Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

President Donald Trump - Formal Impeachment Inquiry Announced

Options
14849515354173

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 39,600 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The Bould Rudy is a bit of a fighter.

    Trump was prepping the floor to fúck him under the Bus Friday, the tune changed pretty rapid Saturday.

    Rudy may be working for the Donald for free but it would appear it still comes at a price.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,697 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mad muffin wrote: »
    He’s not the only one.

    You’ve got Pelosi’s son in Ukraine

    Kerry’s step son in Ukraine

    Schiff has a Ukrainian oligarch benefactor

    Then you have all the Congress and Senate career politicians who have been there for decades now multi millionaires.

    No wonder they’re all upset at Trump trying to impeach him.

    Now list all the Republican tendrils in Ukraine

    https://fortune.com/2019/10/07/naftogaz-trump-associates-mixing-politics-and-profits-ukraine-scandal-impeachment-news/


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    Overheal wrote: »

    Didn’t sound like that got anything. Unlike the Democrats. Just goes to show… if you want corruption done right call on the Democrats. They are masters at it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭notobtuse


    For a bit of fun (or is it just plain spooky?)… The purported prophet Kim Clement prophesied a Donald Trump presidential win way back in 2007. Then in 2014 he predicted the impeachment attempts… and he also prophesied the impeachment outcome. Al this before Trump was even considering a run at the presidency. This is starting to make the rounds on the internet with the Trump impeachment inquiry going on. Oddly accurate, IMO.


    You can ignorantly accuse me of "whataboutism," but what it really is involves identifying similar scenarios in order to see if it holds up when the shoe is on the other foot!



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,979 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    mad muffin wrote: »
    Didn’t sound like that got anything. Unlike the Democrats. Just goes to show… if you want corruption done right call on the Democrats. They are masters at it.

    eh. this isn't hard stuff to find:
    Nepotism.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    Igotadose wrote: »
    eh. this isn't hard stuff to find:
    Nepotism.jpg

    Right? And what’s your point? Are they not qualified? What was Bidens qualifications? Would Biden be getting all the money if his father wasn’t VP?

    Whatever you want to say about the rest they got were they got on their merits or way before Trump became President.

    Can you say the same about Hunter Biden? No you can not. He is a malcontent also ran drug addict who has gotten where he is solely on his father’s coattails. If it wasn’t for his father. He would be serving time for all his transgressions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,697 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mad muffin wrote: »
    Right? And what’s your point? Are they not qualified? What was Bidens qualifications? Would Biden be getting all the money if his father wasn’t VP?

    Whatever you want to say about the rest they got were they got on their merits or way before Trump became President.

    Can you say the same about Hunter Biden? No you can not. He is a malcontent also ran drug addict who has gotten where he is solely on his father’s coattails. If it wasn’t for his father. He would be serving time for all his transgressions.
    Can you not say the things about the kids in Trumpworld? Of course you can. Malcontented drug addicts who got where they are solely on their fathers coat tails (who only got where he is on his fathers coat tails (who only got where he is because america is a nation of immigrants)). If it wasn’t for their father they would all be serving jail time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    So the latest on Sondland’s testimony is supposedly he will testify that Trump told him that there is no quid pro quo.

    So the best evidence against Trump now, is Trump had a quid pro quo because he told ambassador Sondland, that there is no quid pro quo. Good luck with that Democrats.

    The clown show continues…


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    Overheal wrote: »
    Can you not say the things about the kids in Trumpworld? Of course you can. Malcontented drug addicts who got where they are solely on their fathers coat tails (who only got where he is on his fathers coat tails (who only got where he is because america is a nation of immigrants)). If it wasn’t for their father they would all be serving jail time.

    Yeah sure you can. In your fevered dreams.


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,600 ✭✭✭✭Boggles




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,186 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    Ah yes, Sandy Hook conspiracist Wayne Dupree rolleyes.png


    Seriously, why do you follow these @rseholes?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭Cody montana




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,186 ✭✭✭Billy Mays




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Everywhere.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭notobtuse


    The Barr and Durham reports on the misconduct of the FBI, DOJ and CIA (as well as Hillary Clinton and the DNC and Obama political appointees) involvement during and after the 2016 election should be out soon. I’m starting to wonder if the Democrats aren’t playing chess, as well, with the impeachment nonsense. Will the DNC and president Trump declare a cease-fire because they both decide the impeachment and government officials wrongdoings will tear the US apart? Or are the Democrats too deeply entrenched in the impeachment coup and figure their media handmaidens will provide them cover to the American people? And is Trump too pig-headed to back down?

    You can ignorantly accuse me of "whataboutism," but what it really is involves identifying similar scenarios in order to see if it holds up when the shoe is on the other foot!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache



    I remember how hyped the last one was by the same crowd. It was so bigly-yuge that nobody remembers it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    I wouldn't be surprised if the Durham-Barr report isn't complete until after Christmas tbh, given they have just widened the scope and some interviews have only been announced, like Brennan for example. Apparently both are going to Italy again re the Mifsud tapes too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    I wouldn't be surprised if the Durham-Barr report isn't complete until after Christmas tbh, given they have just widened the scope and some interviews have only been announced, like Brennan for example. Apparently both are going to Italy re the Mifsud tapes also.

    What about the Crowdstrike server physically sitting in Ukraine? Can we soon expect to see Barr doing some house-to-house inquiries to get to the bottom of it?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 322 ✭✭SJW Lover


    I remember how hyped the last one was by the same crowd. It was so bigly-yuge that nobody remembers it.


    We all remember the hype around the Mueller Report though. When is that coming out? Mueller gonna destroy the Donald :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    SJW Lover wrote: »
    We all remember the hype around the Mueller Report though. When is that coming out? Mueller gonna destroy the Donald :pac:

    Yeah I remember the Democrats, and a Schiff proclaiming its Mueller time! Just turned out to be warm piss going down Mueller's leg as he sat there mumbling , and bumbling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    SJW Lover wrote: »
    We all remember the hype around the Mueller Report though. When is that coming out? Mueller gonna destroy the Donald :pac:

    The most embarrassing thing was all the celebrity readings, as if the we all just hadn't understood it, and we needed to hear Z listers reading it to see that Donald was in fact a double agent afterall.

    Funny also how when Mueller was laughed at for mumbling and apparently not knowing who or what Fusion GPS was during his testimony in front of Congress, they said "How dare you, he's a 74 year old man!!" but the same folk have seemingly have no trouble whatsoever with laughing at man who's 73 :P


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 322 ✭✭SJW Lover


    Overheal wrote: »
    It’s only interesting to the plum ignorant

    are you equally interested in how much Republicans made in that time? Mitch is no pauper


    More ad hominems from Overheal :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,150 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    I still can’t get an answer from any of you as to why, in your own opinion, the republicans who control the senate have absolutely no interest in investigating any of this democrats corruption?

    The Horowitz report might be interesting but Horowitz himself can’t do much with it.

    Also, is nobody bothered by the fact that trump is involving his own personal lawyer in government business? Could you imagine the howling of Obama had done something like that.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 322 ✭✭SJW Lover


    mad muffin wrote: »
    Yeah I remember the Democrats, and a Schiff proclaiming its Mueller time! Just turned out to be warm piss going down Mueller's leg as he sat there mumbling , and bumbling.


    Schiff went beyond that. He claimed to have seen first hand evidence of direct collusion. No wonder Trump wants his head on a spike. Treasonous behaviour.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 322 ✭✭SJW Lover


    MadYaker wrote: »
    I still can’t get an answer from any of you as to why, in your own opinion, the republicans who control the senate have absolutely no interest in investigating any of this democrats corruption?


    Because the Dems are so completely and utterly inept that they are going to completely expose themselves all by themselves. Dont interrupt your enemy while it is destroying itself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,150 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Any grown ups have an answer?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,979 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    SJW Lover wrote: »
    Because the Dems are so completely and utterly inept that they are going to completely expose themselves all by themselves. Dont interrupt your enemy while it is destroying itself.

    Words mean different things to Teapublicans.

    Inept: 37 indictments just from the Mueller investigation. 5 convictions. This is *just* the Mueller investigation. The only rat not caught, was Trump himself, and only because Mueller provided the information to Congress for them to decide on indicting. Those investigations (into Obstruction) are still going.

    We're not even talking about the impeachment investigation which as we know is just a few weeks old and so far has resulted in many subpoenas, but no indictments yet.

    I do agree the democratic party took too long to start the impeachment process, but so be it, it's in play now.


Advertisement