How long before Irish reunification? (Part 2) Threadbans in OP

markodaly wrote: »

Then its obvious.
You don't if ever back up what you say.

I didn't claim that I didn't object Mark...I said 'nobody ever objected to the RIC annual commemoration'.

You mean NI is not ruled by Westminister anymore?
:D

Yes it is.
They stated that they no longer had a selfish or strategic interest in Northern Ireland though and stated that it was for the people of the island of Ireland to decide their future.
When that was negotiated with a still fully armed group, the IRA agreed that they would accept the majority decision if a border poll was held at regular intervals.
In return for the demilitarisation of northern Ireland and the renaming and restructuring of the disgraced sectarian and partisan police force the IRA agreed to disarm and did.

I can provide backup for any of the statements above.
If you have time could you link to a statement of 'surrender' by any opf the players above by way of back-up? Cheers.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

Hold on.....are you asking Francie for proof that he didn't post something? What do you want him to do, quote his entire posting history!?

I've no idea whether Francie did or did not object to the MoJ going to commemorations, but asking someone to prove they didn't say something? That is so devoid of logic that it is almost incomprehensible.

This is the sort of standard you'd be kicked off a secondary school debate club for, Mark. If you're making an assertion that Francie has said something, you're responsible for providing evidence that he has done so.

It's not the first time Mark has resorted to such nonsense and yet when he's asked to clarify something he already said we get the fabled "I already answered that".

It's almost like he has different standards for others than he has for himself.

At last our partitionists, who have the exact same message as Alex, have a political party to support them.

https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/politics/inevitable-nationalists-lose-border-poll-both-sides-border-says-dup-mla-2980251

Fionn1952 wrote: »

Hold on.....are you asking Francie for proof that he didn't post something? What do you want him to do, quote his entire posting history!?

I've no idea whether Francie did or did not object to the MoJ going to commemorations, but asking someone to prove they didn't say something? That is so devoid of logic that it is almost incomprehensible.

This is the sort of standard you'd be kicked off a secondary school debate club for, Mark. If you're making an assertion that Francie has said something, you're responsible for providing evidence that he has done so.

40k posts, uhmm... wouldn’t fancy goin through that lot.

Lad could sink into a swamp of turgity.

Truthvader wrote: »

B*LLOCKS. You have been a full time apologist and cheerleader for Sinn Fein IRA. Fully trained up in the coded language of Gerryadamspeak with the usual all inclusive cop out phrases such as "It was all wrong" and "we have all suffered". Even going so far as to pretend sociopathic thugs and killers "had no choice"

There is no "all". Depraved and warped individuals who can put a bomb in a pub full of people they have never met or shoot a man in front of his family - or shoot protesters on Bloody Sunday are individually culpable and responsible for the choices they make.

As per other threads I invite all to go through your posting history and judge for themselves

Not getting away with it.

So it is just your select crowd who should be commemorated/remembered?

On shivers to think what kind of a state you would construct Truth...how long would it last before it too went up in flames.

Anyone can review my posting history, if they find one post condoning violence then please post it.
Your post above is condoning the violence of one side while selectively condemning others.

That is good old fashioned cold hypocrisy of the highest order.

FrancieBrady wrote: »

So it is just your select crowd who should be commemorated/remembered?

On shivers to think what kind of a state you would construct Truth...how long would it last before it too went up in flames.

Anyone can review my posting history, if they find one post condoning violence then please post it.
Your post above is condoning the violence of one side while selectively condemning others.

That is good old fashioned cold hypocrisy of the highest order.

Can i assume from this post you view the likes of Jock and Storey as equivalent to Wright and Adair?

Truthvader getting an awful kicking here :D The only reply he seems to have is to put random phrases in inverted commas!!

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I view everyone who killed/resorted to violence as wrong...everybody. How many times do I need to say this?

Are they 'wrong' forever and a day...no, just like anyone who is involved in conflict/war, like many who ran this state up until their deahs by natural causes, you have a chance to redeem yourself. If you continue killing and resorting to or exhorting violence then you remain wrong.

Ah Francie's old "conflict/war" excuse wheeled out again plus the carefully constructed doublespeak

"If you continue killing and resorting to or exhorting violence then you remain wrong."

TRANSLATION. The killing and resorting to violence is only really wrong if you continue. Before that is "wrong" but a different kind of "we had no choice"/" it was partitions fault" wrong. A kind of forgivable understandable misdemeanor

And who decides when it should stop? Why are the dissidents and bombers of Omagh not entitled to continue? We still don't have United Ireland so why is it wrong for them to continue ? Terrible thing about Lyra McKee but ...partition the PSNI provoked etc etc. Is it just when Gerry Adams is satisfied?

Not good enough. Anyone who would murder or mutilate another human being going about their business is a scumbag and a Bobby Storey scumbag is as reprehensible as Shankill Butcher scumbag - though I wonder will we see the same glorious pageant of a "funeral" when the next Loyalist thug checks out.

Truthvader wrote: »

Ah Francie's old "conflict/war" excuse wheeled out again plus the carefully constructed doublespeak

"If you continue killing and resorting to or exhorting violence then you remain wrong."

TRANSLATION. The killing and resorting to violence is only really wrong if you continue. Before that is "wrong" but a different kind of "we had no choice"/" it was partitions fault" wrong. A kind of forgivable understandable misdemeanor

And who decides when it should stop? Why are the dissidents and bombers of Omagh not entitled to continue? We still don't have United Ireland so why is it wrong for them to continue ? Terrible thing about Lyra McKee but ...partition the PSNI provoked etc etc. Is it just when Gerry Adams is satisfied?

Not good enough. Anyone who would murder or mutilate another human being going about their business is a scumbag and a Bobby Storey scumbag is as reprehensible as Shankill Butcher scumbag - though I wonder will we see the same glorious pageant of a "funeral" when the next Loyalist thug checks out.

I can't do anything for this level of simple lying about realities. This is entering Gemma Doherty territory now. You claim the conflict/war is an 'excuse' now?

Does that mean it never happened as Gemma would have us believe?

A reminder of what the GFA was Truth -


The Good Friday Agreement (GFA), or Belfast Agreement (Irish: Comhaontú Aoine an Chéasta or Comhaontú Bhéal Feirste; Ulster-Scots: Guid Friday Greeance or Bilfawst Greeance),[1] is a pair of agreements signed on 10 April 1998 that ended most of the violence of the Troubles, a political conflict in Northern Ireland that had been ongoing since the 1960s.

Again...killing by anyone is always wrong...even if you have 'no choice'. That includes the killing that takes place in conventional wars.

It is wrong to continue as it was wrong to begin.

To continue LYING outright about my position you need to find a post where I have said the IRA were correct Truth...like everyone else in the conflict/war, what they did was wrong.
I am more interested in looking at why it happened so we can make sure it never happens again and that those dissident and belligerent unionists/loyalists are a thing of the past.

Pogue eile wrote: »

Brady will also be released in about 24 years time, will you consider him to be redeemed on release or are you just making this sh*t up as you go???

Probably not but he will be a bit more redeemed than the likes of Dessie Ellis and Gerry Adams enjoying a happy retirement after a life of murder

Truthvader wrote: »

"and that those dissident and belligerent unionists/loyalists are a thing of the past"

Yep that's the real problem right there. GFA or no GFA wanting to be British is never acceptable

Wanting to kill to be British is the problem which is what belligerent Uionism and Loyalist has threatened and does threaten to do. The last time they threatened (Carson etc) they were acceded to and look what happened?

Oh wait, I forgot, Truthvader believes that had no consequences or something something...

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Wanting to kill to be British is the problem which is what belligerent Uionism and Loyalist has threatened and does threaten to do. The last time they threatened (Carson etc) they were acceded to and look what happened?

Oh wait, I forgot, Truthvader believes that had no consequences or something something...

Eh .............the consequence was partition.

The Island was partitioned so that the bit that had imported 25,000 rifles to protect their right to be British were not railroaded into a United Ireland. As ever I expect your solution like your 1969 fantasy would have been send whatever army we could cobble together from pool of bitterness left by the Civil War and invade the North and kill them all into being Irish - or arrive as "Peacemakers?"

Truthvader wrote: »

Eh .............the consequence was partition.

The Island was partitioned so that the bit that had imported 25,000 rifles to protect their right to be British were not railroaded into a United Ireland. As ever I expect your solution like your 1969 fantasy would have been send whatever army we could cobble together from pool of bitterness left by the Civil War and invade the North and kill them all into being Irish - or arrive as "Peacemakers?"

The UVF imported the arms in 1914 (from Germany). That is when their illegal importation should have been dealt with by the British Government.

Truthvader wrote: »

Eh .............the consequence was partition.

The Island was partitioned so that the bit that had imported 25,000 rifles to protect their right to be British were not railroaded into a United Ireland. As ever I expect your solution like your 1969 fantasy would have been send whatever army we could cobble together from pool of bitterness left by the Civil War and invade the North and kill them all into being Irish - or arrive as "Peacemakers?"

Again you cannot help revealing yourself. Not a mention of the Irish who were railroaded into a state they wanted no part of.

No wonder you haven't the ability to spot what the consequences of that eventually was. Even the Church of Ireland and many unionists knew the extreme dangers and likely failure of partition.

I honestly think it is you that has the fantasy about what happened in the conflict/war.