Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Machinery Photo/Discussion Thread II

Options
15354565859200

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭lab man


    Needed a frame that the mat is bolted onto asap have one coming from mchale in the morn through a dealer so he can get his bit outta it 350 inc


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,830 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18



    At first i was wondering how is that much different to a Keltec or Wilson - but then at the end you see its a double decker - wow it looks awesome


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Last bit of silage knocked today with my favourite pieces of kit in the yard


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    Last bit of silage knocked today with my favourite pieces of kit in the yard

    you have a front and back mower?

    do you top with that as well or just for silage?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Panch18 wrote: »
    you have a front and back mower?

    do you top with that as well or just for silage?

    Top with back mower, front mower is just for silage..


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,830 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    Top with back mower, front mower is just for silage..

    How many acres of silage a year are you mowing with that?.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    How many acres a year are you mowing with that?.

    400 acres this year, will be over 500 next year with extra silage ground taken


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,044 ✭✭✭davidk1394


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    Last bit of silage knocked today with my favourite pieces of kit in the yard

    Are you happy with Pottengier ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    davidk1394 wrote: »
    Are you happy with Pottengier ?

    Delighted, the front mower especially follows ground really well, alot of hilly ground here and it peels it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭timple23




    Malone have entered the self loading bale trailer market. 16 bale capacity.

    Some weight, I wonder how stable it will be on hills.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭lab man


    Well if there 960 trailed mower is anything to go by there'll be plenty tractors on there side that's for sure the mower is a disaster


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭Tonynewholland


    lab man wrote: »
    Well if there 960 trailed mower is anything to go by there'll be plenty tractors on there side that's for sure the mower is a disaster

    Does the mower go first or what happens


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭zetecescort


    timple23 wrote: »

    Some weight, I wonder how stable it will be on hills.

    like anything, comes down to the operator having the sense to fill it to suit the conditions. not every load needs to be the full 16 bales


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,368 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.



    Looks good. Be a fair price on it too id say


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,830 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    like anything, comes down to the operator having the sense to fill it to suit the conditions. not every load needs to be the full 16 bales

    I presume the 1st 8 bales will stay down until you have the second 8 loaded
    Centre of gravity shouldn't be too bad


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,375 ✭✭✭MfMan


    lab man wrote: »
    Well if there 960 trailed mower is anything to go by there'll be plenty tractors on there side that's for sure the mower is a disaster

    Why? Unstable?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭lab man


    Very badly balanced


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭X6.430macman


    Would love to see that in action.. I can only assume it would be very unstable on any bit of a slope. Saw a keltec in action for the first time this year and was amazed at how unstable it appeared to be, it didn't fill me with to much confidence


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,078 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Sat in a new John Deere tractor today.

    First thing I commented on was "Ooh leather seat"
    Was told that it's an add on extra seat cover. Colour matched the cab and looking at it for a seat cover it fitted very well. Easy clean with one wipe and it'd save the real seat. Impressed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,059 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    Sat in a new John Deere tractor today.

    First thing I commented on was "Ooh leather seat"
    Was told that it's an add on extra seat cover. Colour matched the cab and looking at it for a seat cover it fitted very well. Easy clean with one wipe and it'd save the real seat. Impressed.

    Some seat covers are very good, everyone asks me why I don't put seat covers on my jeep. they just look the same as the jeeps own upholstery


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,074 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey




    I think this one is a neater idea as it will allow you to tip straight out into a stacked position and get rid of double handling.
    I'm not fussed on the bale release mechanism - seems like something to test welds. I'm sure its made fine though. Its just that the one above has eliminated the stacking at the other side.
    I'd say it would be bigger moolah that the Malone though.
    Just spotted that a gap is needed between each batch to let the grabbers release. Neither ideal!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,044 ✭✭✭davidk1394


    I thought cross machinery are supposed to start putting it into production? I actually bought my Tanco wrapper off that man. Nice fella to deal with.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    I have to admit I don't find them self loading trailers that appealing at all. I would sooner take my money to the likes of Scully and get a high spec trailer with the hydraulic side rails. Met a galvanised one on the road one day and it looked great. Big tyres and plenty of lights on it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭emaherx


    Gillespy wrote: »
    I have to admit I don't find them self loading trailers that appealing at all. I would sooner take my money to the likes of Scully and get a high spec trailer with the hydraulic side rails. Met a galvanised one on the road one day and it looked great. Big tyres and plenty of lights on it.

    I agree, less to go wrong and carry more at a time, no stability issue and probably move more bales in less time except maybe in the shortest of runs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭9935452


    emaherx wrote: »
    I agree, less to go wrong and carry more at a time, no stability issue and probably move more bales in less time except maybe in the shortest of runs.

    They reckon that up to a mile away there isnt anything that will match a keltec for output.
    There is a lad here with a keltec , a double on the front linkage and a 50k fendt.
    He can clear a field fair quick


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭emaherx


    9935452 wrote: »
    They reckon that up to a mile away there isnt anything that will match a keltec for output.
    There is a lad here with a keltec , a double on the front linkage and a 50k fendt.
    He can clear a field fair quick

    The land here is spread over a few miles.

    Is that output just drop and turn around? Bales taken from a large trailer could be stacked directly from the trailer, which would still make it more efficient at less than a mile. Large capacity on those trailers along with no need to tie down.

    I'm sure there would be less fuel used and trailer could transport other things even square bales large or small not limited to round bales


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18


    9935452 wrote: »
    They reckon that up to a mile away there isnt anything that will match a keltec for output.
    There is a lad here with a keltec , a double on the front linkage and a 50k fendt.
    He can clear a field fair quick

    no doubt a Keltec/Wilson is fair quick

    But then you must have a guy in the yard to stack them

    So really a Keltec/wilson should be compared to 2 trailers drawing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18


    Gillespy wrote: »
    I have to admit I don't find them self loading trailers that appealing at all. I would sooner take my money to the likes of Scully and get a high spec trailer with the hydraulic side rails. Met a galvanised one on the road one day and it looked great. Big tyres and plenty of lights on it.

    I wonder what kind of money is a bale trailer with the side rails?

    It's surely got to be the way forward if the strapping down is really really enforced (which it will be soon enough)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    Draw in all bales here with two double balehandlers grand for handy amounts but if there is a good few there and in fields away from the yard the keltec/Wilson ones would be the job. One drawing and one stacking.


Advertisement