Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Waterford GAA Discussion Thread - **MOD NOTE POST #1**

  • 28-03-2017 1:19pm
    #1
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Continued from here.

    Welcome to the Waterford GAA discussion thread.

    This is consistently the most active thread don the GAA forum. As a result, discussion can get quite heated. But there are certain things posters must realise are simply not OK to post:

    - Personal abuse of anyone be they other posters, players, managers, referees, pundits etc. Any personal abuse will result in an infraction or a ban.

    - Rumours about players'/managers'/anyone's personal lives. This should be self explanatory. Apart from being a dickish thing to do, it can lead to legal trouble for Boards.

    - Trolling. Again, self explanatory. Trolls will be banned for a long time.

    - Accusations of trolling. Report a post if you suspect it to be trolling. Do not call a troll out on thread as this will be considered back seat modding.

    - Speculation into the identity of another poster. This is a site-bannable offence.

    This list is not exhaustive. Either myself or another mod may add to this as we see fit. Just because a certain behaviour isn't listed, doesn't mean you can't be banned for it.
    The general Boards.ie rule of Don't be a Dick always applies.

    If you feel a post breaks the rules, simply click this report.gif underneath the post in question to report the post and a mod will deal with it as they see fit.

    So be civil to each other and happy posting.

    ***EDIT (20/11/2015): Quite frankly I'm getting a bit sick of the thread regularly descending into tit for tat insults between posters. From now on, it won't be a card but a ban straight away for anything like this. The mod warning is clear in the first post but yet people still ignore it.
    Also, I'd like to remind people of the ban on discussing players'/managers'/officials' private lives without any substance. You can be getting into libelous territory there. So a zero tolerance policy will be enforced as well.


«134567127

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭blueflame


    Very sorry and disappointed to hear about Coughlan, I for one, despite being a regular critic of our tactics, feel that Coughlan does a very effective job, and if indeed had been allowed to make more mistakes, would be a better full back at this stage. He has pace and he has height, two things can often be the Achilles heel of full backs. has a decent hand and is a no nonsense marker. - yes he plays the man a lot and yes he fouls a lot, but he has become more clever about it in recent time and despite he being constantly blamed in some quarters for conceding goals, in my view he leaks very little.

    I think his loss to the team is huge because it means trying someone else there that it totally untried and possibly means moving someone else effectively "robbing Peter to pay Paul". I agree with some of the posters that Shane fives is far too attack minded as a full back - he did play full back at U21 and for the Seniors but his style has changed completely in the last couple of years. If, and this is a big if, Darragh Fives were fit I would love to see DeBruca move to full back, and Fives take up center back both in conventional roles. I would like to have seen Shane Roche given a proper shot at full back, because I think he has the physical build and attitude for full back - saw him play on Conal Keaney in a challenge against Dublin for a half of game one night in Nolan Park and he did not give Keaney a sniff off the ball - but surprisingly never saw him get a chance there after and now he is gone off the panel. I think that this is one of the major failings of management over the last couple of years, not that i felt that Coughlan needed to be replaced but that we never seriously looked to have a standby full back. The second most often player played there was Shane McNulty and i again state while I have great time for Shane as a hurler he is a wing or half back, I feel he is not suited to full back but would be happy to have him prove me wrong. Conor Gleeson I fear does not have the physique for full back either, a big man like Callinan, Joe Canning or TJ Reid would prove way too much for him to handle.

    Best wishes to Barry and hope for a speedy recovery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,481 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    https://www.joe.ie/news/waterford-council-votes-ban-opposing-gaa-jerseys-citys-streets-583209

    This is not a joke ****ing idiotic

    Edit it's an April Fools joke 'bill to be signed Saturday April 1st lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭cascade12


    I could be wrong but did Shane Roche not come on for Barry Coughlan right at the end on Sunday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭3ships


    cascade12 wrote: »
    I could be wrong but did Shane Roche not come on for Barry Coughlan right at the end on Sunday.

    Stephen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭enoughtaken


    cascade12 wrote: »
    I could be wrong but did Shane Roche not come on for Barry Coughlan right at the end on Sunday.
    Yep, here it is in black and white
    [font=Georgia, serif]Subs: T Devine for Curran (42), M Kearney for A Gleeson (56),  T Ryan for O’Halloran (58), G O’Brien for Shane Bennett (68), S Roche for Coughlan (75).[/font]


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭Deise189


    Yep, here it is in black and white
    [font=Georgia, serif]Subs: T Devine for Curran (42), M Kearney for A Gleeson (56),  T Ryan for O’Halloran (58), G O’Brien for Shane Bennett (68), S Roche for Coughlan (75).[/font]

    Stephen midget Roche not shane Roche. Shane roche dropped himself off the panel due to a lack of game time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭ovalu


    Deise189 wrote: »
    Stephen midget Roche not shane Roche. Shane roche dropped himself off the panel due to a lack of game time.

    That's a pity if true as he's a better player than McNulty or Daniels, but I suppose it's hard to blame him if he got no opportunity after a couple of years and Mcgrath then
    parachuted his two De La Salle clubmen in ahead of him, one of whom may now start come championship


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭culbaire


    Hope Barry Couglan recovers quickly. However he is not an inter county standard full back. He was given the run around by a half fit Seamus Callanan, by Fennelly, Ryan and Shanagher. He persistently fouls. What is worse is, that referees are now wise to that. They are the facts whether Derek McGrath likes it or not. Managers in other counties have spotted the weaknesses in the Waterford set up. McGrath has a closed mind in relation to several players within the county. Common knowlege!! Incidentally I have no connection with any of them. Amazing how those who rush to defend McGrath are very quick to slate Tadhg De Burca who has to act as a de facto second full back to cover a weakness in the full backline. Of course Tadhg is not from De la Salle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,481 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Galway will prob put Joe Canning in on the new full back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭hurler on de ditch


    culbaire wrote: »
    Hope Barry Couglan recovers quickly. However he is not an inter county standard full back. He was given the run around by a half fit Seamus Callanan, by Fennelly, Ryan and Shanagher. He persistently fouls. What is worse is, that referees are now wise to that. They are the facts whether Derek McGrath likes it or not. Managers in other counties have spotted the weaknesses in the Waterford set up. McGrath has a closed mind in relation to several players within the county. Common knowlege!! Incidentally I have no connection with any of them. Amazing how those who rush to defend McGrath are very quick to slate Tadhg De Burca who has to act as a de facto second full back to cover a weakness in the full backline. Of course Tadhg is not from De la Salle.
    Jesus wept


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭enoughtaken


    Deise189 wrote: »
    Stephen midget Roche not shane Roche. Shane roche dropped himself off the panel due to a lack of game time.

    Apologies for my mistake. Not so black and white after all !!! Up the DEISE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭enoughtaken


    culbaire wrote: »
    Hope Barry Couglan recovers quickly. However he is not an inter county standard full back. He was given the run around by a half fit Seamus Callanan, by Fennelly, Ryan and Shanagher. He persistently fouls. What is worse is, that referees are now wise to that. They are the facts whether Derek McGrath likes it or not. Managers in other counties have spotted the weaknesses in the Waterford set up. McGrath has a closed mind in relation to several players within the county. Common knowlege!! Incidentally I have no connection with any of them. Amazing how those who rush to defend McGrath are very quick to slate Tadhg De Burca who has to act as a de facto second full back to cover a weakness in the full backline. Of course Tadhg is not from De la Salle.

    You have been asked numerous times to name the 4 players you claim should be on the team. Can you please tell us. In my opinion your attacks on Barry and Derek and any one from De la Salle is unwarranted. We have contested last 2 league finals (winnning 1 and should be 2 ) Munster final ( ok not great ) and should have been in All Ireland last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 969 ✭✭✭cul beag


    Is Coughlan definitely out? Heard there was a second opinion sought so we might be saved yet!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭Deise Gael


    tbf if you are talking about lads at the moment who could add something to the thing more so than lads who are just making up the numbers and who are not up to it - we don't need to name them because they are all honest to God lads who are bursting a gut but we all know who they are and we all know they will never get near to wearing a league not to mind a championship shirt - here are a few just off the top of my head...

    Peter Hogan, Ray Barry, Shane Walsh (BG) Shane Roche, Ryan Donnelly, Gavin Crotty, Paudie Prendergast, Jamie Nagle, Richie Foley - what did they do wrong?

    Foley, Nagle, Barry and Prendergast have all excelled in the championship for Waterford. and are all still flying with their clubs. Shane Roche never got a look in while he was on the panel. Peter Hogan, Shane Walsh, Gavin Crotty and Ryan Donnelly are the mainstays of their club teams and are well tested at inter county level. All of the above are still real championship options.

    It would be nice to have a few of those options now if Darragh Fives and Barry Coughlan don't make it or if we need a bit of pace in our one man forward line.

    Can you really say the same for the eight or nine more lads who are making up the numbers on the panel at the moment?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭cascade12


    Really enjoyed the weekend in Ennis, good town for the craic. Good game as well and the perfect result without us firing on all cylinders. We look like a team that is going through a fairly tough training regime and great credit is due to the management and players for getting in to another quarter final.
    Against the wind in the second half and four or five points down and snatch a win at the death shows the resilience that Mcgrath has distilled in this squad. Loads of players have been given a chance in this campaign ( minus the four that Culbaire is going to inform us about) so there can be no complaints from the knockers. I like the way the management are going about their business and now it is a question of whether we are good enough or not. I think we are.
    Only negative was the injury to Coughlan after a brave challenge near the end of the match. He has done an excellent job for us as a full back and we need him for the Summer.
    Hard to predict the match against Galway. Baron could be back, Devine and Thomas Ryan might start, Maurice probably will, Mahoney and Fives probably will not be ready. Maybe a rest for Aussie and Curran but they will be grand for the Summer. I would try Philip Mahoney as FB if he was fit, he played well there a few years ago in the League and in my opinion would be the man to replace Barry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭enoughtaken


    Deise Gael wrote: »
    tbf if you are talking about lads at the moment who could add something to the thing more so than lads who are just making up the numbers and who are not up to it - we don't need to name them because they are all honest to God lads who are bursting a gut but we all know who they are and we all know they will never get near to wearing a league not to mind a championship shirt - here are a few just off the top of my head...

    Peter Hogan, Ray Barry, Shane Walsh (BG) Shane Roche, Ryan Donnelly, Gavin Crotty, Paudie Prendergast, Jamie Nagle, Richie Foley - what did they do wrong?

    Foley, Nagle, Barry and Prendergast have all excelled in the championship for Waterford. and are all still flying with their clubs. Shane Roche never got a look in while he was on the panel. Peter Hogan, Shane Walsh, Gavin Crotty and Ryan Donnelly are the mainstays of their club teams and are well tested at inter county level. All of the above are still real championship options.

    It would be nice to have a few of those options now if Darragh Fives and Barry Coughlan don't make it or if we need a bit of pace in our one man forward line.

    Can you really say the same for the eight or nine more lads who are making up the numbers on the panel at the moment?


    No not talking about lads who could add something. Culbaire has stated more than once that there is at least 4 lads not on the panel that should be on the starting 15. Just asking him to name them. I would agree with 4 of the guys you mentioned for the panel.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 739 ✭✭✭robopaddy2


    Some people are seriously delusional. You wouldn't think we won at the weekend, and in THE league quarter final. 3 wins from 5. Pretty decent in a competitive Division 1A. Is that not where we would have wanted to be at the start? Now there's people calling to bring back Jamie Nagle and Richie Foley, lads who have been off the panel with 3 years. Christ above.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 89 ✭✭Deisedozzer


    Deise Gael wrote: »
    tbf if you are talking about lads at the moment who could add something to the thing more so than lads who are just making up the numbers and who are not up to it - we don't need to name them because they are all honest to God lads who are bursting a gut but we all know who they are and we all know they will never get near to wearing a league not to mind a championship shirt - here are a few just off the top of my head...

    Peter Hogan, Ray Barry, Shane Walsh (BG) Shane Roche, Ryan Donnelly, Gavin Crotty, Paudie Prendergast, Jamie Nagle, Richie Foley - what did they do wrong?

    Foley, Nagle, Barry and Prendergast have all excelled in the championship for Waterford. and are all still flying with their clubs. Shane Roche never got a look in while he was on the panel. Peter Hogan, Shane Walsh, Gavin Crotty and Ryan Donnelly are the mainstays of their club teams and are well tested at inter county level. All of the above are still real championship options.

    It would be nice to have a few of those options now if Darragh Fives and Barry Coughlan don't make it or if we need a bit of pace in our one man forward line.

    Can you really say the same for the eight or nine more lads who are making up the numbers on the panel at the moment?

    With the greatest respect, of the players you've listed here one wasn't a starter on last year's u21 panel and has years ahead of him, two are over 30, two more did OK in a handful of games for the senior side 3 years ago and the remainder have struggled to make an impact even when playing for the intermediate team. I think it's hard to make an argument that any of these players are significantly better than those currently on the panel.

    As for Culbaires 'magnificent four' mystery players who should be starting, can you please name these players so it can at least be discussed/debated, the constant bashing of certain players while refusing to name others is at very least disingenuous and pretty boring at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭culbaire


    With the greatest respect, of the players you've listed here one wasn't a starter on last year's u21 panel and has years ahead of him, two are over 30, two more did OK in a handful of games for the senior side 3 years ago and the remainder have struggled to make an impact even when playing for the intermediate team. I think it's hard to make an argument that any of these players are significantly better than those currently on the panel.

    As for Culbaires 'magnificent four' mystery players who should be starting, can you please name these players so it can at least be discussed/debated, the constant bashing of certain players while refusing to name others is at very least disingenuous and pretty boring at this stage.
    You used the expression 'magnificent four'. NOT I. Would you care to address my remarks re the full back position? Of course not! What we have had under Derek McGrath is ruck and maul bastardised hurling with a defence system similar to rugby union. The forward formation is a shambles. Skill levels of players are deteriorating. We have players running around like super fit greyhounds piling into rucks and killing free flowing hurling. This is a mask to hide the weaknesses in the backline. There are several players who can't tackle correctly.

    Derek McGrath has a closed mind in relation to several players in the county. The whole county knows it. There are players on the currrent panel and team who have been tried and tried and found wanting. Amazing that you are not as dismissive of them as you are of others who have never got a fair chance. You just blithely dismiss them and write them off.

    To achieve success very hard decisions are essential. That means dropping friends where necessary. That's the difference between managers like Brian Cody and Derek McGrath. Brian Cody is never slow to seek advice. Down through the years Brian Cody has adopted a policy of dropping players who dont deliver-All Stars or no All Stars. There is no automatic selection. Deliver or face demotion to the bench! Derek McGrath? Thats the difference between success and failure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭culbaire


    Deise Gael wrote: »
    tbf if you are talking about lads at the moment who could add something to the thing more so than lads who are just making up the numbers and who are not up to it - we don't need to name them because they are all honest to God lads who are bursting a gut but we all know who they are and we all know they will never get near to wearing a league not to mind a championship shirt - here are a few just off the top of my head...

    Peter Hogan, Ray Barry, Shane Walsh (BG) Shane Roche, Ryan Donnelly, Gavin Crotty, Paudie Prendergast, Jamie Nagle, Richie Foley - what did they do wrong?

    Foley, Nagle, Barry and Prendergast have all excelled in the championship for Waterford. and are all still flying with their clubs. Shane Roche never got a look in while he was on the panel. Peter Hogan, Shane Walsh, Gavin Crotty and Ryan Donnelly are the mainstays of their club teams and are well tested at inter county level. All of the above are still real championship options.

    It would be nice to have a few of those options now if Darragh Fives and Barry Coughlan don't make it or if we need a bit of pace in our one man forward line.

    Can you really say the same for the eight or nine more lads who are making up the numbers on the panel at the moment?
    Agree 100%


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭culbaire


    robopaddy2 wrote: »
    Some people are seriously delusional. You wouldn't think we won at the weekend, and in THE league quarter final. 3 wins from 5. Pretty decent in a competitive Division 1A. Is that not where we would have wanted to be at the start? Now there's people calling to bring back Jamie Nagle and Richie Foley, lads who have been off the panel with 3 years. Christ above.

    We won a National Hurling League match not an All Ireland or Munster Final.
    One Kilkenny captain threw the National League Cup into the boot of his car after the final and left it there for six months. It was nice to win it but as far as the Kilkenny team was concerned the only thing that mattered was to win the All Ireland. If Waterford won a National League title we would be hearing about it for a year.

    Last Sunday Clare played a far better brand of combined hurlng than Waterford. Sure Waterford got over the line but the style of hurling played is not a good omen for the summer. Just can't see any All Ireland for the county in 2017. The only thing that matters is an All Ireland title. Its a long wait since 1959. It would be nice to see Brick retire with an All Ireland medal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭Deise Gael


    cascade12 wrote: »
    Loads of players have been given a chance in this campaign

    What new players have been given a chance exactly?

    How many new players did we unearth during the League?

    For a Manager who stated publicly that he was not worried about relegation there was absolutely no experimentation whatsoever during the League. Any personnel changes - bar Iggy - were enforced. Hence we are now left with the problem at FB.

    The way I see it we weren't good enough last year so we need to improve. We can do that in two ways - find some new talent and improve our way of playing.

    Tipp, Kilkenny, Dublin, Clare and Cork and have all made changes and tried new things in an effort to improve.

    To me it looks like we have done neither but maybe Derek is holding something back for the championship. I can only hope he is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 328 ✭✭HatchetMan7


    Fullback as we all know is the toughest position to fill and overall i think Barry Coughlan has done a fine job at no. 3 and i think he has improved that little bit every year however the one thing that would improve Barry the most is competition. From the outside looking in it does seem that McGrath has made a mistake here in not giving Shane Roche or someone else a few league games at fullback. Personally i would like to see T. de Burca tried at full back in Coughlans absence as i think Shane Fives plays like a wing back as someone else already mentioned and Conor Gleeson is still a little green and physically isn't strong enough yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭TheScoringGoal


    culbaire wrote: »
    You used the expression 'magnificent four'. NOT I. Would you care to address my remarks re the full back position? Of course not! What we have had under Derek McGrath is ruck and maul bastardised hurling with a defence system similar to rugby union. The forward formation is a shambles. Skill levels of players are deteriorating. We have players running around like super fit greyhounds piling into rucks and killing free flowing hurling. This is a mask to hide the weaknesses in the backline. There are several players who can't tackle correctly.

    Derek McGrath has a closed mind in relation to several players in the county. The whole county knows it. There are players on the currrent panel and team who have been tried and tried and found wanting. Amazing that you are not as dismissive of them as you are of others who have never got a fair chance. You just blithely dismiss them and write them off.

    To achieve success very hard decisions are essential. That means dropping friends where necessary. That's the difference between managers like Brian Cody and Derek McGrath. Brian Cody is never slow to seek advice. Down through the years Brian Cody has adopted a policy of dropping players who dont deliver-All Stars or no All Stars. There is no automatic selection. Deliver or face demotion to the bench! Derek McGrath? Thats the difference between success and failure.

    You've clearly never watched rugby if you think that's a similar defensive set up.

    Well as so many are asking how these players are then clearly the whole county does not know about this closed mind. The other poster named some good players but at least two of them declined call ups to the panel as they want to play soccer as well as club hurling. Can't blame them if that's what they want.

    I can only think of one player who hasn't really contributed this year despite starting all the games. So who are these examples you can provide?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 160 ✭✭crottys lake


    culbaire wrote: »
    Agree 100%

    Do yourself a favour as it is nearly too late. NAME THE FOUR PLAYER'S....

    Your use of the word ''bastardized'' springs to mind.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 160 ✭✭crottys lake


    The news on Barry Coughlan is more encouraging. May not be as bad as first thought.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭mountgomery burns


    It's only a league game when they win, it's a 'legitimate' case for a change of management when they lose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭culbaire


    You've clearly never watched rugby if you think that's a similar defensive set up.

    Well as so many are asking how these players are then clearly the whole county does not know about this closed mind. The other poster named some good players but at least two of them declined call ups to the panel as they want to play soccer as well as club hurling. Can't blame them if that's what they want.

    I can only think of one player who hasn't really contributed this year despite starting all the games. So who are these examples you can provide?
    I will debate the rules of Rugby Union with you any day. Also the rules of Rugby League. Bring it on!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭culbaire


    Do yourself a favour as it is nearly too late. NAME THE FOUR PLAYER'S....

    Your use of the word ''bastardized'' springs to mind.
    Address the issues I raised!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,481 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    http://www.wlrfm.com/sport/local/107776-waterfords-barry-coughlin-sidelined-til-the-summer-with-a-broken-jaw.html

    Barron, Pauric and Austin Gleeson doubtful

    Hopefully we might see Darragh Fives and Philip Mahony return

    Be nice to pick up the win and get another game on the 16th April but with the county championship games fixed for the weekends of 16th & 23rd April (Derek supposably consulted with the county board to fix the games for those dates) I can't see us putting in a massive effort on Sunday up in Galway but we just have too wait and see


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    It's only a league game when they win, it's a 'legitimate' case for a change of management when they lose.

    When they lose playing shte tactics it is.....when they win scraping over the line and still not playing to their strengths its only papering over the cracks

    Who wants a repeat of last year munster final??

    The whole gameplan was completely and utterly destroyed for good then..... Againest kk last augest.. Instead of pushing on and winning relativly comfortable... They wothdrew to defend ...everyone in croke park screaming at them to push on.... Instead it most likely cost them an all ireland apperence




    Have we progressed since then.... After the kk matvh i felt mcgrath deserved 1 more year.... But he seems determined to have a repeat of last years munster final??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭TheScoringGoal


    I think he deserves the year. The semi final was the game he targeted last year and it could have gone our way. I don't think we would have beaten Tipp in the final though.

    I still think Tipp are the best team in the country. I can't understand how people think if we improve we'll automatically beat them. They will improve too. And teams like Kilkenny, Clare, Galway and maybe Limerick, Cork and Wexford are capable of beating any team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭hurler on de ditch


    culbaire wrote: »
    Address the issues I raised!
    ah will you name the four ****ing players before they turn 50


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭Deise Gael


    I think he deserves the year. The semi final was the game he targeted last year and it could have gone our way. I don't think we would have beaten Tipp in the final though.

    I still think Tipp are the best team in the country. I can't understand how people think if we improve we'll automatically beat them. They will improve too. And teams like Kilkenny, Clare, Galway and maybe Limerick, Cork and Wexford are capable of beating any team.

    Nobody has said that we will automatically win anything but will you please lay out how we have improved or even at least least attempted to improve from last year compared to the teams I mentioned above who have patently used the League for that purpose- Tipp, Kilkenny, Dublin, Clare?

    Can you tell me what Waterford have learned?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 89 ✭✭Deisedozzer


    culbaire wrote: »
    You used the expression 'magnificent four'. NOT I. Would you care to address my remarks re the full back position? Of course not! What we have had under Derek McGrath is ruck and maul bastardised hurling with a defence system similar to rugby union. The forward formation is a shambles. Skill levels of players are deteriorating. We have players running around like super fit greyhounds piling into rucks and killing free flowing hurling. This is a mask to hide the weaknesses in the backline. There are several players who can't tackle correctly.

    Derek McGrath has a closed mind in relation to several players in the county. The whole county knows it. There are players on the currrent panel and team who have been tried and tried and found wanting. Amazing that you are not as dismissive of them as you are of others who have never got a fair chance. You just blithely dismiss them and write them off.

    To achieve success very hard decisions are essential. That means dropping friends where necessary. That's the difference between managers like Brian Cody and Derek McGrath. Brian Cody is never slow to seek advice. Down through the years Brian Cody has adopted a policy of dropping players who dont deliver-All Stars or no All Stars. There is no automatic selection. Deliver or face demotion to the bench! Derek McGrath? Thats the difference between success and failure.

    I used the phrase 'Magnificent Four' because you have been harping on about these players for months but refuse to name them while regularly naming and criticising others, it's classic bar stool hurler stuff and takes away from a lot of other good points you are making. We are all dying to know who these players are because by the way you are talking they would add a lot to the team. I presume one of these players is a FB since you have been bashing Coughlan for months. I think Coughlan has been a very solid FB and I don't understand the constant criticism of him. I think the fact that he was in the gaa.ie team of the week but slammed by people on here illustrates that for whatever reason some people here just personally dislike him.

    I don't agree that the players originally mentioned haven't been given a chance, if players can't perform at intermediate level what hope have they at senior? With respect are people seriously suggesting that Ryan Donnelly or Gavin Crotty are championship standard players? The ship has just simply sailed for some of the others because they weren't good enough despite featuring regularly.

    I accept your point that there are other players on the current panel who aren't good enough but I don't agree that we are excluding players who could be starting from the panel. The management team are not idiots.

    I don't like the way Derek sets up the team or the way we are playing any more than you do but in my view he has earned the right to be in charge this year and we should try and support him and the team rather than launching constant criticism with absolutely no praise or acknowledgement when things go well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭TheScoringGoal


    Deise Gael wrote: »
    Nobody has said that we will automatically win anything but will you please lay out how we have improved or even at least least attempted to improve from last year compared to the teams I mentioned above who have patently used the League for that purpose- Tipp, Kilkenny, Dublin, Clare?

    Can you tell me what Waterford have learned?

    Dublin have used the league to improve? God help them if so. I'd also question how clare have done that considering they're contesting a relegation final having won it last year? Kilkenny have played the best team available to them throughout. They are in a very different position to Waterford. Tipp had a conveyor belt of talent coming through so he gave them exposure. Their panel is much deeper than ours or anyone else's.

    I really don't see how this league has any bearing on championship. There's a good break before the first games which will be played on different ground entirely.

    Also Waterford had a high level of participation in the fitz this year. That disrupts the county team more than is acknowledged, they trained with 10 at times. Those lads come back in varying conditions so they may not be as effective for a few months.

    To answer your question I don't know if we have improved. Much in the same way I don't know if other counties have. We could win the league if we wanted by targeting it (like 2015) but we don't have the depth in the squad (despite some feeling we do) to then sustain that into championship. If we lose in the semi final of Munster and again to a lesser team after then we didn't progress. But I think the management team deserve the chance in championship first. From last winter they've said that was the aim this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭blueflame


    I have no problem giving the management team to the end of the year and I do understand that the entire focus can be on championship and that is what success or failure will be measured on.

    However I have a concern and it is in my view a very legitimate one - can you set up a team to play in a certain way and they at the drop of a hat change it - I don't think so - last year in the first game we exploded out of the blocks against KK but when the pressure came on we responded in the manner that we had played all year - we retreated into our shell and left them steal the game from us - second day out we again went toe to toe but as the second half progressed we again fell back into our shell until Fennelly went off injured and then we went for it, but too late. Basically we lacked the belief when seeing the line in front of us to push on and grasp it, rather then stepping on the gas we retreated and this is because it is what we are used to doing, it is what we are trained to do - you cannot just change overnight

    If it is the plan to change tactic completely when do they propose to reveal it - in our first game out? a Munster Final?, a Qualifier? an All Ireland Semi Final or do we wait and hope to get to a Final and then release the beast? We must start to build toward a tactic that will get the best from our players, and build their own belief in themselves so that it become second nature. When Tipp Or KK get in a position of dominance they push and and kill the game, if they get a chance to put their foot on your throath they will do it, no fears.

