Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Coronavirus

1313234363748

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,038 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Surprised by what? RTE's western correspondent?

    Surprised that Google collect location data and know where the device is located. This has been the case for nearly 15 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Surprised by what? RTE's western correspondent?

    Jim Corr's paranoid interpretation of it.

    Information -> Jim Corr's mind -> delusional garbage

    That's the flow, but hey it gets him twitter followers, so there's that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The Nal wrote: »
    Surprised that Google collect location data and know where the device is located. This has been the case for nearly 15 years.

    Not to mention it's opt-in, and the output was produced as meta-data.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,530 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Not to mention it's opt-in, and the output was produced as meta-data.

    you would have to wonder how Corr could be surprised by this. How did he think Google Maps predicted travel times?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,038 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Latest from this complete lunatic



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Not to mention it's opt-in....

    It's not like Google ever collected data, (without) ensuring an opt-in ever before e.g. their Streetview cars on European roads.
    A European audit reveals the web giant 'accidentally' stored payload information from open networks

    ...'accidentally' gathering extracts of personal web activity from domestic wifi networks through the Street View cars it has used since 2007.
    Wifi network names (SSIDs) and identifiers (Mac addresses) for devices like network routers.


    Meanwhile in more recent times (this week) thanks to coronavirus, some EU states have somewhat killed their own democracy.
    The EU has shrugged it shoulders, as one of it's states declared rule by decree for an indefinite period of time.

    The further imposition of border closures to the utilization of mass digital surveillance, may become the new normal for Europe, and the bloc can't stop it, even if it wanted to. It can ask nicely, but that's about it.

    Maybe (as some poster allude to), maybe we should celebrate the effects of COVID19 as it results in the birth of authoritarian nationalism.
    After all if you have nothing to hide from your phones bluetooth and gro-location access, and new manditory tracking apps, that can also access your camera, pictures and contacts, sure you have nothing to fear.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    It's not like Google ever collected data, (without) ensuring an opt-in ever before e.g. their Streetview cars on European roads.
    A European audit reveals the web giant 'accidentally' stored payload information from open networks

    ...'accidentally' gathering extracts of personal web activity from domestic wifi networks through the Street View cars it has used since 2007.
    Wifi network names (SSIDs) and identifiers (Mac addresses) for devices like network routers.


    Meanwhile in more recent times (this week) thanks to coronavirus, some EU states have somewhat killed their own democracy.
    The EU has shrugged it shoulders, as one of it's states declared rule by decree for an indefinite period of time.

    The further imposition of border closures to the utilization of mass digital surveillance, may become the new normal for Europe, and the bloc can't stop it, even if it wanted to. It can ask nicely, but that's about it.

    Maybe (as some poster allude to), maybe we should celebrate the effects of COVID19 as it results in the birth of authoritarian nationalism.
    After all if you have nothing to hide from your phones bluetooth and gro-location access, and new manditory tracking apps, that can also access your camera, pictures and contacts, sure you have nothing to fear.

    You seem to be taking information in, and applying some very broad strokes to it and coming out with.. I'm not sure.

    If Hungary, yes Orban is a right wing authoritarian dick (my opinion), and could take advantage of pandemic measures

    If other countries in Europe, most aren't authoritarian and will likely remove the common sense restrictions in place (step by step) as (if) the pandemic eases

    Have to ****ing word lawyer my sentences up here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    If Hungary, yes Orban is a right wing authoritarian dick (my opinion), and could take advantage of pandemic measures
    Aside from your childish name calling/swearing and ignorance in failing to call out any other (left-wing) dicks, who may (also) be messing up somewhat. E.g. the Swedes has done SFA to date. Also fairly popular Boris, has been sitting on his hands for too long, creating public disquiet and public calls for more action.

    So...

    It looks like you have a conspiracy theory created on and by your own hands, well done:
    "An EU state is taking advantage of Cornovirus"

    Do you now suddenly dissaprove this?

