Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

AEW - All Elite Wrestling (*Spoilers for Latest Show*)

13334363839345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,286 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Cody having a wee dig at Damien Priest and then later they do a reference to Britt's appearance at WarGames.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,689 ✭✭✭sky88


    CastorTroy wrote: »
    Cody having a wee dig at Damien Priest and then later they do a reference to Britt's appearance at WarGames.

    Far too tna which I hate


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    I am not the only person to make this point, but NXT is presenting the alternative product to Raw & Smackdown, whereas AEW uses a lot of the Raw/SD tropes. I think that's why a couple hundred thousand people have given up or gone back to NXT.

    The biggest surprise to me has been the absence of hierarchy in their booking. I really thought we would have top tier stars who rarely if ever lost rather than the 50-50 stuff that WWE does. Instead, Omega has lost half his big matches, so has Pac, so has Page. The Bucks & Lucha's have done a number of meaningless jobs. The women all just beat each other. Last night the number one contender did a job. Why!? And within seconds it was forgotten because they had 5 angles to run.

    The other thing is between Dark Order & Nightmare Collective they have two cult acts, and when you add in Havoc, Allin, Butcher, Blade & Bunny it feels like 25% of the roster is doing a dark/horror/goth gimmick.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭ERG89


    I'm confused one day people are saying that it's too focused on wrestling and not enough on character development & promos then the next day people are saying it's trying to be too much like Raw/Smackdown which is contradicting the in ring focus completely.

    :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 22 dannocasey




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    ERG89 wrote: »
    I'm confused one day people are saying that it's too focused on wrestling and not enough on character development & promos then the next day people are saying it's trying to be too much like Raw/Smackdown which is contradicting the in ring focus completely.

    :confused:

    You are conflating the issues, and adding your own spin.

    There is a case to be made, which others have argued, that the show is too wrestling heavy and there is not enough character development.

    There is also a case to be made, separately, which I would make, that the character development they are doing is derivative and hard to take seriously - a top heel group doing heavy comedy, mutliple acts doing the spooky stuff.

    Cody tends to hit the right notes. He can wrestle well, and does, but he also cuts good promos, and his angles tend to have a realism & simplicity to them. Simplistic and realistic is what they should go for.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭ERG89


    Monokne wrote: »
    You are conflating the issues, and adding your own spin.

    There is a case to be made, which others have argued, that the show is too wrestling heavy and there is not enough character development.

    There is also a case to be made, separately, which I would make, that the character development they are doing is derivative and hard to take seriously - a top heel group doing heavy comedy, mutliple acts doing the spooky stuff.

    Cody tends to hit the right notes. He can wrestle well, and does, but he also cuts good promos, and his angles tend to have a realism & simplicity to them. Simplistic and realistic is what they should go for.

    Adding my own spin :rolleyes:
    The one consistency they've had is you moaning anyway. Most people would have turned off 3 weeks in but you seem to always look for negatives.
    Although fair play to Omega & the Bucks on this weeks rating, since they were apparently the ones at fault for the drop last week they'll need to get the praise for this week.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    dannocasey wrote: »

    Alfred Konuwa.. why is that name familiar? Was he Big Nasty on Bleacher Report??


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    ERG89 wrote: »
    Adding my own spin :rolleyes:
    The one consistency they've had is you moaning anyway. Most people would have turned off 3 weeks in but you seem to always look for negatives
    .

    Attacking the person rather than the point is a sure fire way of showing you know there's truth in what I'm saying & you don't want to discuss that. :D

    I specifically noted the spin you were putting on it & debunked it directly. Have you any retort to the points I made, or do you just want to deflect and have a petty argument? :confused: How about we just move on? :)

    The show had largely been good and the issues have come over the past few weeks. The last 3 shows have had the influx of new and similar acts, the establishment of the fact that guys are going to trade meaningless wins & losses a lot, and that's coincided with the novelty of the show wearing off, and the crowds being quieter & less reactive.

    If you can't hear reasoned & rational criticism without roundly dismissing it, take a page out of Cody's book, he gets it:
    ELDDcQfU0AAkVq2?format=png&name=small


  • Registered Users Posts: 48,990 ✭✭✭✭Lithium93_


    Alfred Konuwa.. why is that name familiar? Was he Big Nasty on Bleacher Report??

    Yeah he was.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,190 ✭✭✭ThePott


    There's a sort of a strange logic with some people and AEW. Thinking that because it's an alternative to WWE or because it's the polar opposite that it is immune from criticism. It's possible to both want it to succeed, watch it and still give it complaints.

    I think the complaint that it's too wrestling heavy is totally valid. I remember when 205 Live started and it became a case of wrestling for wrestlings sake and it was hard to get invested in. No one is saying AEW is bad but it's hard to stay invested in. It doesn't mean we need some cucking story or something stupid but some character development or story would really add to it. Hell a lot of people haven't even cut promos yet. Thinking back to the highlights from the last few weeks have been promos. Cody, Jericho, Moxley, MJF all give amazing non-wrestling segments and they're some of the most over guys there. The show needs variety. They have some of the best talent in the world, we know that but on a show where every nearly wrestler is amazing, that's not enough. AEW is aiming for the smarks who know these people from the indies, which is why they've put less development into a few of them. That'll only get you so far though. Criticise WWE for a lot of things but they often do character stuff well even if the stories can be dogsh1te. Right now from AEW, what do we have to distinguish Jimmy Havoc from The Bunny, The Butcher and the Blade? They're both leather clad goths. Sure Havoc is hardcore but have we gotten anything else from him that you wouldn't have picked up from watching one of his matches, is he that shallow a character. Half the roster seems to have nothing to do until they get a random title match and suddenly develop a personality outside of, I'm a great wrestler.

    Let me be clear, I like AEW but the last few weeks with no particular end goal in mind except put on some great matches they're aimless. We're in a massive wrestling boom where we can find amazing wrestling in a lot of places, story and character matter. People can love AEW and still have some issues with it and hope for it to improve. There are problems with certain aspects of AEW. They were easier to hide in the beginning and when there was a PPV in sight. I don't get why we're meant to just be happy it exists and can't give it some reasonsable criticism.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    HOW DARE YOU ThePott!? YOU HATE AEW AND YOU ARE JUST BEING NEGATIVE


    But seriously now, I agree with pretty much everything you've said. Simply not being WWE shouldn't make you immune to criticism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    I found both shows this week to be less than amazing. I feel the honeymoon period for both shows is over. That said, both shows still were entertaining but had plenty of negatives.

    You cant have homeruns every week and I feel both shows dropped in terms of over all enjoyment.

    Jericho has so many positives but Im finding it hard to take him seriously as a world champion as the weeks progress. Far too much comedy for my liking. As noted above Cody seems to strike the right balance in terms of keeping things simple and entertaining. His feud with MJF has been mostly done right.

    While Jericho has done plenty in elevating the likes of Scorpio Sky, Allan and now JB, I just dont see his work being the headline act for a company. Hes too old in ring and the comedy has slowly creeped in week after week to the point where its a turn off. That said its far from brutal either and still better than anything on Smackdown bar Daniel Bryan.

    The likes of the YB Kenny, Lucha Bros and Pac are all talented wrestlers and their in ring work is fine. But i feel less is more sometimes and they all have had very little chatacter development since Dynamite began and are slowly suffering as a result.

    Also more development characterwise is needed for those lesser known stars like Darby Allan, the BBB, Britt Baker, Provate Party etc. Just less in ring and more backstage onterviews and angles please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    As long as Luchasaurus is on AEW it will be the best wrestling show on TV if he leaves whatever show he ends up on will then be the best wrestling show on TV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    As long as Luchasaurus is on AEW it will be the best wrestling show on TV if he leaves whatever show he ends up on will then be the best wrestling show on TV.

    Saurus and the boys have a very entertaining mid card act. The spotlight with Jericho did them no harm at all. Ive no problem with them at all.

    I do feel from AEW top of the card aspect it does their top heel no favors though. Jericho has already worked a short program with Darby Allan which may be similar to what they are doing with Jungle Boy in terms of plicky underdog vs top dog. plus its not what Jericho needs right now.

    Jericho needs a more serious feud at the minute. Obviously Mox is on the horizon. I would have rathered a continuation of the Allan program rather than a new one with these guys if they are holding off Moxc vs Y2J.

    I also felt the Cody feud was great but too short. Id rather them stretch that out a bit further then have MJF turn.

    One thing I cant fault is Jerichos willingness to evevate younger / newer talent.

    Sky Allan and now these guys are getting a nice rub win lose or draw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,945 ✭✭✭rizzla


    Catching up on Dynamite now. My interest is fading. I started by watching it live, then I'd wake up early to catch it before work, then I'd watch it in work and now I'm watching it whenever.

    I think my interest will pick up again when they start building towards the next PPV, right now it feels like they are threading water. Saying that though, the matches are still excellent. I think if it wasn't for Jericho providing the other side of pro wrestling, I might have tuned out.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Lithium93_ wrote: »
    Yeah he was.

    And now he's at Forbes? Jaysus


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Watched Dark for the first time. Thought Nyla Rose was decent on commentary and Excalibur bounced well off her.

    That's all I have to really say about it. NWA still rules the platform. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,945 ✭✭✭rizzla


    Really liking the Dark Order skits, wouldn't mind seeing them trying to recruit Orange Cassidy for a bit of fun. Hopefully the skits lead to something though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I think AEW men's division is doing a fine job with its booking.

    The top guys are clear: Cody, Mox, Le Champion, and MJF. Plenty of feuds to be had here.

    Then you've guys who are getting a slower build, i.e., Pac, Page, Allin, who will probably be in the top tier within a year or so.

    Then you have the guys they are trying to get off the ground, Scorpio, Jungle Boy, Luchasaurus, Fenix, etc.

    With the PPVs coming every quarter, their arcs don't need to become immediately apparent. E.g., they had a few weeks before it became obvious that Jericho would face Moxley.

    So while the shows seem pretty gung-ho, in terms of trying to capture your immediate attention, the booking has had a fairly consistent long-term focus so far.

    The wildcard is obviously Omega, who seems to be happy to serve carpentry duty for the time being. Whenever the time is right, they can quickly put him in a main event programme with very little justification needed.

    Now the women and the tag division are all over the place... I think Khan may need to step in here and replace whoever is booking this (Omega and the Bucks, respectively?)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    I thought that AEW did a really poor job of disguising all of those empty seats in the audience on this week's Dynamite.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,951 ✭✭✭Cherry_Cola


    I love AEW so far but the main gripes I have are yes there's too much wrestling on the show and they seem to have important storyline advancements on BTE and Twitter of all places. The MJF promo this week being a glaring example.

    I love the fact that the mid-card has some personality and a little bit of story. I would definitely love some more angles and backstage stuff - the inner circle attack on Dustin for example was great. The new Dark order stuff has a bunch of potential too so interested to see where it's headed.

    There's some slight overlap in gimmicks too which is a bit annoying and it's funny I'm saying this as I'm pretty much one too - but there's too many "goth" characters :pac: Jimmy, BBB, Darby, even Brandi - shouldn't have too many dark characters in a 2 hour weekly show.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    JR sounds so exhausted. He's really struggling to keep up the pretence that's he's interested.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,190 ✭✭✭ThePott


    I love AEW so far but the main gripes I have are yes there's too much wrestling on the show and they seem to have important storyline advancements on BTE and Twitter of all places.
    This.
    I don't watch Dark, I don't watch BTE. There's too much to watch and it seems storylines are developing all over the place. Like apparently Hangman Page left the Elite, which I had no idea about and it happened on Being the Elite. If they want to tell any sort of consistent story it should be developing on their primary programme.
    The less said about them doing a women's angle in Picture in Picture the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,689 ✭✭✭sky88


    ThePott wrote: »
    This.
    I don't watch Dark, I don't watch BTE. There's too much to watch and it seems storylines are developing all over the place. Like apparently Hangman Page left the Elite, which I had no idea about and it happened on Being the Elite. If they want to tell any sort of consistent story it should be developing on their primary programme.
    The less said about them doing a women's angle in Picture in Picture the better.

    Page left the elite well that’s new information


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Is/was "The Elite" even a thing on the TV side of things though? Like did they ever do a promo to establish themselves, or even a vignette? I reckon it's really more canon for the Internet fans, while on the TV side of things they seem to be fairly consistently booking Page and Cody as singles guys, and even Kenny had his thing with Moxley that was largely independent of all things Elite.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Neil3030 wrote: »
    Is/was "The Elite" even a thing on the TV side of things though? Like did they ever do a promo to establish themselves, or even a vignette? I reckon it's really more canon for the Internet fans, while on the TV side of things they seem to be fairly consistently booking Page and Cody as singles guys, and even Kenny had his thing with Moxley that was largely independent of all things Elite.
    Commentary referenced Page leaving the Elite so I'm pretty sure it is TV Canon.

    Plus the Bucks and Page were there during the Mox Omega spot into the table of barbed wire at Full Gear.

    It's definitely an established thing but they seem to be slowly disbanding them. Even Cody said in his promo this week that his friends seemed to be busy doing their own thing now.

    Hopefully they put the kibosh on the Elite stuff on YT.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭Blue_Dabadee


    I think Dynamite just needs a perfect balance between in ring action and segments. You don't have to give us barn burner matches every single week.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭BDI


    Put this on for first time this morning. Really good quality. Great production. Great matches and characters.

    Will Vince buy it out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,951 ✭✭✭Cherry_Cola


    BDI wrote: »
    Put this on for first time this morning. Really good quality. Great production. Great matches and characters.

    Will Vince buy it out?


    He didn't manage it with TNA and these are likely in a better position, but only time will tell.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    He didn't manage it with TNA and these are likely in a better position, but only time will tell.

    I dont think Tony Khan is selling.

    No need to buy them out yet anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    What would he buy it for?

    They have 9 weeks of TV tapings and 3/4 PPV's even if it went out of businesses tomorrow it offers Vince nothing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    What would he buy it for?

    They have 9 weeks of TV tapings and 3/4 PPV's even if it went out of businesses tomorrow it offers Vince nothing.

    But what about all those matches with dives to the outside, near falls, and obvious cooperation? The lack of silly angles, or any angles for that matter? Don't you know this is what a wrestling show should be?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    sirmanga wrote: »
    But what about all those matches with dives to the outside, near falls, and obvious cooperation? The lack of silly angles, or any angles for that matter? Don't you know this is what a wrestling show should be?

    What those 6 suicide dives Seth does each match no need for buying AEW when he has Seth for that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    What those 6 suicide dives Seth does each match no need for buying AEW when he has Seth for that.

    Exactly. WWE have the exact same match style as AEW. And AEW is nothing but matches. So AEW literally has nothing different to offer audiences.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    BDI wrote: »
    Put this on for first time this morning. Really good quality. Great production. Great matches and characters.

    Will Vince buy it out?

    Shahid Khan is the owner, and he's substantially richer than Vince, so I wouldn't get your hopes up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    I wonder have they copyrighted Monday Night Dynamite?

    Not long left in the football season and the one show that WWE can't move is RAW, it is the biggest show but also consistently the worst show they put on all week.

    I wonder how many NXT viewers they would pull in if they did. There are about 1.8m viewers for both on Wednesday night, if even 50% of those NXT viewers picked AEW over Raw it could make things interesting...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    Its still real to me godammmnittttt


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    2ndcoming wrote: »
    I wonder have they copyrighted Monday Night Dynamite?

    Not long left in the football season and the one show that WWE can't move is RAW, it is the biggest show but also consistently the worst show they put on all week.

    I wonder how many NXT viewers they would pull in if they did. There are about 1.8m viewers for both on Wednesday night, if even 50% of those NXT viewers picked AEW over Raw it could make things interesting...

    Tony Khan has stated he would never run Mondays because of his fathers ownership of the Jags in the NFL, which plays Mondays. They'd have two properties running opposite one another.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    Monokne wrote: »
    Tony Khan has stated he would never run Mondays because of his fathers ownership of the Jags in the NFL, which plays Mondays. They'd have two properties running opposite one another.

    If he cared that much about his father he wouldn't be running a self indulgent wrestling show that has bled viewers since its first episode.
    Also, not every NFL team play on a Monday night. I think each might only play one Monday per season.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    Seeing Scorpio Sky wrestle what are basically lower end talent on Dark after his mini program with Jericho is such a waste. Same happened to Darby. Whats the point in giving these guys a rub to not follow up. I know they cant push everyone all at once, but its like they need to capatisle better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    beakerjoe wrote: »
    Seeing Scorpio Sky wrestle what are basically lower end talent on Dark after his mini program with Jericho is such a waste. Same happened to Darby. Whats the point in giving these guys a rub to not follow up. I know they cant push everyone all at once, but its like they need to capatisle better.

    Why does the followup need to be immediate? Are they ready to be top guys yet?

    Both Allin and Sky lost. In any other combat sport scenario they'd take a step or two down the ladder and work their way back up to the top. Only next time they get pushed, they'll have more legitimacy given they previously hung with the champ. Hopefully they'll also develop their promos and be more over / have more heat by then.

    Isn't this a pretty standard booking approach?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    sirmanga wrote: »
    If he cared that much about his father he wouldn't be running a self indulgent wrestling show that has bled viewers since its first episode.
    Also, not every NFL team play on a Monday night. I think each might only play one Monday per season.

    Genuine question - if you won 5 million euro on the lotto, the first thing you'd do is complain you didn't win 10, isn't it? :D Your capacity to be negative about quite literally everything is astonishing, fair play for the consistency. ;)

    I agree though. F*ck Tony Khan for trying to capitalise on the live sports rights boom by creating an alternative product in an industry DESPERATELY in need of competition.

    What he has done with his self indulgent actions is bring not one but two interesting and entertaining live 2 hour wrestling shows to Wednesday nights, creating hours of entertainment for audiences, leverage and opportunity for performers, and beaten industry projections for ratings giving himself & his Dad the opportunity to have a successful business and make money.

    It boils my blood. I'm with you.

    Now go on, spin all the above negatively :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    Monokne wrote: »
    Genuine question - if you won 5 million euro on the lotto, the first thing you'd do is complain you didn't win 10, isn't it? :D Your capacity to be negative about quite literally everything is astonishing, fair play for the consistency. ;)

    I agree though. F*ck Tony Khan for trying to capitalise on the live sports rights boom by creating an alternative product in an industry DESPERATELY in need of competition.

    What he has done with his self indulgent actions is bring not one but two interesting and entertaining live 2 hour wrestling shows to Wednesday nights, creating hours of entertainment for audiences, leverage and opportunity for performers, and beaten industry projections for ratings giving himself & his Dad the opportunity to have a successful business and make money.

    It boils my blood. I'm with you.

    Now go on, spin all the above negatively :cool:

    I don't know where to begin. I'll simply point you towards the sinking ratings and the vast amounts of empty seats every week on TV.
    Great for the business. It's truly another golden age of wrestling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    sirmanga wrote: »
    I don't know where to begin. I'll simply point you towards the sinking ratings and the vast amounts of empty seats every week on TV.
    Great for the business. It's truly another golden age of wrestling.

    WWE books 20,000 seat buildings. They average 4800 people in the building. They lost $3.5 million last quarter on house shows. They are also going to make about $200 million in profit this year. You know why? Because it's a TV industry, that's where the money is made in 2019.

    The industry projections were 500-600k. They were always going to start high with the novelty and drop, the key is holding where they are now, maybe growing a little. If someone had told me a year ago that a start up promotion would be putting 5,000 people in the building for TV every week, I wouldn't have believed it. TNA never came close. ROH neither. AEW has greatly overachieved thus far.

    No-one said it's a golden age of wrestling. You are making an argument against a point I didn't make because you know you don't have any counters to what I did say.

    But look, it's all terrible and negative, I get it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    Monokne wrote: »
    Genuine question - if you won 5 million euro on the lotto, the first thing you'd do is complain you didn't win 10, isn't it? :D

    No I wouldn't. Although if I won 850,000 I'd complain that I didn't win 1.4 million. Especially if I won 1.4 million ten weeks ago.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭Monokne


    Hahahahaah, I knew you would!!! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    Monokne wrote: »
    WWE books 20,000 seat buildings. They average 4800 people in the building. They lost $3.5 million last quarter on house shows. They are also going to make about $200 million in profit this year.

    WWE can afford to make the mistakes that WWE makes. AEW cannot afford to make the mistakes that WWE makes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,585 ✭✭✭Jerichoholic


    In 10 weeks Tony has shown that he is an infinitely better booker than Vince is.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭sirmanga


    In 10 weeks Tony has shown that he is an infinitely better booker than Vince is.

    I'm sorry but that is simply wrong. Outrageously wrong. I hope it's sarcasm.


Advertisement