Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

NI Dec 22 Assembly Election

Options
15759616263

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,547 ✭✭✭rock22


    "If this true etc etc' No-one has denied it??"

    That's a pretty low bar for truth then,

    SF are an all Iireland party. Are you suggesting that SF officers should not be able to participate in NI local elections?

    FF and FG have both toyed with the idea of running candidates in NI, just like SF. Are you saying they should be stopped? Are you suggesting that the British government should legislate to deny Irish people the right to participate in NI elections. Do you think that Irish people should be denied to right to participate in British elections?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,396 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Ah I was yanking your chain a bit at the sense of entitlement more than anything, Downcow.

    Apart from the Freeports thing, which would likely involve going back to the negotiating table with the EU, and there's zero appetite for that in either the EU or UK outside of the DUP.

    I also don't think subsidising ferries will do anything at all for your Union, except have a few people wondering why their noisy cousins are back out with the begging bowl. Given the plethora of cheap flights available, I don't see any tangible benefit, but it's ironic that all the moaning you do about the supposed costs of an Irish Language Act (according to you that should all just be spent on healthcare), you wouldn't apply the same standards to the change you end up with in the begging bowl this time.

    As for the food labels, do what you want with that, but it reeks of insecurity.

    Of what you've suggested, zero has anything to do with Stormont, and the only one of any substance.....well I'd be willing to put a friendly wager to the charity of our choices that there won't be a freeport in NI within say the next two years just to put a sensible time frame on things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭standardg60


    The stain of terrorism which will forever be part of Sinn Fein does not seem to be a deterrent to the nationalist electorate in Northern Ireland. Many will say that Sinn Fein is a political party that people are entitled to vote for, but their continuing hegemony does speak uncomfortable truths about the values and priorities of members of the communities which support them.

    Maybe I'm the only one but this, accompanied by the what can only be described as a Hitleresque pose photograph, spoke to me as being a not so subliminal attempt to characterise SF voters as being brainwashed fools akin to 1930 Germans.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,396 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Doesn't seem to be much of a deterrent on the other side of the border for SF, nor does FG and FF's own terrorist links.

    DUP's own stain of terrorism doesn't seem to be much of a deterrent for Unionist voters either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭standardg60


    No it doesn't, but the author has conveniently overlooked that.

    For something directed at a UK audience, i thought it was a pretty disgusting attempt to sway opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,396 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    It's the Spectator; same owners as the Torygraph....what would you expect from a pig but a grunt?



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,435 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes.

    You know the old trope - 'no taxation without representation' - just reverse that, the other side of the coin. You canvas, campaign, vote where you pay your taxes. Simple.

    SF, FF, FG party workers down south do not reside or pay taxes in the north - so clearly they should butt out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,050 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They are helping in a campaign. They ate not voting in the elections.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,435 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Thin line Francie, very thin line.. butting in, interfering in a neighbouring state.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,831 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    A neighbouring state that the voters they are campaigning for wish to be part of.

    Its not illegal despite you somehow believing it is. And every party is involved in it - Alliance have Lib Dem support, Unionists get all sorts of random Scots/Tories/Whatever supporting them, etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 67,050 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    No it isn’t.

    Your reasoning is bonkers which is why nobody from the SDLP FF FG SF Lab etc will take a blind bit of notice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,435 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Are you're inferring that this is OK because the SF voters in NI sure want to be part of the south and so it's fine?

    That is most definitely interfering and seeking to destabilise a neighbouring state. This is what the Russians and Israelis etc get up to - sow seeds of dissension in regions that you wish to conquer, infiltrate them, corrupt their elections etc. Do you not see the obvious as to why this is a bad idea.

    Fine for politicians and civic groups in the south to make policy and make proposals on unity matters. But not directly interfering and seeking to undermine the neighbour state.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,831 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I'm inferring absolutely nothing. I'm saying outright its OK. You are the one trying to hint that its illegal without a shred of a clue of how it could be so.

    I think I would notice if Russian or Israeli canvassers turned up at my door; and I certainly wouldn't vote for a party that's using them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,050 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    How do you ‘destabilise’ a state by taking part in free and fair elections?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Sorry Furze but this is a ridiculous argument, anyone from anywhere is entitled to canvas a prospective voter, it happens anyway online as is obvious in previous elections.

    A voter can agree with everything a canvasser says and promise them their vote, and then do the exact opposite when they're in the booth, but that's democracy for you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,435 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    What exactly have our friends the Russians been up in Belarus, Crimea or the Donbas or Georgia or Chechnya.

    Oh let's see - infiltrating and interfering in any elections. Getting their puppets in power, a bit of ethnic cleansing (persuading people to leave), arranging fake unity votes.

    Political party workers from the south should not be interfering in NI elections, as the parallels with above are obvious and unwanted by the other community that shares the space.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,831 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    This is an absolutely bonkers argument.

    Canvassing is not "infiltrating and interfering"



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭standardg60


    You want to affiliate people in the South with the Russians now?

    Do yourself a favour, don't double down on this.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 35,941 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp



    This is histrionic absurdity. Canvasing is not election interference and no amount of attempts at hysterical equivalence is going to persuade anyone.

    A bunch of RoI volunteers - people who haven't even been confirmed to exist I might add, with only the DUP to believe - heading upo to the north to hand out fliers is not "interference" and it's a weird stubbornness at this stage that you insist it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,396 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    This whole thing alleging, 'interference' with Northern elections is one of the most bizarre takes I've seen here in a long time.

    I reckon even our resident Unionists will distance themselves from it for fear of association with that level of irrationality.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,811 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    There's about 80 Freeports in the EU. There were even 5 in the UK prior to 2012. So it's not the differentiator you may think it is unless you can do it better than everyone else starting from zero.

    Shannon started off the whole Freeport thing back in the 1950's so that may not be as easy as you'd like.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,407 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Would a Freeport be allowed by the GFA? Or even the WFA?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,396 ✭✭✭Fionn1952




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    The fking irony 😂 I wonder did something like that ever happen to Ireland . Jesus wept you are absolutely ridiculous



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,158 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I’m not saying any of this will happen. The ferry thing I believe would be great. We all travel a fair bit back and forth but if it was £100 for a car rather than £300 then I would be over every farts end



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,158 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I honestly don’t know.

    i’ll hold my hands up here. I said a month or so ago that I thought unionism was working on something that I didn’t want to disclose at that point. I even mentioned ‘8 letters’ when people accused me of setting up a situation that I could claim anything afterwards. Well they had time and we aren’t there obviously. So yes it was a freeport. I don’t hear it mentioned now so o don’t know if it is being negotiated or not. I may have been completely wrong but as you know I have never minded admitting that when it happens



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭standardg60


    It's free to travel South if you're ever minded.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,158 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I haven’t done the sums but is this accurate. I’m not saying it is but I read it on a reliable Twitter account. Can the statititions tell us could this possibly be true?

    “SF have more councillors to lift the bins and cut the grass etc, but in reality their actual 1st pref vote was down 17k on assembly 1st prefs.. Dup was down 8k Alliance down 16k. Sdlp down 12K and UUP down 14K.”



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,158 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Remind me how much a pint and a packet of crisps is?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,396 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I really don't see this having much in the ways of mass appeal, and at 200 quid a pop per car I'd certainly question the cost effectiveness of it as a tactic to secure your Union.

    I know we somewhat aggressively disagree on quite a few things, but this is just a bit of a....Meh from me.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement