People who hire hookers?

Roquentin

Saralee4 wrote: »

I agree but i wonder what the protistute was doing that was so great that other girls couldn't provide him with. I mean what could she possibly be doing that was so great he was willing to pay that much? Anyway it worked for him and hopefully for the women too.

Ive seen alot of posts here with people saying it's grand, don't judge people and there is nothing wrong with it but at the end of the post is "it's not for me tho". People are very quick to confirm it's great but not for them. I think this is because ultimately men want to get the best but everyone knows its not real if you have to pay for it. Like strobe you commended and praised him about his honesty of visiting hookers but if there isn't an issue why don't we see more people admitting it or admitting wanting to do it?

you pay for it either way. one uses cash the other uses a different form of currency.

the guy who goes into the nightclub and buys a woman a few drinks pays for it with drinks.

the man/woman in the relationship must trade in some way with the man/woman. there is no such thing as a free lunch

H3llR4iser

I don't see anything wrong with it, it's just that it has a social stigma attached.

Quite a few men simply don't want the "connection", or the "relationship" part of it, but there seem to exist significantly fewer women that think likewise - which, it has to be said, also get unfairly labeled as "sluts".

Alexis Sanchez2

Roquentin wrote: »

you pay for it either way. one uses cash the other uses a different form of currency.

the guy who goes into the nightclub and buys a woman a few drinks pays for it with drinks.

the man/woman in the relationship must trade in some way with the man/woman. there is no such thing as a free lunch

It's simply not true that you pay for it anyway, I've had sex the same night I met women and never paid a cent for any drinks, in fact women have often paid for my drinks.

Roquentin

Alexis Sanchez2 wrote: »

It's simply not true that you pay for it anyway, I've had sex the same night I met women and never paid a cent for any drinks, in fact women have often paid for my drinks.

well you must be a stud because they are paying for you.

Alexis Sanchez2

Roquentin wrote: »

well you must be a stud because they are paying for you.

They weren't paying for me either, I would have snagged them with or without drinks being bought for me.

Roquentin

Alexis Sanchez2 wrote: »

They weren't paying for me either, I would have snagged them with or without drinks being bought for me.

ok well then the trade was something other than money

mariaalice

The absolute cynicism of seeing sex as something you have to pay for( monetary or otherwise ) is so depressing, do so many people fell themselves so unworthy and wary of relationship's.

nokia69

Roquentin wrote: »

ok well then the trade was something other than money

maybe in this case both people are trading sex for sex

a fair deal IMO

lufties

mariaalice wrote: »

The absolute cynicism of seeing sex as something you have to pay for( monetary or otherwise ) is a bit sad.

It is sad, but its reality..some men don't want emotional connection, and some men can't get the type of girl they want. Women have the power.

Alexis Sanchez2

Roquentin wrote: »

ok well then the trade was something other than money

Yes as was said already, sex in exchange for sex.

Roquentin

nokia69 wrote: »

maybe in this case both people are trading sex for sex

a fair deal IMO

yea sexual gratification for sexual gratification. still a trade

hatrickpatrick

Lucena wrote: »

@BD45

The Page 3 thing. Feminists have the right to be against it, even if there are women suffering things far worse in other countries. It's almost like saying people shouldn't waste their time recycling as it's not as important as saving the rainforests.

But it has nothing to do with equal rights. So saying "feminism = gender equality" is disingenuous. Feminism = gender equality + a whole bunch of extra cultural control crap.

@Everyone

Extremists of any belief should not be assumed to represent the whole.

How do you define an extremist vs an "ordinary" feminist? If Reddit's feminism forum, arguably the biggest feminist community on ye Internet right now, officially endorses "shirt gate" and bans people for disagreeing, is it not fair to say that this position is not merely an "extremist" one but a mainstream feminist agenda?

markc2951

visit escort ireland.com and see.the website is been managed from the uk,although it was widely spoken on that websites forum that it had been moved to spain..the company is making savage money.millions..

its a similiar forum to here with moderators and posters congratulating escorts on reaching so many good reviews.

one lad visits a domination escort to be butchered by whips.put in a cage..mad eat dog food but no sex.weird af imo

markc2951

just checked the total number of escorts in dublin and there is just over 400 in dublin now.i kid you not

Tugboats

During the Tiger when people were doing christmas shopping in New York I was banging my way around Prague and Bangkok 6 or 7 times a year. Now a hooker is a luxury I can't afford and I'm stuck with a fat girlfriend

eternal

Tugboats wrote: »

During the Tiger when people were doing christmas shopping in New York I was banging my way around Prague and Bangkok 6 or 7 times a year. Now a hooker is a luxury I can't afford and I'm stuck with a fat girlfriend

Every single goddamn post you write regardless of the topic comes back to your partner. The unoriginality of your existence is a hindrance to my viewing pleasure, just so you know.

Tugboats

eternal wrote: »

Every single goddamn post you write regardless of the topic comes back to your partner. The unoriginality of your existence is a hindrance to my viewing pleasure, just so you know.

Not true. Thanks

crockholm

mariaalice wrote: »

The absolute cynicism of seeing sex as something you have to pay for( monetary or otherwise ) is so depressing, do so many people fell themselves so unworthy and wary of relationship's.

Well,I guess it's time for a bit of honesty then.
Before I was married and had kids,I was single and working in the Netherlands, and I will freely admit to going to a "Health Spa",mostly I would go with a Group of lads,but once or twice,I Went on my own.

We were working on average of 65-75 hours a week in damn tough conditions,we soon figured out from the lads there Before us that there was easier ways to get laid than going to the bars and chatting to some semi-interested Dutch Girls,who themselves had the option of talking to more handsome Dutch men in their native tongue.

The bordello was 50 Euro to enter,but the beer and food were all free from then on in,the atmosphere was fun and easy-going,lots of stag parties being catered for there too.The Girls there were asked by the owners not to be too forcefull when interacting with the Johns,it was more a case of you Went up and spoke to the girl you were interested in.

The Girls themselves were about 50%dutch,the remainder being mostly German,Polish or Belgian or Hungarian with a few (2-3) non-european Girls in the mix,all tastes and peccadillos catered for.

The Place was very well kept (Think giant fancy,ultra modern lounge with jaccuzzi's-maffia roccocco),the Girls were the type that Went to the bars that we weren't left into,and once you had a few beers (or not),conduct business according to your own tastes and hit the Town with the lads after.

Good times.

BetterThanThou

Can't say I have an issue with it, though it's something I wouldn't do myself. As long as he takes the necessary precautions, it shouldn't carry too much risk. Just because he uses a prostitute doesn't mean he has the wrong opinion of women, it's just that the desire for sex and the desire for emotional attraction don't go hand in hand, some people want one or the other, he just wants sex.

Tony EH

Saralee4 wrote: »

I agree but i wonder what the protistute was doing that was so great that other girls couldn't provide him with.

Ah come on, this is hardly a serious question now is it.

Roquentin

another reason as well is the anonymity that visiting an escort affords one. if you enter into a relationship or i suppose even a short fling you become known by the lady and her friends, at least some of them. but if the relationship turns sour its goes sour with all her friends too. if this is a woman from your local area, you could be in trouble.

visiting an escorts does away with this. its a professional service as the advertise. once you walk out the door you never see the lady again. i am sure that is part of the attraction

harry Bailey esq

Tugboats wrote: »

Now a hooker is a luxury I can't afford and I'm stuck with a fat girlfriend

Well at least your username befits you chief :pac:

nokia69

wrong thread

Saralee4

Tony EH wrote: »

Ah come on, this is hardly a serious question now is it.

If you read the full conversation, you would see that I suggested that perhaps the guy had some kind of fetish and this is the real reason why he goes to hookers because he is either too embarrassed to ask a woman or women will not perform what he wants.

The poster doubted that his friend was into anything kinky so you would have to wonder what is so great about sex with the hooker if hes not getting her to do anything kinky, and this guy apparently can get sex with women for free (sometimes its great, sometimes is normal and sometimes not so great sex).

That's why I asked that question because if he's not getting her do anything unusual then I don't understand why it would be so much better. In other words, he's clearly getting the hookers to do something kinky because he's not paying them for sex that he can get for free and if they are not doing something unique for him, then he is not going to pay when he can get that for free as the poster said.

Roquentin

Saralee4 wrote: »

If you read the full conversation, you would see that I suggested that perhaps the guy had some kind of fetish and this is the real reason why he goes to hookers because he is either too embarrassed to ask a woman or women will not perform what he wants.

The poster doubted that his friend was into anything kinky so you would have to wonder what is so great about sex with the hooker if hes not getting her to do anything kinky, and this guy apparently can get sex with women for free (sometimes its great, sometimes is normal and sometimes not so great sex).

That's why I asked that question because if he's not getting her do anything unusual then I don't understand why it would be so much better. In other words, he's clearly getting the hookers to do something kinky because he's not paying them for sex that he can get for free and if they are not doing something unique for him, then he is not going to pay when he can get that for free as the poster said.

well he could just be having sex with an absolute stunner. maybe the girls he normally gets arent quite the same level. some of these escorts are absolutely to die for in terms of looks. brazilians, eastern europeans etc....

Tony EH

Saralee4 wrote: »

If you read the full conversation, you would see that I suggested that perhaps the guy had some kind of fetish and this is the real reason why he goes to hookers because he is either too embarrassed to ask a woman or women will not perform what he wants.

The poster doubted that his friend was into anything kinky so you would have to wonder what is so great about sex with the hooker if hes not getting her to do anything kinky, and this guy apparently can get sex with women for free (sometimes its great, sometimes is normal and sometimes not so great sex).

That's why I asked that question because if he's not getting her do anything unusual then I don't understand why it would be so much better. In other words, he's clearly getting the hookers to do something kinky because he's not paying them for sex that he can get for free and if they are not doing something unique for him, then he is not going to pay when he can get that for free as the poster said.

Sara, there are guys in relationships with girlfriends and wives that don't get so much as a midnight tug on a Thursday night.

Going to a hooker guarantees that the punter gets what he/she wishes. Well, almost anyway. I assume. I've never had that particular experience myself, nor would I be THAT interested in pursuing such either.

But, it's really not that difficult to understand what a hooker offers that other girls are not likely to.

I'm not trying to get at you here, Sara, I just think that your question is an extremely easy one to answer.

Alexis Sanchez2

If you aren't able to seduce stunning women then it's understandable that some men would be be willing to pay for it to see what sex with a stunning woman is like, even if they are paying for it.

Saralee4

Tony EH wrote: »

Sara, there are guys in relationships with girlfriends and wives that don't get so much as a midnight tug on a Thursday night.

Going to a hooker guarantees that the punter gets what he/she wishes. Well, almost anyway. I assume. I've never had that particular experience myself, nor would I be THAT interested in pursuing such either.

But, it's really not that difficult to understand what a hooker offers that other girls are not likely to.

I'm not trying to get at you here, Sara, I just think that your question is an extremely easy one to answer.

Ah no tony I know your not getting at me. Im just very sensitive about the topic because when I was a kid my father left my mother and ran away with a hooker and took my pet hamster with them haha only joking :pac:

I am aware of course that the hooker will provide whatever the guy is paying for (within their own limits) but from the other conversation I was having it sounded as though the guy is saying that sex is great simply because she is a hooker and that the guy wasn't wanting anyting unique just 'guaranteed great sex'. So I was trying to make the point that the real reason he is going to see the hookers is because they will do things for him that the other women will not. The question was rhetorical.

The Corinthian

mariaalice wrote: »

The absolute cynicism of seeing sex as something you have to pay for( monetary or otherwise ) is so depressing, do so many people fell themselves so unworthy and wary of relationship's.

Not unworthy, just don't trust them.

With the consequences of marriage being so punitive for men specifically, there's been a move in Western society twoards what has been called a marriage strike as more and more men simply refuse to get into a legally binding situation that could be devastating to them down the line.

It's not that visible in Ireland yet, where divorce is still only about 16% (same odds as losing a game of Russian roulette, btw), but it's a serious concern elsewhere (where I live it's over 50%). And it's getting worse which is why some countries are introducing cohabitation laws that force people into a form of that legally binding situation once they've been living together long enough. So men are increasingly opting out.

So it is depressing, I agree, but that's what happens when you seek equality by only improving the situation for one gender.

hatrickpatrick

Tugboats wrote: »

I was banging my way around Prague and Bangkok 6 or 7 times a year.

You wan' massaaaaaaaaaaage?

Seriously though, there's a reason they call it Bangkok Careful now