Silent Hill Werewolf Game Thread!

What a well judged meme.

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Can you share with the.group a bit of the reasoning behind your suggestion Phil.

I feel happy enough to change my vote on you given nothing happened at the pet store.

Phil WW wrote: »

Not ignoring this btw.

Google lead me to here: https://silenthill.fandom.com/wiki/Heaven%27s_Night

Which mentions the main character in the game obtaining some useful stuff.

Right, strip club it is. Won't be caught in the voting.

Oisin WW wrote: »

Right, strip club it is. Won't be caught in the voting.

What does this mean?

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Yes but what did it tell you that made you think X.

At the moment it comes across as ... We discussed it in the wolf room...that's research. Whereas

Well the church contains X according to Google so that would be a good reason because I think it'll help us by y.

Keep reading.

Since I know basically nothing about this game, that seems a reasonable choice. Churches and graveyards don’t scream visit me in a horror game

Oisin WW wrote: »

I said we'd have a quick ten minute vote. Strip club had the most votes.


I wanted to go to the church, but I'm not Phil Jong-un.

At 12.11 you said quick vote ending at 12.20. Then made your decision at 12.17.


Some could argue you deciding on the vote, the finish time and then it finishing at a different finish time is a little Oisin Jong-un but meh, bring on the zombie strippers!


Actually was Silent Hill zombies? I'm just thinking or Resident Evil the whole time

Oisin WW wrote: »

I said we'd have a quick ten minute vote. Strip club had the most votes.


I wanted to go to the church, but I'm not Phil Jong-un.

Who made you the leader of the group?

Liam WW wrote: »

Who made you the leader of the group?

Someone had to drive us on. We were dilly-dallying.

Nobody offered an objection to having a quick vote. Strip club got the most votes.


Soooo.....we're off to the strip club. Democracy in action.

Angus WW wrote: »

I suspect silent hill is the size of a small country....

Could be that the fog distorts the town so we’re walking for two hours but we’re not actually walking the real distance from location to location

Tegan WW wrote: »

Our bus driver is dead. We have a map. We went to the pet shop and nothing happened except someone got nervous. Now we are going to strip club in the hopes of finding something more useful than eerie feelings.

Thank you Tegan.

Personally I would have gone to the bait shop, we’re looking to catch some wolves, bait would be handy


We could now use Oisin as bait instead

Oisin WW wrote: »

- Brendan and Liam have had zero interaction so far.

- Brendan votes to lynch Liam.

- The next vote in the thread is Liam to lynch me.

- Liam hasn't wondered why Brendan has already voted for him.

- Both are now griping that I tried to move the game on.

2 people think its dodgy that you by yourself set a time for a vote, then 6 minutes later (earlier than you stated in your arbitarily decided timeframe for the whole village) ended that vote and any possible village discussion on the matter by yourself... so there must be a connection between them?


Methinks the connection is that your actions are dodgy and that they both called you on it, nothing more nothing less.





Just to be clear. My vote is in on Liam (who has had barely any interaction with anyone with his what 2 posts so far) as I had already posited that jumping on the person suggesting no lynching is a nice easy place for a wolf to vote and be able to explain their vote and that he did so but without pushing the issue unike iirc Conor. He just made one post on here about it then was off.





That said, I was hoping he or someone else would do something more dodgy after that as it is always hard to find reasons to vote for someone on day 1.

So Liam do you not think it worth noting that you decided by yourself that a village discussion on something should be decided by a snap vote, one you yourself end by deciding for the village at an earlier time than you yourself stated the deadline for which would be?

Isla WW wrote: »

Kinda think we need to choose the right location each try. Perhaps choosing the wrong location, ie the pet shop for example, just wastes time. Everytime we choose wrong we lose time to reach the correct location. Anyone think the same?

If nothing happens in the next location i propose a vote to decide the next one. Various peeps think the church or cemetery seems to be more significant in a horror game. Given we have nothing else i think we should go to one of them

This makes sense.

The only piece of info we have is that there was sound coming from the church. This, by default should point us towards the church. Every other location has no relevance to the story so far.

Doris WW wrote: »

This makes sense.

The only piece of info we have is that there was sound coming from the church. This, by default should point us towards the church. Every other location has no relevance to the story so far.

Hopefully there will be something at the club ut if not this makes a lot of sense.

Brendan WW wrote: »

So Liam do you not think it worth noting that you decided by yourself that a village discussion on something should be decided by a snap vote, one you yourself end by deciding for the village at an earlier time than you yourself stated the deadline for which would be?

This was meant to be directed at Oisin, I had just been explaining why I voted for Liam.

Phil WW wrote: »

I would argue we should only go there if its good.

How could we know in advance if something is good or not?

Phil WW wrote: »

I would argue we should only go there if its good.

We have to go somewhere. We have no idea of knowing if somewhere is good or bad. but we have more information about this place over others.

Like someone said earlier, we could be wasting time just scooting around to places that aren't even mentioned so far in the game. There's a clear push from the flavor to send us there over the other places.

Whether it's good or bad, I'm in favour of going to somewhere that we have even the tiniest bit of info on over the others.

Phil WW wrote: »

I would argue we should only go there if its good.

But we have no idea what it is though. So we should just avoid it ?

But please keep spreading mindless posts that serve no purpose.

One thing is is sure, Phil shouldnt be choosing our locations again.

Doris WW wrote: »

We have to go somewhere. We have no idea of knowing if somewhere is good or bad. but we have more information about this place over others.

Like someone said earlier, we could be wasting time just scooting around to places that aren't even mentioned so far in the game. There's a clear push from the flavor to send us there over the other places.

Whether it's good or bad, I'm in favour of going to somewhere that we have even the tiniest bit of info on over the others.

Brendan WW wrote: »

Well if its bad then it paints Isla in a bad light.



Surely that info is better than no info but then again hopefully we learn something at the club.

Lads, you are missing the point. Im not saying she would or wouldnt know necessarily. But who doesnt mind bad things happening to the village? Wolves.

Its a slip.

Brendan WW wrote: »

Well if its bad then it paints Isla in a bad light.



Surely that info is better than no info but then again hopefully we learn something at the club.

No it doesn't. It makes me curious.

If youre gonna shade me, do it right

Isla WW wrote: »

But we have no idea what it is though. So we should just avoid it ?

But please keep spreading mindless posts that serve no purpose.

One thing is is sure, Phil shouldnt be choosing our locations again.

I have nothing for or against the Church other than what ive researched (that bad things happen there in the source material; and i acknowledge we dont know how that will translate into this game). I dont mind if we go there - my point is you slipped in expressing the same opinion,

Derry WW wrote: »

Fluting around in your got ain't much use. If it's bad,we fight and kill some wolves.

Why don't you want us to go the church?

I dont know what you are saying here, but im pretty sure you missed my point.

Phil WW wrote: »

We dont, but thats not the point. The point is Isla is happy to go there even if it would be a bad thing for the village.

This is a bullish!t post. That’s clearly not what she meant