Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Does opposing a United Ireland automatically make you unpatriotic?

Options
145791016

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 67,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    No, its just tiring and boring having to argue the same nonsense year in year out.

    Well you know what to do about that? Don't make statements you cannot defend.

    Terrorist is a redundant word here. Because if you use terror, and all soldiers/armies/paramilitaries do, then you are by definition a 'terrorist'. Some happen to be in the employ of governments.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    The last time I checked a history book. The whole of Ireland was Ireland. We do not have a united Ireland at the minute.


  • Registered Users Posts: 67,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    You are entitled to that view, once you re-write the constitution. Until you manage that you can be accused of being unpatriotic.
    It is the firm will of the Irish Nation, in harmony and friendship, to unite all the people who share the territory of the island of Ireland, in all the diversity of their identities and traditions, recognising that a united Ireland shall be brought about only by peaceful means with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well you know what to do about that? Don't make statements you cannot defend.

    Terrorist is a redundant word here. Because if you use terror, and all soldiers/armies/paramilitaries do, then you are by definition a 'terrorist'. Some happen to be in the employ of governments.

    What statement is this then? I stated correctly that the nationalist population in the north lobbied for the British Army to be deployed onto the streets. Something you accept.

    You want to go off an the usual tangent about labelling the BA terrorists as a way to detract away from the topic itself, UI and patriotism.

    So maybe stick with the topic an save your anti British rants to the Poppy thread.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    What drugs are you on? Something with poppy seed anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 67,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    What statement is this then? I stated correctly that the nationalist population in the north lobbied for the British Army to be deployed onto the streets. Something you accept.

    You want to go off an the usual tangent about labelling the BA terrorists as a way to detract away from the topic itself, UI and patriotism.

    So maybe stick with the topic an save your anti British rants to the Poppy thread.

    You made the statement implying that because they were welcomed by besieged people, abandoned to their fate by Dublin and local 'security forces' that nationalists therefore didn't view them as 'terrorists'.


    And I didn't start the conversation about 'terrorists'. Maybe take it up with those that did.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    What facts, you are saying we have a united Ireland at the minute and that the country was formed a united Ireland. And then you say you are speaking facts.

    The whole Ireland is Ireland and always was and always should be.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 67,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    'Patriotic' would mean respecting the constitution of your country...no?

    Which 'Irish' are you talking about and please post the data that shows your case?

    Which political parties will oppose a UI in the south do you think?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You made the statement implying that because they were welcomed by besieged people, abandoned to their fate by Dublin and local 'security forces' that nationalists therefore didn't view them as 'terrorists'.


    And I didn't start the conversation about 'terrorists'. Maybe take it up with those that did.

    That is odd, the nationalist population wanted the BA deployed on the street but also view them as terrorists. Your a hoot.

    Maybe lets revert back to the topic on hand.

    Not wanting a UI can indeed be viewed as being patriotic, as the constitution mentions the free will of the people in this matter. i.e. it is up to each person to form their only view on the matter.

    Patriotism doesn't come into it but is pushed by flag waving numpties.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    markodaly wrote: »
    That is odd, the nationalist population wanted the BA deployed on the street but also view them as terrorists. Your a hoot.
    .

    Tbf they did machine gun nationlists for looking for civil rights??



    Nonetheless all this has zero to do with a united Ireland referendum


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    'Patriotic' would mean respecting the constitution of your country...no?

    What a stupid thing to say.

    Was 95% of the people unpatriotic when they voted on the Good Friday agreement to give up the territorial claim on the North? Do you view a constitution as set in stone that cannot and should not be changed?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    markodaly wrote: »
    What a stupid thing to say.

    Was 95% of the people unpatriotic when they voted on the Good Friday agreement to give up the territorial claim on the North? Do you view a constitution as set in stone that cannot and should not be changed?

    Those 95% voted that Ireland aspires to a united Ireland too?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    'Patriotic' would mean respecting the constitution of your country...no?

    Once again:
    My point is taking the constitution as a barometer for "patriotism" is a pretty silly thing, it means different things to different people. You can have pride in your country without having to refer to a document.

    To take another example, would you call an American that doesn't support their insane gun policy (as catered for by the 2nd amendment) to be unpatriotic?


  • Registered Users Posts: 67,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    That is odd, the nationalist population wanted the BA deployed on the street but also view them as terrorists. Your a hoot.

