Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

22 syrian families arrive in ireland, then what?

Options
1232425262729»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    No because there are different branches of islam, thats like saying if you poll 1000 christians in Dublin then that will be the same as polling all christians around the world.

    If they did only ask one branch Islam for the poll then that would be a pretty stupid thing to do. And if it was in a western country then I actually think the number would be higher if they asked it in an Islamic country. Wouldn't you?


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,408 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    If they did only ask one branch Islam for the poll then that would be a pretty stupid thing to do. And if it was in a western country then I actually think the number would be higher if they asked it in an Islamic country. Wouldn't you?

    Not necessarily, until they do a poll like that then we will never know.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 255 ✭✭PuppyMcPupFace


    Not necessarily, until they do a poll like that then we will never know.

    Channel 4 did a poll that was terrifying to read.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Epic rhetoric.

    What about Ireland’s greying population and socialist policies?

    Whose gonna pay for it?

    You realize its a massive socioeconomic policy that necessitates population growth, indigenously (Irish are having lesser kids at later ages) or through immigration.

    Rather than scream ‘OH NO IMMIGRANTS’ why dont you critique what actually makes them necessary?

    Or better yet, have seven kids

    All that present day immigration does is make the pension bill bigger in the future.

    Nevertheless some immigration is necessary. Preferably fairly compatible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    I dont mean to offend, but you need to look more closely at this poster's history, he is known for posting absolute fraudulent accusations about anyone and all he disagrees with. He did not make a mistake, he tried to pass off a lie as truth as he mistakenly believed I had him on ignore.

    Didn't he even claim that you wrote that under a different user name?

    That's a pretty slimy thing to do thinking you had him on ignore.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    All that present day immigration does is make the pension bill bigger in the future.

    Nevertheless some immigration is necessary. Preferably fairly compatible.

    Yes, the current system relies on a rising population to sustain itself. Which means in the far future there will probably be not much indigenous irish as long as the welfare state exists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    You know where that thread is, don't you.

    You did. Lie all about it you want. Anyway you'll be doing it soon enough again I'd say.

    When you post white supremacist content, it does get read. Scuttle away now.

    You're a child, quote one single post of mine in any thread where I linked to Richard Spencer as you have foolishly claimed... but you won't, because you simply can't as I never have, not once, on any thread. Go on, post this fabled post of mine, prove you're not a spoofer.

    You've embarrassed yourself, you admitted you believed I had you on ignore which is exactly why you felt free to post such lies about me without my knowledge and without my ability to address your lies. Cowardly.

    Now run off and troll someone else, you post lies about me any further and I will show you up as the fraud you are.

    Quite astonishing logic to call the person you put on ignore a coward. You chose not read my content through your own actions. No one else.

    Just like you posted content from Robert Spencer. An extremist. Boards have deleted the thread in which you posted Spencer. The article Spencer wrote in which you shared was about 'the lefts fault those girls where murdered'... Now that coincides with your own views on every Muslim related thread.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Yes, the current system relies on a rising population to sustain itself. Which means in the far future there will probably be not much indigenous irish as long as the welfare state exists.

    That sounds like genocide.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    That sounds like genocide.

    No. Its a demographic shift. Genocide is putting people in camps and executing them. Like in 1938-45


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    No. Its a demographic shift. Genocide is putting people in camps and executing them. Like in 1938-45

    It can also be done systematically, without violence.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 255 ✭✭PuppyMcPupFace


    It can also be done systematically, without violence.

    Yeah but that doesn't allow him to shout HITLER!!!


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    It can also be done systematically, without violence.

    Demographic shifts happen all the time friend. The idea of who’s the native peoples change too.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    Yeah but that doesn't allow him to shout HITLER!!!

    If you dont want that to happen, you better change the welfare state then (;


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭SnakePlissken


    Quite astonishing logic to call the person you put on ignore a coward.

    The only reason you had the confidence to post such a baseless lie about me was because you believed I wouldn't see it, that's the definition of a coward.
    Just like you posted content from Robert Spencer.
    Again, this is a lie? You know it's a lie, you are fooling no one, I told you to back up your claim, you scuttled off only to now reappear from beneath your bridge to post this laughable excuse;
    Boards have deleted the thread in which you posted Spencer.
    Jog on before you have yet another thread shut down with your fraudulent accusations.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    If you dont want that to happen, you better change the welfare state then (;

    That will change all right and I hope you live long enough to see it. If you are indeed Irish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Yes, the current system relies on a rising population to sustain itself.

    Which means in the far future there will probably be not much indigenous irish as long as the welfare state exists.

    The current system.

    But going forward only the most highly skilled and eductated i.e. Europeans, will be of any use as automation takes hold, and all the low-skilled jobs dissapear.

    Sure as a token of goodwill you can take in some poor desperate folks from dangerous and wartorn countries. But you will also have to alow to invest heavily for them to have skills, training and education comparable to modern Europeans.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    That will change all right and I hope you live long enough to see it. If you are indeed Irish.

    Unlikely to change soon tbh


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    The current system.

    But going forward only the most highly skilled and eductated i.e. Europeans, will be of any use as automation takes hold, and all the low-skilled jobs dissapear.

    Sure as a token of goodwill you can take in some poor desperate folks from dangerous and wartorn countries. But you will also have to alow to invest heavily for them to have skills, training and education comparable to modern Europeans.


    Market niches will always exist (;


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Market niches will always exist (;

    Not so much for the uneducated and un-skilled. Unless of course you are perhaps referring to the black market?

    Btw, - The many camped at Calais aren't keen on staying in France as you have to carry ID on your person at all times.
    In the uk you don't and can easily dissapear into the black market as an illegal migrant.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Quite astonishing logic to call the person you put on ignore a coward.

    The only reason you had the confidence to post such a baseless lie about me was because you believed I wouldn't see it, that's the definition of a coward.
    Just like you posted content from Robert Spencer.
    Again, this is a lie? You know it's a lie, you are fooling no one, I told you to back up your claim, you scuttled off only to now reappear from beneath your bridge to post this laughable excuse;
    Boards have deleted the thread in which you posted Spencer.
    Jog on before you have yet another thread shut down with your fraudulent accusations.


    You have to look up the word fraudulent again. I've never got a thread shutdown on boards. I have no reason to lie about you post on boards.

    Just own it man.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 120 ✭✭Robocop Corcoran


    That sounds like genocide.


    The UN once called it replacement migration.

    https://www.un.org/press/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html

    They dont refer to it as that anymore. I wonder why.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    Not so much for the uneducated and un-skilled. Unless of course you are perhaps referring to the black market?

    Btw, - The many camped at Calais aren't keen on staying in France as you have to carry ID on your person at all times.
    In the uk you don't and can easily dissapear into the black market as an illegal migrant.

    In the industrial revolution, the spinning jenny made a lot of people redundant and poor. People thought it degraded society. Indeed, all machines were thought of this way by a lot of people. Then 1-2 generations later, people adapted and moved on (;


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    The UN once called it replacement migration.

    https://www.un.org/press/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html

    They dont refer to it as that anymore. I wonder why.

    Ah yes. The Kalergi plot by Soros and the dark lord Moloch


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Captain Obvious


    When automation begins replacing staff at a more prolific rate it will be up to governments to make sure corporate tax rates reflect the new situation and account for the reduced expenditure experienced by corporations. The additional tax take should then be used for social welfare and training former and prospective workers. At least, that's what a competent government would do. It won't be the first such situation to arise of course. The conversion from fossil fuel to renewable energy creation is undergoing a similar change.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,835 ✭✭✭enricoh


    All that present day immigration does is make the pension bill bigger in the future.

    Nevertheless some immigration is necessary. Preferably fairly compatible.

    Government spending up 9% year on year in 2018, at least when the tiger calved we had spent a few quid on decent roads.
    When the next recession kicks in we'll have spent billions housing and shelling out dole to the worlds bums!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭SnakePlissken


    I have no reason to lie about you post on boards.

    And yet you have, you've history of posting lies, that and childish snipes are all you're capable of.

    Own it.

    Now, I won't be engaging with you any further as to do so runs the risk of you having this thread shutdown as you had another recent thread in After Hours, but I won't be naive enough to put you on ignore. You post another lie about me I will correct you on it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 120 ✭✭Robocop Corcoran


    Can you tell me why? Why is it OK to assume a person is a danger, or even just undesirable, because they come from a country that is predominately Muslim? Why is it OK to assume their religious and political beliefs are congruent with terrorists but it's not OK to associate a person who expressly states the same beliefs as a terrorist with terrorism?

    Can you just elaborate on what you are talking about here, who are you saying has the same beliefs as a terrorist and what are those beliefs?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 199 ✭✭Il Fascista


    There's no need to correct me. You posted white supremacist material.

    You have also made a allegation of libel. That's beyond pathetic.

    Maybe I'm missing something but your following post on this matter mentions Robert Spencer, who's Jewish. Are you say he's a White supremacist?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,502 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    Mod: Thread is not, and never was fit for After Hours. Considering the last few pages has been little more than a handful of posters sniping at each other, I think it has run it's course and will not be moved.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement