Dohnjoe wrote: » That's false, I have never written that 5g was perfectly safe Use the search functionhttps://www.boards.ie/search/submit/?query=5g&forum=&user=759707&date_from=&date_to=
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Your search function says you mentioned 5G in the last 4 days, that doesn't make any sense Where the rest of your comments you have made in other threads?
Dohnjoe wrote: » It makes perfect sense when you factor in that I don't hold the view that 5g is perfectly safe.
tuxy wrote: » I remember that no one had a problem with the first gen. 2G was actually seen by many as dangerous with communities not wanting masts in their area. 3G and 4G was introduced with few complaints Now people are having the same hysteria about 5G as they did about 2G. At what point did 2G because safe and won't the same thing happen with 5G?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » What perfectly safe? If wasn't you, I apologize. I remember one of you, you or Nal posted a link that said 5G was safe? Kingmob does not post links, it's very rare he does that.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Thanks for the apology. And before you misinterpret my view again. This doesn't mean I maintain 5g is dangerous. There's a spectrum of acceptable safety, just about everything has an element of risk.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Entertaining and more shift of stances by Dohnjoe. Previously you claimed 5G was not dangerous and was completely safe. The website is not disinformation. Linking this site with other 5G- conspiracy sites you find online is hilarious. There the names of scientists and their department listed on this site, all writing to the UN summarizing why- 5G is potentially dangerous right now. Are 5g signals perfectly safe? No Perfectly safe (no) mean? Why would anybody use a technology that not 100 per cent safe for the public? How do you know if it is scaremongering? Are you educated enough about 5G to judge these scientists are wrong?
Dohnjoe wrote: » They get bored and move onto the next thing to be hysterical about. They are applying the same faulty thinking to a newer more topical thing.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. Higher the frequency, the more risk (5G likely will have higher frequency) than 3G and 4G. Scientist's concerns are not unfounded.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » Another example of the media using 'fake' footage and passing it off as footage from inside a Covid-19 ward. This time they present what are clearly dolls as Covid-19 patients
Dohnjoe wrote: » It's clearly a training dummy. Words fail me.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » The issue is that it was presented on the news as being from a Covid-19 ward.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Simple challenge: explain what is happening in this video And then, explain how the person who made this video frames it
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » I'm more interested in how Channel 4 framed it tbh
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » More 'lazy' reporting.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Is it generic Covid-19 hospital footage/journalism error orA global conspiracy involving every country from the US to China to Russia faking 10's of thousands of deaths with fake plastic dummies involving every healthcare service in the world, and the disease doesn't exist Think before you post this stuff.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » How do you know its an error?
As for the bolded part, who said anything like that? Certainly not me.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » people said the same thing when electricity was introduced
Alena Tangy Someone wrote: » Yet you can't easily sell a house that finds itself near a large electric pylon. Can't make/sell a mobile phone with a SAR level of +1.6. Also if you choose to sleep right next to an electric fuse box, expect poor health before too long. Saying that, the worst 5G can do is interfere slightly with the natural immune system, not enough of course, to cause a global pandemic. Another theory is that in very high pollution areas (N.Italy/Wuhan) that had recent 5G installs, it somehow casued an exaggerated immune response, maybe something to do with new microwaves and pollutant particles. Perhaps this theory comes from abroad? E.g. last night in an enthic area of Birmingham (mainly SE Asian), they choose to turn a new 70 foot 5G mast, into a raging bonfire.
Alena Tangy Someone wrote: » How COVID19 started is impossible to prove, there are three options (accident, state, or a deep {beyond any single state} purposed release) it could be any of these three. The only important matter now, is the current and future consequences as a result of it. One good example is a 3rd world country (with a 15% poverty rate) Tunis has no problem spending good money on fancy oppresive monitoring technology:
Dohnjoe wrote: » That's nothing, we are entering full deep state 1984 mode
Hong Kong, China - As inbound travellers arrive in Hong Kong they are met with the new face of border security - the Department of Health. In a bid to curtail a rise in COVID-19 cases, arrivals are tested, instructed to download a government mandated app - StayHomeSafe - and wear a wristband that is linked with the app.