    My belief is that a change of tactics will only come as a result of a forced change and i believe the the current tactics are just not playing to our strengths.

    I believe our full-back line would benefit greatly from increased pressure in the opposition back line and a reduction in the amount and quality of ball that is being rained in on them under the present system.

    I believe the likes of de Burca, Darragh Fives and Aussie who are all excellent hurlers would benefit greatly from a more open area around their part of the field and would themselves be able to deliver high quality ball to our forwards.

    I believe Jamie Barron and Kevin Moran with their engines would revel in open play and the extra space in less congested areas.

    I believe we have enough potential ball winners in Brick, Mahony, Maurice, Devine or Foran to win their own ball in the half forward line.

    I believe that a full forward line of the two Bennett's, Curran, Dunford, Dillon O'Halloran have enough pace. movement and craft to create havoc near goal and tie down opposition backs.

    All I am asking is that the management try and build a system that will allow these players reach their combined potential and if we can win an All Ireland (which is a massive task) doing that brilliant - unfortunately i do not see us winning one with current tactics. The current management team have in my view enough brains , insight and dedication to give this a real go, but the big question is have they the courage to trust - to trust themselves and trust their players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭TheScoringGoal


    blueflame wrote: »
    I have no problem giving the management team to the end of the year and I do understand that the entire focus can be on championship and that is what success or failure will be measured on.

    However I have a concern and it is in my view a very legitimate one - can you set up a team to play in a certain way and they at the drop of a hat change it - I don't think so - last year in the first game we exploded out of the blocks against KK but when the pressure came on we responded in the manner that we had played all year - we retreated into our shell and left them steal the game from us - second day out we again went toe to toe but as the second half progressed we again fell back into our shell until Fennelly went off injured and then we went for it, but too late. Basically we lacked the belief when seeing the line in front of us to push on and grasp it, rather then stepping on the gas we retreated and this is because it is what we are used to doing, it is what we are trained to do - you cannot just change overnight

    If it is the plan to change tactic completely when do they propose to reveal it - in our first game out? a Munster Final?, a Qualifier? an All Ireland Semi Final or do we wait and hope to get to a Final and then release the beast? We must start to build toward a tactic that will get the best from our players, and build their own belief in themselves so that it become second nature. When Tipp Or KK get in a position of dominance they push and and kill the game, if they get a chance to put their foot on your throath they will do it, no fears.

    My belief is that a change of tactics will only come as a result of a forced change and i believe the the current tactics are just not playing to our strengths.

    I believe our full-back line would benefit greatly from increased pressure in the opposition back line and a reduction in the amount and quality of ball that is being rained in on them under the present system.

    I believe the likes of de Burca, Darragh Fives and Aussie who are all excellent hurlers would benefit greatly from a more open area around their part of the field and would themselves be able to deliver high quality ball to our forwards.

    I believe Jamie Barron and Kevin Moran with their engines would revel in open play and the extra space in less congested areas.

    I believe we have enough potential ball winners in Brick, Mahony, Maurice, Devine or Foran to win their own ball in the half forward line.

    I believe that a full forward line of the two Bennett's, Curran, Dunford, Dillon O'Halloran have enough pace. movement and craft to create havoc near goal and tie down opposition backs.

    All I am asking is that the management try and build a system that will allow these players reach their combined potential and if we can win an All Ireland (which is a massive task) doing that brilliant - unfortunately i do not see us winning one with current tactics. The current management team have in my view enough brains , insight and dedication to give this a real go, but the big question is have they the courage to trust - to trust themselves and trust their players.

    I wouldn't necessarily agree with all of this but in fairness I can see the logic of your argument. I'm hopeful that the aim is the championship but I can understand your viewpoint.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    robopaddy2 wrote: »
    Some people are seriously delusional. You wouldn't think we won at the weekend, and in THE league quarter final. 3 wins from 5. Pretty decent in a competitive Division 1A. Is that not where we would have wanted to be at the start? Now there's people calling to bring back Jamie Nagle and Richie Foley, lads who have been off the panel with 3 years. Christ above.

    And a win in Nowlan Park and Ennis as well, little bit of perspective here, but lets be honest its perfectly clear that if Derek McGrath was to win the AI the haters here would still find something to crab about, its kind of pathetic and obviously lads with short memories and who let club allegiances rule over county.

    culbaire wrote: »
    We won a National Hurling League match not an All Ireland or Munster Final.
    One Kilkenny captain threw the National League Cup into the boot of his car after the final and left it there for six months. It was nice to win it but as far as the Kilkenny team was concerned the only thing that mattered was to win the All Ireland. If Waterford won a National League title we would be hearing about it for a year.

    It's funny how when Waterford win its only the league and doesn't really count but when they are beaten its the end of the world and the management must go!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 943 ✭✭✭DiscoStew


    Some talk that our new selector has left the set up already, along with Gavin O'Brien.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭redlead


    DiscoStew wrote: »
    Some talk that our new selector has left the set up already, along with Gavin O'Brien.

    To be fair to Gavin, as good a hurler as he is he never took his opportunity at county level when he got it. Our problem is that we have a load of lads upfront all at a similar level but no-one really sticking their hand up as a top class forward that we need. Bennett starting to look good to be fair. Gavin's recent game time was at wing back wasn't it? And he's never going to get his place there.

    Jake Dillon was the only lad that seemed to get away with doing nothing and yet keep his place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 Dublin Dave 2014


    Does anyone know if tg4 are showing Waterford v Galway Sunday ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,481 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Does anyone know if tg4 are showing Waterford v Galway Sunday ?

    yeah live at 4pm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Stopitwillya


    Gavin O Brien is just not good enough for senior intercounty level. The lad doesn't lack skill but is unable to win his own ball. When has anyone ever seen him catch a ball. Never. Far better players not on the county panel who deserve a chance.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 104 ✭✭ThaiTanic


    Full back always was a problematic position for Waterford. I know I dont rate Coughlan very highly compared to other full backs around the country but he will be a loss theres no doubt about it.

    Personally I think someone like Kieran Bennett should be blooded in there now for the remainder of the league, Coughlan will be out for a good while and any little knock to a jaw injury in the mean time could set him back even further. Dont think McNulty has the hurling, discipline or awareness for there. Gleeson dosent have the physical presence and hes too honest a player to play there.

    On the injuries has anyone any updates on 1) Philip Mahoney as I feel he would be a huge addition to our defense at the moment and 2) Micheál Harney who was probably our best player in the u-21 All Ireland final for us last year, along with getting recognized with a Grandville Award and a place on the U21 team of the Year? He hasnt been seen since November!. & 3) Darragh Fives, I know he is meant to miss the remainder of the league but how is his recovery coming along? He is another crucial player for us to have available for the start of the Championship!.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Stopitwillya


    Think Philip Mahony would be a good replacement for Coughlan (who in fairness to him has done a good job and changed many of our opinions on him). Mahony has never really played there but think he has the attributes to make a good full back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭chookieourlaw


    As one or two others have mentioned on here, I think it might be worth trying De Burca at full back. Has the intelligence and the awareness to be able to adapt and is not afraid of getting physical when he needs to. Barry Coughlan will be a big loss and hopefully he will have a speedy recovery. If either Fives or Mahony don't make it back for MSF and we were to get another injury to any of the current starters in backs we would be under pressure big time without Coughlan. Definitely a bit shortsighted not to have tried anyone else out in the position during the league.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭Giveitfong


    The outstanding feature of the game in Ennis last Sunday was the way that Waterford almost completely changed their style of play in the second half. In the first half it was the same old brainless style we have become familiar with in the Derek McGrath era, using the wind to lash long ball after long ball into the Clare goal area. However, once Clare recovered from Waterford’s whirlwind start they took almost complete control, swarm-tackling Waterford players in possession and working their way out of defence using highly-structured passing movements.

    Once they got the ball to a loose man in the midfield area, they took the Waterford half back line completely out of the game by playing the ball in over them, and by directing the ball into the corners they also were able to by-pass the deep-lying Tadhg de Búrca. Amazingly, the Waterford wing backs, Stephen Daniels and Shane McNulty, only got three possessions between them in the first half, and two of these were short puckouts from Stephen O’Keeffe. Meanwhile, the excellent quality of ball coming in gave the Clare full forwards the upper hand on their markers, and between them they got 16 possessions between them whereas, apart from short puckouts, the Waterford full backs only got six possessions.

    While the Waterford wingbacks only got one possession (allowing for short puckouts) between them, their opposite numbers got 12. However, most of these possessions came from passes rather than winning the ball against their markers in one-to-one situations. Meanwhile, as has become a regular pattern, with Tadhg de Búrca lying deep, as usual, the Clare No. 11 Podge Collins ran riot in the first half, getting on the ball no less than 13 times in that half alone. Every other county is now putting a mobile playmaker with scoring ability into the big hole in the middle of the Waterford defence, and no effective measures to counteract this have been apparent.

    By contrast, the Clare centre back, Conor Cleary, playing in a much more forward role, performed a key fulcrum role in Clare’s passing system, always available to take passes from his full and wing backs and move the ball forwards. He had eleven possessions in the first half.

    The only consolation for Waterford from Clare’s tactic of playing the ball into the corners was that they never threatened the Waterford goal, with de Búrca playing his usual highly-effective covering role. The only goal that Clare got was an out-of-the-blue unstoppable bullet from 30 metres by Collins.

    A major element in the Clare system was the superb long-range passing of their goalkeeper, Andrew Fahy. His first two puckouts went long, and were both won by Waterford. From then to the closing stages (when Clare were chasing the game), Fahy never again hit a long puckout to a contested area. He was superb at finding his team mates in space a long way from his goal. In the first half he hit ten puckouts into the hands of team mates outside the 45 metre line (two of them outside 65 metres despite being hit into a stiff wind). Of course the other half of this equation was Clare players making themselves available to take these balls, and Waterford did not work hard enough to close these players down.

    Stephen O’Keeffe did hit seven short puckouts in the first half, but every one of them was to a player on the 20 metre line, and he in turn invariably then drove the ball to more or less where it would have landed had O’Keeffe gone long in the first place. The contrast between Clare’s well-thought-out strategy and the lack of thought in the Waterford short puckouts could not have been more stark.

    The upshot of all this is that, whereas Waterford hit a total of just 13 completed passes in the first half, Clare hit no less than 53. Yet, when the half time whistle blew, Clare were still only two points ahead, made possible by Waterford’s early scoring burst, great long range points from Patrick Curran, Austin Gleeson and Pauric Mahony and a couple of handy frees conceded by Clare. However, I was very fearful for the second half, given Clare’s domination of the play in the first half and the fact that, despite playing against the wind, they had the same number of shots at goal as Waterford (19).

    Whatever was said in the dressing-room at half time, Waterford adopted a completely different style of play in the second half, one which some of us have been yearning for but which we have not really seen before in the McGrath era. In other words, Waterford started passing the ball around, working the ball out from the defence into midfield and sending a lot of good directed ball into the forwards (although there was still too much of the old high ball down on isolated, double-marked, forwards, as the TG4 commentator himself observed).

    In that second half, Waterford actually effected more completed passes than Clare (54/45). While this had the effect of reducing Clare’s amount of possession, the latter remained high and Waterford’s improved play was serving only to stem, rather than reverse, the Clare wind-assisted tide. Where Stephen O’Keeffe continued to restrict his short puckouts to players on his own 20 metre line, Fahy was still hitting superb long balls to players in the midfield area, adding to the pressure on the Waterford defence. With just 14 minutes left on the clock, Clare had doubled their half-time lead to four points, and only one result looked likely.

    Waterford’s achievement in digging out a victory in these circumstances can, I think, be put down to three key factors. Firstly, Clare hit a series of bad wides in the closing stages. This may be linked to the second factor, which is that Waterford looked fitter and stronger in those closing stages, which tends to bear out reports that Waterford have been putting a huge effort into strength and conditioning this year. The third factor was the astonishing impact Tom Devine had on the game following his introduction in the 43rd minute. In his time on the pitch, Devine secured 10 possessions, scored 1-1, set up several further scores and created general havoc in the Clare defence. I have been doubtful of Devine’s ability to make it as a forward at this level, as I thought he lacked the requisite close skills, but he certainly stepped up to the plate on this occasion.

    This game also marked the full entry onto the senior intercounty stage of Stephen Bennett who produced a marvellous effort from start to finish, reflected in 16 possessions (topped only by Tadhg de Búrca on 17). Austin Gleeson also made a major contribution, with 15 possessions in his 58 minutes on the pitch, while Brick Walsh’s typical hard-working input was reflected in 14 possessions.

    Shane Bennett also showed a welcome return to form, and hopefully the team management will have noted how effective he was raiding from the right side of the field, which particularly suits a left-sided hurler. On the other hand, Patrick Curran had something of an off-day, and it struck me that he had lost some weight recently (not what you would expect from a strength and conditioning programme). I thought Brian O’Halloran had a good first half, getting in three shots (two successful) and again showing his knack of being able to turn up where the action is.

    Some people on this thread have been dismissive of Stephen Daniels. However, bearing in mind how good he was before he suffered that awful knee injury a couple of years ago and how it takes time to get back up to speed at this level, I think he should be persevered with. We lack the kind of drive and strength he brings to the wing back position, and last Sunday I thought he showed the value of these qualities in the closing stages.

    By the same token I don’t think that Conor Gleeson has the strength required in the full back line and in my view his undoubted ability would be better used elsewhere. As other posters here have pointed out, Derek McGrath’s failure to give any other specialist full backs game time in the earlier games really came home to roost last Sunday and could have proved fatal.

    Two final points, one a recurring bugbear of mine. Patrick Curran and Stephen Bennett are two of the most exciting scoring prospects I have ever seen emerging in Waterford (and both at the same time). Yet on separate occasions in last Sunday’s game, each of these players found themselves clearing ball 30 metres from their own goal. I just cannot see the sense of this. And to see what Waterford are really capable of, I would ask those who have a recording of the game to look at a passage in the 63rd minute when a short puckout to Tadhg de Búrca went through a further series of superb passes via Tommy Ryan, Kevin Moran and Tom Devine to Stephen Bennett who nailed a brilliant point. This is the kind of hurling Waterford should be trying to play all the time.

    Possession count: S O’Keeffe (7); S Fives (8); B Coughlan (4); C Gleeson (8); S Daniels (10); T de Búrca (17); S McNulty (7); A Gleeson (15); K Moran (8); B O’Halloran (8); P Mahony (9); M Walsh (14); Shane Bennett (11); Patrick Curran (8); Stephen Bennett (16); T Devine (10); M Kearney (1); T Ryan (3); C Dunford (4).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    As one or two others have mentioned on here, I think it might be worth trying De Burca at full back. Has the intelligence and the awareness to be able to adapt and is not afraid of getting physical when he needs to. Barry Coughlan will be a big loss and hopefully he will have a speedy recovery. If either Fives or Mahony don't make it back for MSF and we were to get another injury to any of the current starters in backs we would be under pressure big time without Coughlan. Definitely a bit shortsighted not to have tried anyone else out in the position during the league.

    Man on man.... I question de burcas physical strength in the air... And his pace

    I do think fives is the obvious fit in there


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 191 ✭✭Fred C Dobbs


    GIVEITFONG ... excellent and insightful analysis, as always.  Agree 100% regards Stephen Bennett ; he has that XFactor - oozes class - can both make and take scores in an instant - a fully fit Stephen is a must for Waterford to make the long awaited breakthrough.  Also agree re Stephen Daniels ... he has an aggressive streak and is worth persevering with.  Incidentally, I think Shane Bennett is equally effective, right or left wing - if he could just add a bit of composure (a la his brother) to his game, he would be the finished article, though we forget he's still quite young - don't know the chap at all but I reckon he's the sort of fella that would line out for you 7 days a week, if asked.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement