Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Al Jazeera

1568101146

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭druss


    excollier wrote: »
    How many Premiership games does Cyfra+ intend showing?

    The rights blurb on the Premier League website misleadingly states that Canal+ have rights to "all 380 games".

    I presume this means that they can pick and choose their games without having a BT/Sky standoff. I can't find any clear statement on whether they intend to cover more or less this year. Normally it's just a case of waiting for the programe schedule for the first month of the season.

    I've picked out a random weekend from last season as an example.

    Saturday 23 February 2013.

    http://liveonsat.com/2_day.php?start_dd=23&start_mm=02&start_yyyy=2013&end_dd=23&end_mm=02&end_yyyy=2013

    3 Polish games. Fulham v Stoke (12.45), QPR v Man Utd (15.00). Also Deportivo v Real and Barca v Sevilla.

    Sunday 24 February

    http://liveonsat.com/2_day.php?start_dd=24&start_mm=02&start_yyyy=2013&end_dd=24&end_mm=02&end_yyyy=2013

    2 Polish games, Man City v Chelsea.

    Also PSG v Marseille, Lyon v Lorient, Atletico v Espanyol, Betis v Malaga.

    Monday 25 September

    West Ham V Spurs.

    No Italian football, which they used to show. They don't appear to be interested this year either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭druss


    A proprietary box?

    It sounds like so much hassle when I just want to see all the Serie A games and the other Premiership games :o :pac:

    And that's exactly the point!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    druss wrote: »
    The rights blurb on the Premier League website misleadingly states that Canal+ have rights to "all 380 games".
    .

    Why is it misleading?

    They, like most broadcasters in other territories, have paid for exclusive access to the Premier League's 380 matches.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭excollier


    So it's NC+ that will be showing Premiership, according to that article. I must contact my Polish acquaintence then.
    I wonder which encryption they will be using.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭Smithwicks Man


    druss wrote: »
    And that's exactly the point!

    Ah i see... Might just stick to the online streaming if it's that big of a nuisance without any guarantee of the serie a/premiership games being shown


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭druss


    radiowaves wrote: »
    Why is it misleading?

    They, like most broadcasters in other territories, have paid for exclusive access to the Premier League's 380 matches.

    Some people have said to me that they read Cyfra will show all 380 games. Just saying that they have exclusive Polish rights is sufficient. IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭mightybashful


    Ah i see... Might just stick to the online streaming if it's that big of a nuisance without any guarantee of the serie a/premiership games being shown

    Or not. Only a matter of time til Sean Sherlock gets wind of this

    @owen_g: Premier League secures ruling forcing major ISPs to block "parasitic" streaming site First Row Sports. Claims it was generating £10m a year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭druss


    excollier wrote: »
    So it's NC+ that will be showing Premiership, according to that article. I must contact my Polish acquaintence then.
    I wonder which encryption they will be using.

    That's just the name for the cyfra/n conglomerate. It's still basically cyfra. N is the BSB to Cyfras Sky!

    Same encryption.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,914 ✭✭✭lertsnim


    Or not. Only a matter of time til Sean Sherlock gets wind of this

    @owen_g: Premier League secures ruling forcing major ISPs to block "parasitic" streaming site First Row Sports. Claims it was generating £10m a year.

    That will be as useful as Sherlock blocking the pirate bay. A pointless exercise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    druss wrote: »
    Some people have said to me that they read Cyfra will show all 380 games. Just saying that they have exclusive Polish rights is sufficient. IMO.

    Fair enough. But the phrasing is the same for all press releases - the emphasis being that they can show all 380 games (and many, many broadcasters do show them all).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    radiowaves wrote: »
    Fair enough. But the phrasing is the same for all press releases - the emphasis being that they can show all 380 games (and many, many broadcasters do show them all).

    What broadcasters show them all ?

    Satellite space, its limited.

    They pick what they want.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,642 ✭✭✭iba


    STB wrote: »
    What broadcasters show them all ?

    Satellite space, its limited.

    They pick what they want.

    Abu Dhabi sports showed them all last year and before them Showtime but obviously just in Middle East and North Africa


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    Or not. Only a matter of time til Sean Sherlock gets wind of this

    @owen_g: Premier League secures ruling forcing major ISPs to block "parasitic" streaming site First Row Sports. Claims it was generating £10m a year.

    Times have moved on in the streaming world.

    You cant just block anything these days. There is always a work around no matter if its legal or illegal.

    And by the way in my experience those streaming sites are very dangerous sites to be using. Flash hacked ? Why not. The IP source of a lot of this stuff is coming from are hosting malicious content as I have told Wiziwig before..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    iba wrote: »
    Abu Dhabi sports showed them all last year and before them Showtime but obviously just in Middle East and North Africa

    Neither were available in Ireland as it was on 7W.

    ADMC used proprietary humax boxes with card marrying. They also lost a damn fortune on the deal not that money was their motivation.

    Abu Dhabi TV is a FTA channel. They had to sublicence to Showtime and ARTN in order to fulfill the PL deal that the channels not be shown FTA!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭mightybashful


    STB wrote: »
    Times have moved on in the streaming world.

    You cant just block anything these days. There is always a work around no matter if its legal or illegal.

    And by the way in my experience those streaming sites are very dangerous sites to be using. Flash hacked ? Why not. The IP source of a lot of this stuff is coming from are hosting malicious content as I have told Wiziwig before..

    TBH I hate steaming streaming sites and wouldnt bother with them no more. Too many x's to click and too often a loss of picture


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭mightybashful


    iba wrote: »
    Abu Dhabi sports showed them all last year and before them Showtime but obviously just in Middle East and North Africa

    JSC / bein say they're showing all 380 matches this season


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    STB wrote: »
    What broadcasters show them all ?

    Satellite space, its limited.

    Hardly that much!!!

    At 90-100 minutes per match, all ten games from any matchday could easily be shown within a 24 hour period on just one channel (some games even twice!).

    There are even rights-holders who had enough capacity to show every game live.

    Because, of course, many Premier League rights-holders have dedicated sports channels, some even with dedicated Premier League channels - although thanks to the 3pm restrictions just one channel would probably suffice for the next 3 years...

    I could give you a rundown of broadcasters fully utilising the 380 match contract based on last season but that won't apply to this season.

    Anyway iba has already responded to your request for an example, which apparently doesn't count because you say the channels were not receivable in Ireland (actually they were - via satellite with a minimum 1.8m dish focused on 26East or alternatively using IPTV). So, only channels that you can receive count? No wonder you're not aware that there are broadcasters who make the most of the rights that they pay for :p

    Anyway, TV2 Norway have already said they plan to show all 380 matches next season utilising three channels - TV2 Sport Premium 1, TV2 Sport Premium 2 & TV2 Sport Premium 3.

    And to the original point: PL rights across the world are these days sold on a 380 match basis, even if some channels don't plan on showing every game. If a broadcaster has paid for access to all 380 games why wouldn't it be mentioned in a press release?

    Although that specific phrasing is probably used because there used to be a clause that no team could be featured by a broadcaster more than 37 times. So, saying a rights-holder has "exclusivity" is not the same as saying they have rights to "all 380 games".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    radiowaves wrote: »
    Hardly that much!!!

    At 90-100 minutes per match, all ten games from any matchday could easily be shown within a 24 hour period on just one channel (some games even twice!).

    There are even rights-holders who had enough capacity to show every game live.

    Because, of course, many Premier League rights-holders have dedicated sports channels, some even with dedicated Premier League channels - although thanks to the 3pm restrictions just one channel would probably suffice for the next 3 years...

    I could give you a rundown of broadcasters fully utilising the 380 match contract based on last season but that won't apply to this season.

    Anyway iba has already responded to your request for an example, which apparently doesn't count because you say the channels were not receivable in Ireland (actually they were - via satellite with a minimum 1.8m dish focused on 26East or alternatively using IPTV). So, only channels that you can receive count? No wonder you're not aware that there are broadcasters who make the most of the rights that they pay for :p

    Anyway, TV2 Norway have already said they plan to show all 380 matches next season utilising three channels - TV2 Sport Premium 1, TV2 Sport Premium 2 & TV2 Sport Premium 3.

    And to the original point: PL rights across the world are these days sold on a 380 match basis, even if some channels don't plan on showing every game. If a broadcaster has paid for access to all 380 games why wouldn't it be mentioned in a press release?

    Although that specific phrasing is probably used because there used to be a clause that no team could be featured by a broadcaster more than 37 times. So, saying a rights-holder has "exclusivity" is not the same as saying they have rights to "all 380 games".

    Space. Transponder space I was referring is what would be required for dedicated HD channels for ALL Live games.

    I am fully aware of what is claimed and what is offered/what can be offered.

    I fully understand that you could show full games back to back on one frequency, but it might be difficult doing that for live programming without a time machine for all your subscribers.

    Access/Rights to 380 games does not mean that they will be broadcast live. What one broadcaster in Europe broadcasts ALL games live on one satellite platform last season? NONE. 3pm games. Court ruling within Europe in March 2012 precluded that. Read up.

    What satellite broadcaster outside Europe offered 380 games that can be accessed via what could be called an acceptable sized dish ?

    The only relevance to have access to 380 live games is if you can receive them.

    Now outside of having to use dodgy VPN services to access those IPTV streams from outside Europe (ADMC I gather), you would have needed a 3m dish (1.8m ! lol) at least to access BADR6 and still be reliant on good weather.

    TV2, Norway. Read up on the cost. ALL games LIVE? 3pm's? No. (wasnt this pulled on Viasat in March last year following EU Courts decision affecting all EU countries ?).

    Abu Dhabi TV a free to air operator owned by the royal family had to use Showtime and local TV to distribute its channels at the time because of the PL stipulations that it couldn't be unencrypted. Money was no problem as the royal family have loads!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    STB wrote: »
    Space. Transponder space I was referring is what would be required for dedicated HD channels for ALL Live games.

    ...

    I fully understand that you could show full games back to back on one frequency, but it might be difficult doing that for live programming without a time machine for all your subscribers.

    Access/Rights to 380 games does not mean that they will be broadcast live. What one broadcaster in Europe broadcasts ALL games live on one satellite platform last season? NONE. 3pm games. Court ruling within Europe in March 2012 precluded that. Read up.

    What satellite broadcaster outside Europe offered 380 games that can be accessed via what could be called an acceptable sized dish ?

    The only relevance to have access to 380 live games is if you can receive them.

    Now outside of having to use dodgy VPN services to access those IPTV streams from outside Europe (ADMC I gather), you would have needed a 3m dish (1.8m ! lol) at least to access BADR6 and still be reliant on good weather.

    TV2, Norway. Read up on the cost. ALL games LIVE? 3pm's? No. (wasnt this pulled on Viasat in March last year following EU Courts decision affecting all EU countries ?).

    My advice? You tell me to "read up"!!! Please read up on the posts you're responding to.

    You've jumped in on a debate without actually reading what's been said or debated. Every point of mine you've answered is a shifting of the goalposts (get it?) away from what's been said.

    Who brought up live games? You've even gone to the trouble of making the word live bold, accentuating the fact that we're talking about different things.

    Contracts are sold on the basis of access to all 380 games. Read the press release brought up at the centre of this discussion. That is the simple basis of this discussion and my previous posts. No specific mention of live rights at all, because in many territories - pertinently, including the territory mentioned in the relevant PR - it is now forbidden to show all 380 matches live so quite obviously the discussion couldn't specifically be about live rights, which you seem to think it is.

    The further development was a query about who actually shows all 380 games (again no mention of live). Responses were not acceptable to you as you later introduced HD into the equation in relation to satellite space. You even introduced subscription cost. And further introduced channel location as yet another proviso!!!
    And finally, best of all, your proviso in which you were really arguing with yourself. Which was
    What one broadcaster in Europe broadcasts ALL games live on one satellite platform last season? NONE. 3pm games. Court ruling within Europe in March 2012 precluded that.
    So now it only counts if it's on satellite? (Just again, to be clear, the satellite platform is not mentioned in the relevant PR - in fact save me the bother and read up on the PR yourself. It's linked to in another post.)

    You really should be a politician you know :p

    BTW it was the Premier League who introduced the one 3pm match restriction (and it was on satellite only mate, broadcasters were still free to show other matches online) not the courts. Again, read up on it!

    To conclude:

    I never said TV2 were showing all matches live, nor mentioned subscription costs, so why are you arguing with me?

    I know what time matches kick off at (season-ticket holders need to!) but why is that relevant?

    And to reiterate, I know how many games are, and can be, shown live. So - wait for it! - do the Premier League (who issued the "380 match" press release).

    Any points to make which are relevant to the posts you're quoting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    STB wrote: »
    Now outside of having to use dodgy VPN services to access those IPTV streams from outside Europe (ADMC I gather), you would have needed a 3m dish (1.8m ! lol) at least to access BADR6 and still be reliant on good weather.
    !

    As I said.

    Once again, read again.

    A minimum of 1.8m was needed (in the early stages of last season it was possible). Source? A satellite installer who installed same!
    It later went up to 2.4m, and after that I don't have direct knowledge so will take your word that it has further increased.

    And there are many people (and growing) using a proxy service to subscribe to online providers that show all 380 matches live. What's dodgy about it - out of interest?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    radiowaves wrote: »
    My advice? You tell me to "read up"!!! Please read up on the posts you're responding to.

    You've jumped in on a debate without actually reading what's been said or debated. Every point of mine you've answered is a shifting of the goalposts (get it?) away from what's been said.

    Who brought up live games? You've even gone to the trouble of making the word live bold, accentuating the fact that we're talking about different things.

    Contracts are sold on the basis of access to all 380 games. Read the press release brought up at the centre of this discussion. That is the simple basis of this discussion and my previous posts. No specific mention of live rights at all, because in many territories - pertinently, including the territory mentioned in the relevant PR - it is now forbidden to show all 380 matches live so quite obviously the discussion couldn't specifically be about live rights, which you seem to think it is.

    The further development was a query about who actually shows all 380 games (again no mention of live). Responses were not acceptable to you as you later introduced HD into the equation in relation to satellite space. You even introduced subscription cost. And further introduced channel location as yet another proviso!!!
    And finally, best of all, your proviso in which you were really arguing with yourself. Which was


    So now it only counts if it's on satellite? (Just again, to be clear, the satellite platform is not mentioned in the relevant PR - in fact save me the bother and read up on the PR yourself. It's linked to in another post.)

    You really should be a politician you know :p

    BTW it was the Premier League who introduced the one 3pm match restriction (and it was on satellite only mate, broadcasters were still free to show other matches online) not the courts. Again, read up on it!

    To conclude:

    I never said TV2 were showing all matches live, nor mentioned subscription costs, so why are you arguing with me?

    I know what time matches kick off at (season-ticket holders need to!) but why is that relevant?

    And to reiterate, I know how many games are, and can be, shown live. So - wait for it! - do the Premier League (who issued the "380 match" press release).

    Any points to make which are relevant to the posts you're quoting?

    First off drop the smart ass I think I know it all attitude.

    This is a satellite forum. The Foreign Satellite Forum, not an IPTV forum and definitely not a College debating society forum, least you forget where you are.

    I should have been a politician eh. Sadly I chose telecommunications in college.

    This thread actually started with someone wishing to access Al Jazeera to view the COPA 2 years ago.

    People discussing Al Jazeera in this thread lately are doing so in the hope of having a cheap sub to football as an alternative of Sky for the 2013/14 season. In this case given that Al Jazeera were the likely platform to win the MENA rights and given their subs have been fairly cheap in the past. There are plenty of these football sub threads ongoing under the foreign satellite forum.

    People subscribing expect access to live programming. There expectations do not extend to a 24 hour station showing reruns of previous live games.

    If you have been following these threads, the expectations of many is

    1) affordable
    2) receivable satellite
    3) showing a few live games
    4) Good PQ

    The whole 380 games is a misnomer. Some have claimed access to 380 live games such as Viasat and ADMC.

    Neither of these pass the expectation test in any event.

    ADMC whilst receivable Via IPTV was a nightmare even for those that had the bandwidth, the VPN, and the know. Again this is a satellite forum.

    The minimum dish size required to pick up Badr 6 or Nilesat is not 1.8m. This is far too small for Ireland. This is the third time I have said it. If you believe otherwise, try it.

    There have been some expectations in the previous posts that it will be on 13E (not likely), 26E (perhaps but BADR 6, not BADR 4) or Nilesat 7.3W (highly likely).

    The court ruling on the Karen Murphy drove the FAPL's hand to throw their toys out of the pram. Viasat did not hide the reasoning for this and its still on their website to see.

    As of Saturday, March 10th, we need to make a change in the broadcasts of Premier League. We can only broadcast a live match at 16.00 hours on Saturdays. All other matches from the Premier League will be sent as usual, it's only game at. 16:00 on Saturdays affected. The change implemented by the Premier League after a decision by the European Court of Justice and British courts, and this affects the broadcasting of Premier League over Europe. The game we may send Saturdays. 16:00 broadcast on Viasat Football and Viasat Football HD. As of Saturday, Viasat Premier League HD no longer broadcast live matches but only reprized matches. We are sorry for this and fully understand that this can create anger and frustration. Other games that go at. 16:00 on Saturday offered directly sent via http://www.viaplay.se/.

    If you purchased the subscription to see all 380 games, a live look at the Premier League from Viasat via satellite or broadband TV will have access to Viaplay free season out. Visit www.viasat.se / try-viaplay and register your account.

    Why has this happened?
    These changes implemented by the Premier League after a decision by the European Court of Justice and British courts, and this affects the broadcasting of Premier League over Europe. We will continue to broadcast a live game at. 16:00 on Saturdays at Viasat Football HD / SD and we have a right to broadcast it, and the other on Viaplay. Matches from Premier League, which is at other times is not affected by this.

    What does the rulings?
    Verdicts means that non-UK subscriptions can be used to show the Premier League in the UK. The British Football Association also demands that football is not broadcast on TV on Saturday afternoons when the majority of Premier League matches are played. This is why the changes now being made by the Premier League.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    STB wrote: »
    First off drop the smart ass I think I know it all attitude.

    This is a satellite forum. The Foreign Satellite Forum, not an IPTV forum and definitely not a College debating society forum, least you forget where you are.

    I should have been a politician eh. Sadly I chose telecommunications in college.

    This thread actually started with someone wishing to access Al Jazeera to view the COPA 2 years ago.

    People discussing Al Jazeera in this thread lately are doing so in the hope of having a cheap sub to football as an alternative of Sky for the 2013/14 season. In this case given that Al Jazeera were the likely platform to win the MENA rights and given their subs have been fairly cheap in the past. There are plenty of these football sub threads ongoing under the foreign satellite forum.

    People subscribing expect access to live programming. There expectations do not extend to a 24 hour station showing reruns of previous live games.

    If you have been following these threads, the expectations of many is

    1) affordable
    2) receivable satellite
    3) showing a few live games
    4) Good PQ

    The whole 380 games is a misnomer. Some have claimed access to 380 live games such as Viasat and ADMC.

    Neither of these pass the expectation test in any event.

    ADMC whilst receivable Via IPTV was a nightmare even for those that had the bandwidth, the VPN, and the know. Again this is a satellite forum.

    The minimum dish size required to pick up Badr 6 or Nilesat is not 1.8m. This is far too small for Ireland. This is the third time I have said it. If you believe otherwise, try it.

    There have been some expectations in the previous posts that it will be on 13E (not likely), 26E (perhaps but BADR 6, not BADR 4) or Nilesat 7.3W (highly likely).

    The court ruling on the Karen Murphy drove the FAPL's hand to throw their toys out of the pram. Viasat did not hide the reasoning for this and its still on their website to see.

    As of Saturday, March 10th, we need to make a change in the broadcasts of Premier League. We can only broadcast a live match at 16.00 hours on Saturdays. All other matches from the Premier League will be sent as usual, it's only game at. 16:00 on Saturdays affected. The change implemented by the Premier League after a decision by the European Court of Justice and British courts, and this affects the broadcasting of Premier League over Europe. The game we may send Saturdays. 16:00 broadcast on Viasat Football and Viasat Football HD. As of Saturday, Viasat Premier League HD no longer broadcast live matches but only reprized matches. We are sorry for this and fully understand that this can create anger and frustration. Other games that go at. 16:00 on Saturday offered directly sent via http://www.viaplay.se/.

    If you purchased the subscription to see all 380 games, a live look at the Premier League from Viasat via satellite or broadband TV will have access to Viaplay free season out. Visit www.viasat.se / try-viaplay and register your account.

    Why has this happened?
    These changes implemented by the Premier League after a decision by the European Court of Justice and British courts, and this affects the broadcasting of Premier League over Europe. We will continue to broadcast a live game at. 16:00 on Saturdays at Viasat Football HD / SD and we have a right to broadcast it, and the other on Viaplay. Matches from Premier League, which is at other times is not affected by this.

    What does the rulings?
    Verdicts means that non-UK subscriptions can be used to show the Premier League in the UK. The British Football Association also demands that football is not broadcast on TV on Saturday afternoons when the majority of Premier League matches are played. This is why the changes now being made by the Premier League.

    Jesus!

    You still haven't read exactly what you're replying to, have you?

    I'll be honest, this sort of attitude is what puts contributors off forums.

    A couple of points, then I'm outta this thread.

    Whatever the thread started out as, like all threads on any forum (and like conversations in real-life) discussions organically develop. Attempt to stifle this and you'd have a million threads all specifically about one single thing and not allowed to develop further. Impossible too, I might add.

    As I've already said, when you quoted my contributions your responses were irrelevant (and still are). I joined the thread to respond to somebody else. Their query was nothing to do with AJ either!

    Re the 1.8m dish for BADR - read what I said because at no point have I said that BADR6 is achievable here on a 1.8m dish. (shakes head in frustration).

    Re IPTV you tell me that is out of bounds here but discuss the whole thing at length yourself! It only came up because you said it was not possible to receive ADMC Sports in this country. Have to say the experiences I've heard from others is that they had a good service so people shouldn't be put off if AJ Sports is as cheap. (I think it's for the mods to decide what's acceptable and relevant anyway)

    Re the Karen Murphy court case, you told me it "precluded" more than one live 3pm whilst also advising me to "read up" on it.
    I pointed out to you that it was actually the Premier League who forced the dropping of live 3pm matches.
    The court case did not preclude them - the court case had nothing to do with them, although the Premier League did use the blackout period as one of their objections to the use of foreign decoders in the UK.
    The court case was actually about exclusivity of contracts and it was certainly not in a position to dictate to rights-holders from outside the UK what they can and can't show. Ironically, now that you have read up on it - through a Google translate too - you appear to misunderstand what you're quoting. In this link you can read up on it further.
    The sad part of this is that I'm sure the Premier League hoped that people would blame the court case rather than themselves for the lack of live 3pm matches - unfortunately in your case they've succeeded.
    To be fair to you, when the Premier League introduced their restrictions many forum contributors across the UK turned on Karen Murphy - having originally applauded her when the court decision was made. Some know-it-alls, like myself, warned what might happen - ie live matches forced onto tighter satellite beams and local internet services exclusively. I didn't think they'd actually go as far as preventing them from being screened altogether!

    It seems like a strange attitude, btw, to say that because this is a satellite forum it should be forbidden to say that some broadcasters actually did show all the 3pm games live last season across all their platforms and to actually argue that they didn't because some weren't available on satellite!

    Forums are full of people who argue for the sake of it and don't actually read what they're arguing with.

    If I come across as "knowing it all" it's really because I have read up on what I'm saying. And I do also get it wrong.

    I'm sorted for the upcoming season. I genuinely wish you luck in sorting it for yourself.

    And also wish others luck in sourcing same, hoping that they can bypass the misinformation that can blight forums.

    And a general point to add to the thread.
    I'm not necessarily looking for cheaper than Sky/BT/Setanta access to Premier League games, or even the magical 380.
    I just want access to my team's 38 matches live and am prepared to pay any amount for that. If the 2/3 broadcasters we need to subscribe to here provided them I'd happily sign up.
    This, really, is where the Premier League have got it wrong and are losing out - especially in England - but as long as the rights are sold collectively, or as long as Premier League matches continue to kick-off at 3pm rather than the hassle-free solution of moving them outside the blackout period, I suppose this ridiculous situation will continue.

    Right, as I said, I'm outta here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,647 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Best and cheapest place to buy this card?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭Bubonic


    So as a total newbie to all this, am I right in thinking to get 7 Nilesat for this I would need at least a 1.2 m dish and even then they will soon pair the card to the box?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,642 ✭✭✭iba


    Bubonic wrote: »
    So as a total newbie to all this, am I right in thinking to get 7 Nilesat for this I would need at least a 1.2 m dish and even then they will soon pair the card to the box?

    I think you need at least a 1.8m or even a 3m one; might be paired in the future


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭Bubonic


    iba wrote: »
    I think you need at least a 1.8m or even a 3m one; might be paired in the future

    Crap, thats that so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭kooga


    so anyway al Jazeera minus epl on hotbird is it worth paying for a sub and getting a card in the next week or so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    iba wrote: »
    I think you need at least a 1.8m or even a 3m one; might be paired in the future

    Viaccess 5, definitely!

    1.8 is no good. For Nilesat A Monster, NASA sized dish. Purplesat dont even have calcs its so out of range.

    http://purplesat.com/index.php?p=1_104_STRONG-CHANNELS-LISTS-010713

    Go down to Nilesat 201.


  • Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 19,179 Mod ✭✭✭✭byte
    byte


    kooga wrote: »
    so anyway al Jazeera minus epl on hotbird is it worth paying for a sub and getting a card in the next week or so?
    Depends if JSC stays on Hotbird.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,275 ✭✭✭irishchris


    kooga wrote: »
    so anyway al Jazeera minus epl on hotbird is it worth paying for a sub and getting a card in the next week or so?

    Imo definitely worth it. Have had my sub for the last 3 years and best money ever spent. Champs league, Europa league,fa cup, carling cup,seria A, la liga and internationals for 69 Euro renewal is just great value!


Advertisement