Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Foxhunter Pub Closed by Revenue ?

1235789

Comments

  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 12,900 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    Wasn't it supposed to be turned into an Avoca cafe/shop? Nothing seemed to happen with that plan. It's an eyesore as it it but is in a prime location.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    I'd welcome it. There's what, about 50,000-60,000 people in Lucan / Adamstown and we don't have a grocery Dunnes. Their perpetual spend €50 and get €10 off voucher is highly competitive too.


    You do know Dunnes put up their prices to ensure they make their money, you gain nothing out of the voucher.

    I did an investigation into this for a few months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    Given the space available and the parking spaces required, I'd expect it only to be a relatively small supermarket. It will add maybe 2 or 3 cars per minute to the slip road, I don't think that will make any material difference to how busy it is. The slip road itself isn't hugely busy anyway. Very convenient for people coming home from work in Dublin city to do a quick shop to pick up groceries to make the dinner.

    I'd rather have a massive shiny Tesco Extra on one of those big available green fields around Liffey Valley where one can do the weekly shopping. We need a Tesco too (other than that miserable heap in Hillcrest)


    Road would be blocked in the evenings etc, a supermarket will never be allowed there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,750 ✭✭✭degsie


    Wish people wouldn't speculate about this property without even a tenuous link to a source.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    degsie wrote: »
    Wish people wouldn't speculate about this property without even a tenuous link to a source.


    No fun in that, speculation makes it fun!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,595 ✭✭✭Stealthirl


    degsie wrote: »
    Wish people wouldn't speculate about this property without even a tenuous link to a source.

    I was told there's a Crazy Prices going in with work to start in the next 2 months :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,907 ✭✭✭DopeTech


    Sir Dosser wrote: »
    Heard that Dunnes have bought it. Anyone else hear anymore? It'll be grocery only.

    Well it looks there was no truth in this rumour, has anyone heard anything on it lately? Mad that it can be left vacant for so long.

    https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dopetech.ie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    Sir Dosser wrote: »
    Well it looks there was no truth in this rumour, has anyone heard anything on it lately? Mad that it can be left vacant for so long.

    It's a bad location and that explains why it's vacant. Maybe a McDonald's would suit it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    It's a bad location and that explains why it's vacant. Maybe a McDonald's would suit it

    There are already 4 McDonald's in Lucan. Which is absolutely ridiculous for a population of 50k. I say no thanks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,750 ✭✭✭degsie


    unkel wrote: »
    There are already 4 McDonald's in Lucan. Which is absolutely ridiculous for a population of 50k. I say no thanks.

    Only two actually.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    There are already 4 McDonald's in Lucan. Which is absolutely ridiculous for a population of 50k. I say no thanks.

    In lucan there is only two. Village and superquinn. 2 too many though.

    Can't see much happening yet though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭ArthurG




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,339 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    It's getting towards a point where it needs to get listed on the derelict sites register


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭brick tamland


    Just needs to be bulldozed at this stage. An eyesore. Building can't be saved at this point. Nothing's going to open there with traffic flow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,907 ✭✭✭DopeTech


    Amazing a place the size of this can just be let go to ruin for over 6 years. Any news on what's next for this site?

    https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dopetech.ie



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭ArthurG


    Sir Dosser wrote: »
    Amazing a place the size of this can just be let go to ruin for over 6 years. Any news on what's next for this site?

    Next local elections are in May. Demand answers from potential candidates and in particular incumbents who are presiding over this mess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    ArthurG wrote: »

    Next local elections are in May. Demand answers from potential candidates and in particular incumbents who are presiding over this mess.

    What are the council doing that has any impact on this? This is developers and banks fighting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭ArthurG


    L1011 wrote: »
    What are the council doing that has any impact on this? This is developers and banks fighting.

    It has absolutely nothing to do with banks and developers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    ArthurG wrote: »
    It has absolutely nothing to do with banks and developers.

    Explain your reasoning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 873 ✭✭✭magicray


    Aw I was hoping to see a good update here when this thread popped up

    Sad to see the state it is in now


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Explain your reasoning.

    I'd say its planning. Look at the 16 apartment planning application Got refused on the grounds of intensification of the slip road. TII would have a field day on any development here.

    Chances of anything going in here are slim to none.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Councillors have no influence over TII, thankfully. SDCC have tried to do some bloody stupid things and had TII stop them.

    Harassing councillors and candidates over something they cannot do anything about is pointless.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Councillors have no influence over TII, thankfully. SDCC have tried to do some bloody stupid things and had TII stop them.

    Harassing councillors and candidates over something they cannot do anything about is pointless.

    If the lands were rezoned and you could get an access through Hermitage Garden you would probably get 28/30 houses on the site. Thats where you lobby your councilor.

    No chance of access via slip road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Very unlikely that number of additional units would be allowed on to an internal road in a housing estate.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Very unlikely that number of additional units would be allowed on to an internal road in a housing estate.

    No technical reason why it couldn't. It would be a local issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    godtabh wrote: »
    No technical reason why it couldn't. It would be a local issue.

    Would need to spend an entire day reading DMURS and similar to be certain but I could see the road capacity being a limiting factor.

    As goes local factors, residents in that estate would be unlikely to be happy; particularly as there'd almost definitely be pedestrian/cycle permeability to the sliproad which residents associations usually scream from the rooftops against


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    L1011 wrote: »
    Would need to spend an entire day reading DMURS and similar to be certain but I could see the road capacity being a limiting factor.

    As goes local factors, residents in that estate would be unlikely to be happy; particularly as there'd almost definitely be pedestrian/cycle permeability to the sliproad which residents associations usually scream from the rooftops against

    A road size like that has an AADT of about 750 cars. 34 houses will have an AADT of about 200. Road capacity wont be an issue. J

    unction capacity maybe but that can be solved. The R136 is signalized and there are 2/3 other access points.

    That approach would be a lot more favorable compared to the going onto the slip road. Most developers wouldn't have the stomach with dealing with locals but if you have sank €7.5m into it, it might be the only way to get your money back. Would also depend if its TIC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    godtabh wrote: »
    A road size like that has an AADT of about 750 cars. 34 houses will have an AADT of about 200. Road capacity wont be an issue. J

    unction capacity maybe but that can be solved. The R136 is signalized and there are 2/3 other access points.

    That approach would be a lot more favorable compared to the going onto the slip road. Most developers wouldn't have the stomach with dealing with locals but if you have sank €7.5m into it, it might be the only way to get your money back. Would also depend if its TIC.

    surely the amount of traffic when it was a busy pub was a lot more than if it was made residential, cannot see the logic in not allowing them exit onto the slip road


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    surely the amount of traffic when it was a busy pub was a lot more than if it was made residential, cannot see the logic in not allowing them exit onto the slip road

    It would have had very little traffic at peak periods compared to a large residential development - virtually none in the morning peak, a bit more in the evening for food and off-licence traffic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    That slip road has very little traffic on it as is any time of the day - it's just for people taking a left into one of the lanes (mostly residential) but mostly for the petrol station. Adding 40 housing units won't cause any problems on it


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Its now a case of correct design standards been applied. You'd never get the same there again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    godtabh wrote: »
    If the lands were rezoned and you could get an access through Hermitage Garden you would probably get 28/30 houses on the site. Thats where you lobby your councilor.

    No chance of access via slip road.

    So now you want to push more traffic through another housing estate where kids play?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    That slip road has very little traffic on it as is any time of the day - it's just for people taking a left into one of the lanes (mostly residential) but mostly for the petrol station. Adding 40 housing units won't cause any problems on it

    The slip road backs up alot of the evenings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    The whole N4 backs up alot of the evenings west bound. The slip road is probably used by several people trying to avoid the main N4. Either way I can't see an extra 10 or 20 cars make any significant difference to that.

    Thousands and thousands of approved units at Clonburris with no main national high capacity roads within miles and no suitable infrastructure at all is a completely different matter :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The side of the slip road to turn right towards Lucan is at risk of backing up on the mainline a lot of the time, which is likely to be the main concern of TII


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    L1011 wrote: »
    The side of the slip road to turn right towards Lucan is at risk of backing up on the mainline a lot of the time, which is likely to be the main concern of TII

    Just give the right turn a longer green light, is the easy solution to that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    Just give the right turn a longer green light, is the easy solution to that.

    Its not the light that's the problem, is the traffic going that way


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    So now you want to push more traffic through another housing estate where kids play?

    Yes


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    godtabh wrote: »
    Yes



    And does it affect you?

    Maybe that decision should be with the residents of that estate.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    And does it affect you?

    Maybe that decision should be with the residents of that estate.

    No it shouldn't. Bring low speed low volumes of traffic through an estate is more desirable than having an unsafe access to the national road network. This NIMBY crap has to stop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    godtabh wrote: »
    No it shouldn't. Bring low speed low volumes of traffic through an estate is more desirable than having an unsafe access to the national road network. This NIMBY crap has to stop.

    Well we do it next to your house so!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,750 ✭✭✭degsie


    Well we do it next to your house so!

    HBMkQVuO.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Its not the light that's the problem, is the traffic going that way

    Can still be improved further downstream. Allowed use of both lanes northbound all the way from those lights to the woodies traffic lights for starters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    unkel wrote: »
    Can still be improved further downstream. Allowed use of both lanes northbound all the way from those lights to the woodies traffic lights for starters.


    U could but u will still hit a bottleneck and then back up.

    Traffic should be only in the village in limited hours.
    Need another link road further out also.


    Why not make the foxhunter a park and ride facility with good security.

    Have a safe area to store bikes etc. Get people out of their cars


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,589 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    U could but u will still hit a bottleneck and then back up.

    Traffic should be only in the village in limited hours.
    Need another link road further out also.


    Why not make the foxhunter a park and ride facility with good security.

    Have a safe area to store bikes etc. Get people out of their cars

    It's on the wrong side of the road basically. The walk to the high frequency inbound bus stops is very long

    It's also too far in with major congestion to reach it at all


  • Registered Users Posts: 11 Mary BS


    Only catching up now on this issue because it was so sad to see this long established pub go the way it did..and there was nothing but negative news on it for so long. Anyway, just noticed while out walking that the 'ForSale' sign has been removed in the last few days .. it didn't have a Sold notice on it before this happened as far as I know, maybe there's something happening at last. The site appears to have had a bit of a clean up too as its now spotless. After reading up on some of the comments since I last checked in I think it's only right to point out that the traffic issue that is now a big issue with the site is down to the planning section of SDCC..SDCC decided to grant planning for the Lucan Retail Park that is now the Woodies site, where an old cottage was once in situ. The road scheme there at the bridge was the result of the planning skills of the Planning Dept. of SDCC. The same SDCC is responsible for the shape and size of Hermitage Park Estate including the houses that back onto the slip road. The slip road, could have been wider with more than 2 lanes and indeed the bridge should have been double its size, if it was more forward thinking, especially when it was designed at a time when they knew well that all transport planning was prioritising and indeed encouraging car transport ahead of public transport, so there was no excuse for this inadequate road layout ... imagine a retail park going into a cottage site in the middle of a forked road scheme 10 kilometres from the capital city ! Before I'm killed for mentioning Hermitage Park Estate ... I think the residents there have every right to object to extra traffic being re- routed into their estate if SDCC were to approve a residential development on the FH site that would have its exit onto Hermitage Park rather than the slip road. However, something must be done to move on from the derelict FH site. As I see it the only solution is to have a small development of a mix of a low rise small residential complex of maybe 8 or so 2- bedroom apartments, small supermarket and cafe with appropriate opening times ... and exiting onto the slip road .. With improvements to the slip road ... and a wider bridge at Woddies or another bridge. The bottleneck at this section of the road network on the N4 and the FH site is a direct result of SDCC planning decisions... It's not because of the Foxhunter Pub/Petrol Station ... Those two businesses were there long before the N4 dual carriageway... and the Foxhunter Pub was negatively impacted by SDCC planning/roads designs. Now that the Foxhunter Pub has been killed off by SDCC & Developers, there is a need to find them right development for the site and given the shortage of homes, this ought provide for some residential units. Fingers Crossed that the site's been sold now and hopefully for the local residents it'll be a pleasant outcome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,750 ✭✭✭degsie


    490241.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,683 ✭✭✭monty_python


    Echo.ie reporting the foxhunter has been sold for 3milion

    https://www.facebook.com/792791334066176/posts/3364976006847683/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,858 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    Bound to be houses or apartments


  • Advertisement
Advertisement