Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

12357322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Yeah that's what counts in your world, media headlines. There are 1.5 million people internally displaced in Ukraine already from the Russian conceived and sponsored Donbass conflict. I have to say, I think your posting is scumbaggery with no values. Waving your little Russian flag like this is a football game and that millions already haven't lost their home and many more are set to become refugees. Great craic altogether.

    And before you mention another country as a diversion, take a look at the thread title.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Ahherelads2022


    How you feel now is how I felt when NATO went into Libya ect. So ive been desensitized by any aggression to counter them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Genuinely have no idea what you are saying. If by "us" you mean Ireland, we are involved brcause we are in the EU. As for "our backyard" no idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Of course you hear about them. How else would you know about them. Normal life does not go on.

    None of this had anything to do with Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Can we not derail this thread away from the Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Ahherelads2022


    So why should the EU sanction Russia and not Israel or Turkey?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Why do you want to talk about them and not Ukraine. Why not start a new thread on those issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Ahherelads2022


    Sanction them all or sanction none. Ukraine just needs to renounce NATO membership or go to war. Both bad, but they have no alternative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    A war and sanctions are all not good outcomes for Russia. Ukraine is caught in the grinder. But then it always has been.

    None of this is the interesting. What the economic implications for energy in Europe are.



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,189 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Can anyone else remember a time when a US major network was so overtly broadcasting Russian propaganda?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,216 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yesterday. And the day before, and....



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,118 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Specifically taking troops off the table was a mistake. Even if the US wasn't prepared to fight for Ukraine, specifically announcing it cleared the path to the current moves, and was called out at the time. The US very clearly signalled it was going to leave Ukraine to hang out to dry, the only thing it didn't do was gift-wrap the place. There wasn't even a shred of ambiguity for the Russians to consider.

    Retaining a tripwire force might at least have made Putin think twice, if for no other reason than to avoid accidentally killing Americans which might then trigger a response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,541 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭paul71


    What about this what about what about the price of turnips. Completely irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭paul71


    What about this what about what about the price of turnips. Completely irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    I think Russia rolling into Ukraine suits US long term interests better than US trying to pretend it can hold off Russia on Russia's doorstep where Russia has all the strategic and tactical advantages.

    Sucks for Ukraine sure. Im not sure the Ukraine played this very smart though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Ahherelads2022


    Long term people will keep being killed. Untill Ukraine and Russia are allowed make a deal the prognosis is bad for Ukraine. Sure ya its little cost to the US, Ukraine could of bitten off the hand (crimea, Dpr,LPR) and moved into the EU slash Nato a few years ago. The only way to reclaim those was via a war it couldn't fight. Now the chance it gone.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The US is probably looking not just at Ukraine, but at its role in the world generally. If they were saying they would support the Ukraine fully and then failed, in the end, to commit troops when Russia invaded, then they would seem like an unreliable ally to everyone else. So the decision was taken early on that the US would not give direct military support to Ukraine and that they would not even rely on the "veil of uncertainty" when negotiating with Russia. This is obviously bad for Ukraine, but it means that other US allies looking on won't start to think "the US said it supported Ukraine but when it came down to it they didn't do anything".

    Leaving a tripwire force runs the risk that in an invasion the US/NATO would get sucked into the war. The reality is that while neither the US or NATO want to see a full kinetic war in the Ukraine, they are not prepared to fully commit themselves to its defence. The Tucker Carlson clip above is obviously just the standard Fox news / anti Democrat / anti Biden nonsense, but there is a kernel of truth in it. Ukraine is a democracy, but it is very corrupt and there is a large amount of Russian people and influence there. The US/NATO response is proportionate - they will provide economic aid and military equipment, but they won't go to war with Russia over Ukraine.

    In fact, if you wanted to be very cynical about it, or even consider Putin's world view, you could argue that the US/NATO position does see the Ukraine as more like Russia than themselves, and that a large scale and bloody war between Russia and Ukraine would be like a Russian civil war. The response therefore is to shore up the Ukraine as much as possible to make an invasion as difficult and costly as could be. I could see how a certain part of the US establishment would even welcome Russia getting embroiled in an Afghanistan style "Forever war", and it would be even better for them if the Russian army failed to demonstrate that it was the modernised professional war machine that they are claiming to be. If Russia invades while the US is making very public noises against Russia, and it ends up driving a wedge between Russia and Germany economically, then its all a win for the US.

    So I can see how the US could reach the view that Ukraine is not a hill they want to die on. The EU is in a very different position, but the EU is not united enough nor militarily strong enough to go it alone without the US.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,018 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I tend to agree.

    Removing the threat on military intervention was a mistake.

    I was thinking that they should have held the security meeting in Kiev rather than Munich for similar reasons - Would Putin have rolled in with a bunch of world leaders sitting in the Capital?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Who's stopping them from making a deal?

    It's only chance of keeping Russia out was appeasing Russia/Putin. If that was ever possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,934 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Tucker is just a scumbag troll…. It’s bizzare that he is the mainstream media in America



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    It may have been posted elsewhere, but Ukraine has a very stark options list. Reject membership of NATO or go to war.

    I have no sympathy with putin but Ukraine being a member of NATO places NATO weapons 500 miles from Moscow. If the shoe was on the other foot I could not see the US allowing such a scenario.

    Little boys comparing Willie's is more mature than this fiasco

    If



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    For the last week we've seen US global hawk Drone's patrolling over ukraine along with other surveillance aircraft , they didn't enter Ukrainian airspace yesterday and are not there today ,

    Surveillance aircraft over Poland flying to lativa and Lithuania



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Well they could have stayed away from both Nato and Russia, and be pseudo Neutral.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,018 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Would that be before or after Putin rolled into the Crimea?

    Putin does not want Ukraine to exist as a standalone entity unless he can install a puppet government a la Belarus.

    Neutrality isn't really an option for the Ukraine , it's either complete subservience to Putin or leverage NATO to remain independent - There is no middle pathway sadly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Germany to halt Nord Stream 2 project.

    Was always a bad idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Nice. Germany pulling the plug on the alternative pipeline from Russian. That's bad news for the Kremlin. Had that opened they could easily have shut off all energy to Ukraine which is currently the main conduit to Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    True. Well its all a situation of Putin making. I think it will cost him more economically in the long run through.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    The Pipe line was actually the best think Putin could have done. He's burnt his bridges on it now.



Advertisement