Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The 2020 U.S. Election Irregularities.

Options
1…6061636566…84

Comments

  • Options
    #1862
    salmocab
    Registered Users Posts: 11,320 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    I won’t be arguing with anyone about it, that’s the words of a man that believes the sh1t he just posted.


  • Options
    #1863
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 41,380 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    I see daves back where he belongs


  • Options
    #1864
    PintOfView
    Registered Users Posts: 857 ✭✭✭PintOfView


    12gauge dave wrote: »
    Since are left wing friends have bathed them selves in conspiracies about nazi stages today I thought I'd post this little beauty

    Make of it what you will I won't be arguing with anyone about it im afraid.

    https://twitter.com/SebGorka/status/1366438137287827460?s=20

    If Biden said that in 2007 he likely was repeating good information.

    All machines with a computer in them, PCs, phones, voting machines, etc., are vulnerable to various types of attack, and to simple software 'bugs'.
    (one reason why Microsoft rolls out security and other updates to your Windows PC every month).

    Over the years the US has moved from paperless voting machines, to ones that both record the vote electronically, and also output a paper record that the voter can inspect before putting it in a box like we do.
    After the election a large enough sample of paper ballots, to be statistically significant, are hand counted and results compared to the electronic result.
    In tight races more paper ballots, or all of them, are counted.

    As of the 2018 mid term elections 20% of votes were still cast using electronic only machines, with no paper trail.
    It is these machines that are most vulnerable to invisible manipulation.

    see https://www.govtech.com/elections/Despite-Risks-Some-States-Still-Use-Paperless-Voting-Machines.html from Oct 2020
    "In 2016, there were 14 states that used paperless machines as the primary polling place equipment in at least some of their counties and towns.
    They represented about 1 in 5 votes that were cast in the 2016 election," said Tisler.
    Since then, six of those states have fully transitioned to some sort of paper-based voting equipment.
    Those include Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, South Carolina, Pennsylvania and Virginia

    So by 2020 the opportunities to manipulate the vote were reducing, and the article also states ...

    "That leaves 8 states in 2020 that still have at least some paperless voting machines," said Tisler, though he noted that, even amidst these, efforts have been made to redirect voters to more secure means of vote casting. New Jersey, for instance, has launched a healthy vote-by-mail program for voters, which means paper ballots will be used overwhelmingly this year.

    I think it's pretty unlikely that any side in the last US election would have been able to pull off a major fraud, especially under the noses of the opposition.
    The claim that the Democrats did this twice in Georgia would seem to be even more unlikely given the heightened state of alert you would expect the Republicans to have maintained, in a state with a Republican governor!!

    If the Democrats did, in fact do this, then the Republicans would have displayed a very high level of incompetence in not being able to prevent it, or expose it!!


  • Options
    #1865
    Mic 1972
    Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Says the guy who ignored the post that debunked the claims....


    Steven Crowder debunking the debunkers

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fxKc874hDI


  • Options
    #1866
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,849 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Steven Crowder debunking the debunkers

    These seem like dump and runs. There are a multitude of questions and points put to you on just the previous page, why can't you address any?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1867
    Mic 1972
    Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    These seem like dump and runs. There are a multitude of questions and points put to you on just the previous page, why can't you address any?


    I dont need to address any of your points, you can watch the video where they talk about the addresses that have been conveniently changed right after the video was released, one of which was changed to yet another non existing addrss.
    Who is changing these addresses and why?


  • Options
    #1868
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,232 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    I dont need to address any of your points,
    Lol.
    You can't address any points. That's why you are avoiding them.
    No one is stupid enough to buy that you can address them you're just choosing not to because they are beneath your attention.


  • Options
    #1869
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,849 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    I dont need to address any of your points

    Which signals you can't.

    There is a bottomless pit of meaningless and misleading clips available on the internet, to date not a single one demonstrates systemic fraud. It's a case of trying to fling as much muck as possible and hoping some sticks. None is sticking, and those flinging it are continually running away from that fact.


  • Options
    #1870
    Trigger
    Registered Users Posts: 17,538 ✭✭✭✭Trigger


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Steven Crowder debunking the debunkers

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fxKc874hDI

    Mod: Do not dump links here, support any link you are posting with your own words please.

    The Charter states:
    Do not just plagiarize or regurgitate source material.
    This is NOT a facebook wall. Videos/media/links you do include in your arguments need to be supported with your own words, enough that a reader should be able to follow the conversation without viewing the media - users may be on dial-up, behind firewalls, etc. that restrict their access to streaming content.


  • Options
    #1871
    The Nal
    Registered Users Posts: 12,662 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Its amazing that a comedian could uncover with a few quick googles what the GOP machine and hundreds of lawyers and investigators working full time couldn't.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1872
    Mic 1972
    Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Which signals you can't.

    There is a bottomless pit of meaningless and misleading clips available on the internet, to date not a single one demonstrates systemic fraud. It's a case of trying to fling as much muck as possible and hoping some sticks. None is sticking, and those flinging it are continually running away from that fact.


    I never mentioned systemic fraud.
    These guys are checking addresses and have discovered that a lot of them are not existent, they are fake addresses. The video I posted yesterday was a response to most of the arguments that the debunkers had.
    For example the so-called clerks mistakes which are still irregularities and in most cases are not very credible. Some of these wrong addresses were updated right after the video went viral, with more fake addresses!
    All of this was verified, links and actual addresses were shown in the videos.


  • Options
    #1873
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,232 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    I never mentioned systemic fraud.
    Are you saying there was no systemic fraud?

    How much fraud was there?

    Was it enough to influence the results of the election?

    How come Trump and his highly paid cronies were not able to find the damning evidence that Crowder crank was able to?
    Why did they not use it at any point in the dozens of cases they lost?


  • Options
    #1874
    Mic 1972
    Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    King Mob wrote: »
    Are you saying there was no systemic fraud?

    How much fraud was there?

    Was it enough to influence the results of the election?

    How come Trump and his highly paid cronies were not able to find the damning evidence that Crowder crank was able to?
    Why did they not use it at any point in the dozens of cases they lost?


    Who do you expect to answer that?
    There is evidence of irregularities, but there is no will to investigate, that's the bottom line


  • Options
    #1875
    Princess Consuela Bananahammock
    Registered Users Posts: 33,261 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Who do you expect to answer that?
    There is evidence of irregularities, but there is no will to investigate, that's the bottom line

    Yeah, they just couldn't be bothered. It's only a presidential election in a (supposedly) democratic country.

    You can't invesigate what doesn't exist!!

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Options
    #1876
    silliussoddius
    Registered Users Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Who do you expect to answer that?
    There is evidence of irregularities, but there is no will to investigate, that's the bottom line

    From who? Didn't Jim Jones promise us an investigation into Hillary's cheating in the 2016 election?


  • Options
    #1877
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Who do you expect to answer that?
    There is evidence of irregularities, but there is no will to investigate, that's the bottom line

    Yet no one bought any of this "evidence" to any of the 60+ Court cases, why's that?


  • Options
    #1878
    Mic 1972
    Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Yet no one bought any of this "evidence" to any of the 60+ Court cases, why's that?


    The evidence I'm talking about is on YouTube, anyway no need to go around in circles.
    Bottom line, the general perception is that the election process was flawed by a good degree. And the silencing/suspending of the people who talk has only corroborated that feeling.


  • Options
    #1879
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    The evidence I'm talking about is on YouTube, anyway no need to go around in circles.
    Bottom line, the general perception is that the election process was flawed by a good degree. And the silencing/suspending of the people who talk has only corroborated that feeling.

    This may come as a shock to you but youtube video's are not evidence.


  • Options
    #1880
    Mic 1972
    Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    This may come as a shock to you but youtube video's are not evidence.


    the nonsense of this statement


  • Options
    #1881
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    the nonsense of this statement

    From the poster who gave us
    The evidence I'm talking about is on YouTube, 
    :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1882
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Who do you expect to answer that?
    There is evidence of irregularities, but there is no will to investigate, that's the bottom line
    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    The evidence I'm talking about is on YouTube, anyway no need to go around in circles.
    Bottom line, the general perception is that the election process was flawed by a good degree. And the silencing/suspending of the people who talk has only corroborated that feeling.
    Guys on youtube is not proof. They failed to prove a case in the courts, not even a Republican heavy supreme court decided to intervene. We can conclusively conclude that the election was not rigged. This is why you're pushing this in the conspiracy theories forum. :pac:


  • Options
    #1883
    12gauge dave
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭12gauge dave


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    I see daves back where he belongs

    My name can't be kept out of yer mouths at all :D


  • Options
    #1884
    one world order
    Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭one world order


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Guys on youtube is not proof. They failed to prove a case in the courts, not even a Republican heavy supreme court decided to intervene. We can conclusively conclude that the election was not rigged. This is why you're pushing this in the conspiracy theories forum. :pac:

    The courts buried their heads in the sand and refused to look at the mountain of evidence because they knew the election was a total fraud. The American people know the election was a fraud no matter how much the fake media and big tech tried to cover it up.

    The corruption is widescale in America, it's in Washington, in the courts system and throughout the fake media and big tech. This is why the military is there as a final check, to prevent the illegal takeover by a socialist group working behind the scenes.

    We are now left with this charade playing out, a fake president that gets booed if his picture pops up at the super bowl and elsewhere and a military that's firmly in Trump's corner. Interesting watching it play out, calls for election reform and voter ID are getting louder each day and Trump is cleaning out the republican party of corrupt RINO's and replacing them with America first people.


  • Options
    #1885
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    one world order wrote: »
    The courts buried their heads in the sand and refused to look at the mountain of evidence because they knew the election was a total fraud. The American people know the election was a fraud no matter how much the fake media and big tech tried to cover it up.

    The corruption is widescale in America, it's in Washington, in the courts system and throughout the fake media and big tech. This is why the military is there as a final check, to prevent the illegal takeover by a socialist group working behind the scenes.

    We are now left with this charade playing out, a fake president that gets booed if his picture pops up at the super bowl and elsewhere and a military that's firmly in Trump's corner. Interesting watching it play out, calls for election reform and voter ID are getting louder each day and Trump is cleaning out the republican party of corrupt RINO's and replacing them with America first people.

    Weren't you previously claiming Biden wouldn't be inaugurated? I guess this post is an improvement on mentioning lucifer..


  • Options
    #1886
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    In other news, the Republicans are not even denying that they want to suppress voting anymore.

    https://twitter.com/TBishUp/status/1366778043365163010?s=19


  • Options
    #1887
    salmocab
    Registered Users Posts: 11,320 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Are people actually so gullible that they believe that Trump is still in charge somehow? This has to be a wind up, I can’t believe anyone is that stupid.


  • Options
    #1888
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,849 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    salmocab wrote: »
    Are people actually so gullible that they believe that Trump is still in charge somehow? This has to be a wind up, I can’t believe anyone is that stupid.

    These people are deadly serious, whilst at the same time they give away clues that they know what they are saying is bull****. I guess they live out some fantasy by writing it out on social media and pretending it's true.


  • Options
    #1889
    one world order
    Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭one world order


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Weren't you previously claiming Biden wouldn't be inaugurated? I guess this post is an improvement on mentioning lucifer..

    I don't believe he is president. There is a lot of theatre been shown to us. When you study the inauguration there were too many things off and it didn't look right. It will all come out and it's currently resulting in a lot of people waking up to who is pushing these globalist agenda's.


  • Options
    #1890
    silliussoddius
    Registered Users Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Keep your can kicking foot safe.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1891
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    one world order wrote: »
    I don't believe he is president. There is a lot of theatre been shown to us. When you study the inauguration there were too many things off and it didn't look right. It will all come out and it's currently resulting in a lot of people waking up to who is pushing these globalist agenda's.

    You also believe satanists are everywhere and jeebus is going to come and make Trump president. Everything you have claimed will happen and when it doesn't you make some silly wishy washy excuse as to why and then set a new date sometime in the future as to when the next big date will be.


Advertisement