Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

General British politics discussion thread

12357310

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭Roanmore


    David Lammy, Shadow Justice
    John Healey, Shadow Defence
    Ed Miliband, Shadow BEIS
    Emily Thornberry, Shadow International Trade
    Jonathan Reynolds, Shadow Work and Pensions
    Rebecca Long-Bailey, Shadow Education
    Jo Stevens, Shadow Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
    Bridget Philipson, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury
    Luke Pollard, Shadow DEFRA
    Steve Reed, Shadow Communities and Local Government
    Thangam Debbonaire, Shadow Housing


    I was right about Lammy anyway.

    Surpised no room for Dr Roseanna Khan, finished second in Deputy Leadership race


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Full List of new Shadow Cabinet

    Keir Starmer, Leader of the Opposition
    Angela Rayner, Deputy Leader and Chair of the Labour Party
    Anneliese Dodds, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
    Lisa Nandy, Shadow Foreign Secretary
    Nick Thomas-Symonds, Shadow Home Secretary
    Rachel Reeves, Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    David Lammy, Shadow Justice Secretary
    John Healey, Shadow Defence Secretary
    Ed Miliband, Shadow Business, Energy and Industrial Secretary
    Emily Thornberry, Shadow International Trade Secretary
    Jonathan Reynolds, Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary
    Jonathan Ashworth, Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
    Rebecca Long-Bailey, Shadow Education Secretary
    Jo Stevens, Shadow Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
    Bridget Philipson, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury
    Luke Pollard, Shadow Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary
    Steve Reed, Shadow Communities and Local Government Secretary
    Thangam Debbonaire, Shadow Housing Secretary
    Jim McMahon, Shadow Transport Secretary
    Preet Kaur Gill, Shadow International Development Secretary
    Louise Haigh, Shadow Northern Ireland Secretary (interim)
    Ian Murray, Shadow Scotland Secretary
    Nia Griffith, Shadow Wales Secretary
    Marsha de Cordova, Shadow Women and Equalities Secretary
    Andy McDonald, Shadow Employment Rights and Protections Secretary
    Rosena Allin-Khan, Shadow Minister for Mental Health
    Cat Smith, Shadow Minister for Young People and Voter Engagement
    Lord Falconer, Shadow Attorney General
    Valerie Vaz, Shadow Leader of the House
    Nick Brown, Opposition Chief Whip
    Baroness Smith, Shadow Leader of the Lords
    Lord McAvoy, Lords’ Opposition Chief Whip


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,379 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    devnull wrote: »
    Full List of new Shadow Cabinet

    Keir Starmer, Leader of the Opposition
    Angela Rayner, Deputy Leader and Chair of the Labour Party
    Anneliese Dodds, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
    Lisa Nandy, Shadow Foreign Secretary
    Nick Thomas-Symonds, Shadow Home Secretary
    Rachel Reeves, Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    David Lammy, Shadow Justice Secretary
    John Healey, Shadow Defence Secretary
    Ed Miliband, Shadow Business, Energy and Industrial Secretary
    Emily Thornberry, Shadow International Trade Secretary
    Jonathan Reynolds, Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary
    Jonathan Ashworth, Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
    Rebecca Long-Bailey, Shadow Education Secretary
    Jo Stevens, Shadow Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
    Bridget Philipson, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury
    Luke Pollard, Shadow Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary
    Steve Reed, Shadow Communities and Local Government Secretary
    Thangam Debbonaire, Shadow Housing Secretary
    Jim McMahon, Shadow Transport Secretary
    Preet Kaur Gill, Shadow International Development Secretary
    Louise Haigh, Shadow Northern Ireland Secretary (interim)
    Ian Murray, Shadow Scotland Secretary
    Nia Griffith, Shadow Wales Secretary
    Marsha de Cordova, Shadow Women and Equalities Secretary
    Andy McDonald, Shadow Employment Rights and Protections Secretary
    Rosena Allin-Khan, Shadow Minister for Mental Health
    Cat Smith, Shadow Minister for Young People and Voter Engagement
    Lord Falconer, Shadow Attorney General
    Valerie Vaz, Shadow Leader of the House
    Nick Brown, Opposition Chief Whip
    Baroness Smith, Shadow Leader of the Lords
    Lord McAvoy, Lords’ Opposition Chief Whip

    Thangam Debbonaire. Wish I had a name like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,061 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Thinks it's fair to say that's a broad church of a shadow cabinet, as he promised he would have. So I doff my cap to him.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Thangam Debbonaire. Wish I had a name like that.

    Not bad but its no Bambos Charalambous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    I think overall its fine, compared to government front bench its mensa committee level. No clive lewis a bit disappointing. No wes streeting is good news.

    And no Jess Phillips!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,061 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    I think overall its fine, compared to government front bench its mensa committee level. No clive lewis a bit disappointing. No wes streeting is good news.

    And no Jess Phillips!

    Yeah no Philips and Streeting is excellent news imo. Like you, thought Lewis might get a look in, something environmental.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,427 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Did Yvette Cooper get anything important?

    I always thought Labour made a massive blunder not picking her to replace Ed Miliband in the first place.

    I was disappointed that her husband ran instead of her; she’s very capable. She chairs the Home Affairs Select Committee which, given the Tory majority, is probably a better position to challenge the government than a front bench position.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    No Diane Abbott?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,061 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    No Diane Abbott?

    No.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,332 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Does anyone actually know what would happen if Boris bites the dust? I know from this article that government's position is that Dominic Raab (shudder) would be deputized to lead but how would a final new PM be handled as the experts appear to state it's not a clear cut case here? You can't have a new party election in person obviously (esp. as most members would fall in the category of most vulnerable to the corona virus) but how do you confirm the persons via e-mail voting? It's not like the government can remain without a PM for an extended period of time and the tories would never want another public election either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    I dont know is honest answer. Can there ever be any parliamentary instruction for how to proceed in the event you lose your pm in the midst of a pandemic. I'm going to assume common sense takes over, which unfortunately in this case means Dominic Raab probably taking charge until such a time a regular election can take place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,061 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Im sure all the young go getters of the Tory 1922 committee would come up with a way to vote for a new leader online if it were ever necessary.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    I'm going to assume common sense takes over, which unfortunately in this case means Dominic Raab probably taking charge until such a time a regular election can take place.

    That's kinda problematic if you are someone who has their eye on the top job, but time and age are a little against you.

    Can you afford to give Dover Dom the chance to be the hero who gets the country through the crisis? He then walks the election amongst the members - in fact there may not even be an election as the word goes out that the country needs stability and thus no other MP should stand. It could be another 8 years until the vacancy arises again, and the millennials may then see it as their time.

    So maybe it's better to make sure the mp/membership election is called as soon as possible (democratic procedures must be followed blah blah) and be that hero instead.
    You could see such how such permutations would be keeping (as a wild example) Michael Gove awake at night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    That's kinda problematic if you are someone who has their eye on the top job, but time and age are a little against you.

    Can you afford to give Dover Dom the chance to be the hero who gets the country through the crisis? He then walks the election amongst the members - in fact there may not even be an election as the word goes out that the country needs stability and thus no other MP should stand. It could be another 8 years until the vacancy arises again, and the millennials may then see it as their time.

    So maybe it's better to make sure the mp/membership election is called as soon as possible (democratic procedures must be followed blah blah) and be that hero instead.
    You could see such how such permutations would be keeping (as a wild example) Michael Gove awake at night.

    Yeah, totally see that side of it. Not a great situation for the mighty gover with a beady eye on his rightful throne. But risky enough to be pushing for leadership contests when people just want someone left alone to get on with the job. Tricky one i think.

    After this clown dunno how the prosect of a raab v gove death match would grab me. Anyway i think it will take more than a pesky virus to take johnson down, i can picture him any minute now trying to administer bear hugs to all the staff who treated him as he gets ready to save the nation again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I always thought Labour made a massive blunder not picking her to replace Ed Miliband in the first place.
    I think they should have gone for Liz Kendall on the basis she was new blood and Labour needed a blank sheet. Back in 2015 the assumption under the FTP was no election until 2020 by which time any association with the 2005-2010 administration would be excess baggage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Couple of posters seem happy that Jess Philips didn't get any role.
    Any reason for this?

    I'd have though young, female, from a midlands region that Labour need to do well in, a reasonable level of profile and name recognition would all have been positive points for her. And she has some small support in the party with over 20 MPs voting for her in the first round.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    I'm neutral on Phillips. I said earlier I'd be curious what Starmer would make of her, if anything. I'm impressed at times, she can cut through the faff, but then other times she seems a bit calculating. Like that stuff with mogg for example, just hard to work out. I just have Lisa Nandy, for one, way ahead of her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,061 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    There are far better people, from all wings of the party than Phillips.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    devnull wrote: »
    Full List of new Shadow Cabinet

    Keir Starmer, Leader of the Opposition
    Angela Rayner, Deputy Leader and Chair of the Labour Party
    Anneliese Dodds, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
    Lisa Nandy, Shadow Foreign Secretary
    Nick Thomas-Symonds, Shadow Home Secretary
    Rachel Reeves, Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    David Lammy, Shadow Justice Secretary
    John Healey, Shadow Defence Secretary
    Ed Miliband, Shadow Business, Energy and Industrial Secretary
    Emily Thornberry, Shadow International Trade Secretary
    Jonathan Reynolds, Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary
    Jonathan Ashworth, Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
    Rebecca Long-Bailey, Shadow Education Secretary
    Jo Stevens, Shadow Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
    Bridget Philipson, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury
    Luke Pollard, Shadow Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary
    Steve Reed, Shadow Communities and Local Government Secretary
    Thangam Debbonaire, Shadow Housing Secretary
    Jim McMahon, Shadow Transport Secretary
    Preet Kaur Gill, Shadow International Development Secretary
    Louise Haigh, Shadow Northern Ireland Secretary (interim)
    Ian Murray, Shadow Scotland Secretary
    Nia Griffith, Shadow Wales Secretary
    Marsha de Cordova, Shadow Women and Equalities Secretary
    Andy McDonald, Shadow Employment Rights and Protections Secretary
    Rosena Allin-Khan, Shadow Minister for Mental Health
    Cat Smith, Shadow Minister for Young People and Voter Engagement
    Lord Falconer, Shadow Attorney General
    Valerie Vaz, Shadow Leader of the House
    Nick Brown, Opposition Chief Whip
    Baroness Smith, Shadow Leader of the Lords
    Lord McAvoy, Lords’ Opposition Chief Whip

    Louise Haigh, Shadow Northern Ireland Secretary (interim)

    Interim?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,061 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Louise Haigh, Shadow Northern Ireland Secretary (interim)

    Interim?

    Tony Lloyd is unwell with covid19, so she's covering for him.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Johnson moved to ICU according to breaking news on Sky, pretty serious.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Louise Haigh, Shadow Northern Ireland Secretary (interim)

    Interim?
    Is she a temp while Tony Lloyd recovers from Covid19?


  • Registered Users Posts: 724 ✭✭✭moon2


    Johnson moved to ICU according to breaking news on Sky, pretty serious.

    There was some (apparent) disinformation released about him being on a ventilator well before now. Is this news from a reliable source?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    moon2 wrote: »
    There was some (apparent) disinformation released about him being on a ventilator well before now. Is this news from a reliable source?

    I said nothing about a ventilator.

    The ICU part is from an official spokesperson, it's on like every news channel at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,104 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    moon2 wrote: »
    There was some (apparent) disinformation released about him being on a ventilator well before now. Is this news from a reliable source?

    That wasn't misinformation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,379 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Just under half of patients in ICU as a result of Covid-19 will die.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,332 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    moon2 wrote: »
    There was some (apparent) disinformation released about him being on a ventilator well before now. Is this news from a reliable source?
    Mr Johnson has asked Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab to deputise "where necessary", a spokesman added.

    The prime minister, 55, was admitted to St Thomas' Hospital in London with "persistent symptoms" on Sunday.

    The spokesman said he was moved on the advice of his medical team and is receiving "excellent care".

    A statement read: "Since Sunday evening, the prime minister has been under the care of doctors at St Thomas' Hospital, in London, after being admitted with persistent symptoms of coronavirus.

    "Over the course of this afternoon, the condition of the prime minister has worsened and, on the advice of his medical team, he has been moved to the intensive care unit at the hospital."

    It continued: "The PM is receiving excellent care, and thanks all NHS staff for their hard work and dedication."
    Above taken from the BBC article.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,535 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Couple of posters seem happy that Jess Philips didn't get any role.
    Any reason for this?

    I'd have though young, female, from a midlands region that Labour need to do well in, a reasonable level of profile and name recognition would all have been positive points for her. And she has some small support in the party with over 20 MPs voting for her in the first round.

    She's been a vocal opponent of Brexit, which goes against the Labour Party official policy of vague ambivalence. When she was thinking of running for Labour leader, she had to reign it in a fair bit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 724 ✭✭✭moon2


    I said nothing about a ventilator.

    The ICU part is from an official spokesperson, it's on like every news channel at the moment.

    I know you didn't. It's just hard to tell what's true at the moment and sky also reported this very recently:

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-downing-street-slams-russian-disinformation-over-boris-johnson-ventilator-claim-11969398

    You can understand why I asked for further information considering i couldn't find your story on sky at the time :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,621 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Johnson wouldnt be put into intensive care unless there's something seriously wrong and I would strongly suspect a ventilator is helping him breath

    No 10 really should come out and tell the UK public how bad he really is, it's obvious they are covering


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,450 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Just under half of patients in ICU as a result of Covid-19 will die.
    That unfortunately is is the reality.

    Hopefully it will act as a wakeup call in the UK and to Trump to take things more seriously.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Headshot wrote: »
    Johnson wouldnt be put into intensive care unless there's something seriously wrong and I would strongly suspect a ventilator is helping him breath

    No 10 really should come out and tell the UK public how bad he really is, it's obvious they are covering
    Doesn't the fact that he is in ICU tell you that the situation isn't good, what do you want, a live video stream!


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I see that some "news" outlets are already announcing his death!
    https://www.thewhitehouseinsider.com/2020/04/boris-johnson-becomes-first-world.html?m=1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,477 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    No Diane Abbott?

    She announced earlier she intends to leave the shadow cabinet.

    https://metro.co.uk/2020/02/23/diane-abbott-quit-shadow-cabinet-new-labour-leader-elected-12287027/


    I'm disappointing because I'll miss the comedy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,477 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    No surprise no role for Jess Phillips. Who'd want a loudmouth gaff prone person in one's shadow cabinet when you're trying to create a good image. Not even worth it for the babe diversity image. Wise decision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Just under half of patients in ICU as a result of Covid-19 will die.


    This is not true.

    The lie is coming from an audit of 2249 patients.
    The data showed that of the 690 patients in the sample whose care outcomes were known, 346 - 50.1 per cent - had died, while 344 had been discharged.
    The remaining patients, 1,559, were reported still to be in critical care.

    All the rags chose to run with a 50% death rate which is not true as the majority of outcomes were not yet known.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    VinLieger wrote: »
    This is not true.

    The lie is coming from an audit of 2249 patients.
    The data showed that of the 690 patients in the sample whose care outcomes were known, 346 - 50.1 per cent - had died, while 344 had been discharged.
    The remaining patients, 1,559, were reported still to be in critical care.

    All the rags chose to run with a 50% death rate which is not true as the majority of outcomes were not yet known.
    Do you know the average length of stay in ICU for COVID-19 victims, could he be there for several weeks?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,332 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Do you know the average length of stay in ICU for COVID-19 victims, could he be there for several weeks?
    This is from Italy:
    He said COVID-19 sufferers were spending more than 15 days in intensive care, much longer than the average five to six days for other patients.
    The real worry appears to be if you go on ventilation or not:
    The largest study so far to look at mortality among coronavirus patients on ventilators was done by the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre in London. It found that among 98 ventilated patients in the U.K., just 33 were discharged alive.

    The numbers from a study of Wuhan, China, are even grimmer. Only 3 of 22 ventilated patients survived.

    And a study of 18 ventilated patients in Washington state found that nine were still alive when the study ended, but only six had recovered enough to breathe on their own.
    Worth noting that while he received oxygen when he was admitted he's not (as far as we know) on a ventilator yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,379 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    VinLieger wrote: »
    This is not true.

    The lie is coming from an audit of 2249 patients.
    The data showed that of the 690 patients in the sample whose care outcomes were known, 346 - 50.1 per cent - had died, while 344 had been discharged.
    The remaining patients, 1,559, were reported still to be in critical care.

    All the rags chose to run with a 50% death rate which is not true as the majority of outcomes were not yet known.

    This analysis is very interesting. The data shows categorically that 48% died and 52% were discharged (though some have been readmitted). Where it gets interesting in the analysis is in how various experts in the field are interpreting the data.




    “Most cases are still being treated in an ICU (609). A total of 86 patients have been discharged from the ICU, though a proportion of these have had to be readmitted. Seventy-six patients have died.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Is she a temp while Tony Lloyd recovers from Covid19?

    Tony Lloyd has been admitted to hospital within the past 24 hours, though said to be stable. Hugely popular, conscientious politician. Wish him the best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,646 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    If the PM dies, what happens?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    If the PM dies, what happens?

    Dover Raab is in charge initially anyway.

    The PM is only an MP who goes to the Queen to be nominated as PM as she believes they command the confidence of the HOC.

    So it could be ANYONE who goes to the Palace. Convention (like everything in the HOC) means that it it is usually the leader of the largest party/grouping.

    So party rules dictate that their own way to get a leader.
    In the case of the Tories they can work that out for themselves I guess.

    Four PMs in 4 years is some go!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,477 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Very happy to see Angela Rayner, on day 9 of her self imposed 14 day isolation, call Hancock out on Ridge this morning. This is the opposition they need.

    "I'm disappointed that Matt Hancock, after seven days of having the virus, went out when the World Health Organisation has said you should self-isolate for 14 days.

    "I think it's right that we do that because I cannot stress enough the severity of the symptoms that I have suffered, as you can tell from how breathless I am still now, and I'm day nine, day 10.

    "I think the Government really need to give that clarity and continue to support people doing the right thing."

    Hancock had mild symptoms. Therefore from the day he learned he had it some days probably had passed before he got himself tested.

    Raynor on the other hand had much more severe symptoms than Hancock, which would suggest she was aware of her condition earlier than Hancock was in terms of day 1 of contracting it.

    Whether this is a valid point or not, I would still say that she made a petty point, and a contradictory one, because earlier in the same interview she said it's fine for Hancock to criticize ppl for going outdoors against guidelines but some ppl don't have back gardens.

    So, which is it Raynor, follow the guidelines to the letter or break them if you feel you have some socialist minded excuse to.

    Honestly, the Labour party need a good media adviser to stop them making fools of themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    We're all flapping in the wind a bit here but education is only ever the click of a button away.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/03/200327091234.htm

    "A a new study, researchers found that half of the patients they treated for mild COVID-19 infection still had coronavirus for up to eight days after symptoms disappeared. The research letter was published online in the American Thoracic Society's American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine."


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    AllForIt wrote: »
    Hancock had mild symptoms. Therefore from the day he learned he had it some days probably had passed before he got himself tested.

    Raynor on the other hand had much more severe symptoms than Hancock, which would suggest she was aware of her condition earlier than Hancock was in terms of day 1 of contracting it.

    Whether this is a valid point or not, I would still say that she made a petty point, and a contradictory one, because earlier in the same interview she said it's fine for Hancock to criticize ppl for going outdoors against guidelines but some ppl don't have back gardens.

    So, which is it Raynor, follow the guidelines to the letter or break them if you feel you have some socialist minded excuse to.

    Honestly, the Labour party need a good media adviser to stop them making fools of themselves.
    Oh, for goodness’ sake.

    First off, you would probably make fewer errors if you stopped analysing this along ideological lines and didn’t try to categorise positions as “socialist-minded”. Socialism is neither here nor there; this is about science.

    First off, isolation for those who are symptomatic: UK advice is that, if you have COVID-like symptoms, you should self-isolate for 7 days from the onset of the symptoms. If, after 7 days, if you no longer had a temperature, you can end your self-isolation, even if you still have other symptoms - e.g. a cough.

    But WHO advice is that you should self-isolate for 14 days from the disappearance of symptoms.

    It’s obvious that the UK guidance is much more relaxed that the WHO guidance. There may be reasons for this, and they may be good reasons or bad reasons. But we’ll never know unless somebody asks the question, and gets an answer. And the question is less likely to be asked if nobody points to the discrepancy between the UK advice and the WHO advice. Pointing to that discrepancy and asking the government to account for it is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, and if you are distracted from noticing this by the realisation that the person rasing the issue is a socialist, well, that doesn’t reflect well on you.

    Secondly, social distancing. You suggest that Rayner is contradicting herself by urging observance of the WHO isolation guidelines while taking a more flexible approach to the UK’s social distancing rules. But you’re comparing apples and oranges here. In the first place, there’s a difference between what political leaders should do themselves way of following best practice and setting a good example, and what they should compel citizens to do by force of law, with threat of punishment. It’s not at all contradictory to say that the social distancing rules, if they are to apply to everybody, need to be diverse enough and flexible enough to take account of the widely different circumstances which people face, and at the same time to suggest that there is no apparent circumstance in Hancock’s own situation to suggest that he should not follow best practice in self-isolation.

    (You make the point that Hancock had “mild” symptoms. This is irrelevant; the reason why Hancock should self-isolate has nothing to do with how sick he feels, and everything to do with how infectious he is or may be.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    Oh, for goodness’ sake.

    First off, you would probably make fewer errors if you stopped analysing this along ideological lines and didn’t try to categorise positions as “socialist-minded”. Socialism is neither here nor there; this is about science.

    First off, isolation for those who are symptomatic: UK advice is that, if you have COVID-like symptoms, you should self-isolate for 7 days from the onset of the symptoms. If, after 7 days, if you no longer had a temperature, you can end your self-isolation, even if you still have other symptoms - e.g. a cough.

    But WHO advice is that you should self-isolate for 14 days from the disappearance of symptoms.

    It’s obvious that the UK guidance is much more relaxed that the WHO guidance. There may be reasons for this, and they may be good reasons or bad reasons. But we’ll never know unless somebody asks the question, and gets an answer. And the question is less likely to be asked if nobody points to the discrepancy between the UK advice and the WHO advice. Pointing to that discrepancy and asking the government to account for it is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, and if you are distracted from noticing this by the realisation that the person rasing the issue is a socialist, well, that doesn’t reflect well on you.

    Secondly, social distancing. You suggest that Rayner is contradicting herself by urging observance of the WHO isolation guidelines while taking a more flexible approach to the UK’s social distancing rules. But you’re comparing apples and oranges here. In the first place, there’s a difference between what political leaders should do themselves way of following best practice and setting a good example, and what they should compel citizens to do by force of law, with threat of punishment. It’s not at all contradictory to say that the social distancing rules, if they are to apply to everybody, need to be diverse enough and flexible enough to take account of the widely different circumstances which people face, and at the same time to suggest that there is no apparent circumstance in Hancock’s own situation to suggest that he should not follow best practice in self-isolation.

    (You make the point that Hancock had “mild” symptoms. This is irrelevant; the reason why Hancock should self-isolate has nothing to do with how sick he feels, and everything to do with how infectious he is or may be.)

    Well we all know Johnson only apparently had "mild" symptoms as well...until he was admitted to the ICU, and even then it was only "a precaution".

    It seems even symptoms from a disease are being subjected to political spin now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Well we all know Johnson only apparently had "mild" symptoms as well...until he was admitted to the ICU, and even then it was only "a precaution".

    It seems even symptoms from a disease are being subjected to political spin now.
    To be fair, when doctors say that a CV sufferer has "mild" symptoms, that just means that the patient is not so sick as to require admission to hospital. What doctors call a mild dose of CV might to you and me seem like being very sick indeed. This particular sense of "mild" was not developed specially for Boris Johnson.

    So, yeah, Johnson had "mild" symptoms of CV in the sense that an awful lot of people who are very sick indeed have "mild" symptoms of CV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,753 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Emily Maitlis gave a very good opening to Newsnight last night, taking on this narrative that somehow Johnson will get through because of character and will to fight. It sounds great, but it of course makes it sound like those that die just didn't have the bottle to beat the virus.

    It complete nonsense of course, if Johnson survives it will be down to luck in terms of genetics, severity, speed of treatment or whatever, but nothing to do with his being a leader or is fight or is need to survive for Britain or other such rubbish coming out.

    The last few days has seen people come out and almost make Johnson out to be some super human. Tireless, fit, determined, a fighter, unbeatable on the tennis court! It is crass and insensitive to all those that have lost loved ones to continue on with such a narrative.

    She also touched on the 'great leveller' rubbish that is being spouted. Of course technically the virus doesn't see wealth or privilege but of course those with more resources have more options to reduce the risk. WFH, take a break from work, extend holidays. Those with less have far fewer choices and in many cases will have to work simply because there wealthy bosses deem it so (whilst staying well away from the shop themselves)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6wIcpdJyCI


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    To be fair, when doctors say that a CV sufferer has "mild" symptoms, that just means that the patient is not so sick as to require admission to hospital. What doctors call a mild dose of CV might to you and me seem like being very sick indeed. This particular sense of "mild" was not developed specially for Boris Johnson.

    So, yeah, Johnson had "mild" symptoms of CV in the sense that an awful lot of people who are very sick indeed have "mild" symptoms of CV.

    That may be when a Doctor uses it, but the Downing Street spokespeople seemed to me to be using it to mean "the virus isn't affecting him much". They constantly downplayed his symptoms and said he'd be back in work any day now.

    Now that's not to say they were necessarily lying, since it could be what they honestly believed, or maybe his symptoms were mild up until he took a turn for the worse.

    My own personal thoughts are that some politicians see getting the virus as a sign of weakness. So when they do get it, they do their utmost to assure everyone they're not really affected by it and will be back to normal soon. For many this will be true, but in some cases (most notably Johnson) it just doesn't ring true. And as said in the post above, when it becomes patently clear that he's not brushing the virus off, it's just presented as evidence of his strong character and will to fight.

    It doesn't help that a lot of these same politicians see the disease the same way they'd see terrorists, as though it has goals. For the first few weeks, their total ignoring of social distancing, proudly shaking hands, insisting life go on as normal etc. struck me as though they thought the virus had a psychological agenda, and that taking drastic actions and changing their behavior would be letting the virus "win". I feel this wish to avoid being seen as weak plays a bigger role in the response to Covid-19 than you'd think.

    But again, that's my personal conjecture.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement