Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

VOTE NO

Options
1…5681011

Comments

  • Options
    #212
    The Moldy Gowl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    Father Ted Crilly wrote: »
    I think we can all agree that everyone is a bit bisexual.

    That's a very bold statement


  • Options
    #213
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    cursai wrote: »
    How are things back in the 1920's Macker.

    suprisingly fink free


  • Options
    #214
    Wang King
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,169 ✭✭✭Wang King


    macker33 wrote: »
    Show me where He ever contradicted the Father

    So that's a no then, at least you admit that much, glad we got that sorted!


  • Options
    #215
    The Moldy Gowl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    macker33 wrote: »
    suprisingly fink free

    Interesting, so this country was built on the church, and the gays have only appeared this the church made this country.


    Weird huh?


  • Options
    #216
    222233
    Registered Users Posts: 1,114 ✭✭✭222233


    macker33 wrote: »
    suprisingly fink free

    Why do you fear homosexuality so much ?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #217
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    Windowsnut wrote: »
    boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=89695899

    legalise prostitution macker33??

    Isn't that a sin too? degenerate scum

    Prostitutes serve a purpose, they make the world safer by reigning certain elements.

    Stalkers and gays on the other hand serve no purpose


  • Options
    #218
    trackerman
    Registered Users Posts: 516 ✭✭✭trackerman


    This first post is an obvious False Flag, people should not be fooled by it.


  • Options
    #219
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    222233 wrote: »
    Why do you fear homosexuality so much ?

    Isnt a fink a strikebreaker or something? Like in Strumpet City.


  • Options
    #220
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    macker33 wrote: »
    Prostitutes serve a purpose, they make the world safer by reigning certain elements.

    Stalkers and gays on the other hand serve no purpose

    Ah, selective sinning.

    So whats your plan to get rid of the gays, seeing as they have no purpose?


  • Options
    #221
    B_Wayne
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,039 ✭✭✭B_Wayne


    In relation to Macker's nonsensical paedophilia points. The below goes into plenty of detail on subject. Granted, I think most that read him have the sense to know he's an idiot.
    The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. And, as explained above, many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children.
    http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/HTML/facts_molestation.html


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #222
    Lu Tze
    Registered Users Posts: 3,495 ✭✭✭Lu Tze


    macker33 wrote: »
    Whats to elaborate on, old and new testament both tell us homosexuality is a sin and now the government wants to give gay a medal.

    The government is telling us that homosexuality isnt a sin and that to consider it so is illegal,
    Lu Tze wrote:
    Have they really said that? Any chance you could provide a link to the press release? I would be very interest to see it, it would be the first time a thought has been criminalised as far as i am aware.
    macker33 wrote: »
    The government hasnt thought that far ahead, its called not considering the consequences.

    So they haven't said anything of the sort?


  • Options
    #223
    constance tench
    Registered Users Posts: 862 ✭✭✭constance tench


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma


  • Options
    #224
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    Ah, selective sinning.

    So whats your plan to get rid of the gays, seeing as they have no purpose?

    I think the plan was to let them slowly breed/not breed themselves out of existence but this whole adoption thing throws that idea out the window. Sexual preferences are breed by the parents don't you know.


  • Options
    #225
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    Gowlasauras Rex wrote: »

    Ah I see your troll has become undone. The lols were had.

    Definitely some people had a gay ol'time


  • Options
    #226
    sunshine and showers
    Registered Users Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭sunshine and showers


    VOTE NO...to feeding the shítty troll.


  • Options
    #227
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    cursai wrote: »
    I think the plan was to let them slowly breed/not breed themselves out of existence but this whole adoption thing throws that idea out the window. Sexual preferences are breed by the parents don't you know.

    If we stop straight people having kids then no gay people will be born. I predict complete gay eradication within 100 years.


  • Options
    #228
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    sunshine and showers wrote: »
    VOTE NO...to feeding the shítty troll.

    He is a fine character actor though.


  • Options
    #229
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    What can we blame them on thats the whole organisations fault so? Living in a big gold palace while purporting to be about helping the poor? Running a system of "workhouses" where women werent allowed to leave, had their children taken from them and sold.

    Was that " a few gay priests " too? Were the nuns gay priests?

    You do realise that the laundries replaced the workhouses or do you think workhouses were better.
    Secondly priests didnt turn up at peoples doors and drag them off to the laundry, these people were institutionalised by their own parents.


  • Options
    #230
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    Gandalph wrote: »
    And to think it all started with the theft of an apple.
    The apple wasnt the problem


  • Options
    #231
    freelancerTax
    Registered Users Posts: 391 ✭✭freelancerTax


    macker33 wrote: »
    Ireland has been cursed because of how we carried on during the tiger years and now we risk being cursed again.

    For the last 15 years all we have heard on the radio is progay nonsense from progay mouthpieces.
    Anybody who says anything different to the progay friendly media push is immediately labelled a bigot by the homfacists, Its all completely one sided.

    Are people so easily manipulated? Enda is an idiot who only cares about his legacy. A "first" for ireland.

    Dont make christianity a criminal offence because progay and christianity cannot exist together.
    Gay is a sin to christianity and christianity is a sin lo the libtards, You cant have both.
    Gays have never done anything for ireland, We wouldnt even have an ireland if it wasnt for catholicism. The union jack would be flying over government buildings and not the tricolour.

    Dont let your parish be a gay parish, vote no to "gay marriage"

    Mod note: this OP is below the forum standards but given the large number of responses since 5.40 on a saturday morning and that the No side claim to be denied free speech, I'm simply going to warn the OP to increase the quality of his/her posts rather than simply talking about how much he/she hates the nasty liberal homosexuals. -js

    isn't kiddy fiddling a sin also?? most likley illegal also?
    what about moving know kiddy fiddlers around to different parishes instead of handing them over to authorities?

    just because you label something as "catholic" does not make it right or good.

    the church may have done good things in ireland they have also done some very very bad things...

    dont blindly follow what anyone or any organisation say you should or should not do


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #232
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    If we stop straight people having kids then no gay people will be born. I predict complete gay eradication within 100 years.

    No no no. The bible says it is a man and womans duty to procreate. We can still have 'normal' children just have to isolate them from lefty artsy influences. Tv convinces kids to be gay seemingly.


  • Options
    #233
    B_Wayne
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,039 ✭✭✭B_Wayne


    Justifying the laundries now, I'm really not surprised unfortunately.


  • Options
    #234
    jacksie66
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,988 ✭✭✭jacksie66


    This post has been deleted.


  • Options
    #235
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    cursai wrote: »
    Seriously? Hows That?

    Because ireland would have bent over the same as scotland and wales, it was the catholic faith that made us too different to accept english rule,
    If not for catholicism we would have just rolled with it.
    simple.


  • Options
    #236
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    If we stop straight people having kids then no gay people will be born. I predict complete gay eradication within 100 years.

    I predict a shorter timeframe as they'll just get bored of acting the eejit. Sure its only a fad.


  • Options
    #237
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    Gowlasauras Rex wrote: »
    This country was here before the Catholic Church?

    Not sure what will be left if it ever leaves


  • Options
    #238
    macker33
    Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭macker33


    Thepoet85 wrote: »
    What makes you say that? I'm just curious.
    We'd be just like scotland and wales


  • Options
    #239
    sunshine and showers
    Registered Users Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭sunshine and showers


    macker33 wrote: »
    Not sure what will be left if it ever leaves

    Liberals, homosexuality and leprechauns. :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #240
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    macker33 wrote: »
    Because ireland would have bent over the same as scotland and wales, it was the catholic faith that made us too different to accept english rule,
    If not for catholicism we would have just rolled with it.
    simple.

    Yes. that is simple.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #241
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    macker33 wrote: »
    Secondly priests didnt turn up at peoples doors and drag them off to the laundry, these people were institutionalised by their own parents.

    Thats not answering any of the points. I believe thats called deflection. Is it ok to abuse people as long as their parents sent them to you?

    Is it the womens parents fault Rome has so much wealth while people are poor too?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement