Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Working From Home Megathread

1151152153155157

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,720 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    Not sure how this is remotely relevant to the claim that the main reason businesses want RTO is because of sunk cost leases. It's conspiratorial nonsense, the answer is more straightforward - they think the business works better in the office. Workers may disagree but that doesn't mean either party are wrong or right.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Zayd Wide Victor


    We are RTO for 3 days a week starting in May.

    Currently attending 1 day a week but in Feb will go into the office 2 days .

    It is what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Except that independent research repeatedly finds that productivity increases when blended/remote working is available, over office only.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Zayd Wide Victor


    Companies want the offices filled with their employees.

    Productivity Surveys are useless.

    WFH is coming to an end this year for most.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 12,328 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    Not for me, it's written in my contract and I'd imagine a lot of people who have changed jobs since 2021-ish are in the same boat as me.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Zayd Wide Victor


    Alot of people hired during the pandemic seem to be the targets of restructuring.

    That's based on company layoffs in the news highlighting over hiring during the pandemic. Buts that's another story.

    Many people who never worked in the office even before the pandemic have been instructed to attend the office goring forward.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 12,328 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    I'm not doubting you, I'm just in a lucky position that it is written into my contract that I work full-time from home. I have to, I am in Sligo, the company are based in an office in Dublin city centre. I am the only full-time remote employee.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,806 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition



    Some of the reaction would remind you of the discussion around residential property back in 2007. A drop of nearly 16% in one year is a collapse. And that's a time when employment is very strong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    I am doubting him :-)

    Who wasn't working in the office pre-pandemic? Precious few. Absolutely, some companies are looking for more office attendance. Even where independent academic research - not 'productivity surveys' - shows it's counter-productive.

    There is a round of job layoffs in certain sectors that has everything to do with cutting costs and maximising profits, and nothing to do with the presence of absence of blended/remote working. A prime example would be Microsoft - laying off nearly 2,000 employees in Blizzard Activision despite profits of $5.3 billion in 2022.

    The reality is companies and organisations that are actively hiring are finding it really hard to do so where there is no remote or blended working possible. And yes, that means "down the line" availability. It's perfectly normal to expect new hires to spend more time in the office assuming colleagues are there too until they're up to speed.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Zayd Wide Victor


    Multinationals are not finding it difficult to hire. They are moving roles to lower cost locations. Eg: India.

    There will be massive restructuring this year and next in EMEA and the US to cut headcount costs.

    They won't be reducing headcount, just moving them.

    Also Companies will use the RTO as a way to get people to leave so not to have fo pay redundancy.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,885 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    If anything, I've seen the opposite occurring, India are becoming more expensive in comparison to Europe, main issue these days is visa availability so it's strategic to have centers in India/China but knowing there will be a high turnover of staff.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Indeed. The tech forums I'm on with jobs/employment channels? 95% of job postings are blended or remote. Has it right in the subject line, usually.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,587 ✭✭✭baldbear


    I am working with a US company & have been working 1 day a week in the office the last 18 months.

    Looks like we are been pushed to 3 days a week back in the office. News will be hitting us in the next week I'm guessing. Employees in the US been threatened that their performance reviews will be affected.



  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭Young_gunner




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    We've been 3&2 since the end of the pandemic. No talk of changing so far. I work for a large US Investment bank.

    Id be happier with 2&3 but overall I see some benefits of office time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    There doesn't have to be any logic. It's a power and control thing. If the company want you back, you have two choices.... They don't have to justify their decision.

    It may be good, it may be bad but either way, it's the companies call.

    Interesting that the 'alpha' tech employers - Google, Meta, Apple - want people back and are in a position to enforce it. Other companies look at these boys and thing 'If Apple, etc. think it's a good idea.....'

    Smaller companies (or more enlightened ones) may have to take a different view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,587 ✭✭✭baldbear


    For US employees I've heard about "real estate strategy for us office space." And a new performance goal brought in around the whole office work.

    No reason given to us locally only we are expected in office 3 days a week.

    All stick approach now. If we don't like it tough is what I'm thinking.

    We can ask questions,give feedback but at the end of the day it is meaningless. The top brass have decided 2024 is the year we are forced back .



  • Posts: 0 Gwen Tall Dart


    The smaller companies invested in less infrastructure so wfh suits them just fine. The Big Tech have Big Buildibfs that they want filled with people to justify the lights being on. Buildings tend to deteriorate if not kept “living”, that would be part of their logic, also there’s more complicated hierarchies and they like to keep more of a controlling eye on people working for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    My partner is a contractor, was fully WFH. The company (American) decided two days in the office was now mandatory. Their boss was a little "wait, what?" when they left the office at 5:30 yesterday. "I've a 90 minute commute still to do," shrugged and left. Didn't care it was month end. Previous months, they'd have been working until 8 or 8:30 for a few days around month end. Wish I'd been there to see it.

    (I know that wouldn't work for everyone, but they're in the lucky position of not wanting to renew the contract.)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭Spudman_20000


    If a company can't give a logical explanation as to why they need people back in the office, then "engineered attrition" would be my guess:




  • Registered Users Posts: 7 Craggy Jon


    I am a Civil Servant, living on the outskirts of Trim & working in a large City Centre office. My nearest bus/train link to Dublin is a 25 minute drive. Monday, Wednesday & Thursday working from home. Last Tuesday, I left home at 06.45. I arrived in my office at 10.08. Snarl-ups on M50 caused chaos on all entry routes to City Centre. I arrived into my office, hungry, dying for a pee & totally stressed out. I needed coffee. I spent my first half hour in the canteen, moaning to whoever woukd listen to me, about my commute. Switched on my computer abour 10.50 & got started on my day. Then I met colleagues for lunch- that took about an hour - and back to work till 18.30, when it too me another hour & 45 minutes to get home, exhausted; drained and deflated

    Compare with Wednesday. Set alarm clock for 08.50. Logged in and working from home at 09.00. No distractions. No canteen breaks. No long gossipy lunches, no hideous traffic either coming from or going to work. Worked solidly till 13.00, half hour lunch (when I attended to some domestic chores) & knocked off at 17.30.

    it goes without saying that ALL of my work is doable remotely. Why in the name of all that’s holy can’t my line managers see they are getting SO much more bang for their buck by allowing me to work from home?

    For the record - Dublin traffic on Fridays is manageable. I quite like going into the office on Fridays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,595 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    I know a large tech company with an office in Galway that came to the end of their long term lease last summer. They decided not to renew the lease and agreed with the employees to go 100% WFH. They had to update the contracts and they did offer to pay for serviced desks in those hubs if employees wanted. Saved the company a fortune. Everyone happy.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Zayd Wide Victor


    Back to the office now 3 days a week and it's grand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    This thread went very quiet. How are people finding WFH now? Are companies still supportive. Must say I'm seeing a trend to get people back to office. Fully remote jobs (IT) seem very thin on the ground. 2-3 daqys in the office seems like them norm now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,193 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    a lot of larger companys that were more flexible are now mandating 3 days a week in the office (PWC for one for example)



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 12,328 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    I'm still wfh full-time as the company I work for are on the other side of the country from me. This was the case when they hired me, so no chance of them telling me I have to come back to the office. I have never worked in their office full-time. However being the only remote employee is having it's drawbacks with this particular company. The CEO is very much an in-person person and I get left out of a lot of things that should be communicated to all staff but I get the felling is just passed around the office as the team is small. As a result, I am looking to move to either a fully remote or remote first company or to a more local hybrid position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,595 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    There was a push to get people back into the office but they gave up. I go in about once a month although I haven't been in since March.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users Posts: 444 ✭✭jonnreeks


    Hi,

    I have the option of a Blended Working Policy. It's described as a system that combines working from the employee's work premises and working remotely up to a maximum of two days. It's to provide employees with a dynamic and balanced employment experience. As I am getting near pensionable status I think this could be a perfect option as I intend to continue working beyond the 66 years. I would definitely consider this alternative if my position fulfills the eligibility criteria.

    Is anyone currently part of this scheme and is able to offer their experience of same.

    N



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,684 ✭✭✭This is it


    I'm still fully remote. We can go in if we want, I normally go twice a month to see colleagues, go for lunch etc. but no compulsory attendance yet.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    Currently starting to job hunt. I guess the mandated in-office time will be greater that the actual? You can't tell someone at interview that they must be in 2 days a week and then change it to 3 or 4? What are peoples experience of the actual vs official figures?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,193 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    of course you can, unless your contract is very specific on this (which most wont be)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,595 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Out of curiousity, why do you plan to continue working after 66? I am having the same thoughts myself. I don't know how well I would handle a sudden stop.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,478 ✭✭✭Sono


    1 day a week in the office and hopefully does not increase, love being at home and have never missed the office, the 1 day in there is plenty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,806 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Blended working is where it has ended up now. Very few people doing five days in an office, not that many 100% remote.

    My workers are 100% remote, I am surprised more people haven't gone for this option, but I presume more will as leases end. The saving is huge.



  • Registered Users Posts: 444 ✭✭jonnreeks


    When you reach 65, doesn't the legislation allow you to continue working to 66 when you are entitled to your state pension. Also there is new flexible option of staying at work until 70 years of age availing of the new flexible pension system. Obviously all these option are related to your working circumstances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Unless you're a public servant, there's nothing stopping you from drawing down your contributory OAP and continuing to work

    You can delay the drawdown until 70 and get a bit more, but probably not worth it for most people.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,304 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Same for me. It is by far my least productive day, lots of distractions, 2 hours wasted commuting as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,888 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    A bit of humour to brighten things up.

    I recently left a job that mandated a one day return. As with others, easily the least productive day of the week by some stretch, spent a lot of the day with my headphones in, if I had a meeting I had to search for an empty meeting room or battle with someone who “tried” to book it.

    The reasons given were to create connection, if anything it drove me out, so maybe it worked? 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 404 ✭✭SodiumCooled


    Are people finding many options for remote/hybrid work that isn't IT specifically? Our place has started to mandate a full 5 day return to office for any staff that haven't got hybrid or remote specified in their contract (seems to be in all our locations not just in Ireland). I was doing a mix of 2/3 or 3/2 since covid (fully remote for over a year during covid) so I would be happy with a hybrid role (though would love fully remote) but places don't seem very clear in adverts even if I have heard through the grapevine that the same places do allow hybrid at least. I'd be slow to take a job that didn't have hybrid specified in the contract also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,974 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I mean just comparing a normal day going in or staying at home.

    Going in

    Gone before the kid is gone to school.

    Dog is in the house alone from 8 till 6.

    Rush home and try cook, do homework, spend time with the kid and walk a depressed dog.

    Get much less work done as their are far too many distractions.

    So basically a dog neglected, less time with family, exhaustion, stress and commuting money.

    Working at Home

    Spend the morning with the kid and drop off at school.

    Use my breaks to walk the dog and prepare dinner.

    More time in the evening with the family.

    More work done without needless distractions.

    So basically a happy family, happy dog, more money, less stress and more productive at work.

    Then the office is open to anyone who wants to go in their every day.

    I go in 1 day and I pointed the reason to my manager on why I am not getting as much done in a week as I used too.

    I think depending on your situation at home, the office might be a preferred choice.

    Younger people may not have the set up at home or are more likely to want to socialise.

    Elderly people or people with no kids may like to go in to socialise.

    People with young kids and who need to do so many things during a day just find it so much easier at home.

    The good thing is everyone has a choice to what suits their circumstances.

    We all got on with it before Covid, but this is a different world, and it's hard to justify bringing people who don't want to go back.

    Forcing people back will reduce morale and performance will drop and people will leave to go somewhere who allows them to work in a way that suits them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    The whole of the public service (unless, obviously, you're in a public-facing role such as healthcare). And private sector, I know of people working in HR, accounts, sales and customer support, all blended or remote.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Shelga


    I've been WFH 95% of the time since the beginning of the pandemic, and I'm pretty sick of it now, to be honest. At the same time, I love the flexibility and no commute. I think for my own sanity I need a hybrid role. I feel quite isolated a lot of the days and I don't think video calls makes up for normal human interaction. It doesn't help that my colleagues are quite boring, in my opinion, ha. Maybe it's just finally time for a change all round!

    Does anyone else feel like their attitude to work and career in general has changed a lot since the pandemic? I've been thinking a lot recently about the meaning of work in our lives. It seems really hard to find an interesting job where you work hard, but without killing yourself as a lot of jobs these days seem to come with risk of burnout.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    It's a tricky one. Definitely think the whole work thing is better on-site, but the personal costs (flexibility, commute, time) are huge. Even hybrid takes a lot of management - no point being in if no-one else there.

    I found that I became more detached the longer I spent remote working. In the end, I left and am now considering my options. Basically, I don't want to work :-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 404 ✭✭SodiumCooled


    As someone hybrid (fighting a full 5 day return) I personally find the office a much worse place to work to be honest. I much prefer working at home, more productive overall (while actually working less) and just less of a chore. Even when on-site the vast majority of our calls are done online anyway even when there are a few of us in the same room as there is always other sites or fully remote people involved (even excluding calls with external clients). I find this better anyway as its easier share screens etc or get your point across and on calls you are only listening (which I end up on a lot) I can keep working away on other stuff while listening in - I've grown to really dislike meeting room meetings. That being said I have lots of interaction at home - wife works from home, family close by that I see during the day, kids are around some days so I don't find it isolating or this type of thing.

    With that all being said I do have parts of my role that requires interaction with production and hardware development areas that do require semi-regular onsite presence so fully remote is not an option in my current role.

    Ideally I would like to come in only on the days I specifically need to be there - that is probably 1 or 2 days most weeks but could be 5 days on occasion and no days reasonably often. Instead I have been doing 2 fixed days at home (moving around things to suit this) while having to come in days where I sit all day on calls due to it being a WFO day. To make matters worse we are under mounting pressure to be in the office 5 days per week every week which I am losing sleep over I find it that stressful a prospect.

    Post edited by SodiumCooled on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,911 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    I started a new job recently and it's four days a week in the office and I'm finding it a massive (and difficult) adjustment, tbh. There is just so much dead time involved in having to go in - up at 6.30, don't get home til 7-ish. By the time I walk the dog, cook the dinner, throw on a wash or whatever and sit down for half an hour, the evening is practically gone. It's not helped by the fact that we have a slightly longer than normal working day too, 8 to 5. We do seem to be something of an outlier, though; it's an extremely sought-after employer in a very lucrative sector, so they know they can kind of set whatever terms they want and people will still be vying to work there. From speaking to various recruiters over the past couple of months, though, most companies mandating anything more than three days a week in the office are really struggling to hire.

    Post edited by Dial Hard on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 571 ✭✭✭sonyvision


    The push back to the office has finally come. Expected to be back minimum 2 days a week, I did 3 days then following week I done 1. It is not entirely monitored yet.

    One thing going for me is my manager or team doesn't work in my office so I can't see her jumping on my case if I only get 1 of those days!. At least I can still pick my days and I'll try Mondays as its quite and Fridays with the same logic. If they happen to fall on a public holiday that's not my problem 🤷



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,974 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    DId that thing ever come in where if you reques, your employer has to give a reason for you to be in the office.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 404 ✭✭SodiumCooled


    It was and even changed to make it stronger but I still think it has no teeth and is easily got around by an employer leaving little to fight them on it bar going nuclear like the WRC which you might as well leave rather than do in this case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,974 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Yes it is interesting, I can imagine once they grant one person the right to stay fully remote then others will demand it.

    Even if it was for some medical reason they couldn't disclose that to anyone else looking for it.

    If the green party are so intent on saving the planet, pushing for wfh would seem like a very good thing to pursue.

    Although maybe they wouldn't have any authority to tell companies what to do.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement