Carlow school issues clothing diktat to female students

SAMTALK

Gatling wrote: »

If they sent letters home or emails we still would have gotten a similar case of fauxrage .
Especially on social media ,no matter what way they did this we would still be here.

They explained to the groups involved why this was being discussed with them ,and yet straight home to mammy I'm be sexualised ,bodyshamed ,and afraid of male teacher now .

Jesus wept

But to be fair if there was a letter all the prinicpal had to do was show this and then end of story.

If you speak to a group of people you will get different versions of what was said, and how it was interpreted. The school left themselves wide open with this

Necro

Hurrache wrote: »

How small minded are you, actually, how comfortable does it make you, to pigeonhole a women or girl with an opinion as a feminist, even thinking that's a bad thing.

Do you find it hard to deal with women in general and look for an easy way out for you to bat them away?

Mod:

This isn't the first time you have personalised your responses.

Don't post in this thread again

strandroad

MikeOxsgreen wrote: »

Who?

Not to defend misogynist, but i suspect there's an inferred hatred of women due to confirmation bias, rather than being explicitly said.

I stand to be corrected.

I reported such posts and posters so hopefully they are gone. Is "girls are aiming to be like common whores these days" etc explicit enough?

strandroad

strandroad wrote: »

I reported such posts and posters so hopefully they are gone. Is "girls are aiming to be like common whores these days" etc explicit enough?

So there's one.


Missed it , who was it.
Agree its unacceptable BTW!

6541

Just shows people will argue about anything. look at this thread its ridiculous. We have people online arguing about something that didn't happen. Please go back and listen to the principle. The media have created a story and outrage and loads have fallen for it !!!
People you need to get smarter with your media source. It is pure clickbait. The Sun at it best.
But no lets nail a school and all its staff who are under immense Covid pressure to some bull crap moral cross.
Shame on loads in this thread.

HBC08

lalababa wrote: »

The whole yoga pants thing has gone too far. Tis like going down the street half naked. And never ming seeing their knickers...they don't have knickers!
As a heterosexual it's bordering on dangerously distracting.
There's even auld ones wearing them!

In some cases you can see their lalababa through the leggings.

meeeeh

Sonics2k wrote: »

Eh no, I can see a very very clear difference between some skirt used for bad pornos and some skirt used for the office or school. Just like I don't see a pair of leggings on a damn child and sexualise the child because some adults also wear them.

Apparently I'm sexulising my child when I asked school for her to be allowed to wear leggings for PE. Poor girl was always skinny but for whatever reason her tummy sticks out. Any loose trousers that fit her around waist would slide off her hips.

Sonics2k

MikeOxsgreen wrote: »

So there's one.


Missed it , who was it.
Agree its unacceptable BTW!

There's been quite a few, but thankfully the mods have been doing a great job of banning and deleting them.

iirc there was one guy repeatedly posting about how they're designed to emasculate men and demonize them.

Necro

lalababa wrote: »

The whole yoga pants thing has gone too far. Tis like going down the street half naked. And never ming seeing their knickers...they don't have knickers!
As a heterosexual it's bordering on dangerously distracting.
There's even auld ones wearing them!

HBC08 wrote: »

In some cases you can see their lalababa through the leggings.

Mod:

Cop on with these sort of comments, seriously. It's children we are talking about

Ten of Swords

Closed for review - will reopen shortly