Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2020 NFL Draft

  • 03-03-2020 11:08pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    2020_nfl_draft_logo_DL_1.jpg?itok=aiLSCp42

    Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

    Date(s): Thursday 23rd April - Saturday 25th April

    Here is the draft order for the first round:

    1. Cincinnati Bengals

    2. Washington Redskins

    3. Detroit Lions

    4. New York Giants

    5. Miami Dolphins

    6. Los Angeles Chargers

    7. Carolina Panthers

    8. Arizona Cardinals

    9. Jacksonville Jaguars

    10. Cleveland Browns

    11. New York Jets

    12. Las Vegas Raiders

    13. Indianapolis Colts

    14. Tampa Bay Buccaneers

    15. Denver Broncos

    16. Atlanta Falcons

    17. Dallas Cowboys

    18. Miami Dolphins (from Pittsburgh Steelers)

    19. Las Vegas Raiders (from Chicago Bears)

    20. Jacksonville Jaguars (from LA Rams)

    21. Philadelphia Eagles

    22. Buffalo Bills

    23. New England Patriots

    24. New Orleans Saints

    25. Minnesota Vikings

    26. Miami Dolphins (from Houston Texans)

    27. Seattle Seahawks

    28. Baltimore Ravens

    29. Tennessee Titans

    30. Green Bay Packers

    31. San Francisco 49'ers

    32. Kansas City Chiefs


«13456711

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Here are a couple of mock drafts post the combine.

    SI Mock Draft

    Bleacher Report Mock Draft

    Joe Burrows and Chase Young are just about guaranteed to go one and two but from there it is anyone's guess as a few teams can go up to get a quarterback with the health of Tua Tagovailoa an intriguing one as which team will take the gamble.

    Looks a good draft for some good quality offensive linesmen and it looks like there is a lot of depth at wide receiver.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Very interested to see where Tua and Herbert go, as that will shape a lot of the draft for other teams.

    Would love Giants to trade down from 4 and grab a lineman like Wills or Thomas. When you consider Becton and Wirfs are also highly projected, you could realistically see Giants being able to trade down to 10-14 range and still pick up one of those 4.

    Other option is go defense at 4, with Simmons or Okudah. I'd definitely prefer OL and trading down, though.

    What does everyone else see their team doing?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,151 ✭✭✭letowski


    For the Colts, I see Chris Ballard will look to draft a QB, even if he brings in a veteran as a bridge QB. From his press conferences and interviews, reading between the lines, they don't see Jacoby Brissett as the long term answer.

    I think there will be a run of offensive tackles early, with 4 OTs separating from the pack (Thomas, Wirfs, Bacton and Wills).


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,972 ✭✭✭mikemac2


    My Ravens need a edge rusher, defensive tackle, a guard and wide receiver in that order.

    Absolutely vital we add something to the pass rush.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    As of today, the NFL still plan to hold and televise the Draft on April 23rd-25th in Las Vegas but have cancelled the public events around it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    VillaMad wrote: »
    As of today, the NFL still plan to hold and televise the Draft on April 23rd-25th in Las Vegas but have cancelled the public events around it.

    So no boats across the Bellagio lake? Damn!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Roger Goodell on stage, in full hazmat suit, hugging all the players will be a joy.

    Or is that bit gone too?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    With the draft looking like it is going ahead, this is a serious challenge facing teams

    https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1243517666633138176?s=20


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Even with the combine, pro-days, hand measurements, stupid interview questions, game tape etc, a lot of selections don't pan out so I'm quite looking forward to this year's draft and how the players end up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Even with the combine, pro-days, hand measurements, stupid interview questions, game tape etc, a lot of selections don't pan out so I'm quite looking forward to this year's draft and how the players end up.

    Likely a lot of teams will strike even more gold than normal with UDFAs, as a portion of teams will lean on guys with tests than gambling and guys will end up going undrafted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    A couple of friends and myself done a 1st round mock over the weekend. I've thrown it down below with a couple of comments for some of the picks. Theres also a couple of trades in it, but wasnt really sure of the value of future picks so we just tried to base them off similar trades in the past. My picks were the Panthers, Jets, the first Raiders pick, the Pats, the Packers and the second 49ers pick. Fire all criticism/comments my way:D

    1. Bengals – QB - Joe Burrow

    2. Redskins – Edge - Chase Young

    3. Detroit – TRADE Chargers give Lions 2020 pick 6, pick 37 picks 71 and 2021 2nd round – QB -Tua Tagovailoa
    “Chargers jump ahead of the Dolphins to get Tua. Chargers to stick with Tyrod Taylor for this season, which will give Tua a season to rehab his hip injuries. Chargers hope the Hawain native will be the face of the LA franchise for many years to come”

    4. Giants – OL - Mekhi Becton
    “A giant’s fan on our discord was not happy with this pick. But the stand in GM made the point that Becton’s physicals are exactly what Gettleman will be looking for, he reckons he will fall in love with how high Becton’s ceiling could be”

    5. Dolphins – QB - Justin Hubert
    “Miami settles for the next QB on their list, I don’t think this is the best way to go and we are likely to see Fitzmagic starting in South Florida come September”

    6. Chargers - traded to lions – CB - Jeff Okudah

    7. Panthers – LB/S - Isaiah Simmons

    8. Cardinals – OL - Jedrick Wills

    9. Jags – TRADE Jets give Jags 2020 pick 11, 79 and 158 – OL - Andrew Thomas
    “The Jets don’t want to take the risk of the two remaining top tier tackles going at 9 and 10, so they jump the Browns and have their choice of the two. They go with Thomas who spent most of his college career at LT over Wirfs who spent more time at RT”

    10. Browns – OL - Tristan Wirfs

    11. Jets – traded to the Jags – DL - Derrick Brown

    12. Raiders – WR - Jerry Jeudy

    13. 49ers – WR - Ceedee Lamb

    14. Bucs – OL - Josh Jones
    “Some felt this was a reach, but the GM commented that the Buccs main priority right now is to protect Tom Brady. They have receiving options with Evans, Godwin and Howard, they could do with a RB but he felt there was none worth taking here. He also pointed out that Jones had PFFs highest pass protection grade for college tackles”

    15. Broncos – WR - Henry Ruggs lll
    “Broncos are delighted to get a speedster to go opposite Sutton. They’re giving Drew Lock the tools to help him succeed”

    16. Falcons – CB - CJ Henderson

    17. Cowboys – EDGE - K’Lavon Chaisson

    18. Dolphins – iOL - Cesar Ruiz

    19. Raiders – CB - Kristan Fulton

    20. Jags - TRADE Saints give Jags pick 24 and 88 for pick 20 – WR - Justin Jefferson
    “Saints got a little trigger finger happy here, but they had their eye on a receiver to go opposite Thomas and with the Eagles/Vikings/Patriots who could all benefit from taking a WR, they weren’t willing to take the chance of him not being there. Jefferson is another weapon for Brees, but you have to feel they’re super bowl window id rapidly closing”

    21. Eagles – EDGE - AJ Epenesa

    22. Vikings – WR - Tee Higgins

    23. Patriots – QB - Jordan Love
    “this was one of my picks and I hadn’t a clue who to go with. The Pats have holes all over their roster and I did look to trade down to add to the 12? Picks they already have. Decided to go with QB, Stidham is a youngster and the only season game time I saw him in, he threw an INT straight into Jamal Adams bread basket and Hoyer definitely isn’t the answer. I think WR, LB, OL, DL could have all made sense here”

    24. Saints – Traded to the Jags – CB - Trevon Diggs

    25. Vikings – CB - Jaylon Johnson

    26. Dolphins – S - Xavier McKinney

    27. Seahawks – DL - Javon Kinlaw
    “Not my pick, but the Seahawks got the steal of the 1st round with this pick imo”

    28. Ravens – LB - Kenneth Murray

    29. Titans – EDGE - Yetur Gross-Matos

    30. Packers – WR - Denzel Mims

    31. 49ers - CB - Jeff Gladney

    32. Chiefs – CB - AJ Terrell


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Put me down as another Giants fan who would not be a fan of Becton at 4.

    I'd have Wills, Thomas and Wirfs all ahead of him, and probably in that order.

    A trade down would still allow them to get any of those 4 in the top 10 picks, you would think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    Knex. wrote: »
    Put me down as another Giants fan who would not be a fan of Becton at 4.

    I'd have Wills, Thomas and Wirfs all ahead of him, and probably in that order.

    A trade down would still allow them to get any of those 4 in the top 10 picks, you would think.

    I think if they were to trade down and still get a top tackle they'd what to get in before the cardinals as there's a real chance that the Cardinals, Jags, Browns and Jets would all be looking to take one


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    phatkev wrote: »
    13. 49ers – WR - Ceedee Lamb

    31. 49ers - CB - Jeff Gladney

    I would be pretty happy if the 49ers ended up with those picks.

    At 13, the consensus is that they will go for one of the top 3 WRs and given that it is the biggest need, the group is such quality, and each are a great fit in the scheme in their own way it is probably the most likely scenario. I need to do more research to work out who is my favourite of the group but at this stage I'd be excited for any of them.

    Having said all that, given that there will still be starter level WRs available at the 31st pick, or even from a trade back into the 2nd, it is possible that the team goes another direction. That would likely be if one of the top athletic OTs fall (they don't here), if they decide to fill the hole left at DT by the trade of Buckner (Brown is gone here but Kinlaw is on the board), or they go CB to learn across from Sherman (Henderson is available here). I need to again do more research on each of those options but as of now I wouldn't be mad with any of those choices, even if DL again or development OT are a bit boring.

    At 31, Gladley should be starter ready but his size and athleticism dont quite fill the prototype the team goes for at CB. Most of the secondary is out of contract at the end of 2020 so the move does make sense but I'm not sure of the value here given the big run on CBs. Everyone always wants their team to trade back and get a bunch of great picks but presuming that is off the table I would have jumped at Austin Jackson out of USC. He is pretty raw but the athletic profile is great and he can sit behind Staley until he likely retires at the end of the season or potentially fill in at guard, where the team has been weak.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,151 ✭✭✭letowski


    Is there much interest in the Patriots drafting Jordan Love? Looks like they are going to back Jarrett Stidham. That said, I don't see the fit with Love to the Patriots' offense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,569 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    letowski wrote: »
    Is there much interest in the Patriots drafting Jordan Love? Looks like they are going to back Jarrett Stidham. That said, I don't see the fit with Love to the Patriots' offense.

    I've seen people moot it on Reddit. Suppose the question is what the defense will be with Brady? He was the system, everything was built around him and his unparalleled ability to read the game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Fully virtual draft, all GMs/owners/coaches must do it from their own homes.

    I'm sure certain teams will break those rules but it makes sense for them to be there. Definitely could cause some chaos though on draft night.

    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1247231339994234880?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    I can see it now, the Bengals letting the clock run down to the final seconds ( even though the whole world and their mother know they'll go with Burrow). The 10 second mark hits and theres a state wide blackout in Ohio and they come back online to find they've drafted a punter!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    I hope they don't have autodraft on, they could end up with a fullback from the first round.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Fantasy football has never been more realistic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,151 ✭✭✭letowski


    In some respects the draft could be alot better this year.

    There will be none of this waiting for Goodell to walk out on stage, then next thing there is an under 10 football coming out, then there is a big speech, then interviews, etc. Hopefully all that nonsense will be gone this year, with only just the picks and analysis from TV station.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,385 ✭✭✭franglan


    letowski wrote: »
    In some respects the draft could be alot better this year.

    There will be none of this waiting for Goodell to walk out on stage, then next thing there is an under 10 football coming out, then there is a big speech, then interviews, etc. Hopefully all that nonsense will be gone this year, with only just the picks and analysis from TV station.

    It's still on American TV - the theatrics will still be flowing!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    I've never been one to watch the draft as the whole ceremony aspect of it doesn't interest me at all but I think I might stay up and watch the first round this year.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Yeah, its probably the closest thing we will get to live sport this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    gstack166 wrote: »

    Bleacher Report suggesting the Browns and Broncos have opened trade talks about the #10 pick.

    Jump up to grab their choice of WR? You'd be made to make this trade before seeing what way the board falls though.
    I seen talk on Twitter of the Jets/Falcons swapping #11 for #16 as well. While the Jets could do with picking up as many picks as possible they also desperately need an OT and what ever chance they have of getting a top tackle at 11, they'll have no chance at 16


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,762 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    I hope they don't have autodraft on, they could end up with a fullback from the first round.

    lol last year autodraft gave me Andrew Luck!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Irish time what time is round 1 due to kick off?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,151 ✭✭✭letowski


    TheDoctor wrote:
    Irish time what time is round 1 due to kick off?


    Midnight. First round usually takes 4 hours at least. Could be quicker this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    phatkev wrote: »
    Jump up to grab their choice of WR?

    WRs in R1 are notorious for being busts. By all means take a WR at 15 - but I will be really pissed if Elway trades up to take a WR. I mean the Broncos aren't a WR away from competing - stay at 15 and take BPA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    letowski wrote: »
    Midnight. First round usually takes 4 hours at least. Could be quicker this year.

    Or slower. They may need more time to horsetrade behind the scenes.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭gstack166


    WRs in R1 are notorious for being busts. By all means take a WR at 15 - but I will be really pissed if Elway trades up to take a WR. I mean the Broncos aren't a WR away from competing - stay at 15 and take BPA.

    Rumour is they want Juedy, Raiders & Jets supposedly hot on him too. I’ve read that he’s the best WR to come into the NFL for the last 3 years and could be the best for the next 2/3 years too.

    I agree with you about Denver being far away from competing but maybe the expect to have a good chance on snatching Lawrence or Fields next year and if they do they have the perfect WR for him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    WRs in R1 are notorious for being busts. By all means take a WR at 15 - but I will be really pissed if Elway trades up to take a WR. I mean the Broncos aren't a WR away from competing - stay at 15 and take BPA.

    Just because they are notorious for being busts doesn't make it a true statement. You're still more likely to hit on a WR you pick in the first round than anywhere else (like all other positions).

    WR is also probably the position where your performance is most dependent on others so being a 'bust' isn't always the fault of the player or the GM for picking them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    gstack166 wrote: »
    Rumour is they want Juedy, Raiders & Jets supposedly hot on him too. I’ve read that he’s the best WR to come into the NFL for the last 3 years and could be the best for the next 2/3 years too.

    I agree with you about Denver being far away from competing but maybe the expect to have a good chance on snatching Lawrence or Fields next year and if they do they have the perfect WR for him.

    That isn't true. There is a strong argument that Juedy isn't even the best WR in this draft. Next year there are two or more guys that are trending to be better prospects. This WR class is extremely deep but it doesn't really have absolute superstars that we see some years


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭gstack166


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    That isn't true. There is a strong argument that Juedy isn't even the best WR in this draft. Next year there are two or more guys that are trending to be better prospects. This WR class is extremely deep but it doesn't really have absolute superstars that we see some years

    He’s ranked as the #1 receiver in virtually every major publications rankings and #2 in the rest behind CeeDee Lamb. The 2 I seen him ranked #2 in were 2 of the bigger ones, granted. ESPN & CBS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    gstack166 wrote: »
    but maybe the expect to have a good chance on snatching Lawrence or Fields next year and if they do they have the perfect WR for him.

    Seriously :rolleyes:

    Lock looks like the real deal - and the Broncos are going to improve from last season.

    The reason Denver won't be competing this season is that the roster 3 starters and lacks any decent depth, the OL only has 3 1/2 starters at the moment, there is no WR2, they have no depth at DB and they need an ILB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    That isn't true. There is a strong argument that Juedy isn't even the best WR in this draft. Next year there are two or more guys that are trending to be better prospects. This WR class is extremely deep but it doesn't really have absolute superstars that we see some years

    I would put Lamb above Juedy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Just because they are notorious for being busts doesn't make it a true statement. You're still more likely to hit on a WR you pick in the first round than anywhere else (like all other positions).

    WR is also probably the position where your performance is most dependent on others so being a 'bust' isn't always the fault of the player or the GM for picking them.

    The positions that have the highest bust potential in R1 are - RB, QB and WR - given the position you generally have to take a punt on a QB in R1 - but you don't have to take a RB or WR.

    This year is deep in WR - and I don't have a problem taking one of Lamb, Juedy or Ruggs if they are there at 15 - I do have a problem with giving away 2 R3 picks (and possibly more) to move up 5-6 places to take a WR. Stay at 15 and you get either a WR, an OT or a CB - all of whom Denver needs - and then use the 2 R3 picks to build roster depth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,365 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Yeah, its probably the closest thing we will get to live sport this year.

    Christ that's a depressing thought.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    gstack166 wrote: »
    He’s ranked as the #1 receiver in virtually every major publications rankings and #2 in the rest behind CeeDee Lamb. The 2 I seen him ranked #2 in were 2 of the bigger ones, granted. ESPN & CBS.

    There is a huge difference in saying that Jeudy is ranked #1 receiver by most analysts this year and what you said that 'he’s the best WR to come into the NFL for the last 3 years and could be the best for the next 2/3 years too'. You might have read someone making that claim but any investigation shows that it is complete hyperbole.

    Jeudy isn't elite physically, hasn't really shown he can deal with contested catches, looked at times borderline scared of contact, had drop issues, was surrounded by top players coaching that made things easier for him. Don't get me wrong, I'd be happy if the 49ers ended up with him at 13 but there wouldn't be as many concerns about him as a player if he was as good as your claim implied.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    The positions that have the highest bust potential in R1 are - RB, QB and WR - given the position you generally have to take a punt on a QB in R1 - but you don't have to take a RB or WR.

    This year is deep in WR - and I don't have a problem taking one of Lamb, Juedy or Ruggs if they are there at 15 - I do have a problem with giving away 2 R3 picks (and possibly more) to move up 5-6 places to take a WR. Stay at 15 and you get either a WR, an OT or a CB - all of whom Denver needs - and then use the 2 R3 picks to build roster depth.

    I agree with your thoughts on what the Broncos should do but still disagree on your initial logic regarding busts.

    For all 3 positions you listed, if you want an elite player you're still more likely to get it in the first round than leaving it until a later pick. Each are also positions that rely on others the most to be successful.

    Making decisions based on how notorious a given position is to be a bust is drafting scared and you might as well fire your front office. One of the positions you highlighted as being a bust might get more media coverage but failing similarly at other positions will set you back as much or even more, like an OT or CB that keeps getting beat.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 67 ✭✭Furryglove



    Just take Chase Young already Skins


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,181 ✭✭✭Guffy


    No boards draft this year? Seems an odd year for it not to happen with everyone off :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    I agree with your thoughts on what the Broncos should do but still disagree on your initial logic regarding busts.

    For all 3 positions you listed, if you want an elite player you're still more likely to get it in the first round than leaving it until a later pick. Each are also positions that rely on others the most to be successful.

    Making decisions based on how notorious a given position is to be a bust is drafting scared and you might as well fire your front office. One of the positions you highlighted as being a bust might get more media coverage but failing similarly at other positions will set you back as much or even more, like an OT or CB that keeps getting beat.
    Can I clarify again - I have no problem with Elway taking a WR at 15 - I have a problem with trading up to 10 or 8 to take a WR and costing draft capital that Denver needs to fill holes on the roster and build depth which is sadly lacking.

    Although the latest rumour out of Denver is that they are looking to shift Garrett Bolles and 1.15 to either Cleveland or Arizona to be in a position to take one of the OTs available.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Can I clarify again - I have no problem with Elway taking a WR at 15 - I have a problem with trading up to 10 or 8 to take a WR and costing draft capital that Denver needs to fill holes on the roster and build depth which is sadly lacking.

    Although the latest rumour out of Denver is that they are looking to shift Garrett Bolles and 1.15 to either Cleveland or Arizona to be in a position to take one of the OTs available.

    Again, I have no problem with what you're now saying from a Denver perspective, it makes a lot of sense.

    My disagreement was with you initially leading off your reasoning with the regularly heard cliche around this time of the year that 'WRs in R1 are notorious for being busts' and this should play into decisions, which you later expanded to also include QBs and RBs. Picking any of those positions in the 1st is the greatest likelihood that you'll get an elite player, so letting how other teams have failed in drafting come into your evaluation just shows lack of trust scouts and front office. There's a difference in not valuing certain positions and drafting scared, and your original argument was the latter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,365 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    The whole off season and draft has been messed up obviously by the coronavirus outbreak and thankfully the combine took place because at least teams have recent film on players in the draft. I mean a disadvantage to rookies is the likelihood that training camps will at best be shortened and at worst delayed until later in August. I think it's highly unlikely that any rookie QB starts this upcoming season because as good as some of them clearly are, the likelihood is they won't have the necessary reps done for them to be put in games.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    The whole off season and draft has been messed obviously by the coronavirus outbreak and thankfully the combine took place because at least teams have recent film on players in the draft. I mean a disadvantage to rookies is the likelihood that training camps will at best be shortened and at worst delayed until later in August. I think it's highly unlikely that any rookie QB starts this upcoming season because as good as some of them clearly are, the likelihood is they won't have the necessary reps done for them to be put in games.

    This will likely most hurt the Lions and Giants' market to try to trade down. I don't think it stops Dolphins or Chargers from taking a QB but they aren't going to give away a number of picks with the guys likely to be there already being risks before the lack reps and limited 2020 output.

    Probably also means the Bengals won't move on from Dalton without a good offer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,181 ✭✭✭Guffy




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've Friday off work, so considering staying up to watch round 1 at least.
    Can anyone tell me how I can easily and legally watch this? Do any free channels have it? Is it on the NFL website? Youtube?
    Do I need US ESPN to watch?

    Thanks


  • Advertisement
Advertisement