Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Marian Finucane Thread

Options
1181921232436

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    This is bizarre.

    Good incite into the other side of family businesses.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭jeremyj1968


    Good incite into the other side of family businesses.

    Instead of writing a constitution, you would have thought that the one thing she would have learned from working with her siblings was not to take her children in to the family business as well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 201 ✭✭Kathnora


    Just goes to show that being the CEO of a successful business is not all plain sailing! Of course it has been a well known fact for yonks of years that family businesses can divide siblings and sons and daughters ....nothing new there! Marian has paid a very high price. When and if she does retire the business will carry on without her but there may still be many family fences to mend. Worth it? Definitely not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭Callan57


    That Tory guy begging the EU to provide Boris with a figleaf at the Oct summit ... sounds like undesguised panic


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Usual one sided Rte stuff again today .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭jeremyj1968


    blinding wrote: »
    Usual one sided Rte stuff again today .

    A studio of Chicken Littles as usual. Never mind the democratic vote that the UK are still waiting three years to be acted upon. The ignored fact is that the EU are trying to make it as difficult as possible for the UK to leave, never mind the fact that this is something that the citizens of the UK have voted for.

    "Well if you don't think you will have to pay 50 Billion then you are WRONG".

    And Jim Power is just an embarrassment with no credibility. I thought he would retired his crystal ball after it let him down so badly in 2008. The fact that RTE still introduce this guy as an economic expert reflects badly on the organisation itself. RTE should be responsible for the people that brings on with "expert advice".


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭jeremyj1968


    One thing I remembered from last year - Sinead O'Carroll's online rag The Journal was among all those celebrating 100 years of the women's vote. With regard to BREXIT, is seems like their love of democracy does not trump their love of their own opinions.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/100-years-centenary-women-vote-3828133-Feb2018/


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    A studio of Chicken Littles as usual. Never mind the democratic vote that the UK are still waiting three years to be acted upon. The ignored fact is that the EU are trying to make it as difficult as possible for the UK to leave, never mind the fact that this is something that the citizens of the UK have voted for.

    Chicken Littles, really? There are actual reasons why Ireland should be very concerned about a no-deal brexit. The IMF are predicting 50,000 job losses and a 4pc drop in economic output. Putting the blame entirely on the EU is willfully ignoring the sheer incompetence of May, Boris & Co.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    Chicken Littles, really? There are actual reasons why Ireland should be very concerned about a no-deal brexit. The IMF are predicting 50,000 job losses and a 4pc drop in economic output. Putting the blame entirely on the EU is willfully ignoring the sheer incompetence of May, Boris & Co.
    The Eu if it chose to could do a deal to stop this happening .

    The Eu has chosen not to up to now . Seasoned observers will understand that the Eu will play their hand up to the last minute . That is their prerogative .

    Brexit has to be brought to a conclusion . The Eu can do this as soon as 31st of October by saying clearly there will be no extension . This will bring the decisions on all sides to a head which is what is needed now .


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,504 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Former Taoiseach and EU ambassador to Washington - Chicken Little - I think not.

    BTW pure radio gold "I was there moment" from JB on the Mugabe dinner.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    blinding wrote: »
    The Eu if it chose to could do a deal to stop this happening .

    So could the UK.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    So could the UK.
    They could even do a deal which would suit both if the Eu wasn’t so nervous of Britain doing Ok outside the Eu .


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    blinding wrote: »
    They could even do a deal which would suit both if the Eu wasn’t so nervous of Britain doing Ok outside the Eu .

    This is completely ignoring Boris Johnson's entire strategy since taking office.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    This is completely ignoring Boris Johnson's entire strategy since taking office.
    Boris would bite the hand off the Eu for a sensible deal . The Eu in conjunction with re-moaners have made sure the deal is so bad that Britain would not accept it . This is of course in an effort to stop Brexit altogether .

    The Eu will only agree a sensible deal with Britain when they know Britain is definitely leaving .

    A General Election with a good Majority for Johnson is probably the only thing that will convince the Eu of that . The re-moaners are hiding from an election because they fear a hiding :eek:

    The sooner the Eu is made to understand that Britain is leaving the better . Then we will see some sense .


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    blinding wrote: »
    A General Election with a good Majority for Johnson is probably the only thing that will convince the Eu of that .

    There's no indication that that is going to happen. Most likely outcome will be another hung parliament.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    There's no indication that that is going to happen. Most likely outcome will be another hung parliament.
    Boris is 14 / 17 ( depending on which poll ) points ahead of the Labour Party today .

    If the Brexit party do not contest Tory seats and Tory marginals then Boris can certainly get a good majority . Not certain of course .

    Why do you think the re-moaners are hiding from a General election ?

    Do you think they would be hiding from a General election if they thought they would win it ? :eek:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    blinding wrote: »
    Boris is 14 / 17 ( depending on which poll ) points ahead of theparliament today .

    Yes, but it's the Labour party + liberal democrats. The most recent poll - Con 31%, Lab 28% and Lib 17%.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    Yes, but it's the Labour party + liberal democrats. The most recent poll - Con 31%, Lab 28% and Lib 17%.
    Didn’t the Brexit party have 17% in a Poll today .

    Labour and the Liberal Democrats will never form a pact . It ain’t going to happen .

    The Brexit party and Boris Johnson's Conservative are much more likely to . If they do the Conservatives could have a good majority .


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    blinding wrote: »
    Didn’t the Brexit party have 17% in a Poll today .

    The Uk doesn't have a proportional representation system. That 17% will not equate to seats. How many seats have UKIP ever won. It would in fact split the conservative vote. Labour and the Liberal Democrats would form a government if the numbers stacked up


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    The Uk doesn't have a proportional representation system. That 17% will not equate to seats. How many seats have UKIP ever won. It would in fact split the conservative vote. Labour and the Liberal Democrats would form a government if the numbers stacked up
    If the Brexit party come to an agreement with Johnson’s Conservatives not to run against the Conservatives in their marginals and to take on Labour in their marginals then the Conservatives can / could get a good majority .

    If this happens and Labour don’t make a pact with the Lib Dems ( very unlikely ) then it is virtually impossible for Labour to win .

    This is why re-moaners are hiding from an election . They are hiding from an election for this reason .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,755 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The SNP have 35 seats currently. Before the last election it was 54. There was a mini Conservative resurgence in Scotland, but they will be wiped out again this time.

    A hung parliament is the most likely result. Labour and Liberals have done deals other times in the past. They will likely have the numbers along with the SNP to block any Conservative Brexit stratgey, even if that is supported by Farage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    blinding wrote: »

    This is why re-moaners are hiding from an election . They are hiding from an election for this reason .

    That's the tory spin alright, but that's not the reason, they are preventing Boris from crashing out on October 31st without a deal and they are succeeding.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    The SNP have 35 seats currently. Before the last election it was 54. There was a mini Conservative resurgence in Scotland, but they will be wiped out again this time.

    A hung parliament is the most likely result. Labour and Liberals have done deals other times in the past. They will likely have the numbers along with the SNP to block any Conservative Brexit stratgey, even if that is supported by Farage.
    Didn’t 55% of Scots vote to stay in the UK only a few years ago . The SNP said that was a once in a generation vote for Independence .
    Was it 38% of Scots that voted for Brexit . I believe one third of SNP voters voted for Brexit .

    The SNP would not want to be taking all of their vote for granted . Sinn Fein tried that in the South recently and got electoral kickings for their troubles :eek:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    That's the tory spin alright, but that's not the reason, they are preventing Boris from crashing out on October 31st without a deal and they are succeeding.
    The electorate see Politicians that were calling ( daily ) for a General Election hiding / running from one . Its not a good look as the days go by .

    Boris is doing very well in the Polls and the re-moaner runners / hide-ers are not doing so good .

    They are running and hiding but that can not go on much longer .


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,755 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    blinding wrote: »
    Didn’t 55% of Scots vote to stay in the UK only a few years ago . The SNP said that was a once in a generation vote for Independence .
    Was it 38% of Scots that voted for Brexit . I believe one third of SNP voters voted for Brexit .

    The SNP would not want to be taking all of their vote for granted . Sinn Fein tried that in the South recently and got electoral kickings for their troubles :eek:

    The Conservatives had one seat in Scotland before Ruth came along. They have 12 now, but will be lucky to get any next time. The SNP and Labour will pick up those seats, an effective 24 seat swing in any Brexit vote in parliament. 17% in first past the post, could easily get fewer than 24, for a Farage party.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    blinding wrote: »
    The electorate see Politicians that were calling ( daily ) for a General Election hiding / running from one . Its not a good look as the days go by .

    Boris is doing very well in the Polls and the re-moaner runners / hide-ers are not doing so good .

    They are running and hiding but that can not go on much longer .

    Again, you are ignoring the reason they are doing it and I think we've monopolized this thread enough for one day. I'm sure everybody else has lost interest at this stage.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    The Conservatives had one seat in Scotland before Ruth came along. They have 12 now, but will be lucky to get any next time. The SNP and Labour will pick up those seats, an effective 24 seat swing in any Brexit vote in parliament. 17% in first past the post, could easily get fewer than 24.
    That was before the Scottish Independence Referendum . Supposedly the once in a generation Independence Referendum according to the SNP .

    55% voted against the SNP on that one . One third of SNP voters voted for Brexit . 38% of Scottish Voters voted for Brexit .

    There is no guarantee of how these seats will fall . Its a wonder the SNP are not gagging for a referendum if you are in any way right .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Ahwell wrote: »
    Again, you are ignoring the reason they are doing it and I think we've monopolized this thread enough for one day. I'm sure everybody else has lost interest at this stage.
    Shooting the messenger that does not agree with your view . I wonder how that will work out for you long term ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,755 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    blinding wrote: »
    That was before the Scottish Independence Referendum . Supposedly the once in a generation Independence Referendum according to the SNP .

    55% voted against the SNP on that one . One third of SNP voters voted for Brexit . 38% of Scottish Voters voted for Brexit .

    There is no guarantee of how these seats will fall . Its a wonder the SNP are not gagging for a referendum if you are in any way right .

    There is no guarantee how any seats will fall, but you have concluded that there will be a majority for the Johnson version of Brexit. 50 plus anti Brexit Scottish seats in Westminster makes that much less likely.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As I’m English, I’d like to make one short comment

    In the Sunday Times today on P2 -, “Varadkar said, ‘...not what you’d expect from the Mother of all parliaments’.

    I always thought that the usual sobriquet was, “the Mother of Parliaments”. Maybe Leo is confusing it with, “the Mother of all F*ck Ups”


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement