Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Formula 1 2018: General Discussion Thread

1140141143145146

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Harika


    Interesting but ratty move

    https://twitter.com/hlawiczka/status/1065618494102872069

    Haas saying Not Force India, didn't build their cars themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 381 ✭✭Santan


    Maybe a silly question, but could Williams ever partner for a Ferrari engine, unless they move forward in the next year or 2 with Merc, would it be the worst move for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,896 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Harika wrote: »
    Interesting but ratty move

    https://twitter.com/hlawiczka/status/1065618494102872069

    Haas saying Not Force India, didn't build their cars themselves.

    Is that some silly protest relating to the force India team being a different company to the current race team?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Harika


    mickdw wrote: »
    Harika wrote: »
    Interesting but ratty move

    https://twitter.com/hlawiczka/status/1065618494102872069

    Haas saying Not Force India, didn't build their cars themselves.

    Is that some silly protest relating to the force India team being a different company to the current race team?

    The chassis of not force India was build by force India and by this illegal, fia now has to decide and that is worth 50 million dollars for Haas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Harika wrote: »
    The chassis of not force India was build by force India and by this illegal, fia now has to decide and that is worth 50 million dollars for Haas.

    $50 million. Sure aren't Rich energy ploughing money in there ......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,746 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Has anyone seen anywhere that sells that energy drink?

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,896 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Harika wrote: »
    The chassis of not force India was build by force India and by this illegal, fia now has to decide and that is worth 50 million dollars for Haas.

    It was enough to make them start from zero points surely.
    I can't see Haas winning that. New force India would surely have a case against the fia seeing as they allowed them entry knowing that it was the chassis of the old team, took their entry etc and allowed them to spend a lot of cash going racing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭GarIT


    astrofluff wrote: »
    Has anyone seen anywhere that sells that energy drink?

    I think it's some sort of new company. At the time they were trying to buy Force India for £30m they were valued at £1m. Someone is trying to pump money into advertising to get it off the ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,896 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    GarIT wrote: »
    I think it's some sort of new company. At the time they were trying to buy Force India for £30m they were valued at £1m. Someone is trying to pump money into advertising to get it off the ground.

    Or just an outright scam.
    Reminds me of the mansoor ijaz quantum group nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,717 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    mickdw wrote: »
    It was enough to make them start from zero points surely.
    I can't see Haas winning that. New force India would surely have a case against the fia seeing as they allowed them entry knowing that it was the chassis of the old team, took their entry etc and allowed them to spend a lot of cash going racing.

    I hope you are right. I think it is very juvenile of Haas to even try this. I hope Haas do not win this one and the Fia just drop it.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,026 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    The fact is that in pure, strict technical terms, HAAS are correct - the cars ran by Not Force India were indeed built by a company that was a different one that the current.

    The fact they were allowed to race is probably where this will be shut - it's not exactly the first time this happens, there have been takeovers and changes of denominations in the past - one could have argued the 2009 Brawn GP car was indeed designed and at least partly built by Honda...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,560 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    Force Canada is a totally new company. Force India went into administration so a different set of circumstances. Haas are going by the book. Something should be either in compliance with the rules or not. There should not be grey areas. Force India should have sold up before they went bust but they didn't because of their dodgy owner. FIA or Liberty did a sweetheart deal with Force Canada without following proper procedures and now chickens are coming home to roost. Liberty or FIA will have to pay Haas off or risk it going to court.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭GarIT


    I said at the time Force India should have just missed one race to get the issues sorted. They had two weeks between the race they barely managed to get to and the next.

    They could have kept all of their points if they chose to miss that race and give the time needed for Stroll to buy the team properly instead of just the assets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,896 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    GarIT wrote: »
    I said at the time Force India should have just missed one race to get the issues sorted. They had two weeks between the race they barely managed to get to and the next.

    They could have kept all of their points if they chose to miss that race and give the time needed for Stroll to buy the team properly instead of just the assets.

    I don't think it was that straight forward although I might be wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,940 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    I assume Racing Point will just demonstrate (probably via a mass of paperwork) that there was a clear legal transition of the ownership of the intellectual property between the old and new entities. Haas are clutching at straws for one reason only, cold hard cash. They are like every F1 team ever, completely incapable of separating their own self interest from anything else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,940 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    mickdw wrote: »
    I don't think it was that straight forward although I might be wrong.

    Anyone who's ever had the misfortune of dealing with Indian bureaucracy will almost certainly tell you that a week would have made no difference whatsoever. Asking more than a dozen Indian banks to agree on anything is Mission Impossible, they'd need a committee to decide whether they should form a committee to discuss should they in fact form a committee to discuss the actual issue


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,672 ✭✭✭✭vectra


    skipper_G wrote: »
    Anyone who's ever had the misfortune of dealing with Indian bureaucracy will almost certainly tell you that a week would have made no difference whatsoever. Asking more than a dozen Indian banks to agree on anything is Mission Impossible, they'd need a committee to decide whether they should form a committee to discuss should they in fact form a committee to discuss the actual issue

    You mean like our own Government :pac::pac:

    Back on topic,
    I suppose Haas are right to do what they are doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Harika


    The Haas case has been thrown out and pirelli is to be announced as tyre supplier for the next years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,046 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,885 ✭✭✭✭flazio




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,940 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    Jenson Button is joining Sky's presenting lineup for every race next season. Maybe they'll get rid of Herbert now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭donspeekinglesh


    skipper_G wrote: »
    Jenson Button is joining Sky's presenting lineup for every race next season. Maybe they'll get rid of Herbert now

    Don't know how that's supposed to work when he's signed to do the rest of the WEC season with SMP. The Australian GP clashes with Sebring..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,940 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    Don't know how that's supposed to work when he's signed to do the rest of the WEC season with SMP. The Australian GP clashes with Sebring..

    I just reread it, he's joining the presenting team but not specifically for every race. I think maybe I picked up one of Sky's subliminal messages of every race live blah blah by mistake


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭donspeekinglesh


    skipper_G wrote: »
    I just reread it, he's joining the presenting team but not specifically for every race. I think maybe I picked up one of Sky's subliminal messages of every race live blah blah by mistake

    Sky said he "will see an increased role with Sky F1 during coverage of all 21 races next year." So that might mean some prerecorded stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,714 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    11 Titles, 3 cars, 1 farewell

    https://streamable.com/yr02j

    Adios Alonso!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,240 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    The Channel 4 team photograph from this morning.

    Ds2LhqoX4AIXJci.jpg

    Fleetwood Mac who have the F1 theme song for Channel 4 have it on sale in a 3 CD set celebrating 50 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,338 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Congratulations to them.
    Channel 4 consistently outperformed Sky.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭pyramuid man


    Are Channel 4 still doing highlights next year?

    Thought I heard that earlier this year?

    Dunno what I'll do now that eir sport won't have coverage next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭Top Dog


    Are Channel 4 still doing highlights next year?

    Thought I heard that earlier this year?

    Dunno what I'll do now that eir sport won't have coverage next year.
    Think they have highlights for every race, and full coverage for the British GP


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,338 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    https://www.channel4.com/4viewers/blog/formula-1-coverage-update

    Yes that's the deal, qualifying and race highlights for every race except British GP which will be live.

    It's a pity, I will miss KC and his insights during practice.

    I suppose we are very lucky to get free access to any of the C4 coverage.

    They really are a dream team.


Advertisement