Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin - Metrolink (Swords to Charlemont only)

17778808283123

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭Kevtherev1


    From the article the following paragraph.

    A project brief and procurement strategy submission has now been delayed from the second quarter of 2023 until the end of the year, pre-tender approval for the needed contracts has been delayed until the start of 2024, and most notably the timeline for receiving approval for construction from An Bord Pleanala has now been pushed out by nine months until the end of next year.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is, however, just further evidence of the appalling state that ABP has been allowed devolve into.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Again, it's not news. The oral hearing hasn't happened yet. Christmas next year is actually optimistic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    The longer this gets dragged out for, the more the needs of the city will change, until such time that Metrolink is no longer fit for purpose (see Metro North). Fact is, the whole project is already looking that way as is.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Fact is, the whole project is already looking that way as is.

    How so?



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,666 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    My kingdom for a thread which is just dry progress updates (I know I'm adding to the chaff here but still)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Because demand projections anticipate that green line will need to be upgraded to metro and the longer it takes to deliver current Metrolink, the less Metrolink makes sense as a northside only service.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ah, that's a relatively easy fix that will almost certainly be done in the future anyway. The Green Line upgrade is an inevitability, the delay just makes removing it from the plan seem a lot sillier. Doesn't change the fundamentals Metrolink.



  • Registered Users Posts: 266 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    Hardly a surprise that the whole thing is so far up the left that we'll be fortunate to see the damn thing before 2040. Who benefits?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    That surprises me since DART+ got to oral hearing 14 months after lodging,



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    the can, the kick and the road.


    You would actually suffer from serious metal health issues in this country if you were passionate about rail infrastructure development.



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    I am going to make a prediction.

    Metro will be shelved (they had no intention of building it anyway)

    Luas Finglas extrended to the airport and treated like CrossRail by the politicians and media


    You can go on all you like on here about 'best practice' and 'too slow' but OUT THERE no ones cares what you think and they'll be bought off with the Airport Luas no problem.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I don't agree. Look at the reaction to the Green Line going beyond capacity a few years back, if they didn't already have the Luas tram extension project on the go, there would definitely have been a project to relieve the pressure on the Luas. I'd say that the NTA are saying that any Luas out to the airport will have exactly the same optics, requiring a Metro to solve the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,140 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    My dad moved here in the 60's and there was talk of the metro back then.

    The advantage of an underground is there wont be NIMBYism. You can't complain, actually, as I type this I know there will be complaints. "Its tunnelling under my house! My coffee table vaibrates!" etc.

    We can easily afford it. Just go build it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I know. I get excited about these things.

    Imagining myself coming back from the airport on a new Metro.

    I got excited by the College Green Plaza also.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I don't agree.

    If our economy remains relatively stable, it'll definitely be built.

    We need to open up new land for housing and this facilitates this perfectly.

    We just have to be patient I guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭yer man!


    My expectations for rail projects in Ireland have stooped so low and now just get excited when the local train station gets a new bin



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The "they never seriously planned to build it" conspiracy theory requires a serious suspension of any and all political logic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I'm curious about this post. What was the 60s proposal? The earliest iteration to my knowledge was the 1975 DART plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,140 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I dont know, I wasnt around then and I can't ask him. It may not have gotten as far as a proposal, just talk.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Chorttle, and invoke the 'conspiracy theory' cognitive dissonance all you want, but when you are not getting on a Metro in 2040 you might then wake up to the fact that political logic is the biggest 'conspiracy theory' of them all.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Announcing it, spending hundreds of millions and years of effort on it, taking up time, money and effort from other projects, all while deliberately planning to cancel it makes them look much worse than just not doing anything. It is an utterly stupid theory that has no sense behind it whatsoever.



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Yep. Back in the 90s was new hanging flower baskets for stations. This country is run by barely sentient morons and always will be.





  • I was born 1961, from a young age listened to my mother giving out about how Todd Andrews (Tubridy’s grandfather) closed down rail routes not long before I was born, including the Harcourt Street to Shankill line, upon sone of which the Green LUAS line has been developed since. Ireland once had an extensive slow rail network, but was being replaced with plans for more roads and bus routes.

    In the 1960s Dublin Airport was a small but, for this country, advanced operation, and a very cool place to visit. Only the most wealthy could afford to fly, and a lot of passengers were business travellers including my father. My parents were friends of chief air controller, Tom Donovan, so I got to visit the control tower from infancy, later got to train as a leisure pilot. By far the majority of people visiting the airport aren’t actually flying out of it, but visiting it out of curiosity or as a day out, a free alternative to the zoo. It had a well known restaurant, very popular for a special treat of a Sunday afternoon. There were viewing balconies on the old terminal, always a crowd waving off people with coloured scarfs.

    But there wouldn’t have been much call for regular airport users, pax & staff to use a metro back then. Flights were few, but growing of course, and if you were wealthy enough to fly you had a car or business use of one. Car parking was east, my Dad would pull up right in front of the terminal, no bother. There was a regular bus out from Busáras, but it wouldn’t be that very frequent. Swords was only really a village at that time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Like I said. 2040 and no Metro by then. I can assure you of this. The entire Irish political establishment depends on child-like notions that Irish politicans are all by default paragons of virture and 'shure don't we call them by their first names'

    2040 no metro and the Irish who claim to be non stupid will still be defending them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    2040 is 16 years away. A lot can change, but the work going on in the back ground feels far more advanced than any other previous project.

    Quite simply though, it can't not go ahead. If no construction has started by 2030 then I'll be worried, if by 2040 no running trains, then yeah its a major problem. But if by 2040 there isn't a tbm in the ground then it will never happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 788 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    The Green Party MEP representing Dublin, Ciaran Cuffe, is once again distributing flyers(I live in swords). It's notable that the some of the focus of these flyers is around transportation issues, with a surprising absence of any mention of the Metrolink project. mmmm

    Added to this omission and IMHO even more concerning is the suspicion that the public reversal of Minister Ryan's stance on his recommendation for a reconsideration of MetroLink, which appeared at the time to be driven mainly by his concern for his southside constituents(electorate). This appeared to be more of a political move than a genuine commitment to improving transportation infrastructure, casting doubt on the future of this crucial project. It's disheartening to observe that the Green Party, while in government, seems to neglect the transportation needs of the northside, leaving its residents with only congested roads filled with polluting diesel buses. Perhaps it's time to consider alternatives, as the actions and statements of the Green Party are causing doubt and frustration, Very fVcking frustrating. If a government with a green party in a position of power cant get this project out of the engineers wallets what chance does it have?

    What party of the ones likely to be in power after the next election (SD, FF, FG, Labour and the fing greens) would be most likely not to shelve it?

    This needs to happen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Im just waiting for the cancellation on cost saving grounds... Then inflation can double the cost of this newer cheaper scheme, designed to save a billion or two...



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Like I said. 2040 and no Metro by then. I can assure you of this.

    You can't, but it's entirely beside the point of your idiotic conspiracy theory. If the Metrolink is not delivered it will be incompetence, not some masterplan to never build it while wasting a decade pretending to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    their masterplan is to look like they are actually going to deliver something for years, then can it at the first opportunity. Also you cant get more incompetent than this country. They will ditch the metro, spend it on a few buses, that go nowhere in gridlock and that they dont have drivers for! "Dublin metro cancelled but alternative scheme mooted"



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    their masterplan is to look like they are actually going to deliver something for years, then can it at the first opportunity.

    WHY would that be a plan. It does nothing but make them look incompetent. Also they have had about 70 opportunities to can it, so the "first opportunity" is well in the rear view mirror. They have pushed on against frankly hysterical objections already.

    The only chance of this not being built is a change in government and even then I think it's a small chance as long as the general economic situation and cheap access to debt remains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    I agree about the change in government would reduce the chance of it being built. Its not guarantee if will be built with the same government in place. Varadkar acknowledged the issue with infrastructure spending being slashed, when recessions hit and the bad consequences of it. I believe they now want to put billions aside for an infrastructure fund, to avoid this happening in future. Its a no brainer and obviously very positive, if it does happen... Read about that in the irish times last week.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I do not think the Irish Times would ever be considered pro Metrolink - or any rail infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,529 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    If this project is being built to reduce the effects of climate change; the government along with TII & the NTA would feel like stupid fools in the eyes of the public in not building it by 2040. If Ireland does not deliver the Metrolink for Dublin when it gets to the planning permission comes around by Christmas of next year; the government would be sued, by all of the companies who are currently involved in building it, for loss of earnings.

    I still think that the loss of earnings for not building Metrolink is still unquantified at the moment given the amount of money that is being put aside for the project. Not only is there a huge amount of money being put at risk here; there is also a huge amount of jobs on the line that will lost for people who work in the construction sector and other sectors of the economy if this project ultimately gets scrapped. Not only that; there would also be the misery of paying out massive fines which would come from the EU if ABP decides to cancel Metrolink at that point in 2024.

    Let's just answer these two very basic questions for ourselves; Do we want to surround ourselves with the disasterious optics of scrapping it when we currently have a successful economy at the moment? Or will we be happy to let it slide just to allow some other inferior project become more of a priority if Metrolink gets cancelled between now and 2040?

    My answer to those two questions should be that the government and the other state transport agencies should get this project to reduce this massive amount of risk upon themselves when the project goes ahead in the near future. If other transport projects were built to complement Metrolink; that would be a very good idea. However building these projects like a luas to the airport to ultimately replace Metrolink could possibly very foolish in itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I've said it before and I'll say it again, this "it'll never happen" crap should result in an immediate thread ban. It adds nothing to the conversation and only causes arguments. If you have no interest in discussing the project or how it is progressing, you have no business posting in this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I'm scratching my head wondering where the Examiner got their 'end of 2024' date from, its just not what I'm hearing on the ground, oral hearing is expected soon. The examiner article is hysterically anti metrolink to the point of mouth frothing, a begrudging Cork tirade really. Sort of unbecoming for a broadsheet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Some people get off on being naysayers and harbingers of doom.

    I'm pretty certain it'll happen once our economy stays relatively stable.

    There might be another recession around the corner with China, UK and Germany having some trouble but it will be nothing compared to 08.

    Is there anyway to speed it up once it starts? Can you put a tunnel boring machine at either end or is the cost prohibitive?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,409 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Can’t bore from the city out as all the spoil would have to be transported through the city and all the materials would have to be brought in through the city. Also probably not a practical place to actually start as it would need a large site



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I personally think the construction timescale given is padded to hell. There will be three construction contracts, one involving a TBM. Another TBM would be more hindrance than help on such a short tunnel.

    Rolling stock construction will also be happening at the same time. As the northern civil works contracts finish up, they should be able to start systems fit out while the TBM is still boring further south. The depot will be important, if the PPP Co get that, they may be able to able to start testing rolling stock before tunnelling is finished.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Let's hope so.

    I think it'll make us look like a real modern city to any business people flying in and tourists also.

    It'll change the fabric of the city also. Ballymun will gentrify a good bit. I'd imagine modern apartments built next to Ballymun and Northwood stops would be very attractive to tech workers.

    15 minutes to town and 5 minutes to the airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Let's not get too carried away, it's just (half of) a metro line

    It's not the metro system the city desperately needs.

    So Dublin will still be a city with primitive PT dominated by buses and little or no bus priority.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    You and I will be well dead before the system gets built.

    This Dublin <-> Swords won't be completed until 2035 at the absolute earliest, and the way things are going it could be 2045 (I'll be retired by then hopefully)

    They "probably" won't start the second part of it until the first be is completed. The situation in Dublin could be vastly different by then and it might not be needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    It will be Political Corruption which is an actual conspiracy among well connected types to line the pockets of themselves and their associates and it has been literally the history of this state at least since WW2. That is not a 'theory' by any means.



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    I

    It adds reality and pragmatism based on experience and historical prescident to the conversation, and last time I checked this is not North Korea. Well not yet anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    No this is not North Korea but boards.ie has specific rules about posting constructively. Once you have said you think Metrolink won't happen, there is nothing more you can contribute.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    It’s not North Korea.







    They have a metro!! 😄



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You forgot to end your post with #fact

    Doesn't count now.

    (you are correct, it's not a theory, its an easily provable lie)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Large scale political corruption in Ireland, the type that would involve contracts over €100m, died a violent death in the early 2000s it was effectively banned by EU led rules. Political corruption still exists but you're talking about catering contracts, a few toilet role dispensers things that go under the value of tendering rules.

    To give you an idea, a few months ago the government and opposition were slinging mud at eachother over a matter of €40.50 in delivery of undisclosed election posters. That would have been laughed at in 1980 by politicians in their personal helicopters. The companies involved in metrolink will be billion or trillion euro valued global companies with reputations worth many multiples whatever contract they stand to get through coerce means. Assuming they've found some way to bypass the thousands of checks in a multi layered tender process.



  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭loco_scolo




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭gjim


    Ireland suffers very little corruption in comparison with the rest of the world. It's mostly bobbed about at around the top 5% in lists of the least corrupt countries globally. You should look around the world a little bit - a smidgen of international perspective could help temper your endless, tedious and generally unfounded negativity about the country.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement