ireland has a fine record of producing domestic terrorists I'm really glad that guns are highly restricted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    biko wrote: »

    It looks like it has become a WN symbol even though it was a satire to begin with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Considering the island of Ireland has a fine record of producing domestic terrorists I'm really glad that guns are highly restricted.

    It didn’t stop any actual terrorist of course.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    declan2693 wrote: »
    So the killer was indeed a lefty.

    Hated Trump
    Eco-fasist
    Loved communism

    Why are people trying to link him to the extreme right when hes more like extreme left.
    A lot of people are not so easily categorised. We have conflicting opinions about many things, and this is usually ok.
    What isn't ok is killing people in the name of religion, or in the name of Ebba Åkerlund.


    Sad fact, Ebba Åkerlund's grave have been vandalised several times by a Polish immigrant, probably deranged and not affiliated to any group.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    biko wrote: »

    I really don't like that the okay hand gesture has been hijacked, there aren't that many to begin with. Always used it as an okay symbol, but also in school you'd try to get someone to look at the circle. Feels like if the word fag is banned.

    I grew up smoking fags while giving the okay hand signal. It's times like this that makes me hate we live in the Anglosphere as we import way too much nonsense from the US and the UK because they are so much bigger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    If the thumbs up gets taken away I'll give up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,283 ✭✭✭KikiLaRue


    It didn’t stop any actual terrorist of course.

    Do we know that for sure?

    I’d imagine it made it quite a bit more difficult and a helluva lot more expensive to get your hands on weapons.

    Now that may not have stopped the IRA, but it likely slowed them down. And it almost definitely deterred some young folk who would have loved the glory of taking out a Brit but weren’t actually in any group.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    KikiLaRue wrote: »
    Do we know that for sure?

    I’d imagine it made it quite a bit more difficult and a helluva lot more expensive to get your hands on weapons.

    Now that may not have stopped the IRA, but it likely slowed them down. And it almost definitely deterred some young folk who would have loved the glory of taking out a Brit but weren’t actually in any group.

    Well, legislation on firearms did prevent another Dunblane massacre happening. Similar for Australia. So yep you're gonna get bombers but spree shootings have been eradicated in the UK and Australia.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    I really don't like that the okay hand gesture has been hijacked.
    Unfortunately this could mean a regular unknowing person gets attacked by Antifa or some other violent group that think this meme is a real thing.

    On topic, there are many similarities between Breivik's attack 2011 and this guy.
    I hope it's not a start of lone-wolf "revenge" attacks


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    batgoat wrote: »
    Well, legislation on firearms did prevent another Dunblane massacre happening. Similar for Australia. So yep you're gonna get bombers but spree shootings have been eradicated in the UK and Australia.

    Not true. The Cumbria Shootings . Derrick Bird killed 12 people and injured 11 others before killing himself in Cumbria, England in 2010.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    batgoat wrote: »
    Well, legislation on firearms did prevent another Dunblane massacre happening. Similar for Australia. So yep you're gonna get bombers but spree shootings have been eradicated in the UK and Australia.

    TBH I think they were so rare in the UK and Australia, it's very hard to state that gun control eradicated them.

    Well we know for a fact it didn't eradicate them in the UK.

    The culture unlike other countries just didn't exist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    El_Bee wrote: »
    As far as Pewdiepie is concerned, he's courted and payed lip-service to the alt right ever since their inception, I don't have much sympathy for him to be honest.

    Pewdiepie is an ethnonationalist. He hates non-whites and dog whistles to people who are on the verge of genocide. In light of this attack, the phrase 'subscribe to pewdiepie' must be considered a call to violence.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Even just by reading the messages here he's actually achieving what he wanted in his mainfesto. He set out to cause division. He picked assault rifles so as to link in the US into the discussion. He hand picked names PewDiePie or whatever his name's is, wrote right wing 'martyrs' on his weapons so as to drag both sides into the argument. He chose NZ as it was a soft target and to show nowhere is safe. He live-streamed himself. He then gave himself up without a fight even though he had two more live weapons in his car so he could sit back and enjoy the sh*tstorm. By dragging people through the sh*t and pitting them against each other, causing division, hes achieving exactly what he set out to achieve.

    Delighted they blurred his face. They should throw him in a hole and let the world forget about him. Wipe his name from the records.

    One other thing, can they handcuff these f*ckers from behind. Apparently he gave some right wing salute in court. Brevik did the same . Handcuff their hands behind their backs ffs. Do not give them more of a platform.


Advertisement