    Maybe lets revert back to the topic on hand.

    Not wanting a UI can indeed be viewed as being patriotic, as the constitution mentions the free will of the people in this matter. i.e. it is up to each person to form their only view on the matter.

    Patriotism doesn't come into it but is pushed by flag waving numpties.

    Maybe when they shot dead 14 unarmed people they began to change their minds??? I am just guessing there. :rolleyes:

    I will post the clause again for you:
    It is the firm will of the Irish Nation, in harmony and friendship, to unite all the people who share the territory of the island of Ireland, in all the diversity of their identities and traditions, recognising that a united Ireland shall be brought about only by peaceful means with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island.

    It is anti the constitution not to share in the 'will'.

    You can of course decide by free will, that now is not the time, but to be against a UI at any time, is clearly to be against the constitution which is unpatriotic all day long.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Those 95% voted that Ireland aspires to a united Ireland too?

    It seems Frankie views that changing a constitution is fundamentally unpatriotic. So wanting more liberal laws like divorce, gay marriage is being unpatriotic as they had to come about from changing the constitution.

    Repealing the 8th is also unpatriotic therefore.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    I said it already in this thread a few posts back but I really do believe you need counseling for those drugs you are taking.

    Ireland is 32 counties always was and should always be. Do you follow GAA? The all Ireland championship is with all 32 counties on this island of Ireland.

    Get some counseling for those drugs anyway because you really need it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I said it already in this thread a few posts back but I really do believe you need counseling for those drugs you are taking.

    Ireland is 32 counties always was and should always be. Do you follow GAA? The all Ireland championship is with all 32 counties on this island of Ireland.

    Get some counseling for those drugs anyway because you really need it.

    Nope, when was Ireland united under an Irish ruler or kingdom. The answer is never.

    I said this a while back but I will say it again. Ireland was NEVER united under Irish rule.


  • Registered Users Posts: 67,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    It seems Frankie views that changing a constitution is fundamentally unpatriotic. So wanting more liberal laws like divorce, gay marriage is being unpatriotic as they had to come about from changing the constitution.

    Repealing the 8th is also unpatriotic therefore.

    No, changing the constitution is the correct thing to do if you oppose a clause in it.

    Where are all these people who oppose 'the will to unite the Island of Ireland'.

    Is there a campaign to change the constitution I am unaware of? Is Leo suddenly challenging this silent majority of opposition, that you all have alluded to?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    markodaly wrote: »
    Nope, when was Ireland united under an Irish ruler or kingdom. The answer is never.

    I said this a while back but I will say it again. Ireland was NEVER united under Irish rule.

    Well I'm no expert on history but I remember one high king of Ireland called Brian Boru.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    markodaly wrote: »
    Nope, when was Ireland united under an Irish ruler or kingdom. The answer is never.

    I said this a while back but I will say it again. Ireland was NEVER united under Irish rule.

    Ireland was united in 1922....Until the north formally broke away :D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    No, changing the constitution is the correct thing to do if you oppose a clause in it.

    Where are all these people who oppose 'the will to unite the Island of Ireland'.

    Is there a campaign to change the constitution I am unaware of? Is Leo suddenly challenging this silent majority of opposition, that you all have alluded to?

    Changing your tune, not surprising.

    The constitution mentions that it is up to the people, i.e. the people, us, have to give their consent to a UI. They key word, consent.

    Patriotism has nothing to do with it. Its a nonsense stupid argument. Its a Trump argument.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Ireland was united in 1922....Until the north formally broke away :D:D

    Under Irish rule? Read my post ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 67,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    Changing your tune, not surprising.

    The constitution mentions that it is up to the people, i.e. the people, us, have to give their consent to a UI. They key word, consent.

    Patriotism has nothing to do with it. Its a nonsense stupid argument. Its a Trump argument.

    What are you if you 'oppose' the constitution of your country?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well I'm no expert on history but I remember one high king of Ireland called Brian Boru.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_King_of_Ireland
    The concept of national kingship is first articulated in the 7th century, but only became a political reality in the Viking Age, and even then not a consistent one.[2][3][4] While the High Kings' degree of control varied, Ireland was never ruled by them as a politically unified state, as the High King was conceived of as an overlord exercising suzerainty over, and receiving tribute from, the independent kingdoms beneath him


Advertisement