Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

UFC/MMA Gambling. **NO AFTER-TIMING**

Options
1…5354565859…190

Comments

  • Options
    #1652
    stiffler123
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    Axwell wrote: »
    Risky one to look for a money back bet on.

    I know, I fully expect to be broke in the next hour.


  • Options
    #1653
    martyos121
    Registered Users Posts: 21,352 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Just put a fiver on a risky but achievable treble.
    Lauzon by sub
    Woodley by KO
    Anderson in 1st round.


  • Options
    #1654
    stiffler123
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    stiffler123 wrote: »
    Same as that. Just put a win all my money back bet on Woodley:pac:

    Throwing this on Silva vs Diaz not to go 5 rounds. Feeling super degen tonight, please don't judge:pac:


  • Options
    #1655
    El Guapo!
    Registered Users Posts: 12,430 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    El Guapo! wrote: »
    Also went with treble on

    Silva by dec
    Leites by sub
    Woodley by KO

    37/1 on PP

    So close.
    Just needed Woodley to get the finish.


  • Options
    #1656
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Ugh so close yet so far. What a disaster with uncle creepy, 75% of all bets gone straight away! If Meisha had won by Sub, I would have netted 1200 with Iaquinta by KO, Leties by Sub, and Silva on points, just another 10 seconds in round two was all she needed!

    And then a Boetsch KO would have covered everything, 8-1 for a knockout. Wish he would work on his sub defence, he had that fight in the bag!!!

    I thought Gastelum won his fight, didn't matter much in the end, but Ive no idea how a guy backing up throwing so few strikes can win 30-27 in a judges eyes.

    RE the not making weight, it showed again tonight it just isn't a factor


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1657
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    mailburner wrote: »
    best bet for me on the card is mc call pts at 5/4

    I don't see lineker ever beating the likes of mc call, benav or mouse
    no doubt he'll spend three rounds trying to take creepys head off to no avail

    silva decision 11/4 (365)
    diaz might be outclassed but he's a tough lad to ko, could see silva toying with diaz for five rounds and cruising to a pts win
    cant resist that price


    lauzon @ 2.83 (matchbook)
    see this as a 50/50 fight and was tempted by the sub
    he shouldnt be that big so not turning down value like that




    accum at 93/1
    hettes sub
    mc call
    lauzon
    silva dec
    boyles


    swore I wouldnt go near woodley after condit and shields so am sticking to that

    tempted by alves also, like those odds and natal at 4/5 esp when I seen 8/15 a couple of day ago
    brunson too short but it looks a formality along with leites

    best of luck all

    in shock here
    if somebody gave me a grand to put on something id have put in on mc call
    lineker was swinging but not missing sadly

    silva went as I hoped it would

    wont underestimate iaquinta again for sure

    didnt go near natal or alves apart from the usual losing mugbets

    bad night


  • Options
    #1658
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    mailburner wrote: »

    didnt go near natal or alves apart from the usual losing mugbets

    bad night

    Mein is going to be very hard to predict. He was beating the living daylights out of Alves and looking awesome, but is seems like he can't take a punch/kick at all to the gut. Matt Brown did the same to him. I mean really he should be able to take that kick since it wasn't in the liver. Maybe it broke a rib or something but he got up straight away and looked fairly ok.


  • Options
    #1659
    El Guapo!
    Registered Users Posts: 12,430 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    Lads, I've edited the thread title. From now on its best if everyone avoids after-timing. If you genuinely forgot to put your picks in here before a fight, you're welcome to post afterwards as long as it's accompanied by a screenshot. But repeat offenders will be asked not to post in the thread again. Cheers.


  • Options
    #1660
    Trond
    Registered Users Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭Trond


    Can anyone shed some light on this for me?

    Usually i do multiple small stakes acca's on UFC events. Mainly use betfair.

    For some reason this w/e the exchange wouldn't allow any type of multiples at all. Only the sportsbook part of the website would accept them. 2 weeks ago I got them on fine with the exchange. Odd to say the least, annoying as well.


  • Options
    #1661
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    Just backed thatch at 1.88 to beat bendo (pinnacle)
    Bigger than normal bet for me

    Just can't see past this future superstar :)


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1662
    Mellor
    Registered Users Posts: 39,092 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Just collected a bet for both Diaz and Silva to fail their drug tests.
    Diaz was short odds 1/2, but Silva was a juicy 9/1. Was a risky double, but I thought with Silva coming off injury, and with blackhouse, it was worth the gamble.
    $20 returned $300 :cool:


  • Options
    #1663
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Mellor wrote: »
    Just collected a bet for both Diaz and Silva to fail their drug tests.
    Diaz was short odds 1/2, but Silva was a juicy 9/1. Was a risky double, but I thought with Silva coming off injury, and with blackhouse, it was worth the gamble.
    $20 returned $300 :cool:

    Banned for no screeny! :D


  • Options
    #1664
    Gits_bone
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭Gits_bone


    Had the book opened for Aldo yet?

    Usually just stick to football mostly.


  • Options
    #1665
    El Guapo!
    Registered Users Posts: 12,430 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    Mellor wrote: »
    Just collected a bet for both Diaz and Silva to fail their drug tests.
    Diaz was short odds 1/2, but Silva was a juicy 9/1. Was a risky double, but I thought with Silva coming off injury, and with blackhouse, it was worth the gamble.
    $20 returned $300 :cool:

    Screenshot or 50 burpees.
    Your choice.


  • Options
    #1666
    Pudsy33
    Registered Users Posts: 10,730 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    Gits_bone wrote: »
    Had the book opened for Aldo yet?

    Usually just stick to football mostly.

    Been up on Paddy Power for weeks


  • Options
    #1667
    Trond
    Registered Users Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭Trond


    Gits_bone wrote: »
    Had the book opened for Aldo yet?

    Usually just stick to football mostly.

    1.78 on Betfair


  • Options
    #1668
    Easy Rod
    Registered Users Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭Easy Rod


    Would the change to a nc mean I'll lose my winnings from Silva? Bet was with Paddy Power.


  • Options
    #1669
    EITS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 656 ✭✭✭EITS


    Easy Rod wrote: »
    Would the change to a nc mean I'll lose my winnings from Silva? Bet was with Paddy Power.

    Usually the result on the night is the result that settles the bet


  • Options
    #1670
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Easy Rod wrote: »
    Would the change to a nc mean I'll lose my winnings from Silva? Bet was with Paddy Power.

    Negative, have had a couple accumulators in the past where guys got popped for roids, never has an affect on the winnings. Just in case they change their mind cash out quick!


  • Options
    #1671
    scudzilla
    Registered Users Posts: 11,911 ✭✭✭✭scudzilla


    Mellor wrote: »
    Just collected a bet for both Diaz and Silva to fail their drug tests.
    Diaz was short odds 1/2, but Silva was a juicy 9/1. Was a risky double, but I thought with Silva coming off injury, and with blackhouse, it was worth the gamble.
    $20 returned $300 :cool:

    Where can ya bet on this? Be a lot more fun in future betting on who fails a piss test!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1672
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6acVTAwwts


    Predictions for this weekend!


  • Options
    #1673
    CurryFlavoured
    Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    Good predictions but I think Thatch wins, Henderson's big thing at LW was his size and Thatch is massive. Ben's only chance is if he survives the early rounds and it turns out that Thatch has poor stamina and declines (not that unlikely given his size/weight cut I suppose).

    Thatch, Holloway KO/TKO, Lentz points, Magny.


  • Options
    #1674
    weemcd
    Registered Users Posts: 6,419 ✭✭✭weemcd


    Thatch by KO any one? Henderson will lose if it's predominantly striking


  • Options
    #1675
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    CurryFlavoured wrote: »
    Good predictions but I think Thatch wins, Henderson's big thing at LW was his size and Thatch is massive. Ben's only chance is if he survives the early rounds and it turns out that Thatch has poor stamina and declines (not that unlikely given his size/weight cut I suppose).

    Thatch, Holloway KO/TKO, Lentz points, Magny.

    The bookies agree with you about Thatch, but I have faith in Henderson! I think Thatch is jumping a level too high from the guys he's fought who've been bottom of the UFC rankings.

    A couple of interesting underdog singles - Kunimoto be Sub @ 10-1 on paddy power and Cole Millar by sub similar odds.


  • Options
    #1676
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    weemcd wrote: »
    Thatch by KO any one? Henderson will lose if it's predominantly striking

    going thatch round 1 at 9/2 with a saver on round 2 at 7/1

    I think we'll see great things from thatch in the future starting tomorrow night
    in the past 2 years or so both thatch and khabib are two fighters I expect to go to the top although the ww div is seriously stacked


  • Options
    #1677
    dulux99
    Registered Users Posts: 2,795 ✭✭✭dulux99


    Going big on Ben Henderson/Nik Lentz double at about 6/4.

    Thatch is decent and has a lot of hype but I just think the quality of opponents that Bendo has fought is in another planet, even if it was at a lower weight class. Ben wasn't exactly small at that weight either.


  • Options
    #1678
    CurryFlavoured
    Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    I reckon there'll be at least 10 lbs difference between Henderson and Thatch. Henderson is used to being a little heavier than his opponents at LW so this is a different kettle of fish altogether. Size is too big a factor imo.


  • Options
    #1679
    Hoki
    Registered Users Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭Hoki


    Thatch has a massive height & reach advantage plus will be at least 180 lbs come fight time. I'm all over him to win at 4/5 and have him in a double to win by KO at 17/10 with Neil Magny to win on points at 15/8.


  • Options
    #1680
    darced
    Registered Users Posts: 7,056 ✭✭✭darced


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1681
    TimRiggins
    Registered Users Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭TimRiggins


    Going a little out of left field

    Kelades to beat Borg (I think Borg shades it but Kelades should not be 4/1 in this, wouldn't be suprised if he won)
    Holloway first round
    Thatch to win

    10 returns 380


Advertisement