Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

2018 Leaf

1177178180182183196

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,873 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    That's interesting Thierry. Any link?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,436 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    Supposedly its only a fix for cars built after October from what I have read

    They have a different floor layout to accommodate the larger 60kWh pack

    More floor space, better cooling or something

    Well the electric Swedes car is very new from what I can make out.

    But yer someone one Speak EV claims to have had the update retrofitted as a software update.

    He reckoned that it took 2 to 3 hours and Nissan Denmark people were involved (guy is from Denmark)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    unkel wrote: »
    That's interesting Thierry. Any link?

    Saw a comment on mynissanleaf forum

    Not sure if it's true, but guy seemed to know what he's talking about


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    Old diesel wrote: »
    Well the electric Swedes car is very new from what I can make out.

    But yer someone one Speak EV claims to have had the update retrofitted as a software update.

    He reckoned that it took 2 to 3 hours and Nissan Denmark people were involved (guy is from Denmark)

    Probably correct too

    Good news anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭KCross


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    Supposedly its only a fix for cars built after October from what I have read

    They have a different floor layout to accommodate the larger 60kWh pack

    More floor space, better cooling or something

    I doubt it.

    If there was more cooling the temp wouldnt be increasing as much. The video clearly shows that it is still heating up like before but still maintaining close to max charge rate (where before at the same temp it would be at 22kW) so thats doesnt jive with whatever you read.

    Maybe the battery space has been increased too in prep for L60 but I'd say thats entirely coincidental based on the video posted.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    KCross wrote: »
    I doubt it.

    If there was more cooling the temp wouldnt be increasing as much. The video clearly shows that it is still heating up like before but still maintaining close to max charge rate (where before at the same temp it would be at 22kW) so thats doesnt jive with whatever you read.

    Maybe the battery space has been increased too in prep for L60 but I'd say thats entirely coincidental based on the video posted.

    Just posting what I read Cross

    What's with the attitude?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,873 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    KCross wrote: »
    The video clearly shows that it is still heating up like before but still maintaining close to max charge rate (where before at the same temp it would be at 22kW)

    Yeah, most likely Nissan just programmed the BMS to be more tolerant. If that's the case, good news for all L40 as a simple software upgrade will get rid of #rapidgate

    It does make you wonder though why they chose the programming as it is in the first place. There must have been a reason for it. It also makes you wonder about how bad this upgrade will be to the battery, which already seems to suffer more from degradation than any other EV batteries on the market today. But I guess that's Nissan's problem with giving the 8 year battery warranty :p

    If I were a L40 owner, I would be delighted. Let's hope Nissan will do a recall and fix all these cars. And at the same time make DC charging stop at 85%. No more 2.5 hours at the fast charger, boyos!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    unkel wrote: »
    Yeah, most likely Nissan just programmed the BMS to be more tolerant. If that's the case, good news for all L40 as a simple software upgrade will get rid of #rapidgate

    It does make you wonder though why they chose the programming as it is in the first place. There must have been a reason for it. It also makes you wonder about how bad this upgrade will be to the battery, which already seems to suffer more from degradation than any other EV batteries on the market today. But I guess that's Nissan's problem with giving the 8 year battery warranty :p

    If I were a L40 owner, I would be delighted. Let's hope Nissan will do a recall and fix all these cars. And at the same time make DC charging stop at 85%. No more 2.5 hours at the fast charger, boyos!

    They'll be cheap to replace anyway :)

    $50/kWh in 2025

    https://www.envision-group.com/en/news.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,752 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Rapidgate is boring. More interested in the WLTP
    Question today, motorway, 120km non stop, would you get 200km?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭KCross


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    Just posting what I read Cross

    What's with the attitude?

    Huh? Am I not allowed contradict you or what you’ve read!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    unkel wrote:
    It does make you wonder though why they chose the programming as it is in the first place. There must have been a reason for it. It also makes you wonder about how bad this upgrade will be to the battery, which already seems to suffer more from degradation than any other EV batteries on the market today. But I guess that's Nissan's problem with giving the 8 year battery warranty

    Exactly. If they programmed strict limits and cutoffs it means they were afraid of degradation with higher temperatures. It means #rapidgate = very conservative battery thermal management, that's all what it was it seems...

    While derestricting the thermal management fixes the rapidgate it may cause faster battery degradation.

    Now, the question is - will Nissan allow/push the BMS update knowing that it may potentially lead to increased battery warranty claims? Why would they do that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,094 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Rapidgate is boring. More interested in the WLTP
    Question today, motorway, 120km non stop, would you get 200km?

    Nope. Not even close.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭grudgehugger


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Rapidgate is boring. More interested in the WLTP
    Question today, motorway, 120km non stop, would you get 200km?

    As the Doctor said, not even close.

    You won’t get 200km @ 105 right now based on my experience.

    Range def much better in summer (as an EV newbie, this surprised me even though I”d read about it).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,436 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    unkel wrote: »
    Yeah, most likely Nissan just programmed the BMS to be more tolerant. If that's the case, good news for all L40 as a simple software upgrade will get rid of #rapidgate

    It does make you wonder though why they chose the programming as it is in the first place. There must have been a reason for it. It also makes you wonder about how bad this upgrade will be to the battery, which already seems to suffer more from degradation than any other EV batteries on the market today. But I guess that's Nissan's problem with giving the 8 year battery warranty :p

    If I were a L40 owner, I would be delighted. Let's hope Nissan will do a recall and fix all these cars. And at the same time make DC charging stop at 85%. No more 2.5 hours at the fast charger, boyos!

    If theyve changed the car structure by using L60 platform on a 40 - then the fix may not be retrofittable.

    For example if you use an L60 floorpan - the 40 kwh pack may well have more space to fit into - so it might be that Nissan have spread the cells over a bigger area - and that allows lower temps - and thus more tolerant settings.

    I am not at all convinced we have a workable fix here - definitely not for summer use anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,094 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Funny enough, I reckon I'd get close to the same range now in my 33kwh i3 as I would in a 40kwh Leaf. Which is pretty damning given the extra capacity of the Leaf and the i3 isn't exactly aerodynamic either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,873 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Question today, motorway, 120km non stop, would you get 200km?

    LOL, not a chance. Today, no wind or rain and about 9C max temp. Good weather for winter weather. Just guessing here but I'd say at 120km/h GPS speed you'd get something like this:

    Leaf 40kWh - 140km
    eGolf 36kWh - 150km
    Ioniq 28kWh - 165km


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    unkel wrote: »
    LOL, not a chance. Today, no wind or rain and about 9C max temp. Good weather for winter weather. Just guessing here but I'd say at 120km/h GPS speed you'd get something like this:

    Leaf 40kWh - 140km
    eGolf 36kWh - 150km
    Ioniq 28kWh - 165km

    We need minimum 60kWh+ EV's for city to city motorway driving in winter :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,873 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    We need minimum 60kWh+ EV's for city to city motorway driving in winter :eek:

    I wouldn't go that far. We need decent chargers. With the new Ionity charger being built right now, I could go from Dublin to Cork and back with a 20 minute stop on both legs of the journey. I find that acceptable - and to clarify - I'd only make a trip like that once or twice a year

    If you drive cross country at motorway speeds all the time, you'd need a newer generation car (not the older generation 2016 Ioniq or 2018 Leaf) like the 2018 Kona with a motorway 120km/h range of well over 300km even in winter


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,233 ✭✭✭rolion


    unkel wrote: »
    LOL, not a chance. Today, no wind or rain and about 9C max temp. Good weather for winter weather. Just guessing here but I'd say at 120km/h GPS speed you'd get something like this:

    Leaf 40kWh - 140km
    eGolf 36kWh - 150km
    Ioniq 28kWh - 165km

    No offence, but respecting similar parameters, you forgot the i3, which could go...and go.. and go...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,094 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    rolion wrote: »
    No offence, but respecting similar parameters, you forgot the i3, which could go...and go.. and go...

    It could only go and go and go if it had the REx. I'd say the i3 would get about 150km at the minute on motorway speeds and on pure electric. Well technically a bit less as the REx would kick in at 6% if you ran it that low and if you did, you'd certainly need to ease up from motorway speed.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,752 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    We need minimum 60kWh+ EV's for city to city motorway driving in winter :eek:

    No....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭Casati


    unkel wrote: »
    LOL, not a chance. Today, no wind or rain and about 9C max temp. Good weather for winter weather. Just guessing here but I'd say at 120km/h GPS speed you'd get something like this:

    Leaf 40kWh - 140km
    eGolf 36kWh - 150km
    Ioniq 28kWh - 165km

    What would the Kona be- I understood 300km no bother?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    unkel wrote: »
    I wouldn't go that far. We need decent chargers. With the new Ionity charger being built right now, I could go from Dublin to Cork and back with a 20 minute stop on both legs of the journey. I find that acceptable - and to clarify - I'd only make a trip like that once or twice a year

    If you drive cross country at motorway speeds all the time, you'd need a newer generation car (not the older generation 2016 Ioniq or 2018 Leaf) like the 2018 Kona with a motorway 120km/h range of well over 300km even in winter

    Its stopping every hour or so

    Stopping every hour is a pain in the ass good network or not

    Agree Kona no issue

    It can go longer than most bladders


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    No....

    If u don't want to stop every hour or so they are

    50kWh min would be ideal


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    Casati wrote: »
    What would the Kona be- I understood 300km no bother?

    It would

    Huge battery and pretty efficient


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,094 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    We need minimum 60kWh+ EV's
    Mike9832 wrote: »
    50kWh min would be ideal

    40kWh, do I hear 40kWh???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭✭Zenith74


    60kWh for me for your city-to-city car, your second car can certainly be smaller, no need for all EVs to be this size.

    Stopping every hour is a little too frequent I think, really would like to be able to do 1.5 minimum (so ~180km). Also for the average Joe you cannot have them arriving at 2% battery, think people need to see ~20% to feel comfortable, this also leaves room for diversions etc. Assuming you're only charging to 80% on FCPs, you've really only got 60% of your battery capacity to give you that 180km, so the car needs to have a real range of about 300km @120km/h.

    Obviously this doesn't have to apply to us EV nuts who are willing to put up with stopping more regularly, having a natter at the FCP etc., but for Joe Average this is where it needs to be for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,427 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I think for a main EV, Kona and Niro @ 64kwh are about right, 400km/250m.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭Gile_na_gile


    Lads/Laddesses - More of a how challenge question than a "will it?" question I hope. L40 driving from Kildare Meath border area to South Tipp. 180km

    25km on regional road
    145km motorway
    10k on regional roads

    What sort of driving, if any, gets a Leaf to a destination charger (overnight granny cable) without stopping for a single charge with four passengers? It is within effective range of Leaf, but my guess is that it is possible if driving 105km/h on motorway, and/or taking the old road for part of the journey.
    I.e. Follow M7 to N77 in Laois. Take exit 17 from M7
    29 min (49.1 km)
    Get on M8 from R433

    Conditions: SW headwind of 20km, cold and wet, heating on low.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    Lads/Laddesses - More of a how challenge question than a "will it?" question I hope. L40 driving from Kildare Meath border area to South Tipp. 180km

    25km on regional road
    145km motorway
    10k on regional roads

    What sort of driving, if any, gets a Leaf to a destination charger (overnight granny cable) without stopping for a single charge with four passengers? It is within effective range of Leaf, but my guess is that it is possible if driving 105km/h on motorway, and/or taking the old road for part of the journey.
    I.e. Follow M7 to N77 in Laois. Take exit 17 from M7
    29 min (49.1 km)
    Get on M8 from R433

    Conditions: SW headwind of 20km, cold and wet, heating on low.

    Should be no prob @ 100km/h or below

    Bjorn got 200km in - 2c @ 90km/h

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQansDFt-GM&feature=share


Advertisement