Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Derek Chauvin murder trial (George Floyd)

2456767

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,337 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    DerekC16 wrote: »
    What's the racial make up of the jury?

    According to journalist who was on bbc radio 4 a bit ago, it’s a diverse one with it split 50-50 between whites and non whites.

    I know it’s a bit sterile but at the end of the day the prosecutions job is to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the former police officer in question is guilty of the charges against him. And the defence is there to provide the doubt. I mean the OJ trail jurors said after the fact that prosecution didn’t prove beyond a doubt that he did it even if they may have felt he was guilty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    I don't see how they can go with murder on it, but my god it will not be well received by the public.

    Im personally predicting manslaughter unless they can truly hammer home the toxicology report evidence. The public won't like it but its the right thing to do, 8-10 years.

    I know it varies by jurisdiction in the US. But, in the main, murder involves intent to kill. I can't see how it could be argued that this cop intended to kill George Floyd.

    I'd agree with the above.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,018 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I hope for the sake of innocent people and business owners in cities across America he is sent down


    I agree. You dont want a dodgy cop going free to harass more innocent people or business owners


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭UrbanFret


    If OJ walked theres no reason This guy couldn't too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    And manslaughter. The lesser charge...

    Yup.

    My point is, it doesn't matter if he can cough syrup in his system. He died by human hand.

    Those playing the "he was a drug-fueled criminal" are playing games. Most likely to be self-identified "Patriots" or Trump supporters or the like. It's not a coincidence.

    We all know the ones. Very likely to call someone "woke"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Lundstram wrote: »
    Like a few posters said above, the cop will most likely serve big time in order to keep the peace, there will be uproar if he walks free.

    The worst possible outcome is a verdict not based on the evidence. I hope this is not the case.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭Curse These Metal Hands


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Yup.

    My point is, it doesn't matter if he can cough syrup in his system. He died by human hand.

    Those playing the "he was a drug-fueled criminal" are playing games. Most likely to be "Patriots" or Trump supporters or the like. It's not a coincidence.

    We all know the ones. Very likely to call someone "woke"

    Sorry I misread your opening post.

    Yeah. I just worry that there's a certain level of public perception that the murder conviction is in the bag, my point is that the defence has a decent case for manslaughter. Will the American public accept a manslaughter conviction should it come to pass I wonder?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Lundstram


    KaneToad wrote: »
    The worst possible outcome is a verdict not based on the evidence. I hope this is not the case.

    True. Emotions cannot come into it.

    IMO, he didn't intend to kill him but did heavily contribute to his death. 10 years sounds about right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Yup.

    My point is, it doesn't matter if he can cough syrup in his system. He died by human hand.

    Those playing the "he was a drug-fueled criminal" are playing games. Most likely to be self-identified "Patriots" or Trump supporters or the like. It's not a coincidence.

    We all know the ones. Very likely to call someone "woke"

    Yeah. Even if he was on loads of drugs it's a hell of a coincidence that he overdoses while a man has a knee on his neck.

    And if he did overdose should he not have had medical help instead of a man keeping a knee on his neck. Are you not then guilty of neglect causing death?

    I would be very surprised if he didn't kill him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,337 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    KaneToad wrote: »
    The worst possible outcome is a verdict not based on the evidence. I hope this is not the case.

    It’d be a bad step alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,638 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    He'll probably get convicted on the softest charge, serve 1-2 years if even and be let out on appeal after everyone's moved onto the next outrage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Witcher wrote: »
    He'll probably get convicted on the softest charge, serve 1-2 years if even and be let out on appeal after everyone's moved onto the next outrage.

    In your opinion, do you think a 24 month sentence is appropriate for killing someone?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    In your opinion, do you think a 24 month sentence is appropriate for killing someone?

    Plenty of judges in Ireland do , when it comes to driving related deaths


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 919 ✭✭✭wicklowstevo


    breezy1985 wrote: »
    I agree. You dont want a dodgy cop going free to harass more innocent people or business owners

    regardless of the outcome I doubt he had a future in law enforcement to be fair


  • Registered Users Posts: 23 KB1980


    This police officer should be behind bars, he knew exactly what he was doing. Unbelievable that he still had his knee on George's neck even after the paramedics arrived!!!!! And I do not believe for one second that 4 police officers couldn't put George in the back of the police car....an example of an broken police system.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Plenty of judges in Ireland do , when it comes to driving related deaths

    And you agree with them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    And you agree with them?

    No I don't, sentences here are far to lenient in some cases


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    No I don't, sentences here are far to lenient in some cases

    Grand. So this guy shouldn't get a sentence as lenient either


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Can you imagine the craic if he gets off.

    There will be mayhem no matter what the result, if he gets off it will be a raging riot/looting if he gets convicted it will start as a celebration turning into a riot/looting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,407 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    What I really can't understand is the timing of the City of Minneapolis to pay $27 million in compensation to his family prior to the court case. Surely this puts pressure on jurors and should have happened after the court case?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    Anyone ever check up on Floyd's victims of his crimes?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    What I really can't understand is the timing of the City of Minneapolis to pay $27 million in compensation to his family prior to the court case. Surely this puts pressure on jurors and should have happened after the court case?

    It's pure madness.....

    People actually wronged, need full time care that are still alive wouldn't get that for an actual proper case of negligence.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,128 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Really hope the cop goes down, police in America are out of control towards African Americans and hopefully this is a start to making a mends between law enforcement and the African American community.


  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭Character Building


    He deserves some sort of sentence but I think proving murderous intent on the part of Chauvin will be difficult. I think the manslaughter charge is possible, but it's too early to know what sort of case the defense might be able to raise until we see the unseen video evidence that displays events leading up to the video that we have all seen. The conflicting expert medical evidence that the defence is submitting which claims that Chauvin's knee did not cause any bruising or block Floyd's airwaves will also further muddy the waters and may be enough to turn that 1 necessary juror.

    This case is no slam dunk. I think anything less than Chauvin going down on the most serious charge will see looting and riots.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭CtevenSrowder


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Yup.

    My point is, it doesn't matter if he can cough syrup in his system. He died by human hand.

    Those playing the "he was a drug-fueled criminal" are playing games. Most likely to be self-identified "Patriots" or Trump supporters or the like. It's not a coincidence.

    We all know the ones. Very likely to call someone "woke"
    The only person whose mentioned Trump and woke is you. Let it go, Trump is no longer the president. Free your mind of the man.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,598 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    A lot of the comments seem a bit oblivious to what he's actually charged with.

    Oh, I think he will be done for the manslaughter charge then. And surprised he didn't try take a plea bargain for that.
    Taking a plea is not up to him. He was willing to take a pleas.
    Attorney General said no. It's going to court because they are going for the murder charge.
    The manslaughter charge is an absolute lock imo.
    Murder 3 is likey imo. Murder 2 is less likely.

    He deserves some sort of sentence but I think proving murderous intent on the part of Chauvin will be difficult.
    Obviously with multiple around around and being filmed he didn't have murderous intent. which is irrelevant.
    None of the charges require murderous intent. They aren't trying to prove that
    The conflicting expert medical evidence that the defence is submitting which claims that Chauvin's knee did not cause any bruising or block Floyd's airwaves will also further muddy the waters and may be enough to turn that 1 necessary juror.
    You don't need to cause bruising to choke somebody. Nor to you need to close airways.
    He'll need far more than 1 juror.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Those things didn’t kill him in that moment though. The person kneeling on his neck did. But for the fact that a police officer happened to be kneeling on his neck for 9 minutes, slowly cutting off his oxygen supply to the degree that he could no longer breathe, he would not have died.

    Floyd was claiming he could not breath before he was brought to the ground. He first said it as they tried to put him into the car. "While standing outside the car, Mr. Floyd began saying and repeating that he could not breathe,"


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭ThewhiteJesus


    The outcome of this trial won’t change a thing in America, generally there is no smoke without fire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,618 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I think there was more to it than it being about race. I think they knew each other previously as they worked at the same club so there could be bad blood there . In the cops camera everything was going along normally till he started freaking out when they tried to put him in the squad car . So for everyone thinking he just arrested him and started kneeling on his neck it didn't just happen like that . I'm not trying to justify what the cop done but I don't think the cop will get done for murder , as murder has to be premeditated. I still think he'll get locked up though .

    My post was not in any way related to race.

    Just from looking at the video, Chauvin was looking like he was showing his authority and power to the onlookers. He was telling them “don’t dare tell me how to do my job.”

    In a weird way, his actions may have been exacerbated and spurred on by people telling him to stop. It riled him, and made him more determined not to comply..

    Had there been no onlookers “berating”him, maybe Floyd would be alive. Just a thought.

    Chauvin was “sticking” it to the onlookers as much as he was to George..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53 ✭✭gladerunner


    Im not normally shocked by the content on boards.ie, but to see this man dying on the pavement being described as an unfortunate incident is beyond the realms of possibility for me. Those 9 mins seemed to go on forever, Chavin had ample opportunity to release the pressure and calm the situation down, isnt that what cops are supposed to be trained for ! Even the cop that tried to intervene was pushed to the side.

    Somehow a life can be devalued and extinguished, and because it happens in America, its seems as part of the game over there.
    And so what if he was a criminal, does that mean we should allow cops to be murder people they dont like ? Unbelievable.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,692 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Mellor wrote: »
    A lot of the comments seem a bit oblivious to what he's actually charged with.
    Agreed on this. Or at least, people hear 'murder' and think intent to kill has to be proven, whereas it doesn't with these charges.


    I also agree that the 3rd degree charge is the most likely. I can see the defence making an argument that he didn't intend to harm, but I cannot see how they make a defence against the argument that putting your knee on a man's neck and leaving it there for 9 minutes while he tells you he can't breathe before losing consciousness is depraved indifference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Really hope the cop goes down, police in America are out of control towards African Americans and hopefully this is a start to making a mends between law enforcement and the African American community.

    stats and studies say otherwise.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Aido101111


    It was definitely murder, he had time as well as a group of people pleading with him just to get off his neck. George said "I can't breathe" over 20 times. If anyone thinks this is not murder then I've lost faith in humanity!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    People are getting upset over the 9min video but ignore the entire video of the arrest.
    He was resisting arrest and was complaining he couldn't breath the entire time when he clearly could - cos he was resisting getting into the car.

    I think it hinges on whether the pinning is police training or not, if so and the state of Floyds health/toxicology , he should go free. If not then a conviction is appropriate.

    The notion that he should be convicted (as people here suggest) to appease the mob is abhorrent. Rioters should be dealt with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    paw patrol wrote: »
    People are getting upset over the 9min video but ignore the entire video of the arrest.

    The 9 min video is the upsetting part!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Aido101111 wrote: »
    It was definitely murder, he had time as well as a group of people pleading with him just to get off his neck. George said "I can't breathe" over 20 times. If anyone thinks this is not murder then I've lost faith in humanity!

    Would you not wait to hear all the evidence first?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Aido101111


    KaneToad wrote: »
    Would you not wait to hear all the evidence first?

    What more evidence would you need to hear? It was all captured clearly on video!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    The 9 min video is the upsetting part!

    but it isn't the entire story.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭V8 Interceptor


    Fandymo wrote: »
    Floyd was claiming he could not breath.

    He had the C19 virus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    paw patrol wrote: »
    but it isn't the entire story.

    What is not in doubt is that George Floyd died at the hand of that cop. It was homicide. You agree with this, correct?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Thats what I think will happen, as I said an unfortunate accident while trying to restrain a drug crazed criminal resisting arrest.

    continuing to keep your knee on somebodies neck after they tell you they can't breathe sure sounds accidental.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭V8 Interceptor


    Chauvin can't get a fair trial. As soon as he's not given the chair they'll all kick off.

    Orientals are getting beaten up left, right and center in the US. Its blacks who are beating on them but apparently its because of white supremacism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Chauvin can't get a fair trial. As soon as he's not given the chair they'll all kick off.

    Orientals are getting beaten up left, right and center in the US. Its blacks who are beating on them but apparently its because of white supremacism.

    Do you think that Chauvin is liable for the death of George Floyd?




  • Chauvin can't get a fair trial. As soon as he's not given the chair they'll all kick off.

    Orientals are getting beaten up left, right and center in the US. Its blacks who are beating on them but apparently its because of white supremacism.

    Get for a walk and go clear your moronic ramblings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    continuing to keep your knee on somebodies neck after they tell you they can't breathe sure sounds accidental.

    You're beyond naive. You'll find numerous videos online of people being arrested and them exaggerating the actions of the police: "The cuffs are too tight", "you're choking me"; or as we seen in Balbriggan, claims of racism simple because the police were arresting someone who committed a crime. Police would be well used to claims as such, made unjustly. It's very hard to treat the claims of criminals with good faith, when they usually don't believe in good faith.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Aido101111 wrote: »
    What more evidence would you need to hear? It was all captured clearly on video!

    I wasn't there, I'm guessing you weren't there either. Why would you not want to hear the evidence from everyone who was there and were connected to the man's death? That evidence will be tested in a court, if its not strong enough it will not form part of jury decision.

    Why are you rushing to decision without all the facts?? All facts considered and a decision made is the best outcome for everyone.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭V8 Interceptor


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Do you think that Chauvin is liable for the death of George Floyd?

    Yes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,618 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    TomTomTim wrote: »
    You're beyond naive. You'll find numerous videos online of people being arrested and them exaggerating the actions of the police: "The cuffs are too tight", "you're choking me"; or as we seen in Balbriggan, claims of racism simple because the police were arresting someone who committed a crime. Police would be well used to claims as such, made unjustly. It's very hard to treat the claims of criminals with good faith, when they usually don't believe in good faith.

    Very pertinent post, and will certainly lead to the defence using this...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    What is not in doubt is that George Floyd died at the hand of that cop. It was homicide. You agree with this, correct?

    Of course there can be doubt. This is why we test the evidence (all the evidence) in the court.

    We can't discount the possibility that something else was the reason for the man dying (however unlikely we currently think that is) until we hear all the evidence. I really don't understand the mindset that decisions are made before all facts are known.

    This is not a pro-cop or an anti George Floyd stance. It's a pro justice system stance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    KaneToad wrote: »
    Of course there can be doubt. This is why we test the evidence (all the evidence) in the court.

    We can't discount the possibility that something else was the reason for the man dying (however unlikely we currently think that is) until we hear all the evidence. I really don't understand the mindset that decisions are made before all facts are known.

    This is not a pro-cop or an anti George Floyd stance. It's a pro justice system stance.

    I agree with you. This is what the trial is for. We'll hear all evidence.

    The evidence i've seen so far includes two autopsies saying the cause of death was homicide, plus a video of him doing it. Pretty damning so far.

    Murder? Perhaps, perhaps not. But if the trial finds that the cop was not responsible for his death i'll be very surprised.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement