Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Taxation of alternative fuelled vehicles

Options
123457»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,850 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Apologies I thought that's what you were asserting.

    Given thread title I assumed this was a discussion on EV taxes in the future rather than a specific timeframe (i.e. during transition to net zero)

    I still believe the state will levy new taxes to make up the decrease in revenues when the EV sized hole in budget begins to show prominently. Whether they *should* or not, is a different matter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭creedp


    Or EV tax by kwh or KW power output, or a combination of all these metrics, etc. There are plenty of ways to introduce higher taxes on EVs without getting into the complications of user based charges. People seem to forget that before we introduced the virtuous CO2 based motor taxation system, for many many years ICEs were taxed based on engine size. Its only a matter of when EV taxes will increase or maybe some people would prefer an increase in the marginal income tax rate or VAT, etc to offset the reduced motor tax revenues arising from the transition to EVs. Either way the tax will be collected



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,959 ✭✭✭User1998


    What we should be more worried about is VRT. Motor tax increases may only be a couple of hundred per year, but currently EV’s only have a VRT rate of 7% compared to up to 40% for petrol or diesel vehicles.

    I’d imagine electric cars will sky rocket starting in a few years. The following years after that VRT will slowly be increased back to petrol/diesel levels.

    Its a good opportunity for Gov to actually give us a fair VRT price similar to the rest of the EU but I can’t see that happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    No I never said EV's run for free.

    I said they pay about 20c per 100km V €6 per 100kms for ICE. (Ballpark figures there)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭creedp


    EVs are certainly cheaper than ICEs to run but not that cheap unless you have free work charging or are robbing electricity from your neighbour or family😀

    A decently efficient EV might be getting an average of say 16kwh per 100km which combined with the cheapest night rate available from Pinenergy at 5 cent per kW would be 80cent or in my case, paying 18cent per kW, €2.90 per 100km.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Yep, for people who have to run on public charging the cost of an ID.4 vs a Tiguan will end up pretty much the same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    It's what the government get I am referring to.

    Roughly 6 litres / 100km and they take about a €1 a litre in duty plus VAT, so €6 per 100km

    If an EV gets about 20kwh per 100kms, charged at 10c night rate thats €2 +9% vat. So the government get roughly €20c / 100kms. If it's 16kwh and pinergy it's only 10c/100kms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,736 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    How much would say a bog standard mondeo 2 ltr diesel cost same distance



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    Ballpark €10 of which government take €6

    As opposed to an EV costing ballpark €2 of which the government get €0.20c



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭creedp


    Yea I get you and its why moving entirely to EVs will leave an almighty hole in the tax base.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭creedp


    My Smax diesel costs about €10 per 100km



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,112 ✭✭✭innrain


    Based on this thinking let's encourage people to smoke and drink otherwise gov looses revenue. ;)



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,736 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Sounds pretty cheap move then as opposed to " are certainly cheaper than ICEs to run but not that cheap unless you have free work charging or are robbing electricity from your neighbour or family"



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭creedp


    I was referring to @waterwelly EV figure of 20cent per 100km which would be a lot less that the true cost but he subsequently clarified his figure only related to the Govt tax take, ie the VAT on electricity.

    In any case point still stands that EVs are far cheaper to run so long as you can charge at home or at work.

    In relation to this thread, the majority of this difference is down to the minimal taxation on EV fuel



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭creedp


    No the comparable thinking would be how can we make up the lost revenue from the reduction is tobacco exise duty.

    I don't think anyone is advocating we should force people to burn more fuel



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    It's comparable, if you only looked at the excise duty on tobacco you'd say any measures to reduce tobacco use are bad for the exchequer. It ignores the reduction in health costs from reduced use of tobacco products. Similarly an increase in EV usage will result in a drop in excise duties from oil products. Based on what we know now about local pollutants the removal of combustion waste from our streets will have positive health affects, and we'll also see a reduction in the amount of money used to import petroleum products. 4% of our GNI is used to import fossil fuel products from the Middle East, Norway and the UK. If that money stays in the Irish economy will it make up a shortfall?

    I don't think the equation is as simple as we currently get X from motor tax + excise, we need to replace X completely to maintain the balance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    It's only cheap until the government start charging EV drivers a proportionate "user pays" tax on EV's.

    Which is what everybody else on the thread has been discussing all along. Except you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭creedp


    Of course there are off setting expenditure savings associated with reducing consumption of fossil fuels but how will we fund the not insignificant cost of upgrading the electricity grid and wind/solar infrastructure to enable us to generate the additional electricity necessary to replace fossil fuels. Renewable energy is not free to generate and will require massive Govt investment and support in the coming years. Methinks EV drivers will have to dig deep to contribute to this renewable revolution



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    A while back John Fitzgerald from the ESRI said that the government take in 6 billion in petroleum receipts, So if the whole country went EV they need to make the shortfall up.

    So he suggested a ULEZ style tax for all the cities and make it almost impossible to drive into the city center. Then have a distance levy/tax so someone driving from Dublin to Cork pays more than someone going to kildare etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,736 ✭✭✭✭listermint




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,736 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Well no I'm just challenging the notion that you started with and then changed that evs were paying nothing. Wasn't true at the start I'm glad to see you changed tack.

    Incidentally I'm paying ev, van and 2 motorcycles tax. Should I get more road as I pay more tax than you ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    I never said EV's pay nothing.

    Read back my posts and quote where I said it please.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,959 ✭✭✭User1998


    If you compare to London, ULEZ wouldn’t have any effect if the whole country went EV. They are low emission vehicles so they are exempt from paying. A congestion charge would affect all vehicles regardless of their emissions, but it would be very unfair to introduce this in Ireland because our public transport is so bad.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    Well he said a congestion charge again this is with the loss of 6 billion in Revenue so I'm assuming charges for EV included so really it's nothing to do with the environment just taxes/levy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    Cheaper due largely to how the fuel is taxed though.

    In my view it's a hidden incentive to buy an EV.

    In time taxation on EV's will have to be higher to compensate the government for what they will be losing on fuel duty and VAT.

    In simple terms EV drivers will have to start footing more of the bill for maintaining the roads they drive on.

    But that's a while away yet.

    Which, in my view, makes buying an EV today an extremely smart choice

    1/ prices have been reduced

    2/ no great demand so better bargaining power

    3/ road maintenance contributions will remain deflated until mass adaptation, which right now seems further away than ever.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    I think they offer some savings to the state in that carbon taxes are avoided and they provide energy security and independence as we are not importing fossil fuels. And hence exporting money from the economy. Thus will be more noticeable as we increase our RES penetration.

    mire and more people are going with PV. It’ll be interesting to see how the government deal with loss of revenue there.


    as for motor tax. I think we’ll eventually move towards a pay per Km.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    Pay by weight will be a big part of the mix too I'd say.



Advertisement