    Specifically: of App tracking, geo-location data capture, using wireless bluetooth beacons (30 meter range, pre-amplification), smart live facial recognition cameras (requiring 5G), and mandatory access to typical 'smartphone's' tools such as pictures, data, logs and contacts (creation and tracking of a new 'Digital Identy', so to speak).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Just watch Oliver North reaction when he was asked about the shadow government! Another senator stepped in quickly and said don't answer that a classified area. Answering that would expose the rogue deep state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Aside from your childish name calling/swearing and ignorance in failing to call out any other (left-wing) dicks, who may (also) be messing up somewhat. E.g. the Swedes has done SFA to date. Also fairly popular Boris, has been sitting on his hands for too long, creating public disquiet and public calls for more action.

    So...

    It looks like you have a conspiracy theory created on and by your own hands, well done:
    "An EU state is taking advantage of Cornovirus"

    Do you now suddenly dissaprove this?

    Specifically: of App tracking, geo-location data capture, using wireless bluetooth beacons (30 meter range, pre-amplification), smart live facial recognition cameras (requiring 5G), and mandatory access to typical 'smartphone's' tools such as pictures, data, logs and contacts (creation and tracking of a new 'Digital Identy', so to speak).

    What?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,650 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Aside from your childish name calling/swearing and ignorance in failing to call out any other (left-wing) dicks, who may (also) be messing up somewhat. E.g. the Swedes has done SFA to date. Also fairly popular Boris, has been sitting on his hands for too long, creating public disquiet and public calls for more action.

    So...

    It looks like you have a conspiracy theory created on and by your own hands, well done:
    "An EU state is taking advantage of Cornovirus"

    Do you now suddenly dissaprove this?

    Specifically: of App tracking, geo-location data capture, using wireless bluetooth beacons (30 meter range, pre-amplification), smart live facial recognition cameras (requiring 5G), and mandatory access to typical 'smartphone's' tools such as pictures, data, logs and contacts (creation and tracking of a new 'Digital Identy', so to speak).

    Says the guy who deliberately misspelled posters names :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    What?

    It looks like you have a conspiracy theory created on and by your own hands, well done: "An EU state is taking advantage of Cornovirus"
    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    If Hungary, yes Orban is a right wing authoritarian dick (my opinion), and could take advantage of pandemic measures

    Do you now suddenly dissaprove of this?

    Specifically: of App tracking, geo-location data capture, using wireless bluetooth beacons (30 meter range, pre-amplification), smart live facial recognition cameras (requiring 5G), and mandatory access to typical 'smartphone's' tools such as pictures, data, logs and contacts (creation and tracking of a new 'Digital Identy', so to speak).


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭notobtuse


    Haven't read all these pages or seen if this has been shown before... but highly interesting from back in the early days of the pandemic...

    https://img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02/16/114720192-5eb8307f-017c-4075-a697-348628da0204.pdf

    You can ignorantly accuse me of "whataboutism," but what it really is involves identifying similar scenarios in order to see if it holds up when the shoe is on the other foot!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    It looks like you have a conspiracy theory created on and by your own hands, well done: "An EU state is taking advantage of Cornovirus"

    I wrote that an authoritarian leader like Orban could take advantage of the new measures. There are people quite rightly concerned about it.

    Conspiracies, inside jobs, plots, sleaze, collusion, etc happen all the time, however that's not really a "conspiracy theory" of the sorts we read on this forum, it's more to do with the nature of politics in that country.
    Do you now suddenly dissaprove of this?

    Specifically: of App tracking, geo-location data capture, using wireless bluetooth beacons (30 meter range, pre-amplification), smart live facial recognition cameras (requiring 5G), and mandatory access to typical 'smartphone's' tools such as pictures, data, logs and contacts (creation and tracking of a new 'Digital Identy', so to speak).

    I have no idea what you are talking about here, you'll have to explain


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    I wrote that an authoritarian leader like Orban could take advantage of the new measures. There are people quite rightly concerned about it.

    Either he is, or he isn't.
    Unless of course, you're unable to construct a view on this by yourself and escape such vagueness.
    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    I have no idea what you are talking about here, you'll have to explain
    Such an innocent little mind. If a country is going to 'take advantage' or abuse of power, it would very most likely start with the 'strict monitoring and surveillance of it's citizens'.

    Outside of gossip and reporting of sick people to an 1800 hotline. The current best tool for this is using a 'Digital ID'. Currently this is limited to installing a state approved App (either via push or manditory measures), which constantly monitor all actions, locations and data.

    The down side with this is you can say you only use a dumb phone, have no battery power, or 'forgot your phone' when heading out for a walk.

    Now if only there was some sort of persistant, portable and embedded always-on, non-escapable, birth-to-death technology that could fix this problem... Ah wait its our old friends over at www.id2020.org to the resuce !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Either he is, or he isn't.
    Unless of course, you're unable to construct a view on this by yourself and escape such vagueness.

    It's a perfectly valid view.
    Such an innocent little mind. If a country is going to 'take advantage' or abuse of power, it would very most likely start with the 'strict monitoring and surveillance of it's citizens'.

    Outside of gossip and reporting of sick people to an 1800 hotline. The current best tool for this is using a 'Digital ID'. Currently this is limited to installing a state approved App (either via push or manditory measures), which constantly monitor all actions, locations and data.

    The down side with this is you can say you only use a dumb phone, have no battery power, or 'forgot your phone' when heading out for a walk.

    Now if only there was some sort of persistant, portable and embedded always-on, escapable birth-to-death technology that could fix this problem... Ah wait its our old friends over at www.id2020.org to the resuce !

    I have no idea what you are talking about here or why you keep trying to insert that url


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It's a perfectly valid view.
    Oh so vague, undecisive, and very sit on the fence-ish.
    A perfectly squirmish view.

    You would now appear unable commit to a conspiracy theory that you yourself alluded to.
    Quickly backtracked, and focused on the italacised 'could' factor, and then sugest to holding this 'could' as valid.
    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    I have no idea what you are talking about here or why you keep trying to insert that url
    So very innocent.

    How exactly do you think a state 'could' (as you say) 'take advantage' of COVID?
    May it have something to do with e.g. say manditory/push Apps installed on Smartphones?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,530 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Oh so vague, undecisive, and very sit on the fence-ish.
    A perfectly squirmish view.

    You would now appear unable commit to a conspiracy theory that you yourself alluded to.
    Quickly backtracked, and focused on the italacised 'could' factor, and then sugest to holding this 'could' as valid.


    So very innocent.

    How exactly do you think a state 'could' (as you say) 'take advantage' of COVID?
    May it have something to do with e.g. say manditory/push Apps installed on Smartphones?

    have we moved on from the mark of the beast to mandatory smart apps?

    anyway, no CT required for Orban. He is a right-wing authoritarian.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,799 ✭✭✭✭Ted_YNWA


    You have a dedicated thread to discuss www.id2020.org

    Post it there, this was derailed enough with comments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Oh so vague, undecisive, and very sit on the fence-ish.
    A perfectly squirmish view.

    You would now appear unable commit to a conspiracy theory that you yourself alluded to.
    Quickly backtracked, and focused on the italacised 'could' factor, and then sugest to holding this 'could' as valid.

    Obtuse and pedantic stuff. It's perfectly clear, there's no backtracking whatsoever.
    So very innocent.

    How exactly do you think a state 'could' (as you say) 'take advantage' of COVID?
    May it have something to do with e.g. say manditory/push Apps installed on Smartphones?

    Due to this pandemic Hungary passed emergency legislation allowing Orban to rule by decree with no time limit set on it. And since he's on the authoritarian end of the spectrum, with not a great track record, it's open for potential abuse.

    I have no idea how or why you are trying to insert a national ID project for the world's poor into that, or this debate


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    anyway, no CT required for Orban. He is a right-wing authoritarian.

    Sure you don't like him, as is evident by your name calling and personal bias, perhaps you're likely batting hard for the left-wing, who knows for sure.
    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    If Hungary, yes Orban is a right wing authoritarian dick (my opinion), and could take advantage of pandemic measures

    But yet you have indeed suggested due specifically to the COVID situation, he could now 'take advantage of pandemic measures'.

    This sounds much like a 'conspiracy theory'.
    The very thing you spend your days trying desperately to close, a theory of conspiracy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,530 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Sure you don't like him, as is evident by your name calling and personal bias, perhaps you're likely batting hard for the left-wing, who knows for sure.

    can you point out the name calling and personal bias in the post you quoted?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    can you point out the name calling and personal bias in the post you quoted?
    Minor misunderstanding, not you, it was Dohnjoe chap that had said:

    "Orban is a right wing authoritarian dick"

    Which alluded to prior held bias from him, before presenting his conspiracy theory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    One of the latest is that this is was all a "plan-demic" by the "NWO" to curb worldwide protests by emptying the streets, or something


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    People burning 5G masts over conspiracy theories linking the masts with Coronavirus

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-52164358


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭EyesClosed


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    People burning 5G masts over conspiracy theories linking the masts with Coronavirus

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-52164358

    This is exactly why these insane conspiracy theories need to be questioned not just believed.

    Sure it can be fun to spread anti 5g rumours, but people take this stuff very seriously and will believe it, when there is literally no evidence to back it up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    EyesClosed wrote: »
    This is exactly why these insane conspiracy theories need to be questioned not just believed.

    Sure it can be fun to spread anti 5g rumours, but people take this stuff very seriously and will believe it, when there is literally no evidence to back it up.

    They're entities who will assert blindly that there is no scientific resistance to 5G and is not unhealthy.  If they do, a small bit of researching, they'll find this. 

    http://www.5gappeal.eu/about/

    List of scientists who think 5G dangerous.
    https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal

    This is not info to back up the theory 5G and the Virus are linked. Just information that most people never saw before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    If they do, a small bit of researching, they'll find this. 

    They'll find a lot of anti-5g sites posing as legitimate information. Some people are unable to tell the difference between real information and carefully crafted disinformation. A lot of people are unable to tell the difference between good science and bad science.

    Are 5g signals perfectly safe? No
    Are the suns rays perfectly safe? No

    There's a relative risk to both. Cranks and alarmists exploit the grey area in order to scare-monger that the risk is higher or much higher than it really is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    They'll find a lot of anti-5g sites posing as legitimate information. Some people are unable to tell the difference between real information and carefully crafted disinformation. A lot of people are unable to tell the difference between good science and bad science.

    Are 5g signals perfectly safe? No
    Are the suns rays perfectly safe? No

    There's a relative risk to both. Cranks and alarmists exploit the grey area in order to scare-monger that the risk is higher or much higher than it really is.


    Entertaining and more shift of stances by Dohnjoe.  Previously you claimed 5G was not dangerous and was completely safe.

    The website is not disinformation. Linking this site with other 5G- conspiracy sites you find online is hilarious. There the names of scientists and their department listed on this site, all writing to the UN summarizing why- 5G is potentially dangerous right now.

    Are 5g signals perfectly safe? No

    Perfectly safe (no) mean? Why would anybody use a technology that not 100 per cent safe for the public? How do you know if it is scaremongering? Are you educated enough about 5G to judge these scientists are wrong?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    One of the latest is that this is was all a "plan-demic" by the "NWO" to curb worldwide protests by emptying the streets, or something

    My position and is opinion. China bought research from America leading scientists and somehow the virus got leaked. I don’t think its a conicidence that Charles Lieber ( one of America top chemists) and the Harvard Department chair of Chemical, and Chemical, biology research got arrested in Jan 2020. From media reports i looked up last night his last visit to Wuhan was in Nov 2019.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Entertaining and more shift of stances by Dohnjoe.  Previously you claimed 5G was not dangerous and was completely safe.

    Show us the post.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Show us the post.

    There three musketeers (yourself, Nal, Kingmob) one of you posted links 5G was safe and not dangerous. There 113 pages to find out which of you posted the links.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    There three musketeers (yourself, Nal, Kingmob) one of you posted links 5G was safe and not dangerous. There 113 pages to find out which of you posted the links.

    That's false, I have never written that 5g was perfectly safe

    Use the search function
    https://www.boards.ie/search/submit/?query=5g&forum=&user=759707&date_from=&date_to=


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    That's false, I have never written that 5g was perfectly safe

    Use the search function
    https://www.boards.ie/search/submit/?query=5g&forum=&user=759707&date_from=&date_to=

    Your search function says you mentioned 5G in the last 4 days, that doesn't make any sense :confused: Where the rest of your comments you have made in other threads?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    I think anyone using 5G or even talking about it need to have a good look at their frequency and ask the question, what wavelength am I on?

    Treehuggers are always looking for an excuse to burn things, the irony.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Your search function says you mentioned 5G in the last 4 days, that doesn't make any sense :confused: Where the rest of your comments you have made in other threads?

    It makes perfect sense when you factor in that I don't hold the view that 5g is perfectly safe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It makes perfect sense when you factor in that I don't hold the view that 5g is perfectly safe.

    What perfectly safe? If wasn't you, I apologize. I remember one of you, you or Nal posted a link that said 5G was safe? Kingmob does not post links, it's very rare he does that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It makes perfect sense when you factor in that I don't hold the view that 5g is perfectly safe.

    I remember that no one had a problem with the first gen.
    2G was actually seen by many as dangerous with communities not wanting masts in their area.
    3G and 4G was introduced with few complaints
    Now people are having the same hysteria about 5G as they did about 2G.

    At what point did 2G because safe and won't the same thing happen with 5G?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    tuxy wrote: »
    I remember that no one had a problem with the first gen.
    2G was actually seen by many as dangerous with communities not wanting masts in their area.
    3G and 4G was introduced with few complaints
    Now people are having the same hysteria about 5G as they did about 2G.

    At what point did 2G because safe and won't the same thing happen with 5G?

    They get bored and move onto the next thing to be hysterical about. They are applying the same faulty thinking to a newer more topical thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    What perfectly safe? If wasn't you, I apologize. I remember one of you, you or Nal posted a link that said 5G was safe? Kingmob does not post links, it's very rare he does that.

    Thanks for the apology. And before you misinterpret my view again. This doesn't mean I maintain 5g is dangerous. There's a spectrum of acceptable safety, just about everything has an element of risk.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Thanks for the apology. And before you misinterpret my view again. This doesn't mean I maintain 5g is dangerous. There's a spectrum of acceptable safety, just about everything has an element of risk.

    RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. Higher the frequency, the more risk (5G likely will have higher frequency) than 3G and 4G. Scientist's concerns are not unfounded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,650 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Entertaining and more shift of stances by Dohnjoe.  Previously you claimed 5G was not dangerous and was completely safe.

    The website is not disinformation. Linking this site with other 5G- conspiracy sites you find online is hilarious. There the names of scientists and their department listed on this site, all writing to the UN summarizing why- 5G is potentially dangerous right now.

    Are 5g signals perfectly safe? No

    Perfectly safe (no) mean? Why would anybody use a technology that not 100 per cent safe for the public? How do you know if it is scaremongering? Are you educated enough about 5G to judge these scientists are wrong?

    So ban all modes of transport?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    They get bored and move onto the next thing to be hysterical about. They are applying the same faulty thinking to a newer more topical thing.

    Exactly, I guess they missed out on 3 and 4G as they were banging on about something else at the time.
    RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. Higher the frequency, the more risk (5G likely will have higher frequency) than 3G and 4G. Scientist's concerns are not unfounded.

    At what point should the line be drawn though? Perhaps back at the first generation?


  • Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Old news at this stage but both CBS and Sky news used the same footage, Skys was from Italy and CBS claimed the footage to be from New York. Its hard then to trust any footage you see.
    Screen-Shot-2020-04-04-at-17-31-03.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Another example of the media using 'fake' footage and passing it off as footage from inside a Covid-19 ward.

    This time they present what are clearly dolls as Covid-19 patients



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Another example of the media using 'fake' footage and passing it off as footage from inside a Covid-19 ward.

    This time they present what are clearly dolls as Covid-19 patients


    It's clearly a training dummy. Words fail me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It's clearly a training dummy. Words fail me.

    Yes it is a training dummy, it even says so on the wall behind it. The issue is that it was presented on the news as being from a Covid-19 ward.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Lazy reporting is not a conspiracy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,201 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The issue is that it was presented on the news as being from a Covid-19 ward.

    Simple challenge: explain what is happening in this video

    And then, explain how the person who made this video frames it


  • Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Simple challenge: explain what is happening in this video

    And then, explain how the person who made this video frames it

    I'm more interested in how Channel 4 framed it tbh


  • Advertisement
Advertisement