Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Foxhunter Pub Closed by Revenue ?

1568101114

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,905 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    There are already 4 McDonald's in Lucan. Which is absolutely ridiculous for a population of 50k. I say no thanks.

    In lucan there is only two. Village and superquinn. 2 too many though.

    Can't see much happening yet though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭ArthurG




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,485 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    It's getting towards a point where it needs to get listed on the derelict sites register


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭brick tamland


    Just needs to be bulldozed at this stage. An eyesore. Building can't be saved at this point. Nothing's going to open there with traffic flow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭DopeTech


    Amazing a place the size of this can just be let go to ruin for over 6 years. Any news on what's next for this site?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭ArthurG


    Sir Dosser wrote: »
    Amazing a place the size of this can just be let go to ruin for over 6 years. Any news on what's next for this site?

    Next local elections are in May. Demand answers from potential candidates and in particular incumbents who are presiding over this mess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    ArthurG wrote: »

    Next local elections are in May. Demand answers from potential candidates and in particular incumbents who are presiding over this mess.

    What are the council doing that has any impact on this? This is developers and banks fighting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭ArthurG


    L1011 wrote: »
    What are the council doing that has any impact on this? This is developers and banks fighting.

    It has absolutely nothing to do with banks and developers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    ArthurG wrote: »
    It has absolutely nothing to do with banks and developers.

    Explain your reasoning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭magicray


    Aw I was hoping to see a good update here when this thread popped up

    Sad to see the state it is in now


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Explain your reasoning.

    I'd say its planning. Look at the 16 apartment planning application Got refused on the grounds of intensification of the slip road. TII would have a field day on any development here.

    Chances of anything going in here are slim to none.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Councillors have no influence over TII, thankfully. SDCC have tried to do some bloody stupid things and had TII stop them.

    Harassing councillors and candidates over something they cannot do anything about is pointless.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Councillors have no influence over TII, thankfully. SDCC have tried to do some bloody stupid things and had TII stop them.

    Harassing councillors and candidates over something they cannot do anything about is pointless.

    If the lands were rezoned and you could get an access through Hermitage Garden you would probably get 28/30 houses on the site. Thats where you lobby your councilor.

    No chance of access via slip road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Very unlikely that number of additional units would be allowed on to an internal road in a housing estate.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Very unlikely that number of additional units would be allowed on to an internal road in a housing estate.

    No technical reason why it couldn't. It would be a local issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    godtabh wrote: »
    No technical reason why it couldn't. It would be a local issue.

    Would need to spend an entire day reading DMURS and similar to be certain but I could see the road capacity being a limiting factor.

    As goes local factors, residents in that estate would be unlikely to be happy; particularly as there'd almost definitely be pedestrian/cycle permeability to the sliproad which residents associations usually scream from the rooftops against


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Would need to spend an entire day reading DMURS and similar to be certain but I could see the road capacity being a limiting factor.

    As goes local factors, residents in that estate would be unlikely to be happy; particularly as there'd almost definitely be pedestrian/cycle permeability to the sliproad which residents associations usually scream from the rooftops against

    A road size like that has an AADT of about 750 cars. 34 houses will have an AADT of about 200. Road capacity wont be an issue. J

    unction capacity maybe but that can be solved. The R136 is signalized and there are 2/3 other access points.

    That approach would be a lot more favorable compared to the going onto the slip road. Most developers wouldn't have the stomach with dealing with locals but if you have sank €7.5m into it, it might be the only way to get your money back. Would also depend if its TIC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    godtabh wrote: »
    A road size like that has an AADT of about 750 cars. 34 houses will have an AADT of about 200. Road capacity wont be an issue. J

    unction capacity maybe but that can be solved. The R136 is signalized and there are 2/3 other access points.

    That approach would be a lot more favorable compared to the going onto the slip road. Most developers wouldn't have the stomach with dealing with locals but if you have sank €7.5m into it, it might be the only way to get your money back. Would also depend if its TIC.

    surely the amount of traffic when it was a busy pub was a lot more than if it was made residential, cannot see the logic in not allowing them exit onto the slip road


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    surely the amount of traffic when it was a busy pub was a lot more than if it was made residential, cannot see the logic in not allowing them exit onto the slip road

    It would have had very little traffic at peak periods compared to a large residential development - virtually none in the morning peak, a bit more in the evening for food and off-licence traffic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,120 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    That slip road has very little traffic on it as is any time of the day - it's just for people taking a left into one of the lanes (mostly residential) but mostly for the petrol station. Adding 40 housing units won't cause any problems on it

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Its now a case of correct design standards been applied. You'd never get the same there again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,905 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    godtabh wrote: »
    If the lands were rezoned and you could get an access through Hermitage Garden you would probably get 28/30 houses on the site. Thats where you lobby your councilor.

    No chance of access via slip road.

    So now you want to push more traffic through another housing estate where kids play?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,905 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    That slip road has very little traffic on it as is any time of the day - it's just for people taking a left into one of the lanes (mostly residential) but mostly for the petrol station. Adding 40 housing units won't cause any problems on it

    The slip road backs up alot of the evenings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,120 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    The whole N4 backs up alot of the evenings west bound. The slip road is probably used by several people trying to avoid the main N4. Either way I can't see an extra 10 or 20 cars make any significant difference to that.

    Thousands and thousands of approved units at Clonburris with no main national high capacity roads within miles and no suitable infrastructure at all is a completely different matter :mad:

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,451 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The side of the slip road to turn right towards Lucan is at risk of backing up on the mainline a lot of the time, which is likely to be the main concern of TII


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,120 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    L1011 wrote: »
    The side of the slip road to turn right towards Lucan is at risk of backing up on the mainline a lot of the time, which is likely to be the main concern of TII

    Just give the right turn a longer green light, is the easy solution to that.

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,905 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    Just give the right turn a longer green light, is the easy solution to that.

    Its not the light that's the problem, is the traffic going that way


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    So now you want to push more traffic through another housing estate where kids play?

    Yes


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,905 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    godtabh wrote: »
    Yes



    And does it affect you?

    Maybe that decision should be with the residents of that estate.


Advertisement