Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Offseason 2021 - Trades, Free Agency, QB Carousel

178101213

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,772 ✭✭✭Mr. Guappa


    Sam Darnold traded to the Panthers. Jets get a 6th this year, 2nd and 4th rounders next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭krustydoyle


    That's decent business by the Jets


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,208 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    Seems reasonable for Darnold. Carolina is a good landing spot, hope it works out for him after a difficult start to his career.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,363 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Well hopefully Sam darnold can get a restart of his career because Adam gase made a balls of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    Mr. Guappa wrote: »
    Sam Darnold traded to the Panthers. Jets get a 6th this year, 2nd and 4th rounders next year.

    The best thing about this is we wont have to listen to the "will the Jets take a QB or stick with Darnold" ****e thats been going on for the last 3 months!

    Happy for Sam though, getting out of NY was definitely the best play for him and he'll be teaming up with some familiar faces down in Carolina

    Happy with what the Jets got for him as well


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    On paper, it's a good deal for the Panthers as Sam Darnold is only 23 and gets a fresh start but he really showed little to nothing at the Jets to get excited about whatsoever.

    21 picks in the next two drafts for the Jets now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    VillaMad wrote: »
    On paper, it's a good deal for the Panthers as Sam Darnold is only 23 and gets a fresh start but he really showed little to nothing at the Jets to get excited about whatsoever.

    21 picks in the next two drafts for the Jets now.

    You have to take account of the contract into that though. Panthers guaranteed his 5th year option already at ~$19m. Best case for the Panthers he plays well this upcoming season to make the draft picks seem cheap but then they'll be paying him top end QB money. Worst case, he is a similar player to the Jets and he is costing you that money in 2022 and you're down picks trying to get a QB and build around him.

    It is slightly better than I expected for Darnold but a decent trade for all sides given the risk.

    I'm interested in what, if anything, it says about the draft. Does it mean they didn't like anyone outside of who they expect to go in the top 3 or was it just going to cost too much to move up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,961 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Seems very cheap for Darnold. I honestly don't think the Jets needed a new QB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,363 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Seems very cheap for Darnold. I honestly don't think the Jets needed a new QB.

    I think this move is about both sides moving on, which is the best for all concerned because it wasn’t working.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,065 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    You have to take account of the contract into that though. Panthers guaranteed his 5th year option already at ~$19m. Best case for the Panthers he plays well this upcoming season to make the draft picks seem cheap but then they'll be paying him top end QB money. Worst case, he is a similar player to the Jets and he is costing you that money in 2022 and you're down picks trying to get a QB and build around him.

    It is slightly better than I expected for Darnold but a decent trade for all sides given the risk.

    I'm interested in what, if anything, it says about the draft. Does it mean they didn't like anyone outside of who they expect to go in the top 3 or was it just going to cost too much to move up?
    If Atlanta were shipping the no. 4 pick they were likely not taking calls from a division rival?

    That or they only like the top 3.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Christy42 wrote: »
    If Atlanta were shipping the no. 4 pick they were likely not taking calls from a division rival?

    That or they only like the top 3.

    Probably, though most teams have a price on that kind of thing. Might potentially mean Falcons aren't budging for anyone, which could mean they're taking a QB - which is against what I felt they'd do.

    At that point Panthers would be moving up for potentially their 5th choice QB and one of them is really not like the others so it would be a gamble. The way things shaped up Darnold is the safer option than rolling the dice at draft time. Probably means Bridgewater is on the move again and they could recoup some of what they gave for Darnold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,961 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Itssoeasy wrote:
    I think this move is about both sides moving on, which is the best for all concerned because it wasn’t working.
    Who has it worked out for at the Jets in the last twenty two years since Woody Johnson bought them.
    Chad Pennington, Mark Sanchez and Geno Smith all had bad careers because they went to the Jets.
    Sam Darnold is a good QB held back by a organisation. It's a great move for the Panthers. And I said Bridgewater was a bad move by them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Who has it worked out for at the Jets in the last twenty two years since Woody Johnson bought them.
    Chad Pennington, Mark Sanchez and Geno Smith all had bad careers because they went to the Jets.
    Sam Darnold is a good QB held back by a organisation. It's a great move for the Panthers. And I said Bridgewater was a bad move by them.

    I don't necessarily disagree with your first point, but the players you've mentioned above didnt exactly go on to have stellar careers after leaving the Jets!

    I've watched pretty much every snap Darnold has taken in the last 3 years and while he definitely has the tools to be successful he has been no where near consistent enough with the fundamental stuff and has regressed each year. I hope with some proper coaching and an actual QB coach he can get this stuff right, because I for one would love to see him succeed.

    Also I dont think you can blame a GM/Coach that had nothing to do with drafting a certain QB, looking to go out and get there own player. Especially from the coaching side when they've only realistically got 1 season to evaluate him in their system


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,961 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    phatkev wrote:
    Also I dont think you can blame a GM/Coach that had nothing to do with drafting a certain QB, looking to go out and get there own player. Especially from the coaching side when they've only realistically got 1 season to evaluate him in their system
    I never mentioned head coaches or those involved in personnel decisions like a GM.
    The most critical person(s) at every franchise are the owners. The Johnson's are terrible owners. I have no idea how much they involve themselves in the draft or anything else but they obviously are not doing things right.
    Just in recent times I thought Todd Bowles had the potential to be a great head coach. He didn't look anything like the coach he'd been prior to going there. I'd liken Saleh to him but not just as good in my opinion but still looks like he should make an excellent HC. I expect it won't work out though.
    Mike LaFleur hasn't done anything to suggest he'll be good with a rookie QB. He worked with Garappolo as passing game co-ordinator. The niners were better known as a running team during his time there. What has Rob Calabrese done to give anybody confidence he can do well coaching a QB?
    We are talking about a franchise that had one winning season through three head coaches in the last ten years.
    I'm not blaming the head coaches for that although I thought Gase was a bad hire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,166 ✭✭✭✭paulie21




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,166 ✭✭✭✭paulie21


    Edelman released by the Pats.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Chiefs trade for Orlando Brown of the Ravens.

    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1385670034110959630


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,899 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    VillaMad wrote: »
    Chiefs trade for Orlando Brown of the Ravens.

    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1385670034110959630

    A 24-year-old OT who has back-to-back Pro Bowls to his name is a nice pick up. The line looks okay on paper now with Brown, Thuney, Blythe, Long and Duvernay-Tardif coming back. Mahomes will be happy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,772 ✭✭✭Mr. Guappa


    Teddy Bridgewater traded to the Broncos for a 6th round pick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,326 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    I guess that's them out of the QB sweepstakes in Round 1.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Macie Small Loudspeaker


    I guess that's them out of the QB sweepstakes in Round 1.

    Is it? Does bridgewater for a 6th end your qb chase?


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Macie Small Loudspeaker


    Xavi6 wrote: »
    A 24-year-old OT who has back-to-back Pro Bowls to his name is a nice pick up. The line looks okay on paper now with Brown, Thuney, Blythe, Long and Duvernay-Tardif coming back. Mahomes will be happy.

    Reminds me of when the eagles trade for Jason peters and I was upset we lost our first :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,326 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    Is it? Does bridgewater for a 6th end your qb chase?

    I'd say it signals they like another position, or more likely, they fancy a nice bundle for a trade down if one of the 5 QBs is still on the board.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Macie Small Loudspeaker


    I'd say it signals they like another position, or more likely, they fancy a nice bundle for a trade down if one of the 5 QBs is still on the board.

    I think they just saw value tbh I don't think they think he's their future


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    That rumour has been circling a while and I wasn't a fan. But for a 6th? I mean, you can't go wrong there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,065 ✭✭✭Christy42


    That rumour has been circling a while and I wasn't a fan. But for a 6th? I mean, you can't go wrong there.

    Even better is the contract situation. Teddy gets paid 10 million next year with the Panthers footing 7 of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Christy42 wrote: »
    Even better is the contract situation. Teddy gets paid 10 million next year with the Panthers footing 7 of it.

    Yup.

    It's a win for us.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    I think they just saw value tbh I don't think they think he's their future
    I still think DEnver will draft a QB in the 1st round. I think its the end of Lock now, wonder if they release him if there is a Cap Hit or will they save money?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,961 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I still think DEnver will draft a QB in the 1st round. I think its the end of Lock now, wonder if they release him if there is a Cap Hit or will they save money?
    Cap hit is $1.9m but he only earns $1.3m so cutting him would be stupid.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Cap hit is $1.9m but he only earns $1.3m so cutting him would be stupid.
    Looking at those figures, yep, it would be stupid.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭MileHighGuy


    The trade offer was turned down, but that would've been an all-timer.

    SF proposed 3rd overall, plus picks, plus Garopollo plus other players, for a 38 year old Aaron Rodgers.....if I was the Packers I might have been tempted.

    Aw.....now they saying not true. Well it was fun while it lasted (for me!)
    Would love to see Rodgers in another uniform before he retires.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    The trade offer was turned down, but that would've been an all-timer.

    SF proposed 3rd overall, plus picks, plus Garopollo plus other players, for a 38 year old Aaron Rodgers.....if I was the Packers I might have been tempted.

    Aw.....now they saying not true. Well it was fun while it lasted (for me!)
    Would love to see Rodgers in another uniform before he retires.

    I'm hoping he'd end up with us.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    The 49ers called GB about Rodgers but no formal offer was made, GB no intention of trading him.

    No idea what this means about 49ers intentions in the draft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,223 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    If he plays to Brady's timeline he could have 5+ more years. 5 years of an upper tier QB's career, even at the tail end, is gotta be worth one first round plus a mediocre QB with some potential upside but injury concers


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Technically 3 first round picks if the number 3 pick is part of the deal.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Macie Small Loudspeaker


    ELM327 wrote: »
    If he plays to Brady's timeline he could have 5+ more years. 5 years of an upper tier QB's career, even at the tail end, is gotta be worth one first round plus a mediocre QB with some potential upside but injury concers

    That's the outlier of all outliers to be fair gb would bite your hand off I'd think


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »
    The 49ers called GB about Rodgers but no formal offer was made, GB no intention of trading him.

    No idea what this means about 49ers intentions in the draft.

    Same as Kyle and Lynch did during their first off season when they made a call to Bill asking if they would trade Brady. Might as well shoot their shot, especially with the way GB have been treating Rodgers (drafting Love and not redoing his contract). Worst case they unsettle Rodgers a bit :pac:

    Probably nothing concrete to be taken for the draft but it is another case of them looking at QBs that are nothing like Jones.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,368 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    I'll never forgive San Francisco if they trade the #3 pick to the Packers and they draft another HOFer who will haunt my dreams for the next decade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,326 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    God I love draft day.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Oat23 wrote: »
    I'll never forgive San Francisco if they trade the #3 pick to the Packers and they draft another HOFer who will haunt my dreams for the next decade.

    49ers would never do that....................again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Oat23 wrote: »
    I'll never forgive San Francisco if they trade the #3 pick to the Packers and they draft another HOFer who will haunt my dreams for the next decade.

    Rodgers would probably retire tomorrow to finally get back on the 49ers for not picking him before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,368 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Rodgers would probably retire tomorrow to finally get back on the 49ers for not picking him before.


    I suppose he could retire and become the permanent host of Jeopardy. That is easily a $15m+ per year job :pac:

    edit: I was joking but Rapoport just tweeted this

    https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1387862127768219650


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Same as Kyle and Lynch did during their first off season when they made a call to Bill asking if they would trade Brady. Might as well shoot their shot, especially with the way GB have been treating Rodgers (drafting Love and not redoing his contract). Worst case they unsettle Rodgers a bit :pac:

    Probably nothing concrete to be taken for the draft but it is another case of them looking at QBs that are nothing like Jones.

    At this point it is pretty obvious that Rodgers' team contacted the 49ers about him wanting out and they made the call. When GB said no Rodgers decided to go nuclear today.

    Looks like Broncos and Raiders will have the edge though as they are out of conference. 49ers 3rd must be tempting though as GB could likely trade it for a very nice haul and still get one of the top talents.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Macie Small Loudspeaker



    Rodgers and bill against brady and the sb champs would be some matchup to be fair


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    Apparently he's interested in the Raiders............HEY! Stop laughing! Even Raiders fans can dare to dream on Draft day........makes a change from our headline being we've drafted the fastest player!! LOL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Rodgers and bill against brady and the sb champs would be some matchup to be fair

    No


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,899 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Rodgers to Broncos looking likely apparently.

    If true, insanity that the Packers messed things up this bad


  • Advertisement
Advertisement