If a man wants a woman......

Feisar · 03-03-2019 8:50pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

Honestly, were you abused as a girl?

Ah here, no need to go there.

Ted Johnson · 03-03-2019 8:54pm

Feisar wrote: »

Ah here, no need to go there.

It would explain a lot.

lainey_d_123 · 03-03-2019 8:57pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

Honestly, were you abused as a girl?

Is that another line from your PUA manual? You get more and more pathetic each time.

It really bothers you that women don't build their entire lives around what men think of them, doesn't it?

I mean, REALLY bothers you.

wyf437gn6btzue · 03-03-2019 9:00pm

lainey_d_123 wrote: »

Hilarious. I couldn't give a fook if I'm attractive or not. Unlike you, I don't have a fragile ego built upon what people think about my outward appearance and nor do I fear rejection. Maybe you could try therapy or something.

you seem not to give a fook about much yet you just went on a 3 page rant vilifying men who want to ride younger women

eviltwin · 03-03-2019 9:01pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

Honestly, were you abused as a girl?

fcuk sake that is really out of order, have a bit of respect

ginandtonicsky · 03-03-2019 9:04pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

Honestly, were you abused as a girl?

Ted Johnson wrote: »

It would explain a lot.

LOLZ! Says Mr chore sex guy. The lunatic with 75,562 boards accounts espousing the same red pill shyte about women hating their husbands and doling out "chore sex" the second a dating thread opens around here. FOR YEARS.

More issues than a magazine stand Teddy!

Ted Johnson · 03-03-2019 9:07pm

lainey_d_123 wrote: »

Is that another line from your PUA manual? You get more and more pathetic each time.

It really bothers you that women don't build their entire lives around what men think of them, doesn't it?

I mean, REALLY bothers you.

It would explain a lot about your issues with men. I'm sorry if that happened to you.

Im also sorry that my cat lady jibe upset you. I forget not everyone has a thick skin.

Feisar · 03-03-2019 9:11pm

Succubus_ wrote: »

Is there anything to be said for another mass orgy?

Username checks out!

You Ma'am win the internet. I read it as a mass orgy as in a massive one. The double entendre with Father Ted was golden.

mzungu · 03-03-2019 9:37pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

It would explain a lot about your issues with men. I'm sorry if that happened to you.

Im also sorry that my cat lady jibe upset you. I forget not everyone has a thick skin.

Tell me. What exactly is the root of your (obvious) issues with women? Reregging thousands of times to post the exact same thing year in year out screams "man with big problems" to me.

All that PUA stuff you (and others) come out with sounds like cult member talk. Pretty much every generalisation you have made in this thread is not based in reality.

You would be doing yourself a big favour by stepping away from all that sort of stuff.

Pac1Man · 03-03-2019 9:40pm

Remember the last Boards orgy we had? I was the only one not wearing Uggs. Felt so self conscious.

Ted Johnson · 03-03-2019 9:52pm

mzungu wrote: »

Tell me. What exactly is the root of your (obvious) issues with women? Reregging thousands of times to post the exact same thing year in year out screams "man with big problems" to me.

All that PUA stuff you (and others) come out with sounds like cult member talk. Pretty much every generalisation you have made in this thread is not based in reality.

You would be doing yourself a big favour by stepping away from the RedPill stuff.

My only 'issue' is that I prefer younger women. Every so often I met one who likes me back. Happy days.

Also PUA is not some dangerous voodoo science. It boils down to improving yourself, stop viewing women as mythical creatures, and going out and having fun.

It would do a lot of men good to read up on it.

eviltwin · 03-03-2019 10:02pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

My only 'issue' is that I prefer younger women. Every so often I met one who likes me back. Happy days.

Also PUA is not some dangerous voodoo science. It boils down to improving yourself, stop viewing women as mythical creatures, and going out and having fun.

It would do a lot of men good to read up on it.

Nothing wrong with that, we were all young and beautiful once and had our share of attention. Nothing lasts forever though.

I just don't understand why some men and women have to state their preferences while also dragging down those who don't meet it.

Just because someone doesn't meet the standard is no. reason to slag them off or talk about them like they have no value

mzungu · 03-03-2019 10:03pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

My only 'issue' is that I prefer younger women. Every so often I met one who likes me back. Happy days.

Also PUA is not some dangerous voodoo science. It boils down to improving yourself, stop viewing women as mythical creatures, and going out and having fun.

It would do a lot of men good to read up on it.

Personally, I think PUA is utter waffle. I should get that out there from the start. I also don't care (nor does anybody) that you prefer younger women. Your business, not mine.

You say PUA is about "improving yourself" and to "stop viewing women as mythical creatures." Then why did you feel the need to denigrate women in their 30s and 40s pretty much from your initial post in this thread? That's insecurity, not self-improvement.

Ted Johnson · 03-03-2019 10:11pm

mzungu wrote: »

Personally, I think PUA is utter waffle. I should get that out there from the start. I also don't care (nor does anybody) that you prefer younger women. Your business, not mine.

You say PUA is about "improving yourself" and to "stop viewing women as mythical creatures." Then why did you feel the need to denigrate women in their 30s and 40s pretty much from your initial post in this thread? That's insecurity, not self-improvement.

It's not waffle though. Maybe you should reading some yourself? And I don't mean a Guardian tier review of the Mystery Method.

As for the Cat Ladies, well they exist. Are bitter single older women a protected class now?

Mister Vain · 03-03-2019 10:24pm

Wibbs wrote: »

the guy wouldn't touch her with someone else's mickey. Never made sense to me.

That one never made sense to me either. Does it mean that you would have to actually touch someone else's mickey in order to touch her with it, or would you just gently nudge him from behind?

Professor Moriarty · 03-03-2019 10:25pm

mzungu wrote: »

Personally, I think PUA is utter waffle. I should get that out there from the start. I also don't care (nor does anybody) that you prefer younger women. Your business, not mine.

You say PUA is about "improving yourself" and to "stop viewing women as mythical creatures." Then why did you feel the need to denigrate women in their 30s and 40s pretty much from your initial post in this thread? That's insecurity, not self-improvement.

I think it's less PUA and more WUM.

mzungu · 03-03-2019 10:34pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

It's not waffle though. Maybe you should reading some yourself? And I don't mean a Guardian tier review of the Mystery Method.

I know enough about it to safely state that it is indeed waffle and definitely not for me. So no thank you.

Ted Johnson wrote: »

As for the Cat Ladies, well they exist. Are bitter single older women a protected class now?

You are proving my point. You seem to be completely incapable of referring to women over a certain age in a respectful manner. You reach straight for insults. Again, where is the self improvement in this?

You see, this is part of the multitude of reasons why right-thinking men don't gravitate towards PUA.

03-03-2019 10:37pm

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

I think it's less PUA and more WUM.

I suspect so. There's something very unconvincing about his posts, the level of overkill!

Ted Johnson · 03-03-2019 10:41pm

mzungu wrote: »

I know enough about it to safely state that it is indeed waffle and definitely not for me. So no thank you.

You are proving my point. You seem to be completely incapable of referring to women over a certain age in a respectful manner. You reach straight for insults. Again, where is the self improvement in this?

You see, this is part of the multitude of reasons why right-thinking men don't gravitate towards PUA.

Don't really care about your offence over the Cat Ladies. But let's talk about pua.

Seems as a man you can't win. You're expected to be born a natural. Most men aren't, some are hopless with women. I certainly was in my early 20s.

So I worked and studied and improved my game. But that now makes me the bad guy.

Oh well, at the end of the day I'm the one laughing.

Feisar · 03-03-2019 10:52pm

mzungu · 03-03-2019 10:53pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

Don't really care about your offence over the Cat Ladies. But let's talk about pua.

Seems as a man you can't win. You're expected to be born a natural. Most men aren't, some are hopless with women. I certainly was in my early 20s.

So I worked and studied and improved my game. But that now makes me the bad guy.

Oh well, at the end of the day I'm the one laughing.

I think we both know that's not true.

mzungu · 03-03-2019 10:55pm

Feisar wrote: »

A good song. It always reminds me of that scene in the Commitments where your man is in the confessional and he thinks Marvin Gaye sung it. So the priest corrects him "That was Percy Sledge!"

Funny scene. Great movie.

Gimme A Pound · 03-03-2019 10:57pm

Ted Johnson wrote: »

It's not waffle though. Maybe you should reading some yourself? And I don't mean a Guardian tier review of the Mystery Method.

As for the Cat Ladies, well they exist. Are bitter single older women a protected class now?

Do you know any? I'm sure they exist but I think tv exaggerates things too. Sometimes being single full stop on their part seems to be equated with bitter. It's enjoyment from guys who were turned down by women when they were younger (this has been admitted here) but they are not all unhappy with being single, and their detractors come off as far more resentful.

Wibbs · 03-03-2019 11:30pm

mzungu wrote: »

right-thinking

Aside: And not picking on you M. That's a pair of words that has always worried me when it precedes, well any word really. It's almost always whatever the "mature" considered notion of what any particular society has agreed upon, and must not be questioned, and every such society is utterly convinced is correct and immutable. "Right thinking". Ohhhh... nope. *Shudder*.

Ted Johnson · 03-03-2019 11:58pm

Mya Poor Greenery wrote: »

Do you know any? I'm sure they exist but I think tv exaggerates things too. Sometimes being single full stop on their part seems to be equated with bitter. It's enjoyment from guys who were turned down by women when they were younger (this has been admitted here) but they are not all unhappy with being single, and their detractors come off as far more resentful.

I've met them yes. And when I was younger and more naive I would sometimes approach older women. The contempt some older woman have for younger men would make your head spin. I don't know why when they literally could have Chad every night of the week.

Anyway who cares? Im drunk now. The gender war serves no purpose. We should all just get along.

Delusional virgin or bitter roastie, who cares. We're all human at the end of the day.

ginandtonicsky · 04-03-2019 12:03am

Ted Johnson wrote: »

they literally could have Chad every night of the week.

No-one in Ireland is called Chad. Literally no-one.

Ted Johnson · 04-03-2019 12:06am

ginandtonicsky wrote: »

No-one in Ireland is called Chad. Literally no-one.

Chad is slang for a sexually successful man. I.E. a stud, a player.

Chad is the guy who rocks up to the nightclub, skips the que because everyone loves him, and leaves with two supermodels for a threesome.

ArchXStanton · 04-03-2019 12:10am

Ted Johnson wrote: »

Chad is slang for a sexually successful man. I.E. a stud, a player.

Chad is the guy who rocks up to the nightclub, skips the que because everyone loves him, and leaves with two supermodels for a threesome.

More slang from the Dorito Lords in the US

mzungu · 04-03-2019 12:15am

Wibbs wrote: »

Aside: And not picking on you M. That's a pair of words that has always worried me when it precedes, well any word really. It's almost always whatever the "mature" considered notion of what any particular society has agreed upon, and must not be questioned, and every such society is utterly convinced is correct and immutable. "Right thinking". Ohhhh... nope. *Shudder*.

Actually, that's a fair point Wibbs. Using "right-thinking" was the wrong choice of words there. Mea culpa.

The point I was trying to convey was that (outside of impressionable youngsters) most men outside of their early twenties should be able to see PUA for the waffle that it is.

lainey_d_123 · 04-03-2019 12:16am

Ted Johnson wrote: »

I've met them yes. And when I was younger and more naive I would sometimes approach older women. The contempt some older woman have for younger men would make your head spin. I don't know why when they literally could have Chad every night of the week.

Anyway who cares? Im drunk now. The gender war serves no purpose. We should all just get along.

Delusional virgin or bitter roastie, who cares. We're all human at the end of the day.

Wait....now you're saying older women can 'have Chad any night of the week'? You just said they were all bitter old cat loving spinsters. Which is it?

If a man wants a woman......

Comments