Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
jfk taken out by mob??? **Contains Graphic Images**
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Brown Bomber wrote: »Nobody offended with the blaming of Italians/ Italian Americans?
Anyone?...
I don't seem to recall them being blamed for almost anything you can think of on an almost daily basis.0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Cut it out.Brown Bomber wrote: »Nobody offended with the blaming of Italians/ Italian Americans?
Anyone?...0 -
-
-
-
-
Why was the car cleaned immediately after the murder? Appears something wanted to be hidden!?
Because the inside of the car was splattered in blood and brain matter and it was a gruesome sight.
The physical evidence however shows that Kennedy was struck by two bullets.
1. In the back of the base of the neck above the level of the shoulder blade and to the right of the spine at the level the C6 vertebra before it exited the base of the trachea below the larynx.
A. Bullet Hole in Back of Suit Collar and Shirt.
B. Bullet Hole in Back.
C. Halo around Bullet Hole.
D. Spine Struck by Bullet.
E. & F. Pleura and Lung Bruised.
G. Air in Tissues.
H. Hole in Trachea.
I. Tracheostomy.
J. Holes in Front of Shirt.
K. Nick in Necktie.
2. The fatal bullet struck Kennedy in the back of the head and exited the top front right side:
It is clear therefore that two fatal shots came from above and behind from the direction of the 6th floor TSBD south east corner window.
There was nothing to remain hidden. Oswald did it.0 -
-
1.fergus o brien wrote: »his post office box account did not have A hiddel named so no post for A
hiddel would be sent to that box.
That's completely untrue. This is where the issue is addressed in the Warren Report:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/wcr4.htm#p2During the evening of November 22, 1963, a review of the records of Crescent Firearms revealed that the firm had shipped an Italian carbine, serial number C2766, to Klein's Sporting Goods Co., of Chicago, Ill. After searching their records from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. the officers of Klein's discovered that a rifle bearing serial number C2766 had been shipped to one A. Hidell, Post Office Box 2915, Dallas, Tex., on March 20, 1963. (See Waldman Exhibit No. 7, p. 120.) According to its microfilm records, Klein's received an order for a rifle on March 13, 1963, on a coupon clipped from the February 1963 issue of the American Rifleman magazine. The order coupon was signed, in hand printing, "A. Hidell, P.O. Box 2915, Dallas, Texas." (See Commission Exhibit No. 773, p. 120.) It was sent in an envelope bearing the same name and return address in handwriting. Document examiners for the Treasury Department and the FBI testified unequivocally that the bold printing on the face of the mail-order coupon was in the hand printing of Lee Harvey Oswald and that the writing on the envelope was also his. Oswald's writing on these and other documents was identified by comparing the writing and printing on the documents in question with that appearing on documents known to have been written by Oswald, such as his letters, passport application, and endorsements of checks. (See app. X, p. 568-569.) In addition to the order coupon the envelope contained a. U.S. postal money order for $21.45, purchased as No. 2, 202, 130, 462 in Dallas, Tex., on March 12, 1963. The canceled money order was obtained from the Post Office Department. Opposite the printed words "Pay To" were written the words "Kleins Sporting Goods," and opposite the printed word "From" were written the words "A. Hidell, P.O. Box 2915 Dallas, Texas." These words were also in the handwriting of Lee Harvey Oswald.(See Commission Exhibit No. 788, p. 120.) From Klein's records it was possible to trace the processing of the order after its receipt. A bank deposit made on March 13, 1963, included an item of $21.45. Klein's shipping order form shows an imprint made by the cash register which recorded the receipt of $21.45 on March 13, 1963. This price included $19.95 for the rifle and the scope, and $1 for postage and handling. The rifle without the scope cost only $12.78.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/wcr4.htm#p2
2.the hand gun is in guestion also.
Wrong again.
This issue is also discussed in the Warren Report:Heinz W. Michaelis, office manager of both George Rose & Co., Inc., and Seaport Traders, Inc., identified records of Seaport Traders, Inc., which showed that a ".38 S and W Special two-inch Commando, serial number V510210" was shipped on March 20, 1963, to A. J. Hidell, Post Office Box 2915, Dallas, Tex. The invoice was prepared on March 13, 1963; the revolver was actually shipped on March 20 by Railway Express. The balance due on the purchase was $19.95.
Michaelis furnished the shipping copy of the invoice, and the Railway Express Agency shipping documents, showing that $19.95, plus $1.27 shipping charge, had been collected from the consignee, Hidell. (See Michaelis Exhibits Nos. 2, 4, 5, p. 173.) Handwriting experts, Alwyn Cole of the Treasury Department and James C. Cadigan of the FBI, testified before the Commission that the writing on the coupon was Oswald's. The signature of the witness, D. F. Drittal, who attested that the fictitious Hidell was an American citizen and had not been convicted of a felony, was also in Oswald's handwriting.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/wcr4.htm#p26
3.marina testified to taking one photograph (when 3 would turn up over the years ) there are many problems with marinas story for obvious reasons.
There are no problems with Marina's story. She admitted she took the photos and she has never changed her story.
The photos that became Warren Commission exhibits were developed from the negatives found in the Paine's garage among Oswald's possessions.
One photo turned up in the possessions of George de Mohrenschildt who had befriended Oswald in the summer of 1962.
Oswald had sent him a print of one of his backyard photos with the words "To my friend George from Lee Oswald" with the date '5/IV/63' and the phrase "“'Hunter of fascists, ha-ha-ha!” written in Russian scrawled on the back. The writing was in Oswald's handwriting.
4.true ,but he and his sister saw the package and said it was 24 inches max (oswald had this parcel under his armpit and cupped in the palm of his hand )the rifle even broken down was 30 plus inches (see buel wesley frazier warren commission testimony)
Mrs. Randle said the packages was about 28 inches long.
The Warren Commission concluded that in any case both Randle and her brother Wesley were mistaken about the length of the package.
The Long and Bulky Package
On the morning of November 22, 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald left the Paine house in Irving at approximately 7:15 a.m. while Marina Oswald was still in bed. Neither she nor Mrs. Paine saw him leave the house. About half-a-block away from the Paine house was the residence of Mrs. Linnie Mac Randle, the sister of the man with whom Oswald drove to workBuell Wesley Frazier. Mrs. Randle stated that on the morning of November 22, while her brother was eating breakfast, she looked out the breakfast-room window and saw Oswald cross the street and walk toward the driveway where her brother parked his car near the carport. He carried a "heavy brown bag."Oswald
Commission Exhit No. 1304
gripped the bag in his right hand near the top. "It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand. It was ... more bulky toward the bottom" than toward the top. She then opened the kitchen door and saw Oswald open the right rear door of her brother's car and place the package in the back of the car. Mrs. Randle estimated that the package was approximately 28 inches long and about 8 inches wide. She thought that its color was similar to that of the bag found on the sixth floor of the School Book Depository after the assassination.
Frazier met Oswald at the kitchen door and together they walked to the car. After entering the car, Frazier glanced over his shoulder and noticed a brown paper package on the back seat. He asked, "What's the package, Lee?" Oswald replied, "curtain rods." Frazier told the Commission "... the main reason he was going over there that Thursday afternoon when he was to bring back some curtain rods, so I didn't think any more about it when he told me that." Frazier estimated that the bag was 2 feet long "give and take a few inches," and about 5 or 6 inches wide. As they sat in the car, Frazier asked Oswald where his lunch was, and Oswald replied that he was going to buy his lunch that day.
Frazier testified that Oswald carried no lunch bag that day. "When he rode with me, I say he always brought lunch except that one day on November 22 he didn't bring his lunch that day." Frazier parked the car in the company parking lot about 2 blocks north of the Depository Building. Oswald left the car first, picked up the brown paper bag, and proceeded toward the building ahead of Frazier. Frazier walked behind and as they crossed the railroad tracks he watched the switching of the cars. Frazier recalled that one end of the package was under Oswald's armpit and the lower part was held with his right hand so that it was carried straight and parallel to his body. When Oswald entered the rear door of the Depository Building, he was about 50 feet ahead of Frazier. It was the first time that Oswald had not walked with Frazier from the parking lot to the building entrance. When Frazier entered the building, he did not see Oswald. One employee, Jack Dougherty, believed that he saw Oswald coming to work, but he does not remember that Oswald had anything in his hands as he entered the door. No other employee has been found who saw Oswald enter that morning.
In deciding whether Oswald carried the assassination weapon in the bag which Frazier and Mrs. Randle saw, the Commission has carefully considered the testimony of these two witnesses with regard to the length of the bag. Frazier and Mrs. Randle testified that the bag which Oswald was carrying was approximately 27 or 28 inches long, whereas the wooden stock of the rifle, which is its largest component, measured 34.8 inches. The bag found on the sixth floor was 88 inches long.(See Commission Exhibit No. 1304, p. 132.) When Frazier appeared before the Commission and was asked to demonstrate how Oswald carried the package, he said, "Like I said, I remember that I didn't look at the package very much ... but when I did look at it he did have his hands on the package like that," and at this point Frazier placed the upper part of the package under his armpit and attempted to cup his right hand beneath the bottom of the bag. The disassembled rifle was too long to be carried in this manner. Similarly, when the butt of the rifle was placed in Frazier's hand, it extended above his shoulder to ear level. Moreover, in an interview on December 1, 1963, with agents of the FBI, Frazier had marked the point on the back seat of his car which he believed was where the bag reached when it was laid on the seat with one edge against the door. The distance between the point on the seat and the door was 27 inches.
Mrs. Randle said, when shown the paper bag, that the bag she saw Oswald carrying "wasn't that long, I mean it was folded down at the top as I told you. It definitely wasn't that long." And she folded the bag to length of about 28 inches. Frazier doubted whether the bag that Oswald carried was as wide as the bag found on the sixth floor, although Mrs. Randle testified that the width was approximately the same.
The Commission has weighed the visual recollection of Frazier and Mrs. Randle against the evidence here presented that the bag Oswald carried contained the assassination weapon and has concluded that Frazier and Randle are mistaken as to the length of the bag. Mrs. Randle saw the bag fleetingly and her first remembrance is that it was held in Oswald's right hand "and it almost touched the ground as he carried it." Frazier's view of the bag was from the rear. He continually advised that he was not paying close attention. For example, he said,
...I didn't pay too much attention the way he was walking because I was walking along there looking at the railroad cars and watching the men on the diesel switch them cars and I didn't pay too much attention on how he carried the package at all. Frazier could easily have been mistaken when he slated that Oswald held the bottom of the bag cupped in his hand with the upper end tucked into his armpit.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/wcr4.htm#p11
Oswald's fingerprints were found on the package, the paper and tape used to create the parcel came from the TSBD and fiber closely matching those from the blanket used by Oswald to store his rifle in the Paine garage were also found on the package.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/wcr4.htm#p11
5.yes no curtain rods were found(as far as we know) ,wrong his landlady was seen hanging curtains in his room the evening of jfks assassination.
Oswald's story was bogus:During October and November of 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald lived in a rooming house in Dallas while his wife and children lived in Irving, at the home of Ruth Paine, approximately 15 miles from Oswald's place of work at the Texas School Book Depository. Oswald traveled between Dallas and Irving on weekends in a car driven by a neighbor of the Paines, Buell Wesley Frazier, who also worked at the Depository. Oswald generally would go to Irving on Friday afternoon and return to Dallas Monday morning. According to the testimony of Frazier, Marina Oswald, and Ruth Paine, it appears that Oswald never returned to Irving in midweek prior to November 21, 1963, except on Monday, October 21, when he visited his wife in the hospital after the birth of their second child.
During the morning of November 21, Oswald asked Frazier whether he could ride home with him that afternoon. Frazier, surprised, asked him why he was going to Irving on Thursday night rather than Friday. Oswald replied, "I'm going home to get some curtain rods ... [to] put in an apartment." The two men left work at 4: 40 p.m. and drove to Irving. There was little conversation between them on the way home. Mrs. Linnie Mac Randle, Frazier's sister, commented to her brother about Oswald's unusual midweek return to Irving. Frazier told her that Oswald had come home to get curtain rods, It would appear, however, that obtaining curtain rods was not the purpose of Oswald's trip to Irving on November 21.
Mrs. A. C. Johnson, his landlady, testified that Oswald's room at 1026 North Beckley Avenue had curtains and curtain rods, and that Oswald had never discussed the subject with her. In the Paines' garage, along with many other objects of a household character, there were two flat lightweight curtain rods belonging to Ruth Paine but they were still there on Friday afternoon after Oswald's arrest. Oswald never asked Mrs. Paine about the use of curtain rods, and Marina Oswald testified that Oswald did not say anything about curtain rods on the day before the assassination. No curtain rods were known to have been discovered in the Depository Building after the assassination. In deciding whether Oswald carried a rifle to work in a long paper bag on November 22, the Commission gave weight to the fact that Oswald gave a false reason for returning home on November 21, and one which provided an excuse for the carrying of a bulky package the following morning.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/wcr4.htm#p9
6.true ,he was seen about 11.50 am by his workmates and his supervisor bill shelly (when shelly and his workmates went down from the sixth floor for lunch he was left behind ) and he said send the elevator back up (he was next seen on the first floor by his supervisor bill shelly at around 11.55 am) whare he was seen by other witnesses around 12.00 and somewhere between 12.15 and 12.25 he was seen in the second floor canteen by carolyn arnold.
So what? Oswald's whereabouts at 12.30 in the 6th floor window are the issue.
7.the paper bag (which i assume is the parcel you mention has never been linked to oswald)
Oswald's prints were found on the bag and fibers from the blanket in the Paine residence were also found on the bag.he was stationed on the sixth floor filling orders is it not reasonable to assume his prints would be on many many parcels
These were the conclusions of the Warren Commission on this subject:
,In evaluating the significance of these fingerprint and palmprint identifications, the Commission considered the possibility that Oswald handled these cartons as part of his normal duties. Since other identifiable prints were developed on the cartons, the Commission requested that they be compared with the prints of the 12 warehouse employs who, like Oswald, might have handled the cartons. They were also compared with the prints of those law enforcement officials who might have handled the cartons. The results of this investigation are fully discussed in chapter VI, page 249. Although a person could handle a carton and not leave identifiable prints, none of these employees except Oswald left identifiable prints on the cartons. This finding, in addition to the freshness of one of the prints and the presence of Oswald's prints on two of the four cartons and the paper bag led the Commission to attach some probative value to the fingerprint and palmprint identifications in reaching the conclusion that Oswald was at the window from which the shots were fired, although the prints do not establish the exact time he was there.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/wcr4.htm#p16
His latent palm print was found on the rifle barrel by Dallas PD Lieutenant Day in the crime lab.A latent print is the result of perspiration exuded by the sweat pores in the ridges. This perspiration is composed of water, protein or fatty materials, and sodium chloride (salt). A latent print can be developedmade visiblein several ways. Sometimes a latent print can be developed merely by the use of correct lighting. A second method is to brush the print very lightly with a powder, which adheres to its outline. Once a print is powdered it. can be photographed, lifted, or both. (In lifting, an adhesive substance, such as scotch tape, is placed over a powdered print. When the adhesive is lifted the powder clings to its surface. The adhesive is then mounted.) However, powder is usually effective only on objects which have a hard, smooth, nonabsorbent surface, such as glass, tile, and various types of highly polished metals and is usually not effective on absorbent materials, such as paper or unfinished wood or metal, which absorb perspiration so that there is nothing on the material's surface to which the powder can adhere. Prints on absorbent materials can sometimes be developed by iodine fumes, which may react with fatty or protein materials which have been absorbed into the object, or by a silver nitrate solution, which may react with sodium chloride which has been absorbed into the object.
A dead mam does not perspire and therefore there could not have been a latent print created after his death by shadowy conspirators.
If Day was part of a cover up then he MUST have known there was a conspiracy.
Why would conspirators needlessly involve a Dallas policeman? That just doesn't make sense.
8.no fragments found were matched to the "oswald rifle" its not possible to match fragments to a rifle or gun to the exclussion of all others, yes empty shells were found and the so called magic bullet ,wether these were the shells of bullets fired at jfk debateable as is the magic bullet.
Wrong again.:D There is no debate on this issue.
You don't know much about forensics do you?
Grooves on bullets created by the lands of the spiral rifling in the barrels of guns can be match microscopically and are as unique as a fingerprint.
Fragments of a bullet were found on the front seat of the limousine and were matched to Oswald's rifle. The rifle grooves were found on the metal jacket.
The CE399 bullet was also similarly matched to Oswald's rifle.In addition to the three cartridge cases found in the Texas School Book Depository Building, a nearly whole bullet was found on Governor Connally's stretcher and two bullet fragments were found in the front of the President's car. The stretcher bullet weighed 158. 6 grains, or several grains less than the average Western Cartridge Co. 6. 5-millimeter Mannlicher-Carcano bullet. It was slightly flattened, but otherwise unmutilated. The two bullet fragments weighed 44. 6 and 21. 0 grains, respectively. The heavier fragment was a portion of a bullet's nose area, as shown by its rounded contour and the character of the markings it bore. The lighter fragment consisted of bullet's base portion, as shown by its shape and by the presence of a cannelure. The two fragments were both mutilated, and it was not possible to determine from the fragments themselves whether they comprised the base and nose of one bullet or of two separate bullets. However, each had sufficient unmutilated area to provide the basis of an identification. Based on a comparison with test bullets fired from the C2766 rifle, the stretcher bullet and both bullet fragments were identified as having been fired from the C2766 rifle.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/app10.htm#p4
9.some where in the region of 50 to 60 witnesses said shots came from the so called grassy knoll area (no more or no less than those that said shots came from the book depository) as for the several witnesses who saw a man fitting oswalds description in the window please provide the witness names and either their sworn affidavits or warren commission testimony to back this up.
Howard Brennan saw Oswald fire the shots at Kennedy from the 6th floor window. This is his sworn affidavit:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/brennan1.htm
And this is his testimony:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/brennan.htm
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/brennan2.htm
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/brennan3.htm
This is a list of the other witnesses with links to their testimony to Warren Commission:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/wit.htm#a
This essay is the result of an exhaustive study of each and every assassination witness analysing how many shots they heard and where the believed the shots came from.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/shots.htm
76.7% heard 3 shots.
53.8% believe the shots came from the TSBD.
33.7% believe the shots came from the grassy knoll.
BUT ONLY 4.8% believe the shots came from TWO directions.There is overwhelming evidence that at least some shots were fired from behind the motorcade. Several witnesses saw a shooter, or at least a gun in the sixth floor sniper's nest window. The medical evidence is clear that both Kennedy and Connally were hit from behind (regardless of whether either was also hit from the front). Once we understand that at least some shots came from behind, it is hard to see how shots could also have come from the Grassy Knoll without more witnesses reporting shots from more than one direction. It begins to look like some were confused about the direction of the shots.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
fergus o brien wrote: »ok i can see where your coming from now as all your links seem to be from one particular site.
1/ here is a link which shows oswalds application for a post office box account (a hiddel is not named )
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId=141054
All my textual quotes are linked to a site that has the entire text of the Warren Report. Maybe you should try reading it? You made an entire series of claims that I debunked refering directly to the Report.
The PO box was under the name A. Hidell as has been already explained in my previous post. End of.2/ i think the link above concerns this issue.
What link? Be specific please.3/ "Marina Oswald herself not only gave two different versions as to where the backyard pictures were taken, she also gave different versions of the number of photos taken. At first, she testified she had taken just one photo, but later changed it to two. Finally, she said she took the photos from a different direction. In addition, Marguerite Oswald testified that soon after the assassination, Marina showed her a third photo, which she had hidden in her shoe. In that photo, Oswald was shown holding the rifle over his head with both hands. This is the same pose that can be seen in the Roscoe White photograph.
But since Marina did not know how to use the camera, at first admitted to taking only one photo, then said two -- then changed the very direction in which she said she was taking photos -- as with so many other things Marina said under duress and fear of deportation, her testimony in this matter is as difficult to reconcile with reality as her testimony that Lee Oswald planned to shoot former Vice President Richard Nixon -- a story even the Warren Commission didn't believe. It seems Marina had to say whatever she had to. ? Nobody can blame her for quailing under pressure."
Marina took the photos. Common sense would tell anybody that. Who else took the photos? The Fairy Godmother? End of.4/"Mrs. Randle said the packages was about 28 inches long.
The Warren Commission concluded that in any case both Randle and her brother Wesley were mistaken about the length of the package."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_-5L_JNF6g&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDWaOjFqgHk&feature=related
http://www.american-buddha.com/presumeguilty6.htm#fn10
I posted a photo of the dissembled rifle next to the brown paper package recovered from the TSBD sniper nest. Why did you ignore it?
It clearly shows that the rifle could indeed have been transported to the TSBD in Oswald's parcel.
Logic tells you that was why Oswald went to the Paine household, why fibers of the blanket were found on the parcel and why Oswald walked ahead of Frazier and disappeared upstairs before Frazier reached the TSBD that morning.5/"Oswald's story was bogus:"
I already showed you why his story was bogus.6/"true ,he was seen about 11.50 am by his workmates and his supervisor bill shelly (when shelly and his workmates went down from the sixth floor for lunch he was left behind ) and he said send the elevator back up (he was next seen on the first floor by his supervisor bill shelly at around 11.55 am) whare he was seen by other witnesses around 12.00 and somewhere between 12.15 and 12.25 he was seen in the second floor canteen by carolyn arnold. "
"So what? Oswald's whereabouts at 12.30 in the 6th floor window are the issue."
there is another man bonny ray williams who ate his lunch on the sixth floor and he said he was there till 12.20 maybe later (he never saw oswald) could that be because he was where he said he was in the second floor canteen ,a maximum of 90 seconds after the shooting officer marion baker and building manager roy truly confront oswald in the second floor canteen where he said he went for a coke.
Oswald built a wall of boxes around the 6th floor south east corner window which meant he would have been invisible to anybody on the 6th floor.
Oswald probably hid there until Williams went away.
Nobody else except Oswald was on the 6th floor when the motorcade came by at twelve-thirty.
Oswald had ample time to arrive in the lunch room a minimum of 90 secs after the shooting to be confronted by Officer Baker.7/"Oswald's prints were found on the bag and fibers from the blanket in the Paine residence were also found on the bag."
"What evidence was "presented that the bag . . . contained the assassination weapon"?
"A [38-inch long] handmade bag of paper and tape was found in the southeast corner of the sixth floor alongside the window from which the shots were fired. It was not a standard type bag which could be obtained in a store and it was presumably made for a particular purpose," says the Report (R134). Before any evidence relevant to this bag is presented, the Report draws an important inference from its location; "The presence of the bag in this corner is cogent evidence that it was used as the container for the rifle" (R135). The Commission was unequivocal; the evidence meant only what the Commission wanted it to mean -- nothing more, nothing less. To take issue with the inference read into the evidence: the presence of that bag in that corner is "cogent evidence" only that someone placed the bag in the corner. Its location of discovery can not tell who made the bag, when it was made, or what it contained. The Commission wanted it to have contained the rifle; therefore, it must have.
Having attached a significance to this bag (CE 142) "cogent" only for the Commission's predisposition toward Oswald's sole guilt, the Report presents what it labels "Scientific Evidence Linking Rifle and Oswald to Paper Bag." There was no difficulty in linking Oswald to the bag; his right palmprint and left index fingerprint were on it, proving that at some time, in some way, he had handled it. Again, the Commission reads an improper inference into this evidence. Because the palmprint was found at the bottom of the paper bag, says the Report, "it was consistent with the bag having contained a heavy or bulky object when [Oswald] handled it since a light object is usually held by the fingers" (R135). Not mentioned is the fact that, as Oswald walked to Frazier's home, he grasped his package at the top, allowing it to hang freely, almost touching the ground. According to the Commission's analysis of how people hold packages, it would seem unlikely that Oswald's bag contained anything "heavy or bulky." Nor is there any proof that Oswald was holding CE 142 when he left prints on it. Had it been lying on a hard, flat surface, Oswald could have leaned against or on it and left prints.".
What other reason would Oswald's prints and the fibers of the blanket from the Paine garage be found on the paper bag found near the sniper nest on the 6th floor? His prints were also found on the boxes stacked around the nest and his palm print and fibres of his work shirt were found on the rifle.
The only logical explanation is that Oswald took the rifle from the Paine garage in the paper bag and he was there on the 6th floor, built the sniper nest with the book crates, lay in wait for the motorcade and shot the President.
Any other explanation is frankly ridiculous.8/there is no argument that a palm print was found on the rifle (but only after oswalds death) ill come back to the bullets and shells and fragments as time is againts me .
Save yourself the trouble and just admit that the physical evidence proves that Oswald's rifle fired the shots that killed Kennedy and wounded Connally. This was clearly established by the forensic investigation of the bullets compared to the rifle.9/http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/brennan1.htm
ill come back to mr brennan also but here are a few witness who saw something different to what mr brennan saw.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_ZYa_nK-Gc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y9_d9L6NOU&feature=related
The only logical explanation for what Brennan saw when you include all the other evidence that I have already gone over is that Lee Harvey Oswald was the man firing the shots from the 6th floor window.
The overwhelming majority of the witnesses testimony matches the physical evidence.
The physical evidence however supersedes the witnesses testimony.
The physical evidence shows that two bullets struck Kennedy in the back of the neck and the back of the head and that the shots came from above and behind from the direction of the 6th floor window.
The inescapable conclusion is that Oswald must have brought the rifle to work, Oswald must have fired the rifle and that 3 shots were fired by Oswald, two of whom wounded the President, the final one fatally.0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbbIjki-HLoAdvertisement