Jim Corr is talking about the New World Order right now!

mike65

http://www.todayfm.com/article.asp?id=15131

He has not mentioned the lizards.............yet!

Mike.

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

rofl

please let david icke on the air, please let david icke on the air

Black Swan

But I don't know how to goose step!

mike65

OMG he is now talking about Sept 11 as a neo-con inside job, years of staring at his sisters backsides from a drum riser has clearly taken its toll on the poor lad.

"I'm a truth seeker"

Mike.

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

'i hate conspiracies'

ahahahahaha

oh sweet jesus, you don't think he's on boards do you?

casey?

Dinner

mike65 wrote: »

OMG he is now talking about Sept 11 as a neo-con inside job

He's gone on a rant there.

Apparently the people who carried out this "inside job" were smart enough to orcestrate the whole thing, but slipped up when it came to naming the hijackers and chose people who are still alive. Solid argument there.

mike65

I knew I got myself locked out of Conspiracy Theories for a reason.

Mike.

Sarn

Muhahhaaa they'll never stop us now. Too little too late Mr Corr.

MooseJam

ah missed it

jcrowbar

Just plain nuts...

Black Swan

Recommend that this thread be transferred to the Zombie forum...;)

mike65

The show is downloadable from about 9 pm.

Mike.

Mr. CooL ICE

Justice for Jim! Not the good kind though, more the 'lock him up and throw away the key' kind

lizardfudge

mike65 wrote: »

He has not mentioned the lizards.............yet!

He better not either... otherwise he'll be in big trouble!

johnny_ultimate

Its always amusing when "celebrities" go stark raving mad.
Jim should lay off the google videos.

oleras

it was the most amazing argument about the lesbian treaty i have heard so far !

javaboy

But I thought I defeated the New World Order when I finished Sly Spy Secret Agent on the C64 back in the day?

Dudess

Who's Jim Corr?

javaboy

Dudess wrote: »

Who's Jim Corr?

Excess baggage.

monkeyfudge

Dudess wrote: »

Who's Jim Corr?

He's the member of the Corrs I don't want to have sex with.

javaboy

monkeyfudge wrote: »

He's the member of the Corrs I don't want to have sex with.

Which reminds me of that age old schoolyard question: All of the Corrs or none of the Corrs?

~Rebel~

and who also for a long time went out with someone who looks disconcertingly like his sisters..Andrea Roche

merlinsmerryman

I gor one found it very informative :rolleyes: It was actually one of the best radio moments ever. I was breaking my heart laughing on the M50. Matt cooper didnt know what to say really, which made it all the funnier

mike65

http://www.radioireland.ie/lastword/2952008-17.wmv

5 mb download, ff to 45 mins.

Mike.

~Rebel~

mike65 wrote:

http://www.radioireland.ie/lastword/.wmv

5 mb download, ff to 45 mins.

Mike.

good stuff, cheers mike!

Agamemnon

http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8548/corrqt5.jpg

Dudess

Oh I thought it might have been another Jim Corr - so has the musician Jim Corr been trying to spread the word for a while now? I would never have associated him with all dat conspiracy shtuff.

MooseJam

javaboy wrote: »

Which reminds me of that age old schoolyard question: All of the Corrs or none of the Corrs?

all the corrs if I can be the daddy

AlmightyCushion

"Evidence of thermaide"

Lol, it sounds like a type of juice. I think it's thermite you're on about there, Jim.

ronano

this is brillant

Bros123

Didn't Jim Corr marry one of his sisters??

JIZZLORD

epic lulz

cornbb

I heard this earlier, epic lulz indeed

MooseJam

that blokes a nutter

mike65

that blokes a nutter

Mike.

curiousn

if you start to look into the facts, beyond what's on the TV news, a lot of the official version of events doesn't stand up to scutiny. Watch "911 Mysteries" on google video before you decide he's crazy. Fair play to you Jim for having the balls to present an alterative view.

MooseJam

Bill Clinton couldn't get away with getting a blow job and you think the Bush administration planned and executed the biggest terrorist attack in history on their own country .... yea right

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

there's always one..

Mossy Monk

Good man Jim.

~Rebel~

curiousn wrote: »

if you start to look into the facts, beyond what's on the TV news, a lot of the official version of events doesn't stand up to scutiny. Watch "911 Mysteries" on google video before you decide he's crazy. Fair play to you Jim for having the balls to present an alterative view.

...Jim?



listened to it after the ireland match. he's a bit of a frickin' nutbar alright

popebenny16

well he's wrecked the corrs sales in the states now.

what was that bit about no desks remaining in the wreckage of the towers? the iron all going to south east aisa????? i remember the C4 doc on 9-11 ("what happened" I think...) and there were plenty of office rubbish and they took every girder to an island and individually marked each one to see what happened and to ease reconstruction.

and........ what mainstream media has reported the lads werent all dead?? thats news to me........ as for some geezer saying eh, that's me, that could be false passports just the same name.

must lurk on the conspiracies forum for full story

curiousn

Easy to see everyone jumping to the conclusion that Jim's a nutter.

Has anyone bothered to watch "911 Mysteries" before being so sure about this?



Does anyone still believe the offical story that the Iraq war is only about protecting democracy and finding the WMDs and nothing to do with oil.

TequilaMockingBird

*looks at shoes*

johnny_ultimate

curiousn wrote: »

Has anyone bothered to watch "911 Mysteries" before being so sure about this?

Nah. Just reading the title of said video sent me into rolleyes overdrive and they haven't stopped rolling yet.

javaboy

curiousn wrote: »

Easy to see everyone jumping to the conclusion that Jim's a nutter.

Has anyone bothered to watch "911 Mysteries" before being so sure about this?



Does anyone still believe the offical story that the Iraq war is only about protecting democracy and finding the WMDs and nothing to do with oil.

You're oversimplifying things really. Very few people believe that the Iraq war is all about democracy/WMD but that doesn't mean they have to subscribe to every crackpot theory about how 9/11 happened.

The simple fact is that it would be practically impossible for the US government to perpetrate such a major terrorist attack on its own soil without some serious leaking.

~Rebel~

curiousn wrote: »

Easy to see everyone jumping to the conclusion that Jim's a nutter.

Has anyone bothered to watch "911 Mysteries" before being so sure about this?

seen a few of these random conspiracy shows and while they're very interesting and say very scary things that could all be true, i've yet to see anything that makes me actually believe what they are saying. I would just need serious proof, and if they have this very serious obvious proof then i would imagine there would be a lot more uproar then just conspiracy nuts. for a start with all this impeccable evidence i would expect a lot of pissed families suing the government.

monkeyfudge

Conspiracy wise... at worst they let it happen.

oleras

I like to keep an open mind on most things, but if someone could orcestrate 9/11 for insurance claims or world power or whatever, dont you think they could also pull videos exposing them off google videos ?

sorry for the ot.

Anyway, at least he wont burn in hell for havin "those" kind of fantasies....:D

Kernel

~Rebel~ wrote: »

seen a few of these random conspiracy shows and while they're very interesting and say very scary things that could all be true, i've yet to see anything that makes me actually believe what they are saying. I would just need serious proof, and if they have this very serious obvious proof then i would imagine there would be a lot more uproar then just conspiracy nuts. for a start with all this impeccable evidence i would expect a lot of pissed families suing the government.

Rule by Secrecy - book by Jim Marrs (heavy going at time, and undoubtedly some disinfo mixed in, but a lot of solid research), and Behold a Pale Horse by Bill Cooper are good reads on the subject. There was talk of a lawsuit being taken for 9/11, unfortunately, the Bush administration cannot legally be held accountable.

And, for all the mockers, there is a sound historical basis for the new world order, which is well documented and referenced throughout the 20th century. I think you're confusing the new world order with the 'illumati'. The new world order is a process - a political agenda, not an organisation.

Kernel

oleras wrote: »

I like to keep an open mind on most things, but if someone could orcestrate 9/11 for insurance claims or world power or whatever, dont you think they could also pull videos exposing them off google videos ?

They could, but why bother? There's potential for blowback from doing that. It would be very difficult to control the entire internet, and if stories leaked of censorship of the topic, it would damage their credibility. Much easier to control things through spin and disinfo.

Kernel

popebenny16 wrote: »

what was that bit about no desks remaining in the wreckage of the towers? the iron all going to south east aisa????? i remember the C4 doc on 9-11 ("what happened" I think...) and there were plenty of office rubbish and they took every girder to an island and individually marked each one to see what happened and to ease reconstruction.

and........ what mainstream media has reported the lads werent all dead?? thats news to me........ as for some geezer saying eh, that's me, that could be false passports just the same name.

must lurk on the conspiracies forum for full story

I posted a link about the hijackers recently in conspiracy theories. As for removal of the metal to Asia, that's whats known as the fastest removal of evidence ever!