Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Opening of "No-Food" pubs pushed out again

24567197

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 162 ✭✭junebabies


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Won't this encourage increase house parties more now?

    You can only have 10 people indoors from 4 different households max. I presume this is to stop the house parties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 162 ✭✭junebabies


    KiKi III wrote: »
    A house party with 10-20 of your friends is way, way less dangerous than a night out in 2-3 venues each of which have scores of staff and customers.

    Max of 10 indoors now and only from 4 different households.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    I get it, I really do, but why the focus on pubs?
    I got a haircut today in the Grafton Barber where a nice barber cut my hair with no social distancing (Completely within guidance)
    I just don't get the focus on the boozer...
    Because we had to spread out the reopening, and pubs were left towards the end because they were high risk.

    As it is I don't see how we reopen schools. So opening pubs now when cases are tottering on the edge of getting dangerous would be a poor decision, as it would mean choosing pubs over schools. If cases don't start increasing, we can move on to pubs.

    Nightclubs will never reopen before a vaccine. That's my view. Any kind of indoor venue which can't reasonably enforce social distancing is extremely problematic - unfortunately that includes weddings etc.

    The good news is vaccines are progressing well. It will be a hell of a party when the vaccines become available.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭Poorside


    junebabies wrote: »
    You can only have 10 people indoors from 4 different households max. I presume this is to stop the house parties.


    And who is going to actually police that? Guards come to your door, you don't have to let them in without a warrant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    junebabies wrote: »
    Max of 10 indoors now and only from 4 different households.

    What about only 8 but from 5 different households? Its a pile of nonsense at this stage, i can see the rationale behind the guidelines but its unenforceable and nobody is taking it seriously anymore


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    People in other countries obey rules and wear masks.
    Do they actually do it out of civil duty, do it only because they'll actually get punished or instead just also follow the Irish line? I asked a friend in Germany for example, where fines and all are more strictly enforced, and he said not everyone even there was wearing masks on public transport. The attitude is not just an Irish one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    What about only 8 but from 5 different households? Its a pile of nonsense at this stage, i can see the rationale behind the guidelines but its unenforceable and nobody is taking it seriously anymore
    Very little of this is enforceable, that's not the type of country we are. It's your personal decision whether to be part of the national effort or not.

    Lots of people are taking it seriously. A minority of loud and mostly obnoxious people are not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Tig98 wrote: »
    I understand everyone giving out but I think it's justified.

    Was up North after the pubs reopened and it was pure bedlam. They attempted to space out tables in pubs but no social distancing what so ever in the toilets, smoking areas or outside the pubs themselves. Big crowds of people milling around together. There will definitely be a surge up there in the coming weeks.

    Food service and maybe a few pints in a tightly monitored setting is okay for the moment
    There won't be a surge because the so-called disease simply isn't here.


    The State has no right to shut any business or to tell people how to live their lives.


    All pubs should open in spite of this edict. The criminals in Leinster House must go.


  • Registered Users Posts: 48 Whitehorse


    Do all pubs not have an official capacity limit on their licence. If this was capped at say 50% it would be easy enough to monitor and if they breach it they are closed and licence suspended for a month. Those obeying the rules could at least get back trading .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭almostover


    The people who make these decisions dont spend time drinking pints in pubs

    They hate them

    This is it in a nutshell, it's like back when not wearing a seatbelt became illegal. A minor inconvenience to protect yourself and others. But people waste all their energy p*ssing and moaning about it. Just wear the mask in shops and on public transport. It's not that hard.

    My employer has made mask wearing mandatory on their premises and a person is sent home if they don't wear it or don't wear it properly. Proper order and nobody has complained


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭almostover


    The people who make these decisions dont spend time drinking pints in pubs

    They hate them

    We have a seriously unhealthy relationship with alcohol in this country, this week has exposed that. People going nuts that the pubs wont open in a pandemic and people trying to excuse a drunk driving TD.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭almostover


    What about only 8 but from 5 different households? Its a pile of nonsense at this stage, i can see the rationale behind the guidelines but its unenforceable and nobody is taking it seriously anymore

    Whether its enforceable or not doesn't matter, we need to take collective responsibility for keeping the virus suppressed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,372 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    There is undoubtably a big pub culture in Ireland. However there is also a not insignificant anti-pub element who would close all the pubs tomorrow if they could. Virus or no virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭boombang


    There is undoubtably a big pub culture in Ireland. However there is also a not insignificant anti-pub element who would close all the pubs tomorrow if they could. Virus or no virus.

    Going to the pub is someone's private business in peacetime. At present, it's a risk to population health. If publicans can't run them sensibly, then they should deal with closing temporarily. Some have already proven that they can't do a sensible job, so I think the whole sector will needs to share the pain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,999 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Poorside wrote: »
    And who is going to actually police that? Guards come to your door, you don't have to let them in without a warrant.

    Ha! That's a joke, the Gardai have no more than 2 cars to cover my local area in Dublin which has a population of about 80,000+
    The chances of them showing up to inspect a house party... Zero!

    Can't have a holiday, can't go for a pint... Fire up the BBQ and bring trays of cans.. let's party!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,999 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    There is undoubtably a big pub culture in Ireland. However there is also a not insignificant anti-pub element who would close all the pubs tomorrow if they could. Virus or no virus.

    True, the slogan for Ireland is now "Céad míle F**k off..."

    We're closing what many tourists come here for our famous welcome and pub culture, and you're not welcome here anyways....You'll be refused service from any tourism related business and treated like a leper...


  • Registered Users Posts: 692 ✭✭✭rodders999


    The people who make these decisions dont spend time drinking pints in pubs

    They hate them


    There are two bars in the Dàil to be fair.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    As the saying goes: You won't smell like roses if you shīte in a bucket.

    Correct decision from this government


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,497 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    Some Professor said that earlier; 'love to know how you're safer in a pub by buying a €9 sandwich as opposed to one who doesnt? '

    They should be all shut or all open.

    Restaurants and places serving good reopened.

    Not pubs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Mortelaro


    boombang wrote: »
    I support this. Was out in a restaurant with the in laws on Sunday. Some well meaning acquaintance comes up, buckled, hugs and kisses half of our group, shakes hands with the other. I know it's just because he was pissed, but there's nothing we could do but smile awkwardly. There's no telling drunk people. We'll not be back to pubs or restaurants in a while after that experience.

    Drink and COVID don't mix.

    Theres a pub in Cornwall thats installed an electric fence to police social distancing, I kid you not

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-53389977


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,592 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    So many of these pubs are not going to reopen at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,542 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    People in other countries obey rules and wear masks.

    Not the Irish though. Rules don't suit the Irish.

    That is absolute rubbish.

    Most Irish people are complying with requirements.

    The vast majority of people complied with travel distance restrictions.

    You can't apply something like that to nationalities, it's human nature.

    They're always be a considerable minority who don't follow rules due to ignorance and/or stupidity but it's the exact same in other countries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Mortelaro wrote: »
    Theres a pub in Cornwall thats installed an electric fence to police social distancing, I kid you not

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-53389977
    Presumably they will be prosecuted for that...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Irish people think that (other) Irish people are disobedient and ignore rules. A grain of truth in that but hugely exaggerated. Our citizenry is way more compliant, for good or ill, than generally gets acknowledged.

    A corresponding belief is that Europeans/Northern Europeans/Germans/Scandinavians (delete as appropriate) are perfectly compliant.

    In fact the authorities in Stockholm closed down a number of restaurants due to lack of enforcing social distancing.

    And from France in April:

    French police hand out 900,000 lockdown fines including to holiday home owners


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 824 ✭✭✭The chan chan man


    My €2.5k “staycation” (shudder..) will be some craic so..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,382 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    There is undoubtably a big pub culture in Ireland. However there is also a not insignificant anti-pub element who would close all the pubs tomorrow if they could. Virus or no virus.
    That "anti-pub element" may include general people against recreational addictive drugs, or indeed those against all recreational drugs including non addictive ones.

    There could also be others (like myself who drinks heavily) who would love to just see the pathetic hypocrites suffer for shits n giggles even though I would suffer myself. Not just pubs closing but any outlet selling recreational drugs that might lead to loss of inhibitions that may lead to greater risk.

    The amount of sad idiots who still make out like they do not understand the meal rules is pathetic "durrr, I'm a stoopid ignorant moroooon, what difference does eating make", you're fooling nobody, and I am genuinely feeling pity if you genuinely are that stupid. Unable to realise why laws are already in place in restaurants or for pubs with children. Some seem to think they look smart if they pretend to be idiotic ignorant cunts, I still don't get it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,800 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    There won't be a surge because the so-called disease simply isn't here.


    The State has no right to shut any business or to tell people how to live their lives.

    The disease simply isn’t here, sure, so thousands of medical personnel the world over, including virologists are making **** up.

    We are seeing the almost 26,000 people in this country who had had covid, given an incorrect diagnosis. The 1748 people who have died, and their deaths attributed to covid were misdiagnosed too ? Ok.

    Would you like to elaborate in as technically detailed a manner as possible to inform us as to the information that leads you to make-believe ... “the disease simply isn’t here”.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Simon Harris and Varadker were on an absolute mission to try and end the drinking culture in Ireland over the last 4 years. They have been constantly lobbied by health Quangos and NGOs to go after alcohol. NPHET is run pretty much entirely by health professionals who no doubtedly have links or are apart of the anti-alcohol lobby. This is their golden ticket.

    It is 100% an anti-alcohol thing.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    rubadub wrote: »
    That "anti-pub element" may include general people against recreational addictive drugs, or indeed those against all recreational drugs including non addictive ones.

    There could also be others (like myself who drinks heavily) who would love to just see the pathetic hypocrites suffer for shits n giggles even though I would suffer myself. Not just pubs closing but any outlet selling recreational drugs that might lead to loss of inhibitions that may lead to greater risk.

    The amount of sad idiots who still make out like they do not understand the meal rules is pathetic "durrr, I'm a stoopid ignorant moroooon, what difference does eating make", you're fooling nobody, and I am genuinely feeling pity if you genuinely are that stupid. Unable to realise why laws are already in place in restaurants or for pubs with children. Some seem to think they look smart if they pretend to be idiotic ignorant cunts, I still don't get it.

    I understand the meal rules but they are nonsense. If I want go tomorrow sit down for 105 or whatever ridiculous number it is now have a few pints and go home,. I shouldn't have to eat overpiced food too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,800 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    ablelocks wrote: »
    it's a good thing - from what I've seen, social distancing is not happening effectively in shops or restaurants. Not at the beach or on the streets. Not at all in sports training I'm involved in or by supporters at the challenge matches I've been to. There isn't a hope in hell that a pub can operate and not be a focal point for COVID 19.

    Think about it - the people who are getting out and about as it is aren't doing what they're supposed to do.

    If the pub's reopened on Monday, it would coincide with the restart of most GAA (and other sports) matches. So on the weekend of the 25th, people will go to a match, congregate in the ground, roar and shout and then go to the pub!

    If Covid could talk this is what it would ask for - a perfect opportunity to reset and tear into us again.

    Look at the evidence from around the world in countries that have eased their lockdowns.

    I love going to the pub (or used to) but this is just asking for our hospitals to be overloaded again and all our efforts over the last 5 months will have been in vain.

    This btw is a brilliant post, spot on and some...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,268 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Simon Harris and Varadker were on an absolute mission to try and end the drinking culture in Ireland over the last 4 years. They have been constantly lobbied by health Quangos and NGOs to go after alcohol. NPHET is run pretty much entirely by health professionals who no doubtedly have links or are apart of the anti-alcohol lobby. This is their golden ticket.

    It is 100% an anti-alcohol thing.

    I have to ask if you honestly believe this? “Let’s use the pandemic to close the pubs lads waheeeey”

    Do you ever stop and think before posting?


  • Registered Users Posts: 801 ✭✭✭frillyleaf


    My €2.5k “staycation” (shudder..) will be some craic so..

    Why are you saying 2,5k ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭almostover


    Simon Harris and Varadker were on an absolute mission to try and end the drinking culture in Ireland over the last 4 years. They have been constantly lobbied by health Quangos and NGOs to go after alcohol. NPHET is run pretty much entirely by health professionals who no doubtedly have links or are apart of the anti-alcohol lobby. This is their golden ticket.

    It is 100% an anti-alcohol thing.

    Would you be willing to admit that we have an unhealthy relationship with alcohol in this country?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    almostover wrote: »
    Would you be willing to admit that we have an unhealthy relationship with alcohol in this country?

    Yes, that won't change because the pubs are closed. People who want to drink will drink for cheaper now, meaning they have more money for more alcohol


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    boombang wrote: »
    I support this. Was out in a restaurant with the in laws on Sunday. Some well meaning acquaintance comes up, buckled, hugs and kisses half of our group, shakes hands with the other. I know it's just because he was pissed, but there's nothing we could do but smile awkwardly. There's no telling drunk people. We'll not be back to pubs or restaurants in a while after that experience.

    Drink and COVID don't mix.

    A locked fool in a restaurant isn't indicative of how people will behave in their quiet local.

    Hope you enjoyed your meal btw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Trying to get my head around Michael Martins assertion "I hope the TWSS extension will help" I'm assuming a vast majority of pubs currently closed have temporarily laid off staff, equally with zero revenues the prudent decision would have been for staff to go on the PUP so I'd doubt very much any extension of TWSS is of any benifit to publicans or staff affected.

    The government seem hell bent on either ending PUP or certainly reducing it but at the same time happy it seems to pay up to 75% of payroll for business's shut and it likely TWSS costing far more. I get the concept but surely are they not the same. I also get expenses, losses etc but they are separate issues.

    It's seems statistically TWSS more palatable than PUP

    So PUP = €350 PW unless reduced to €203 pw
    TWSS = €2800 PM average PM but mostly higher.

    Both essentially doing the same thing, maintaining income for those laid off. (Although businesses back trading can continue to claim TWSS to cover most of payroll)

    Surely TWSS should be aimed at those who have returned to work and PUP maintained and Aimed at those currently laid off.

    Businesses currently back trading as normal and still availing of TWSS is another story

    Some businesses never closed, are making profits and are still claiming this payment for their employees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,021 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    Some businesses never closed, are making profits and are still claiming this payment for their employees.

    It is alarming and I see on other threads, employees back working full hours for 75% of wages, also some reports of tax being deducted despite the fact TWSS is not taxes at source.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,805 ✭✭✭lertsnim


    Padraig Cribben of the VFI on Newstalk this morning calling for the ban of alcohol sales in supermarkets to stop house parties so pubs can eventually open.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    The idea that they are doing this because some people don't like drink and see an opportunity is clearly nonsense, and worse on you if you really think this.

    The government are taking their advice from the people in public health who are dealing with mass idiocy like house parties in Killarney where tens of people are getting infected. They can see what way the numbers are looking, and it's not looking good. So we need to get some control back before we can move ahead with further reopenings.

    Wear a mask. Stop going to house parties. Physical distancing from other people. That's what will get the pubs opened.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,860 ✭✭✭SteM


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    Some businesses never closed, are making profits and are still claiming this payment for their employees.

    I'm assuming that Revenue will get to these companies at some point and the money will be paid back? Should be pretty easy to to figure out which companies are doing this based on tax return I'd hope.


  • Registered Users Posts: 735 ✭✭✭milehip


    Limpy wrote: »
    God gets his revenge for good Friday. Blame Munster rugby for challenging him.

    Don't forget gay marriage and abortion!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    SteM wrote: »
    I'm assuming that Revenue will get to these companies at some point and the money will be paid back? Should be pretty easy to to figure out which companies are doing this based on tax return I'd hope.

    I would hope so. My daughter works in the 'Health & Safety' sector and she says they've never been busier yet she and other employees are on this payment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭boombang


    A locked fool in a restaurant isn't indicative of how people will behave in their quiet local.

    Hope you enjoyed your meal btw.

    Show me your foolproof rule for differentiating between drinking establishments in which people will behave sensibly and those in which they won't. Show me the same rule that all pubs will be happy with. We were in a smart enough restaurant. Not the place where you'd expect that behavior.

    I like the pub. I just think we need to deal with this deadly virus in a sensible way. If we can't expect everyone to be sensible in the pub, they we're going to have to wait longer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭boombang


    Simon Harris and Varadker were on an absolute mission to try and end the drinking culture in Ireland over the last 4 years. They have been constantly lobbied by health Quangos and NGOs to go after alcohol. NPHET is run pretty much entirely by health professionals who no doubtedly have links or are apart of the anti-alcohol lobby. This is their golden ticket.

    It is 100% an anti-alcohol thing.

    I'm pretty sure it's an anti-deadly virus thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    Did we do this backwards maybe? Should we have shut the off licenses and kept the pubs open? If 3/4 of new cases are people under 25 surely a lot of that must be down to house parties. With drink being more expensive in the pub and staff/management to enfore distancing maybe people would've had less exposure to the virus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    hmmm wrote: »
    The idea that they are doing this because some people don't like drink and see an opportunity is clearly nonsense, and worse on you if you really think this.

    The government are taking their advice from the people in public health who are dealing with mass idiocy like house parties in Killarney where tens of people are getting infected. They can see what way the numbers are looking, and it's not looking good. So we need to get some control back before we can move ahead with further reopenings.

    Wear a mask. Stop going to house parties. Physical distancing from other people. That's what will get the pubs opened.


    So like MM you agree the problem is with the house parties.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    mossie wrote: »
    Few of those countries have the same pub culture we do though.

    The issue isn't pub culture. Social hubs of any kind shouldn't have been re-opened for accommodating customers so soon.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    almostover wrote: »
    Would you be willing to admit that we have an unhealthy relationship with alcohol in this country?

    The obsession with alcohol is in the critique of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,226 ✭✭✭✭BPKS


    hmmm wrote: »
    The idea that they are doing this because some people don't like drink and see an opportunity is clearly nonsense, and worse on you if you really think this.

    The government are taking their advice from the people in public health who are dealing with mass idiocy like house parties in Killarney where tens of people are getting infected. They can see what way the numbers are looking, and it's not looking good. So we need to get some control back before we can move ahead with further reopenings.

    Wear a mask. Stop going to house parties. Physical distancing from other people. That's what will get the pubs opened.

    This is the nub of it.

    Why not just shut down areas of the country that have high cases. Like Dublin. Don't let people in or out for a month.

    The house party you refer to was a bunch that travelled from Dublin to Killarney when one of them was awaiting the results of his Covid test. (That a-hole should be locked up by the way - what he did was way worse that those people 'coughing' on Guards back a few months ago).

    Kerry was Covid free for 30 days in a row around May/early June.

    Is there a case for allowing everything to open in unaffected areas and restrict travel to/from areas where there are significant numbers?

    But then again that wouldn't suit the people in NPHET cos most of them probably live and work in the area with the significant numbers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    hmmm wrote: »
    The idea that they are doing this because some people don't like drink and see an opportunity is clearly nonsense, and worse on you if you really think this.

    The government are taking their advice from the people in public health who are dealing with mass idiocy like house parties in Killarney where tens of people are getting infected. They can see what way the numbers are looking, and it's not looking good. So we need to get some control back before we can move ahead with further reopenings.

    Wear a mask. Stop going to house parties. Physical distancing from other people. That's what will get the pubs opened.

    You can't drink a pint if you're wearing a mask.

    There was no problem if you didn't wear a mask in shops at the peak of the pandemic.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement