Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tommy Robinson jailed

1232426282986

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    dav3 wrote: »
    Never heard of them.

    They do sound like nutters all right.

    Can you elaborate?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dav3


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Can you elaborate?

    Yes


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    dav3 wrote: »
    Yes

    Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.


    It wasn't a medical diagnosis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.

    We could say you’re a nutter if you think calling Asian people “Pakis” is ok. Listen mate if you want to go around advocating the use of the word “Paki” and supporting groups that want to deport non whites then crack on but don’t be doing the snowflake routine when someone calls you a racist.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    FTA69 wrote: »
    We could say you’re a nutter if you think calling Asian people “Pakis” is ok. Listen mate if you want to go around advocating the use of the word “Paki” and supporting groups that want to deport non whites then crack on but don’t be doing the snowflake routine when someone calls you a racist.


    No one called me a racist.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    It wasn't a medical diagnosis.

    who asked you? your buddy can answer for himself.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    FTA69 wrote: »
    We could say you’re a nutter if you think calling Asian people “Pakis” is ok.

    Who said it was ok to call Asian people pakis?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Who said it was ok to call Asian people pakis?

    You. You were moaning that you’re not allowed call people Pakis as it’s not a racist term.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Who said it was ok to call Asian people pakis?

    Do really think this 20 questions charade is fooling anybody.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    who asked you? your buddy can answer for himself.


    It is a discussion forum. all are free to comment. or do you not like free speech?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    FTA69 wrote: »
    You. You were moaning that you’re not allowed call people Pakis as it’s not a racist term.

    I think you need to read the posts before you jump the gun there, chief. I never mentioned the word Asians once.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    Do really think this 20 questions charade is fooling anybody.

    You gonna answer my original question or just spout out of you?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dav3


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.

    Calm yourself down there princess.

    I don't think those nutters would appreciate you assuming they all have mental health issues.

    It appears the 'Irish' branch is made up entirely of Polish and bizarrely ulster unionists. Although maybe not that bizarre.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    dav3 wrote: »
    It appears the 'Irish' branch is made up entirely of Polish and bizarrely ulster unionists. Although maybe not that bizarre.


    So you didnt see the Belfast protest i take it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    thebull85 wrote: »
    So you didnt see the Belfast protest i take it?

    ....belfast protests by who?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Taytoland


    jooksavage wrote: »
    Taytoland wrote: »
    So Bloody Mary didn't exist and the burning of Protestants didn't happen. Of course it happened. One of the reasons Guy Fawkes happened is because he wanted to return England back to the one true faith and get rid of the heretics. You had Catholic resistance for centuries.

    We were drawing parallels between todays anti-Islam hysteria and 18-19TH CENTURY anti-Catholicism. You've dragged us all the way back to 1605 to support your argument.... which, FUNNILY ENOUGH, is exactly what the ringleaders of the Gordon riots reached for (and it was considered reaching even then). Turf mentioned Antonia Fraser earlier. Her book is the King and the Catholics. Recommended.
    Read her book on the gunpowder plot and you will learn more about traitor Guy Fawkes wanting to restore the one true faith which he and his buddies wanted to overthrow England.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    Odhinn wrote: »
    ....belfast protests by who?

    By all the Loyalist thickos giving Nazi salutes presumably.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    FTA69 wrote: »
    By all the Loyalist thickos giving Nazi salutes presumably.

    Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

    As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

    As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.


    well that is a matter of opinion. i can say without fear of contradiction that they are most definitely thick.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    well that is a matter of opinion. i can say without fear of contradiction that they are most definitely thick.

    Anybody giving Nazi salutes is thick ill agree with you on that one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Anybody giving Nazi salutes is thick ill agree with you on that one.


    i was referring to the people who support the likes of tommy robinson. I doubt there was an IQ over 80 at the violent protest in london.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    i was referring to the people who support the likes of tommy robinson. I doubt there was an IQ over 80 at the violent protest in london.

    Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Ive seen that, personally i dont think paki is a racist word and a lot of pakistanis ive met and worked with have described themselves as paki, lets be real here why is it ok to call an austrailian an aussie, or a british person a brit.

    But you cant call a pakistani a paki?

    Its bull****.

    This is complete and utter nonsense. No Pakistani refers to themselves as a "Paki", its Pakistani, unless they are trying to reclaim the word, but that in that context its much like the n-word in that its ok for people from that group to say it.

    BTW, my family is from the Azad Kashmir, so I can tell you very clearly no one in the Pakistani community would use that term to describe themselves.

    The term is racist term and pretending otherwise is utterly absurd and quite frankly farcical to claim otherwise.

    Its a slur aimed at anyone who is South Asian regardless of the national origin of there parents. To pretend otherwise, is simple farce.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.


    Well at least you live up to the stereotype.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

    Calls some one else a key board warrior and then post the most key board warrior thing possible :rolleyes:. Nothing more amusing than far right poster supporting people who made there hatred for them abundantly clear.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    wes wrote: »
    This is complete and utter nonsense. No Pakistani refers to themselves as a "Paki", its Pakistani, unless they are trying to reclaim the word, but that in that context its much like the n-word in that its ok for people from that group to say it.

    BTW, my family is from the Azad Kashmir, so I can tell you very clearly no one in the Pakistani community would use that term to describe themselves.

    The term is racist term and pretending otherwise is utterly absurd and quite frankly farcical to claim otherwise.

    But why is it ok to use the word Brit or Aussie, is it a case that we are only allowed shorten certain words.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    If the Gardai ever find a traffic cone in one of their horseboxes they'll know who to suspect now.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    wes wrote: »
    Calls some one else a key board warrior and then post the most key board warrior thing possible :rolleyes:. Nothing more amusing than far right poster supporting people who made there hatred for them abundantly clear.

    Im no keyboard warrior, if your buddy wants come call me a thick to my face it can be organised.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 302 ✭✭AfterLife


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

    As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.

    There's no doubting we have our own share of dumb *****.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    But why is it ok to use the word Brit or Aussie, is it a case that we are only allowed shorten certain words.


    Context. Its not that hard to understand. It really isn't. One would have to willfully try hard not to understand.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    AfterLife wrote: »
    There's no doubting we have our own share of dumb *****.

    Tell me about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Im no keyboard warrior, if your buddy wants come call me a thick to my face it can be organised.


    I'm not his buddy. And i'm very choosy about the company i keep.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

    As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.

    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/free-tommy-robinson-rally-in-belfast-photos-36994601.html

    Lol. Look at these proud sons of Ulster here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    thebull85 wrote: »
    But why is it ok to use the word Brit or Aussie, is it a case that we are only allowed shorten certain words.

    Oh dear, :rolleyes: I shouldn't have to explain this. Racist use the term "Paki" to racially abuse people of South Asian origin. The term "Brit" or "Aussie" are not used to racially abuse white people. Seriously man you need to learn what context is, otherwise it will be impossible for you to understand the world around you.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    Context. Its not that hard to understand. It really isn't. One would have to willfully try hard not to understand.

    Calling some a paki b*astard or an brit b*stard or an aussie c*nt, whatever way you want to put it is wrong.

    Referring to someone as a brit, an aussie or a paki is not racist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

    Because you'd have a ripping retort that you can't express over the internet? Or because you'd smack him?

    Dude, when you resort to that kind of argument, you've lost the argument.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    FTA69 wrote: »


    Low IQ thugs the lot of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Calling some a paki b*astard or an brit b*stard or an aussie c*nt, whatever way you want to put it is wrong.

    Referring to someone as a brit, an aussie or a paki is not racist.




    people from pakistan would disagree with you. History disagrees with you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭tritriagain


    i was referring to the people who support the likes of tommy robinson. I doubt there was an IQ over 80 at the violent protest in london.

    You can back that up can you. I'm no fan of tr but labelling all his supporters thick is really just burying your head in the sand and avoiding the most important issue i.e why do so many people across Europe feel such anger and disconnection from the social and economic future of their Homeland .it's there, and to ignore it is asking for trouble in the long term.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    Grayson wrote: »
    Because you'd have a ripping retort that you can't express over the internet? Or because you'd smack him?

    I wouldnt do anything, because i know he wouldnt call me it to my face.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dav3


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

    Please tell me this is a parody account.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    You can back that up can you. I'm no fan of tr but labelling all his supporters thick is really just burying your head in the sand and avoiding the most important issue i.e why do so many people across Europe feel such anger and disconnection from the social and economic future of their Homeland .it's there, and to ignore it is asking for trouble in the long term.


    but they are thick. Why else would they be taken in as they have?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    dav3 wrote: »
    Please tell me this is a parody account.


    i really dont think it is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    Educationally marginalised sounds better than thick to be honest.

    But yeah, if you support Mr Lennnon, you need help.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    people from pakistan would disagree with you. History disagrees with you.

    As i said before, pakistanis ive met here and in the UK have referred to themselves as "pakis" actually it was mostly said like "im paki". Id no problem being called a mick or a paddy (also not racist) in England and i think anyone that has a problem with that is an extremly delicate person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    As i said before, pakistanis ive met here and in the UK have referred to themselves as "pakis" actually it was mostly said like "im paki". Id no problem being called a mick or a paddy (also not racist) in England and i think anyone that has a problem with that is an extremly delicate person.


    I refer you to my previous answer where i mentioned context. Some black people refer to themselves as n*gger. do you think you can call them by that name?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    I refer you to my previous answer where i mentioned context. Some black people refer to themselves as n*gger. do you think you can call them by that name?

    Id never call anyone a n*gger, we know the origins of that word. However paki is short for pakistani its a little bit different.

    I dont know the origins of the word paki. People will probably say it originated in England in the 50s but id doubt that very much.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭thebull85


    Well at least you live up to the stereotype.

    Challenge someone to call me a thick to my face, what stereotype am i living up to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    thebull85 wrote: »
    Id never call anyone a n*gger, we know the origins of that word. However paki is short for pakistani its a little bit different.

    I dont know the origins of the word paki. People will probably say it originated in England in the 50s but id doubt that very much.


    and you would be wrong. As i said history is not on your side. Though it first appeared in the 1960s not the 1950s. It is most definitely a racial slur. But as a tommy supporter you dont want to see that.



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/6740445.stm


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement