Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Tommy Robinson jailed

Options
1…118119121123124…143

Comments

  • Options
    #3602
    El_Duderino 09
    Registered Users Posts: 20,033 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    GinAndBitter wrote: »
    El_Duderino 09 wrote: »
    I wonder if TR will make a big noise about him.

    Joke. Obviously he doesn't care if the pedo isn't brown.

    This pedo got 11 years for his crimes. Not long enough but longer than what some get for similar crimes.
    OK. Like I said. TR won't care because the pedo isn't brown. Surely we can agree on that.


  • Options
    #3603
    GinAndBitter
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 746 ✭✭✭GinAndBitter


    El_Duderino 09 wrote: »
    OK. Like I said. TR won't care because the pedo isn't brown. Surely we can agree on that.

    You guys seem fascinated with skin colour.


  • Options
    #3604
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    El_Duderino 09 wrote:
    OK. Like I said. TR won't care because the pedo isn't brown. Surely we can agree on that.

    I respectfully disagree.


  • Options
    #3605
    El_Duderino 09
    Registered Users Posts: 20,033 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Deleted User wrote: »
    El_Duderino 09 wrote:
    OK. Like I said. TR won't care because the pedo isn't brown. Surely we can agree on that.

    I respectfully disagree.
    Why?

    Remind me, does he regularly highlight white pedos or just brown pedos?


  • Options
    #3606
    El_Duderino 09
    Registered Users Posts: 20,033 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    GinAndBitter wrote: »
    El_Duderino 09 wrote: »
    OK. Like I said. TR won't care because the pedo isn't brown. Surely we can agree on that.

    You guys seem fascinated with skin colour.
    Touche. You're playing the game but that was a good one.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3607
    El_Duderino 09
    Registered Users Posts: 20,033 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Don't his supporters care about what they're actually seeing. TR using his Thurs national news story this week, with news media publishing the video he made of the incident, and still think he's being shut down by d'meeja.

    Hammering on a bloke's door at 5am to intimidate him to drop a legal case against him and still his supporters will claim he's unfairly treated. I suppose it's got nothing to do with the reality for his people


  • Options
    #3608
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    El_Duderino 09 wrote:
    Remind me, does he regularly highlight white pedos or just brown pedos?

    He highlighted a worrying fact that police were afraid to act upon paedophelia in the "Asian" community for fears of racism.

    This is akin to you stating that people who highlight clerical abuse of children are ignoring incestuous abuse within families.

    Tommy Robinson has an agenda. That agenda is that there is a disproportionate amount of Muslim child abuse in England. The fact that he doesn't cover every incident is whataboutary.

    White, brown, yellow, green, purple, orange or white abuse is horrific. But it seems to Tommy Robinson in his own personal experience, that Muslim rape gangs are given a certain leeway that whites aren't.

    Yes, it's anecdotal. Yes, a large amount of his supporters are unsavoury. But it doesn't lessen the fact that it happens.

    I, again, don't always agree with Tommy Robinson's methods, but he isn't the bogeyman that he is made out to be.


  • Options
    #3609
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Deleted User wrote:
    White, brown, yellow, green, purple, orange or white abuse is horrific. But it seems to Tommy Robinson in his own personal experience, that Muslim rape gangs are given a certain leeway that whites aren't.

    That particular paragraph could have been framed more succinctly. Im in the pissings of rain at the moment but I hope you all understood what I meant


  • Options
    #3610
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,265 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Deleted User wrote: »
    He highlighted a worrying fact that police were afraid to act upon paedophelia in the "Asian" community for fears of racism.

    This is akin to you stating that people who highlight clerical abuse of children are ignoring incestuous abuse within families.

    Tommy Robinson has an agenda. That agenda is that there is a disproportionate amount of Muslim child abuse in England. The fact that he doesn't cover every incident is whataboutary.

    White, brown, yellow, green, purple, orange or white abuse is horrific. But it seems to Tommy Robinson in his own personal experience, that Muslim rape gangs are given a certain leeway that whites aren't.

    Yes, it's anecdotal. Yes, a large amount of his supporters are unsavoury. But it doesn't lessen the fact that it happens.

    I, again, don't always agree with Tommy Robinson's methods, but he isn't the bogeyman that he is made out to be.

    only long after others did the same


  • Options
    #3611
    El_Duderino 09
    Registered Users Posts: 20,033 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    He highlighted a worrying fact that police were afraid to act upon paedophelia in the "Asian" community for fears of racism.

    This is akin to you stating that people who highlight clerical abuse of children are ignoring incestuous abuse within families.

    Tommy Robinson has an agenda. That agenda is that there is a disproportionate amount of Muslim child abuse in England. The fact that he doesn't cover every incident is whataboutary.

    White, brown, yellow, green, purple, orange or white abuse is horrific. But it seems to Tommy Robinson in his own personal experience, that Muslim rape gangs are given a certain leeway that whites aren't.

    Yes, it's anecdotal. Yes, a large amount of his supporters are unsavoury. But it doesn't lessen the fact that it happens.

    I, again, don't always agree with Tommy Robinson's methods, but he isn't the bogeyman that he is made out to be.


    Ok so the question I asked is whether TR highlights white pedos. So is that a yes or a no to the question?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3612
    98q76e12hrflnk
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭98q76e12hrflnk


    El_Duderino 09 wrote: »
    Ok so the question I asked is whether TR highlights white pedos. So is that a yes or a no to the question?

    Where does he highlight the coloured?


  • Options
    #3613
    El_Duderino 09
    Registered Users Posts: 20,033 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    declan2693 wrote: »
    Where does he highlight the coloured?

    I didn't say he did. I'm asking if he regularly highlights pedos who are white. Does he?

    I get that the point is to be evasive to maintain the idea that he's just against pedos. But surely you don't think it's just coincidence that he only gets excited about pedos who happen to be brown. Do you?


  • Options
    #3614
    98q76e12hrflnk
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭98q76e12hrflnk


    El_Duderino 09 wrote: »
    I didn't say he did. I'm asking if he regularly highlights pedos who are white. Does he?

    I get that the point is to be evasive to maintain the idea that he's just against pedos. But surely you don't think it's just coincidence that he only gets excited about pedos who happen to be brown. Do you?

    He doesnt hightlight paedos based on skin colour.
    Why do you constantly bring race into it?


  • Options
    #3615
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    El_Duderino 09 wrote:
    Ok so the question I asked is whether TR highlights white pedos. So is that a yes or a no to the question?

    I'll happily answer no. But why do you ask that? Are you calling him a racist because he highlights that non white people are given preferential treatment?


  • Options
    #3616
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Violet Plain Pennon wrote:
    He doesnt hightlight paedos based on skin colour. Why do you constantly bring race into it?


    Paedos are paedos. If they aren't brought to justice by their ethnicity or their religion, then surely there is a problem. Yes?


  • Options
    #3617
    98q76e12hrflnk
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭98q76e12hrflnk


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Paedos are paedos. If they aren't brought to justice by their ethnicity or their religion, then surely there is a problem. Yes?

    Of course. TR highlighted how a large group of paedos from a certain religion were being protected by the police and government and allowed to continue raping children for years for fear of being called a racist.


  • Options
    #3618
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    declan2693 wrote: »
    Where does he highlight the coloured?


    That thing he got held in contempt for. You should know this.


  • Options
    #3619
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    GinAndBitter wrote: »
    You guys seem fascinated with skin colour.


    Ah, the old "you're the real racists" trope. It's not new and it's not clever but you do you.


  • Options
    #3620
    VeryTerry
    Closed Accounts Posts: 342 ✭✭VeryTerry


    Got my first yellow card because of my post in this thread for a comment made at GinAndBitter. I'm assuming she'll make an argument for me to have it rescinded on the grounds of free speech.


  • Options
    #3621
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    declan2693 wrote: »
    He doesnt hightlight paedos based on skin colour.
    Why do you constantly bring race into it?


    Oh, you're doing it too. It's been a popular trope on the_donald, gab and other such places where freeze peach people congregate. It's an oldie but sometimes works.


    It's basically "You're the real racist because you noticed that he only goes after brown people. You're the real racist for noticing that. Not the guy who goes after the brown people."


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3622
    El_Duderino 09
    Registered Users Posts: 20,033 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    I'll happily answer no. But why do you ask that? Are you calling him a racist because he highlights that non white people are given preferential treatment?

    Why do I ask? Because I want to know how far you're willing to toe the party line to pretend he's just honestly highlighting pedos because he cares about the children.

    I I haven't said he's racist. I think it's immaterial if he is racist. He's selling the narrative that the poor white man is being discriminated against because his supporters want to hear it.

    His not being racist is as irrelevant as caring about children. It's selling a message to his people and it's extremely successful. Look at the things he does and his supporters are willing to overlook the naughty behaviour because of his community work honestly exposing pedos.

    He's selling a message that people want to hear. The story has even grown to the point that he's the one who broke the story like he's an investigative journalist or something. It's fantasy stuff.


  • Options
    #3623
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    El_Duderino 09 wrote:
    I I haven't said he's racist. I think it's immaterial if he is racist. He's selling the narrative that the poor white man is being discriminated against because his supporters want to hear it.

    I disagree. He is highlighting that people are getting away with paedophelia for fear of being classed as racist.


  • Options
    #3624
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Deleted User wrote: »
    I disagree. He is highlighting that people are getting away with paedophelia for fear of being classed as racist.


    You mean the people who were arrested and sentenced to prison? Yeah, nice work there Tommy.


  • Options
    #3625
    GinAndBitter
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 746 ✭✭✭GinAndBitter


    VeryTerry wrote: »
    Got my first yellow card because of my post in this thread for a comment made at GinAndBitter. I'm assuming she'll make an argument for me to have it rescinded on the grounds of free speech.

    Beg me.


  • Options
    #3626
    VeryTerry
    Closed Accounts Posts: 342 ✭✭VeryTerry


    GinAndBitter wrote: »
    Beg me.

    Rat.

    Report me again.


  • Options
    #3627
    GinAndBitter
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 746 ✭✭✭GinAndBitter


    VeryTerry wrote: »
    Rat.

    Nice, don't be crying about your yellow card, it's ok, remember this is just an online forum. You'll be ok.


  • Options
    #3628
    TomSweeney
    Registered Users Posts: 3,195 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    It's gas really, people on here defending Stuchberry, while he is a big AntiFa supporter - you know the crowd that go around beating up and attacking people with differing political opinions then them.

    And they go on about TR's thuggery ?

    Each side is as bad as the other.


  • Options
    #3629
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    VeryTerry wrote: »
    Got my first yellow card because of my post in this thread for a comment made at GinAndBitter. I'm assuming she'll make an argument for me to have it rescinded on the grounds of free speech.


    As the great PigHead once said on this very forum, you can't call someone a spanner. But you can describe their post as spannery.


    There are many ways to avoid being spanked by the mods while still saying what you want to say.


  • Options
    #3630
    GinAndBitter
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 746 ✭✭✭GinAndBitter


    mcmoustache wrote: »
    As the great PigHead once said on this very forum, you can't call someone a spanner. But you can describe their post as spannery.


    There are many ways to avoid being spanked by the mods while still saying what you want to say.

    Solid advice.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3631
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    declan2693 wrote: »
    He doesnt hightlight paedos based on skin colour.
    Why do you constantly bring race into it?

    It might have something to do with Tommy and a pedophile finding a neo Nazi group... that turned out to be full of pedophiles... which tommy nor his followers seemingly give half a sh*t about.

    For them -and for Tommy most of all- the children being molested and raped are not victims, not really even human (which comes naturally to those on the far right) just weapons to attack minorities which and nothing more. Those being molested and raped by Tommy's old mates (including those he originally defended as 'stitched up') can just be happily ignored.

    That includes anyone and everyone in this thread claiming to be a supporter of his despite how often all the EDL pedophile links and Tommy's utter silence on them are brought up.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement