The 2020 U.S. Election Irregularities.

Cody montana

one world order wrote: »

I don't believe he is president. There is a lot of theatre been shown to us. When you study the inauguration there were too many things off and it didn't look right. It will all come out and it's currently resulting in a lot of people waking up to who is pushing these globalist agenda's.

Facts don't care about your feelings.
Also, get help.

Billy Mays

What was off about the inauguration and what didn't look right owo?

PintOfView

Mic 1972 wrote: »

The evidence I'm talking about is on YouTube, anyway no need to go around in circles.
Bottom line, the general perception is that the election process was flawed by a good degree. And the silencing/suspending of the people who talk has only corroborated that feeling.

Do you think Donald Trump didn't know about the evidence on youtube.
Is that why he lost 60 odd court cases, because he forgot to look for evidence on youtube?

As regards the general perception that the election was flawed, who gave you this perception?
It wasn't by any chance Donald Trump!

Come on! Do you really believe this stuff?

Mic 1972

Deleted User wrote: »

Guys on youtube is not proof. They failed to prove a case in the courts, not even a Republican heavy supreme court decided to intervene. We can conclusively conclude that the election was not rigged. This is why you're pushing this in the conspiracy theories forum. :pac:

I dont push any conspiracies in any forum, but I see you seem worried protecting your little safe space

PintOfView

one world order wrote: »

The courts buried their heads in the sand and refused to look at the mountain of evidence because they knew the election was a total fraud. The American people know the election was a fraud no matter how much the fake media and big tech tried to cover it up.

The corruption is widescale in America, it's in Washington, in the courts system and throughout the fake media and big tech. This is why the military is there as a final check, to prevent the illegal takeover by a socialist group working behind the scenes.

We are now left with this charade playing out, a fake president that gets booed if his picture pops up at the super bowl and elsewhere and a military that's firmly in Trump's corner. Interesting watching it play out, calls for election reform and voter ID are getting louder each day and Trump is cleaning out the republican party of corrupt RINO's and replacing them with America first people.

But Trump lied throughout his presidency. How can you say the media that were exposing his lies are fake?

Surely it was the other way round?

Timberrrrrrrr

Mic 1972 wrote: »

I dont push any conspiracies in any forum, but I see you seem worried protecting your little safe space

But you do, you did it a couple of posts ago

the general perception is that the election process was flawed by a good degree

one world order

Billy Mays wrote: »

What was off about the inauguration and what didn't look right owo?

Biden did not use air force one, military had no badges on their coats, those there looked unhappy and uncomfortable, national guard turned their backs to Biden during the motorcade, gun salute didn't look real and a few others were some things that stood out. Biden also hasn't addressed Congress which is unusual for a new president.

ohnonotgmail

one world order wrote: »

Biden did not use air force one, military had no badges on their coats, those there looked unhappy and uncomfortable, national guard turned their backs to Biden during the motorcade, gun salute didn't look real and a few others were some things that stood out. Biden also hasn't addressed Congress which is unusual for a new president.

air force one was down in florida with trump. The president is traditionally allowed to use AF1 to fly home. your post is just nonsense based on ignorance.

one world order

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

air force one was down in florida with trump. The president is traditionally allowed to use AF1 to fly home. your post is just nonsense based on ignorance.

So Trump was using AF1. That makes sense.

Timberrrrrrrr

one world order wrote: »

So Trump was using AF1. That makes sense.

As was his right as out going president, he is allowed use it one last time on that day. This has been explained to you God knows how many times :rolleyes:

If (as you claim) Trump is still president, why hasn't he got use of AF1 anymore? Why is he hiding out in an empty Mar A Largo playing golf every day?

Fighting Tao

one world order wrote: »

So Trump was using AF1. That makes sense.

Yes that is how it works. The outgoing president gets to fly home using Air Force 1.

Dohnjoe

one world order wrote: »

Biden did not use air force one, military had no badges on their coats, those there looked unhappy and uncomfortable, national guard turned their backs to Biden during the motorcade, gun salute didn't look real and a few others were some things that stood out. Biden also hasn't addressed Congress which is unusual for a new president.

Most of this stuff is fact-checked here

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/02/02/fact-check-meme-9-questions-makes-false-biden-inauguration-claims/4333267001/

e.g.

'Why was Biden denied a military plane to bring him to DC?'

Traditionally, outgoing presidents provide transportation to Washington for the incoming administration. CNN reported on Jan. 19 that the Trump administration did not offer Biden’s team transportation to the capital. His arrival via private plane has nothing to do with the legitimacy of his presidency.

'Why wasn’t Biden rendered a 21 gun salute as costumery for an incoming President? You know, like trump received the same day, January 20th?'

This claim is false. Biden received a 21-gun salute when he arrived at Arlington National Cemetery after the inauguration ceremony at the U.S. Capitol.

'Why did military turn their backs to Biden when he dove by them, rather than face and salute, which is an absolute requirement for service members?'

USA TODAY fact-checked claims that National Guard members had turned their back in dissent to Biden's motorcade after a video of troops on Jan. 20 went viral. We found that guard members had turned their backs to protect the president from external threats as he arrived at the Capitol. A National Guard spokesperson confirmed the action was protocol and not an expression of disapproval as critics had widely misconstrued it be.

Billy Mays

National Guard did the exact same thing for Trump's inauguration parade


Funny that

one world order

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Most of this stuff is fact-checked here

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/02/02/fact-check-meme-9-questions-makes-false-biden-inauguration-claims/4333267001/

e.g.

Fact check - National Guard refuses to give the so called president a salute and instead turned their backs, is because of protecting against external threats. Are people really this gullible?

I know the fake media is a strong programming tool but really? 70% turned away from him and the rest turned to him with no structure to it. People really need to wake up and start realising there are some very evil people controlling this world.

Fighting Tao

Billy Mays wrote: »

National Guard did the exact same thing for Trump's inauguration parade


Funny that

Yep. Maybe some people need it dumbed down. Take a steward at the edge of the pitch at a football match. They are facing the crowd to protect the players and officials from the threat of supporters encroaching on the area. It is the same for the national guard protecting the president elect.

one world order

Fighting Tao wrote: »

Yep. Maybe some people need it dumbed down. Take a steward at the edge of the pitch at a football match. They are facing the crowd to protect the players and officials from the threat of supporters encroaching on the area. It is the same for the national guard protecting the president elect.

Well that makes a whole load of sense. Protecting against a fence with nobody behind it. There is absolutely no hope for humanity, we really are sheep in need of a saviour.

Fighting Tao

one world order wrote: »

Well that makes a whole load of sense. Protecting against a fence with nobody behind it. There is absolutely no hope for humanity, we really are sheep in need of a saviour.

There is little scope to go against orders in the military. They are doing what they signed up to do. However, how do you know there wasn’t a protest ongoing nearby that could breach police lines and the national guard would be the next line of defence?

PintOfView

one world order wrote: »

Fact check - National Guard refuses to give the so called president a salute and instead turned their backs, is because of protecting against external threats. Are people really this gullible?

I know the fake media is a strong programming tool but really? 70% turned away from him and the rest turned to him with no structure to it. People really need to wake up and start realising there are some very evil people controlling this world.

see https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-national-guard-back-biden-idUSKBN29Q2YX

It was the same for Trump in 2016, and similar for Obama before him.

How do you explain that?

namloc1980

So what's the latest date for Trump to be put back into power?

namloc1980

namloc1980 wrote: »

So what's the latest date for Trump to be put back into power?

If Trump dropped dead in the morning, one world order would still claim he was still the sitting president.. :P

King Mob

Mic 1972 wrote: »

Who do you expect to answer that?

Well you, because it's your belief.
If you aren't able to answer these questions please just state this directly. No need to dodge and avoid.

Mic 1972 wrote: »

There is evidence of irregularities, but there is no will to investigate, that's the bottom line

Lol.
But Trump and his goons fought tooth and nail against the results.
Why did they not use any of this "evidence".

Do you believe that the legal team of the president and the greatest business mind of all time were unable to find the evidence this Crowder crank was able to with some googling?

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Deleted User wrote: »

If Trump dropped dead in the morning, one world order would still claim he was still the sitting president.. :P

In all fiarness, I wouldn't exactly trust the lying fecker to die either.

The Nal

namloc1980 wrote: »

So what's the latest date for Trump to be put back into power?

March 4th (tomorrow) or March 20th I've read.

salmocab

The Nal wrote: »

March 4th (tomorrow) or March 20th I've read.

I’d say Joe is sh1tting himself

salmocab

salmocab wrote: »

I’d say Joe is sh1tting himself

You can't call him incontinent here..

He probably is like, but someone will be along any minute to tell you he's in peak physical condition..

There seems to be a lot of strawmanning going on here still anyway to overlook the issues around the election..

Like, in retrospect the whole q thing was obviously a psy op to mislead trump support..if there was anything to it it would not have ended like it did..

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

You can't call him incontinent here..

He probably is like, but someone will be along any minute to tell you he's in peak physical condition..

There seems to be a lot of strawmanning going on here still anyway to overlook the issues around the election..

Like, in retrospect the whole q thing was obviously a psy op to mislead trump support..if there was anything to it it would not have ended like it did..

what issues were there that were unique to this election?

salmocab

[Deleted User] wrote: »

You can't call him incontinent here..

He probably is like, but someone will be along any minute to tell you he's in peak physical condition..

There seems to be a lot of strawmanning going on here still anyway to overlook the issues around the election..

Like, in retrospect the whole q thing was obviously a psy op to mislead trump support..if there was anything to it it would not have ended like it did..

A psy op? Would you stop it was a bunch of clowns justifying everything by telling gullible fools that there was more to everything than there was.

ohnonotgmail

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

what issues were there that were unique to this election?

The mail in ballot fiasco..The dead voters.. The issues around voting machines..

Look, it doesn't matter now.. Funnily enough the sixth made sure these issues wouldn't be looked at..

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

The mail in ballot fiasco..The dead voters.. The issues around voting machines..

Look, it doesn't matter now.. Funnily enough the sixth made sure these issues wouldn't be looked at..

what mail in ballot fiasco?
what dead voters? not that canard.
what issues around voting machines?

you're just rehashing the same nonsense that has been debunked many times before.

King Mob

Deleted User wrote: »

The mail in ballot fiasco..The dead voters.. The issues around voting machines..

What issues with these are you refering to?
The only one that's actually been shown to have happened is a Trump supporter who used a dead person's identity to vote for Trump.

Deleted User wrote: »

Like, in retrospect the whole q thing was obviously a psy op to mislead trump support..if there was anything to it it would not have ended like it did..

How do you know it's "Obviously a psy op"?
How do you know it wasn't just a case of gullible people being mislead by something silly on the internet?

How do you know that your false claims of voter fraud are not also a psy op to make Trump supporters also look bad?