Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread V - No Pic/GIF dumps please

Options
1308309311313314321

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 36,249 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    gimli2112 wrote: »
    JRM came up with some math that if you discount the MPs on her payroll she lost and it's a terrible result for her.

    His crew love spinning math. :rolleyes: He's had his shot and lost, that's the bottom line. Though he'll be well suited with this result as he can stand on the sidelines and roar and shout irrelevancies about how she should go to the Queen, his favourite.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 421 ✭✭Folkstonian


    EdgeCase wrote: »
    Well, now what we've got past that Tory naval gazing she still has to get this deal through parliament which looks extremely unlikely.

    Just the small matter of a deficit of 117 of her own party, plus 10 DUP votes, to claw back from elsewhere in the house.

    Piece of cake for Theresa, right?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,613 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    gimli2112 wrote: »
    JRM came up with some math that if you discount the MPs on her payroll she lost and it's a terrible result for her.

    Yet spent the whole of the last year saying that you cannot exclude votes from the Brexit vote because everybodies vote counts and that would be against democracy.

    It's laughable, typical little rich boy, changes the rules when he loses because he is so used to getting his own way yet doesn't like it when people do the same.

    He's the very worst of selfish, arrogant politicians.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    EdgeCase wrote: »
    Well, now what we've got past that Tory naval gazing she still has to get this deal through parliament which looks extremely unlikely.
    She claimed she has a legal solution for the backstop.

    This should be fun, because she doesn't. And now she's going to prove it, turn the Tories into an even bigger laughing stock and there's nothing they can do about it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,242 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    What does she do coming up to 21st Jan? Corbyn is right to wait, he wouldn't win it.
    HoC will force a Ext of Art50 and 2nd Ref.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,368 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    gimli2112 wrote: »
    JRM came up with some math that if you discount the MPs on her payroll she lost and it's a terrible result for her.

    Nasty little insinuation about fellow Tories. Par for the course for Jacob.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,803 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    That effectively kills off the Withdrawal Agreement, presumably.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Seems that opinion is split on whether there is good news for her or not. Labour supporters are calling it as a blow while her supporters are ecstatic with the result.

    It really doesn't matter as her deal is still not getting through parliament so she may have a majority of support in her party but if she cannot get it through the HoC then it really doesn't matter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,522 ✭✭✭thecretinhop


    corbyn will have the uk as a third world state if he gets in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,368 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    corbyn will have the uk as a third world state if he gets in.

    Yes, that's his cunning plan.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,625 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    devnull wrote: »
    63% backing her is a clear mandate if you consider that the ERG consider 52% is a clear mandate for Brexit.

    Now the Tories have to wait 12 months for another heave.
    Though according to Brexiteers you cannot ever have another vote on the same subject ever again, because that would be undemocratic.
    Unless of course it is something completely, entirely different if it is about something they want.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,366 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Just the small matter of a deficit of 117 of her own party, plus 10 DUP votes, to claw back from elsewhere in the house.

    Piece of cake for Theresa, right?

    Tony Connelly saying 117 is bad news for the deal : he says those same MPs will turn all their attention to voting it down now.


  • Administrators Posts: 53,577 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's really hard to see how we avoid a vote of some description from this point, either an election or a people's vote.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,844 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    corbyn will have the uk as a third world state if he gets in.

    As would 117 Tories it seems.


    Follow the money. There's chaos investments made there...


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    corbyn will have the uk as a third world state if he gets in.

    He'd wanna crack on so, cos the Tories are beating him to it


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    All of Scotland hates the tories - except of course those who voted in 13 Conservative MPs at the last general election.
    Which is 12 more than the previous election.

    And probably 12 more than the next unless they can deliver on fishing rights and other Brexit related stuff. And we aren't even talking Hard Brexit.

    I’d expect any other PM to resign. Theresa has a different outlook though, so all bets are off.
    The lady's not for turning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Just the small matter of a deficit of 117 of her own party, plus 10 DUP votes, to claw back from elsewhere in the house.
    That's not how party politics work. You toe the party line or you leave. She only needs to find someone to replace the DUP.
    As much as the SNP hate them, Sturgeon might be the one to turn to, in exchange for assurances about Scottish interests.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭UsedToWait


    awec wrote: »
    It's really hard to see how we avoid a vote of some description from this point, either an election or a people's vote.

    I think it's really hard to see anything but a complete breakdown / eventual reorganisation of the UK polity at this stage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,523 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Interesting point made on Sky that in the leadership campaign which she won two years ago, she only got 199 votes in the second ballot. She got one more.

    Of course, she was going against 2 people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Just the small matter of a deficit of 117 of her own party, plus 10 DUP votes, to claw back from elsewhere in the house.

    Piece of cake for Theresa, right?


    Not just the 117, you would have people who voted for her and who will still vote against the deal as they don't want a Brexiter coming in but cannot support the deal.

    Let's just remember,

    https://twitter.com/mrjamesob/status/1072962227127418909

    James O'Brien, "Even tonight, nothing substantive has changed since the ‘red lines’ met the Good Friday Agreement, and the weaponisation of free movement met the indivisibilty of the four freedoms. Literally nothing.
    As you were."

    Also if there was a no confidence motion in the house, how will those 117 that voted against her be able to argue that she is not good enough for the Conservative Party but she is good enough to be PM?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    devnull wrote: »
    63% backing her is a clear mandate if you consider that the ERG consider 52% is a clear mandate for Brexit.

    Its a clear mandate within the Tory party only. As to the overall situation, nothing has really moved on. Unintentionally we now know more than we did a few minutes ago as to how many Tories would have voted against TM’s deal had it gone before the HoC, ie, it would have been crushed when combined with the opposition of Labour, the SNP, DUP etc. With the EU declaring that the WA can’t be changed, I’m not sure what the British government can do now to satisfy their own domestic audience.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,055 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    The presenter on BBC to Rees Mogg just before he signed off - You must have a busy night of plotting ahead of you :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,031 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    i don't particularly like may or what she stands for but i'm glad she has survived the vote. the deal she got was the best that was going to be got, and while it pleases no-body, perhapse it might ultimately cause the downfall of brexit (maybe that is her plan but perhapse i'm giving her a bit to much credit)
    my view is that she is the only one who can lead the conservatives that is being realistic about what kind of brexit can actually be delivered. i dread to think what would have happened had she not survived, mog or johnson as her replacement would have been horrific as they have delusians of grandure in my view and i fear any new "deal" they would have got would be a lot worse.
    ultimately the only really good deal is remain.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,613 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Can't believe Richard Drax on Sky News now.

    He's stating that there was a clear mandate for leave and that people didn't want to be half in and half out and wanted to be out and the people clearly thought this but there shouldn't be a second vote because the people have spoken.

    He then goes on without taking much of a brath saying that despite the fact May has won the vote she doesn't have a big enough mandate and too many people voted against confidence in her so with such a small majority she should not continue and she should resign.

    What a bunch of hypocrites - notice how they change their definition of mandate and what a small majority is depending on what vote they are talking about, so many contradictions and different rules for different things, they are really a disgrace.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    awec wrote: »
    It's really hard to see how we avoid a vote of some description from this point, either an election or a people's vote.

    2nf referendum would be a possibility expecially if combined with an A50 withdrawal. 2nd ref would also have to be between the WA and Remain. No Deal will have to be removed as a factor. A referendum isnt gonna solve anything UNLESS of course Labour
    decides to campaign on the remain platform and with Corbyn right now thats not a certainty unlrss he can be armtwisted into it in return for the PMs job.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,242 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    ERG tie themselves close to the DUP. TM needs the DUP to govern, that's their leverage.
    Soubry makes the point, far less bitter than JRM, that in effect the majority of backbenchers did not support her.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,368 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Soubry and Buckland tearing into each other on Sky. Thought Buckland was going to headbutt her at one stage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    All of Scotland hates the tories - except of course those who voted in 13 Conservative MPs at the last general election.

    Shocking result for May in the ballot - one hundred votes against her is catastrophic I think.

    I’d expect any other PM to resign. Theresa has a different outlook though, so all bets are off.

    Corbyn lost a confidence vote of 172-40 for Labour leader, not a bother on him. I think she did well, all things considered.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,523 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Brave woman to use part of her speech to talk about domestic governance.

    Interesting that she mentioned going to Europe to look for political and legal assurances about the backstop. Did not hint that she will be looking for or expecting changes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 67,755 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Soubry and Buckland tearing into each other on Sky. Thought Buckland was going to headbutt her at one stage.

    I am not aware of a political mess as big as this where shots weren't eventually fired.

    The multiple sides seem completely irreconcilable.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement