Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The 8th amendment referendum - part 4

1177178180182183195

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,167 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    NIMAN wrote: »
    I take it that should Yes win tomorrow, then abortions will be a fast-tracked procedure on the health service? There won't be the usual waiting time that people in the health service usually experience.

    Say a woman goes to her GP and is 9 weeks pregnant and says she won't be able to cope with the child. This obviously means that the HSE/GP etc only have 3 weeks to get everything sorted out.

    Is it a procedure that will be able to be done in a GP surgery, or will it require a hospital visit?

    up to 12 weeks it only requires a 3 day wait and taking 2 pills


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,160 ✭✭✭Huntergonzo


    Get out there and vote Yes tomorrow folks.....or vote No, whatever you think yourself, never really understood canvassing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,877 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    They will be allowed later than 12 weeks here too, and I'd need you to provide a source for that as everyone is different and it really depends on the woman and potential medical conditions, etc. Most will be medical but definitely not all.

    Stop peddling lies.

    After 12 weeks will only be allowed in case of FFA or danger to mother's life.

    This has been stated ad nauseum but No side keep twisting it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,781 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    They will be allowed later than 12 weeks here too, and I'd need you to provide a source for that as everyone is different and it really depends on the woman and potential medical conditions, etc. Most will be medical but definitely not all.

    Medical doesn't mean surgical.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,167 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    They will be allowed later than 12 weeks here too, and I'd need you to provide a source for that as everyone is different and it really depends on the woman and potential medical conditions, etc. Most will be medical but definitely not all.

    The number prior to 12 weeks who cant take the pills will be a minority.
    after 12 weeks a surgical abortion is required. but they will also be a minority.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    But you are opening the door to it.

    My lobbying won’t be heard over what the rich and powerful decide is the best course of action with abortions once the up in the air referendum is passed.

    Then you would never vote yes. If your fear is opening the door then you are saying you want to keep the 8th and continue to export the problem to the UK.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭Cupcake_Crisis


    Allowing it for hard cases within that restricted window?

    How do you prove a hard case?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭Digital_Guy


    NIMAN wrote: »
    What do people think is the chance that if Yes wins, abortion will be used as contraception by some people?

    I would guess very small numbers, but I was reading a piece online last night from Irish women in the UK arguing both sides, one worked in the NHS and said she knew of one woman who has had 8 abortions.

    I know numpties like her are the extreme examples, but I'm sure there will be enough stupid ones who simply don't take contraception seriously enough, knowing they have an escape route should they get pregnant.

    8? Absolutely morally bankrupt person. Tragic and enabled by a culture of abortion, one where it's totally acceptable to have one (or 8!), and they are freely available. Would she have had any if it wasn't so socially acceptable? Or that number of them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭Digital_Guy


    How do you prove a hard case?

    Should be pretty easy when the yes campaign have talked about them endlessly!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,053 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Honestly seems like someone who's temperamentally not suited to public life at all.

    Yes but the funny thing is that John Waters is an incorrigible attention seeker.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Conservatory


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Then you would never vote yes. If your fear is opening the door then you are saying you want to keep the 8th and continue to export the problem to the UK.

    I’d vote yes if the referendum safeguarded another vote on the committee decision. The committee decision to me seems to be

    “abortion no questions asked for all we know she could have been raped”

    I can’t vote yes for that. I’m not here to pick sides I guess I’m here to complain about how the referendum was put together.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭Cupcake_Crisis


    Should be pretty easy when the yes campaign have talked about them endlessly!

    So you also have no idea how you would legislate for rape without a 12 week window?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭Digital_Guy


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Then you would never vote yes. If your fear is opening the door then you are saying you want to keep the 8th and continue to export the problem to the UK.

    Or, that you want something in between that's less extreme for a lot of people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,390 ✭✭✭✭gmisk




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭Try_harder


    Like the Marriage Referendum, some people just cant own their No, and blame the Yes side for them voting No!

    Fooling no one!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I’d vote yes if the referendum safeguarded another vote on the committee decision. The committee decision to me seems to be

    “abortion no questions asked for all we know she could have been raped”

    I can’t vote yes for that. I’m not here to pick sides I guess I’m here to complain about how the referendum was put together.

    I think you need to read up on what a referendum is and what you're actually voting on. And this committee you talk about are not in any way the decision makers here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Nettle Soup


    Has anyone got a link to Ronan Mullen in the Pat Kenny debate where he judged the young woman that got an abortion in the UK? I want to show it to someone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭Digital_Guy


    So you also have no idea how you would legislate for rape without a 12 week window?

    Au contraire, I most definitely do and I referred to this earlier. If someone has been raped, all they should need to do is sign a document to that effect. That's it, no questions asked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭Try_harder


    Has anyone got a link to Ronan Mullen in the Pat Kenny debate where he judged the young woman that got an abortion in the UK? I want to show it to someone.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Conservatory


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    I think you need to read up on what a referendum is and what you're actually voting on. And this committee you talk about are not in any way the decision makers here.

    I think you need to see how the world really works.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Or, that you want something in between that's less extreme for a lot of people.

    Let's say the proposed legislation was very restrictive and only dealt with hard cases. You still need to vote yes tomorrow to get rid of the 8th to allow that. But then in the future another government could liberalise the law. I think a lot of No voters genuinely don't understand what tomorrow's vote is about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭Cupcake_Crisis


    Au contraire, I most definitely do and I referred to this earlier. If someone has been raped, all they should need to do is sign a document to that effect. That's it, no questions asked.

    So, you don’t trust them to have choice over their wombs, but you do trust them to not lie about being raped?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    I’ll just leave this here....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭Try_harder


    Au contraire, I most definitely do and I referred to this earlier. If someone has been raped, all they should need to do is sign a document to that effect. That's it, no questions asked.

    Whats to stop fallen women and jezzabelles exploiting your system? The no camp would cry!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 13,016 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    Has anyone got a link to Ronan Mullen in the Pat Kenny debate where he judged the young woman that got an abortion in the UK? I want to show it to someone.

    https://twitter.com/NaomiOhReally/status/999440104644136961


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,390 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Has anyone got a link to Ronan Mullen in the Pat Kenny debate where he judged the young woman that got an abortion in the UK? I want to show it to someone.
    https://twitter.com/tvcritics/status/999413185068355585?s=19


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Berserker


    NIMAN wrote: »
    What do people think is the chance that if Yes wins, abortion will be used as contraception by some people?

    I would guess very small numbers, but I was reading a piece online last night from Irish women in the UK arguing both sides, one worked in the NHS and said she knew of one woman who has had 8 abortions.

    I know numpties like her are the extreme examples, but I'm sure there will be enough stupid ones who simply don't take contraception seriously enough, knowing they have an escape route should they get pregnant.

    It'll depend on the cost of having an abortion. If it's free then people will use it as another option.
    gctest50 wrote: »
    This isn't the UK though

    The Netherlands has among the lowest rate

    The RoI is far more like the UK than the Netherlands culturally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭Dressing gown


    That's an easy one. Just replace 'abortion' with any other word. For example; 'drinking'.

    Ireland has a culture of drinking - it's socially very acceptable, not at all frowned upon, really prevalent, etc.

    Spain doesn't (or pick another nation). Being drunk is frowned upon, people don't tend to drink to excess as a matter of course, alcohol is more seen as a complement to a meal than something to go out and binge on.



    Missing the crucial part there - 20 women she *knows*. So she has 20 friends who have had abortions, and they've clearly talked about it, discussed it, said 'oh I had one too', etc. Reflective of a culture of abortion.

    Do you know 20 women who have had abortions? I am 99.99% certain you don't, and I'd say there is almost nobody in Ireland who does. Why? Because there is a very low abortion rate (relatively at least), and no culture of abortion - one where it is really acceptable and commonplace to have one.



    Well I did say I was leaning towards no. And the long posts are a way of teasing things out for myself as well.

    I’m a few pages behind but 1 in 20 pregnancies is not low. We may have a low abortion rate compared to other countries, but it’s not exactly rare is it? If you know 19*20 women of child bearing age there’s every chance you know 20 women that have had an abortion....im pretty sure most people of child bearing age know 400 others? Just because you don’t know about it doesn’t mean you don’t know the women that have had them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭gctest50


    Has anyone got a link to Ronan Mullen in the Pat Kenny debate where he judged the young woman that got an abortion in the UK? I want to show it to someone.




    Ronan Mullen : Saoirse you deserve love and respect regardless of what you have done



    https://twitter.com/NaomiOhReally/status/999440104644136961





    From 1996 to 2001, Mullen worked in the Communications Office of the Archdiocese of Dublin and appeared as a spokesperson for the Archdiocese and Cardinal Desmond Connell.

    Cardinal Connell was later found to have covered up numerous instances of child sex abuse


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    Try_harder wrote: »
    Whats to stop fallen women and jezzabelles exploiting your system? The no camp would cry!

    The No side seem to love suggesting alternatives the No side would or even did furiously oppose. It's... weird.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement