Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tesla/Lithium stocks discussion

  • 04-04-2016 5:02pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Prezatch


    Have started a new thread...
    Green Mile wrote: »
    Elon Musk’s dream is to progress the whole electric car market not just for Tesla. He publishes the technology as open source for other companies to use to help them to compete with Tesla and each other, to help aid the progression of making electric cars more affordable and mainstream to the public. It doesn’t matter to him if people buy Tesla or Google cars etc, his main goal is to trigger a move for all car companies to direct their resources to getting electric cars to the market to “better the world”. He outlines this himself in many Tesla interviews online.

    Tesla is
    in my opinion,
    not a long term company to invest in. The guy is worth 13Billion, this is a project/hobby to him. Elon Musk is the closest we have to a real life Iron Man and has a cult following.
    I sold my Tesla shares at $244 and I think it was a good idea selling at that price when I did. It’s not a long term idea. But I could be wrong.

    I also sold my holding today at $246, a tidy one month 24% gain.


«13456733

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,964 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    I sold at $235 before the recent dip and rise, my best ever return on a share but wasn't tempted to get back in when they kept going down, its impossible to know where they're going to go, Id agree with Green Miles post though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭lucky john


    "Elon Musk’s dream is to progress the whole electric car market not just for Tesla. He publishes the technology as open source for other companies to use to help them to compete with Tesla and each other, to help aid the progression of making electric cars more affordable and mainstream to the public. It doesn’t matter to him if people buy Tesla or Google cars etc, his main goal is to trigger a move for all car companies to direct their resources to getting electric cars to the market to “better the world”. He outlines this himself in many Tesla interviews online. "

    True, but that is only part of the story. There are two reasons why he shares his technology. 1. to turn EV's into a mass market acceptable product. Its easier to do that with plenty of producers than with Tesla on its own. 2. the competition were, and still are for the most part so far behind in their development of EV's, they did nothing to challenge Tesla. By giving them his ideas he is forcing his own company to drive on and continue to innovate.

    The end result is not a mad scientist just in this to better humanity. It is also an extremely ambitious business man prepared to go rewrite every business book on how to built a multi billion dollar company.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭Roonbox


    Its seems very expensive up here -
    $35k car make a $35b co?
    2015 Tesla sld 51,095 vehicles
    GM sold ~10m

    Tesla lost $889m
    GM made $8.45b


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    They're investing in the gigafactory and rolling out superchargers and new stores. Also R&D on Model 3. That's where the money is going. Tesla wants to grow fast.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Prezatch


    Excellent video here that explains the current situation:

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-03-31/tesla-doubles-down-with-the-model-3


  • Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭pajosjunkbox


    Bought in @ 1.58 back in Feb. First real dabbling in shares. Opened a degiro account and decided to play with some savings. Not sure whether to hold or take the money and run. Also bought BOI , Cairn homes and Netflix but Tesla have dwarfed them !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    Bought in @ 1.58 back in Feb. First real dabbling in shares. Opened a degiro account and decided to play with some savings. Not sure whether to hold or take the money and run. Also bought BOI , Cairn homes and Netflix but Tesla have dwarfed them !

    You could set up a stop loss order with DeGiro in case TSLA suddenly heads south. That's what I have done.

    I was actually expecting a drop in the share price after Tesla missed their target but it seems the huge numbers of reservations made up for that. Based on this I think the price will trend higher in the coming weeks provided the broader market isn't rattled too much. Volume is double the average.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Roonbox wrote: »
    Its seems very expensive up here -
    $35k car make a $35b co?
    2015 Tesla sld 51,095 vehicles
    GM sold ~10m

    Tesla lost $889m
    GM made $8.45b
    What has that got to do with anything? :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Tried to go short Tesla today, but the borrow cost is just ridiculous, so I have played the short through a January 2017 put at $160 with a stop loss at $310. Yee-haw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭Roonbox


    What has that got to do with anything? :pac:

    Damn right Francie, what are numbers when it just keeps rising :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭Roonbox


    Tried to go short Tesla today, but the borrow cost is just ridiculous, so I have played the short through a January 2017 put at $160 with a stop loss at $310. Yee-haw.


    You may find this interesting if you are thinking of shorting -
    http://www.riskreversal.com/2016/04/06/update-tsla-closing-apr-june-put-calendar-near-stop/


  • Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭Corcaigh84


    Bought in @ 1.58 back in Feb. First real dabbling in shares. Opened a degiro account and decided to play with some savings. Not sure whether to hold or take the money and run. Also bought BOI , Cairn homes and Netflix but Tesla have dwarfed them !

    Apologies if OT but like you I am considering my first dabble in shares, and also with degiro. What would be your minimum amount of cash to throw on there to get my feet wet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    thefloss wrote: »
    Apologies if OT but like you I am considering my first dabble in shares, and also with degiro. What would be your minimum amount of cash to throw on there to get my feet wet?

    Which shares are you considering? US shares incur about €0.5 in commission with DeGiro, which is 0.5% if you're investing €100, so I would suggest investing at least €200.

    For ETFs the charge is €4 (at least for US ETFs). Other stock exchanges have different changes, I think.

    If you're talking about Tesla, 1 share would be OK but I would not recommend buying Tesla at the current price (about $268).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Roonbox wrote: »
    You may find this interesting if you are thinking of shorting -
    http://www.riskreversal.com/2016/04/06/update-tsla-closing-apr-june-put-calendar-near-stop/
    I am not too worried, those people were unlucky to short into a market rally and some Tesla ramping. I think the market is over-valued and am expecting a market decline at some point this year. I think that story stocks likes Tesla that have no earnings and are basically only a promise, are going to take a pasting at some point, especially when it comes to raising equity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭Roonbox


    I am not too worried, those people were unlucky to short into a market rally and some Tesla ramping. I think the market is over-valued and am expecting a market decline at some point this year. I think that story stocks likes Tesla that have no earnings and are basically only a promise, are going to take a pasting at some point, especially when it comes to raising equity.

    I agree with you but that doesn't mean it cant get even higher before it falls. Its a tough one to try to pick a top on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    My stop loss kicked in at 255 yesterday so I'm out for the time being. Time will tell if it was the right decision.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,006 ✭✭✭_Tombstone_




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭lucky john



    I think Musk would appreciate the symbolism of using that site, not to mention what financial benefits the French would offer to have him anchored there.

    Historic landing by the Dragon rocket yesterday. Well done to SpaceX


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Elon Musk is on well on his way to a $1.6 billion pay-out thanks to shareholders - http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-18/elon-musk-ahead-of-pace-for-1-6-billion-tesla-motors-payday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Wall Street values Tesla at $620,000 per car. By contrast, a GM vehicle is worth $4,800: http://reut.rs/1SX9pDz


  • Registered Users Posts: 335 ✭✭b4bmm


    I haven't heard anyone on about Lithium on here. Has anyone invested in a Lithium company or know of any that could be of interest.

    I know quite a few that have boomed over the last 12 months. Phenomenal returns 20-40X all ASX listed companies. Of course I haven't invested in them, have invested in a graphite company instead. Nowhere near the gains of these companies but as it stands on paper a good return. Holding for more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    I think demand for lithium will increase a lot over the coning years due to more and more EVs coming to the market, but I haven't done any research yet.

    The Tesla Gigafactories Are Coming. Can Global Lithium Supply Keep Up?
    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/04/26/the-tesla-gigafactories-are-coming-can-global-lith.aspx

    A few contenders:
    http://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/energy-investing/lithium-investing/top-lithium-producers/

    As for Tesla, it seems there are still issues with Model X production so I expect the stock to keep falling in the near term. The earnings report is due today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 674 ✭✭✭FernandoTorres


    Lithium has massive potential. Tesla Model 3 pre-orders and Powerwall are just one aspect of it. There is massive government backing in China for electric vehicles and they're aiming to have 5m on the road by 2020. In 2014 there were 665,000 electric cars in the world. All of the major manufacturers are now seeing it as the future. If any of these things play out to even a fraction of their potential, demand for lithium will be through the roof and supply is still quite low.

    I've personally invested in PLS and AJM (ASX). Up over 200% on each and have the option to buy another $30k in PLS for 0.38 (currently trading at 0.64). PLS is sitting on potentially the biggest lithium resource on the planet and I believe it will easily be $1 by year end. The only danger I can see is an alternative battery coming along but no sign of that on the horizon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    Is future demand already priced in, or are lithium shares reasonably priced?

    How has world production and lithium prices changed over the last 5 years?

    Who can increase or are increasing production reasonably quickly?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 674 ✭✭✭FernandoTorres


    Couple of good articles there:

    http://www.economist.com/news/business/21688386-amid-surge-demand-rechargeable-batteries-companies-are-scrambling-supplies

    http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/pages/macroeconomic-insights-folder/what-if-i-told-you/report.pdf

    PLS for example hasn't actually sold anything yet. They're about 2 years off the start of mining but they do have a huge confirmed resource and plenty of finance. Obviously it's still all based on potential future earnings so I wouldn't be putting the life savings on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,407 ✭✭✭positron


    My first SELL ever - sold the 5 TSLA shares $232.50 each. I had bought them $200, and while I held them price crashed to $140 and then went up to $270 or so. About $150 "earned" and after commission, fees, tax, time wasted etc it's about three fiddy. Meh, not bad, for a learning exercise.

    In my totally worthless layman view, TSLA will go down for a few weeks until Musk announces some great news and I hope to buy these 5 shares back at around $200 again. No major profits here, just a bit of fun with degiro.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭lucky john


    Q1 results beat expectations on some figures and inline on others so a good day. big move forward of 2 years in production ramp. can't see $200 for a while yet. more likely stable to $250. News on the battery wall production to come later but it will have to be ramped fast as well in line with car production.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    lucky john wrote: »
    Q1 results beat expectations on some figures and inline on others so a good day. big move forward of 2 years in production ramp. can't see $200 for a while yet. more likely stable to $250. News on the battery wall production to come later but it will have to be ramped fast as well in line with car production.
    I would be very worried about the spate of senior management executives on the production side.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-04/two-tesla-production-chiefs-to-leave-ahead-of-biggest-challenge-yet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭lucky john


    I would be very worried about the spate of senior management executives on the production side.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-04/two-tesla-production-chiefs-to-leave-ahead-of-biggest-challenge-yet


    Musk is not the kind of guy that would be easy to work for and production has always lagged the promises so far. So i expect that now the promise is huge the pressure is going to be unbearable for many.

    Still, look at spaceX. Musk set about doing the impossible there and despite many quitters the employees delivered. What was noticeable and amazing about the landing on the barge last month was the exuberance and the youth of all the employees. Don't underestimate the dedication Musk seems to drag out of those that follow him.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,333 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Here's a fun highlight for Tesla and the claim "more cars will lower the losses" from their Q1 report.
    GAAP loss	cars sold GAAP loss per car
    1Q 2016	$282,267,000	14810	$19,059
    4Q 2015	$320,397,000	17478	$18,331
    3Q 2015	$229,858,000	11603	$19,810
    2Q 2015	$184,227,000	11532	$15,975
    1Q 2015	$154,181,000	10045	$15,349
    4Q 2014	$107,629,000	9834	$10,945
    
    The more cars they sell the more loss they make per car and while failing to deliver the June consensus target of 19.6k cars by only expecting 16k cars they believe they will be able to deliver 500k by 2018.

    Best of luck to the believers who decide to buy into the hype.

    Oh and for the model 3 deposit ownersTesla says "Thanks for paying the interest on our loans; we hope we'll not go bankrupt before you want to take delivery of the car".
    April cash receipts for vehicles in transit at quarter end plus Model 3 reservation deposits allowed us to pay back $350 million on the asset based line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    How is loss per car actually calculated? Where did you find those figures?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Nody wrote: »
    Here's a fun highlight for Tesla and the claim "more cars will lower the losses" from their Q1 report.
    GAAP loss	cars sold GAAP loss per car
    1Q 2016	$282,267,000	14810	$19,059
    4Q 2015	$320,397,000	17478	$18,331
    3Q 2015	$229,858,000	11603	$19,810
    2Q 2015	$184,227,000	11532	$15,975
    1Q 2015	$154,181,000	10045	$15,349
    4Q 2014	$107,629,000	9834	$10,945
    
    The Tesla Model X costs $80k, the loss per car is nearly $20k.

    If you can't make money selling a car at $80k - how the hell will they make money selling the Model 3 for $35k?

    I am very happy being short this company, at some point the delusion will catch up on this turd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    The bit about them using refundable customer deposits to re-fi debt was also hilarious.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,333 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Sabre Man wrote: »
    How is loss per car actually calculated? Where did you find those figures?
    Their security filings listed on their site, here's Q1 2016 for example and scroll down to Net loss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    You're looking at it the wrong way. It doesn't say anything about loss per car. Tesla isn't losing money on cars sold, but is simply spending money building the company for future growth.

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/if-you-value-tesla-per-car-sold-youre-an-idiot-2016-05-05?siteid=yhoof2

    I don't own any TSLA shares at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Sabre Man wrote: »
    Tesla isn't losing money on cars sold, but is simply spending money building the company for future growth.
    Sorry, you are wrong on this. Even before capex for the next round of growth is considered, Tesla lost money in 2015. Check the cash flow statement for 2015 if you don't believe me.

    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459016013195/tsla-10k_20151231.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Prezatch


    Elon Musk has announced that their output targets have been brought forward by 2 years from 2020 to 2018 :eek:

    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/e5d0e114-124a-11e6-91da-096d89bd2173.html#axzz47mqFlukK


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,333 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Oh and for those that missed it; this is a great line in their letter to shareholders:
    Given our plans to advance our 500,000 total unit build plan,essentially doubling the prior growth plan, we are re-evaluating our level of capital expenditures, but expect it will be about 50% higher than our previous guidance of $1.5 billion for 2016.
    So now they are going to spend $2.25 billion in pure CAPEX in 2016 alone from a company that posted Q1 losses of $282 million and stated it's going to get worse. Now they stated they hope to get 25% margin on their model X which is a premium model so let's give them 20% margin on the model 3 (and these are all pre-GAAP so actual margin is significantly lower, as a reference Porsche as the highest margin luxuary car company has 18% margin on their cars, Volkswagen cars are a 2.3% so think about that for a moment) and give the 500k cars @ 40k each (since they think everyone are going to buy upgrades). We have a pre-GAAP profit then of $1 billion. This means they need to sell half a million cars a year with 5k extras for three years only to recover the investment of 2016 alone (and that's before we start talking interest, write down on machines etc.); for those not aware 2017 is expected to have similar investments as well.

    Please can someone tell me with a serious face they expect Model 3 to sell for 7 years straight at 500k a year (maximum capacity when they come out; not adding the CAPEX to go up to a million a year by 2020)? And that's just to break even on the equipment to build the cars; not including the costs for the actual materials, workers, design, sales force, recalls etc. Break even with everything included would require the model 3 to sell at maximum capacity for around 10+ years straight without ANY NEW COSTS.

    I'm sure Musk will make money from his factory possibly but for the fools buying into Tesla stock? Sorry but this is puff puff pass kind of stock to me; not a single number shown to date on how this company will ever make a profit even at maximum production of an car for 10 years to cover existing costs and that's assuming they somehow magically managements to get these margins which to date they have never managed...
    Sabre Man wrote: »
    You're looking at it the wrong way. It doesn't say anything about loss per car. Tesla isn't losing money on cars sold, but is simply spending money building the company for future growth.
    Tesla has never made a profit, ever. Not as a niche supercar company, not as a small car company and they are not going to make a profit trying to sell cheap electrical cars either. Not a single number presented to back it up, not a single economical prognosis by them has been achieved on margins or profits. All we have is vague hand waving that it will be possible in the future somehow somewhere. Tesla is simply Musk's way to get other people to pay for his dream of a future with electrical cars but that does not make a profitable or sustainable company.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    Sorry, you are wrong on this. Even before capex for the next round of growth is considered, Tesla lost money in 2015. Check the cash flow statement for 2015 if you don't believe me.

    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459016013195/tsla-10k_20151231.htm

    Your statement seems to be correct and the losses could potentially increase as Tesla ramps up production.

    - Our cash flows from operating activities are significantly affected by our cash investments to support the growth of our business in areas such as manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative.

    - Our operating cash flows are also affected by our working capital needs to support growth and fluctuations in inventory, personnel related expenditures, accounts payable and other current assets and liabilities.

    - The decrease in operating cash flows in 2015 as compared to 2014 was due to an increase in overall inventory to support growth.

    Sales in Norway peaked in 2014. Due to the unfavourable exchange rate and discussions in Norwegian EV discussion forums I believe sales this year will be lower than 2015. A new Tesla is a lot more expensive now than it was a few years ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭zpehtsfd


    Nody i agree with you that the stock is way ahead of itself but .......
    Nody wrote:
    Oh and for those that missed it; this is a great line in their letter to shareholders:

    Actually nobody missed it cause the reason they increased it by 50% was already posted in the message just before yours i.e. output targets brought forward 2 years to 2018
    Nody wrote:
    Now they stated they hope to get 25% margin on their model X which is a premium model so let's give them 20% margin on the model 3 (and these are all pre-GAAP so actual margin is significantly lower, as a reference Porsche as the highest margin luxuary car company has 18% margin on their cars, Volkswagen cars are a 2.3% so think about that for a moment) and give the 500k cars @ 40k each (since they think everyone are going to buy upgrades). We have a pre-GAAP profit then of $1 billion. This means they need to sell half a million cars a year with 5k extras for three years only to recover the investment of 2016 alone (and that's before we start talking interest, write down on machines etc.); for those not aware 2017 is expected to have similar investments as well.

    So output target of 500K cars would be for their affordable Model 3? :confused: They are already forecasting delivery of 90K Model S/X for 2016 so it's not too far-fetched to imagine 200K in 2020 at an ASP of say $80K. Add 200K of the Model 3 at ASP of $40K and the #'s look completely different.
    Nody wrote:
    Tesla is simply Musk's way to get other people to pay for his dream of a future with electrical cars but that does not make a profitable or sustainable company.

    Don't be so cynical. Musk is a revolutionary just like Jobs was. Tesla isn't some pet project for him. Tesla is a startup in a nascent market. In a relatively short space of time he has brought car engineering to a whole new level and the affordable Model 3 is incomparable in performance and range. The future of EVs is here and Tesla will be a sustainable and profitable company within the next 10 years. imo

    Also Wall Street doesn't care about EPS as long as they see future revenue growth (Amazon and Salesforce being prime examples of this). Add to that the massive short interest (plus borrow rate) and there will be no shortage of buyers on the way down. GL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,407 ✭✭✭positron


    I just read that while Tesla is building the Gigafactory, it's Panasonic who is going to make actual cells in there - Panasonic is investing something like $1.6 B. It makes sense that Tesla leverage off Panasonic's expertise like that. News I read is from earlier this year (not new).

    However if someone want to buy some Panasonic shares, where do you do it? Do I have to buy shares in Japan exchage, or Panasonic Corporation (ADR) on nasdaq or on Borsa Frankfurt?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Prezatch


    Sabre Man wrote: »

    Junior miners are where the real risk/reward is to be made at the moment however. The larger companies such as Albemarle spike up and down slightly but the likes of Pilbara are on a different level, up 47% in the last 5 days alone :eek:

    https://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1462982886430&chddm=1805&chls=IntervalBasedLine&q=ASX:PLS&ntsp=1&ei=4VgzV-mnH9HDUb3uo-AK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Prezatch


    Pioneer Resources (PIO) mentioned in the 2016 share picks thread last week, up 165% in the last 5 days... There really are crazy movements going on for these lithium mining companies on the ASX


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man




  • Registered Users Posts: 335 ✭✭b4bmm


    PLS, GXY, AJM, PIO, BGS, PIO, ZNC to name a few off the top of my head all lithium plays on the ASX.
    Dont hold any as of this post.

    There is a trend now on the ASX that companies who were initially exploring for other commodities have jumped on the
    Lithium hype train announcing that permit x may contain Lithium and will be investigated further. Just the mention of the word
    Lithium gets people into a frenzy and wanting to load up. Be careful most won't be up to scratch. The arse will fall out of many of them.
    In and Out investments would be the best way to play many of them. PLS and AJM look the goods. Cant comment on the rest apart from BGS who is African based and if they get good drilling results in Mali that should put a rocket under the SP. They also have a big gold play there potentially so you will be getting a good fall back if the Lithium aspect doesn't come in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭Sabre Man




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,765 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Tesla raising $1.4bn with a share sale. Musk selling 550 million shares to meet a tax obligation thanks to the exercising of options.

    Does Musk think the shares are overvalued?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement