Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Survivor: Winners at War

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    Another great episode, if it keeps up this standard in the run in it'll be my favourite season in years.

    Ben is so bad at certain parts of the game, telling Tony he was the target before the IC in the hope that it would help convince him to vote out his arch nemesis Jeremy.

    As someone has already said, Michelle is all over the place. Such a disappointing second half of the season. Her social game is impressive and I can see how it was enough to get her the win in her original season but she's going to struggle to replicate that again.

    In terms of the game, Sarah seems to have gotten over last weeks blindside but at the same time she'll never talk to Tony again if she gets voted out. That's quite the reaction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    cyberhog wrote: »
    I like the challenges on EOE this season. It was very boring last season when they just sat around all day doing nothing. I would like to see Natalie return to the game she was very impressive in the challenges and I think she deserves another shot.

    Unless the EoE person goes on an immunity run to the end I expect them to get voted out quickly.

    I would hope that this jury wouldn't be swayed by their relationships from EoE and them putting themselves in the returning player's shoes but it is way too high a risk to let them get to the final vote


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,964 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    Wow this is a quality season, potential GOAT. Tony is a machine. Kim completely deserved it for cookies and peanutbuter ffs, maybe if it was cheeseburgers? They're days away from playing for $2 million and you step down for a food reward...

    The balls on Jeremy and Sarah in TC aswell not to play especially Sarah to refuse the free idol, this is ultra level Survivor gameplay, now everyone will have to take Tony and maybe Jeremy having idols in their pockets into account, anything could happen just off that. Jeremy threatening Denise aswell... I need a shower after that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,964 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    CBS advertising for next seasons players aswell, good to see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭pooch90


    This was the first episode I actually enjoyed of this Season!
    Great game play by Tony.
    I think my issue is there are still so many characters with EoE and main camp. At least when they get voted out they are just jury. I also dont like that whoever returns has gotten to watch every TC prior to returning.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Thargor wrote: »
    CBS advertising for next seasons players aswell, good to see.

    The guy that covers it for Entertainment Weekly did some interviews around whether it will make it to season 50. As a show runner Jeff is understandably being a bit coy about it but seems positive

    https://ew.com/tv/jeff-probst-survivor-season-50/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    It was a double episode tonight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭seligehgit


    I thought it was the finale.

    Great episode nonetheless.

    It was hilarious Jeremy endeavouring to explain to Tony that a fortnight consisted of 14 days.:D

    Absolutely adore Michelle,rooting for her in many ways as the undoubted underdog.

    Shame she did'nt play the advantage for Jeremy.

    I can't understand how on God's earth Nick throw his vote towards Ben.In what world did he think he'd an in with Tony,Sarah,Ben and less so Denise.Bonkers stuff.Michelle gave him a reality check.His disadvantage of Ben was a tad closing the stable door after the horse has bolted.Futile.

    Hoping and predicting Natalie will return to the game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 SteveK83


    Very good episode that and am glad they did the whole recap thing at the end ahead of the 3 hour finale.

    Not too sure on the EOE aspect. I think a more redemption island type aspect would have been better. Cant see anyone from EOE winning it no matter who comes back in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 140 ✭✭TimeUp


    I'd love to see Yul return and win. I like all the remaining players that haven't been voted out, except Sarah.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Also Starring LeVar Burton


    SteveK83 wrote: »
    Very good episode that and am glad they did the whole recap thing at the end ahead of the 3 hour finale.

    Not too sure on the EOE aspect. I think a more redemption island type aspect would have been better. Cant see anyone from EOE winning it no matter who comes back in.

    Did you not watch the first Edge of Extinction season? The one where the person who came back from Edge of Extinction went and won the whole thing? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭tvercetti


    seligehgit wrote: »
    Absolutely adore Michelle,rooting for her in many ways as the undoubted underdog.

    I'm in the complete opposite camp, her just being there annoys me. Someone in tonight's episode (Tony?) said its an insult to the great players her making it to the end of a champions season and I can't disagree. I love an underdog story but shes just clueless out there. I'd say Aubry is sick watching her out there wondering how she got beaten by her.
    SteveK83 wrote: »
    Not too sure on the EOE aspect. I think a more redemption island type aspect would have been better. Cant see anyone from EOE winning it no matter who comes back in.

    If Natalie comes back in after being in extinction since the first vote with her idol and plays it right to take out Tony/Sarah and makes it to the final 3 opposite Michelle, Nick or Ben, then are you betting against her winning after the time she has spent with the jury??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    Ben, Nick and Michelle are pretty far from great player territory based on recent performances.

    Rooting for Tony but hoping he'll have to face a few more bumps on the road for entertainment purposes, he's really been great this season. I wonder if Sarah does have a shot if they sit beside each other as she has plenty of friends on the jury and Tony has orchestrated a few blindsides that could leave a bitter taste.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Tony deserves to win the game as it stands he has played it brilliantly.


    I do however think whoever comes back from EOE will win it as they will have had plenty of time to work the jury members while there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 SteveK83


    Did you not watch the first Edge of Extinction season? The one where the person who came back from Edge of Extinction went and won the whole thing? :rolleyes:

    Yeah I did. Chris Underwood...put himself in the fire making challenge to get some jury credit. Bold move and it paid off.

    You need a CV to win Survivor.....your gonna have to do a hell of a lot to come back from EOE and win the game ahead of someone who has played well in the game and has not been to EOE.Im not saying it couldnt happen...Im just saying I cant see it happening this season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    It always felt like there were two other big factors that won it for Chris beyond his cv (which was really only choosing to make fire, teaming up with Rick for one vote)

    - the amount of time you spend with the jury will curry favour. I thought it was put quite well in this TC where they made clear that they are not chess pieces.
    - if the jury can't vote for someone returning from EoE who had little opportunity to play on the main island then what's the point in them not doing a Sandra and buggering off after eviction

    There seems to be a school of thought that these will matter less in an all winners season but I'm not so sure. Natalie is 100% still a contender from what I'm seeing.

    Side note, it was good to finally see where all those tokens went on EoE at the time of the first battle back with Natalie and Rob buying an idol.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭seligehgit


    tvercetti wrote: »
    I'm in the complete opposite camp, her just being there annoys me. Someone in tonight's episode (Tony?) said its an insult to the great players her making it to the end of a champions season and I can't disagree. I love an underdog story but shes just clueless out there. I'd say Aubry is sick watching her out there wondering how she got beaten by her.



    If Natalie comes back in after being in extinction since the first vote with her idol and plays it right to take out Tony/Sarah and makes it to the final 3 opposite Michelle, Nick or Ben, then are you betting against her winning after the time she has spent with the jury??

    I don't want her to win and most certainly do not believe she is a great player but she is a real sweetheart.TBF to her she has been out on the outs from day one,she's not savvy enough in spite of the fact she has a good social game.In addition she had to contend with all the Wendell stuff.He was pretty unpleasant.

    She was not unclueless in her attempt to target Ben but Nick messed that up.It was a shame she did throw her advantage Jeremy's way.

    Ben was excellent in the season he won survivor and was delighted he won it.However I find his ability to be particularly unpleasant towards select others in the absence of a seemingly rational reason less than endearing.

    Tony ATM deserves the win and I love the guy.Who knows a Natalie could upset the apple cart?I think she's a great player.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 4,664 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hyzepher


    I think Natalie could be favourite to win if she manages to get back into the main group. Everyone on EoE thinks she's a beast and after 14 fire tokens it's hard not to agree that she has played the game brilliantly from that side of things.

    It feels to me that the 5 remaining players, apart from maybe Tony, have not thought too much about the end game. Natalie coming in with idols etc might be able to take advantage of that chaos


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    S.M.B. wrote: »
    It always felt like there were two other big factors that won it for Chris beyond his cv (which was really only choosing to make fire, teaming up with Rick for one vote)

    - the amount of time you spend with the jury will curry favour. I thought it was put quite well in this TC where they made clear that they are not chess pieces.
    - if the jury can't vote for someone returning from EoE who had little opportunity to play on the main island then what's the point in them not doing a Sandra and buggering off after eviction

    There seems to be a school of thought that these will matter less in an all winners season but I'm not so sure. Natalie is 100% still a contender from what I'm seeing.

    Side note, it was good to finally see where all those tokens went on EoE at the time of the first battle back with Natalie and Rob buying an idol.

    I understand why the went for EoE given the cast but I think it is the worst twist in survivor. Players that don't get voted out in many ways are at a disadvantage but as we saw the last time it is a hard thing to make that argument at final tribal. When you crap on people not playing while on the edge or not deserving to win, you are crapping on the experience of the majority of the jury and the hope they've clung onto for weeks.

    Having said that, I think Tony, Sarah, and Denise stand a decent shot of beating the returning player, whoever they are. For Tony it is obvious. Even though she was left out of a few votes, Sarah can position herself as the person running things with/behind Tony, played a strong social game, and she'd likely have Tony on the jury to be an aggressive advocate (to be the bad guy calling out how the EoE contestant shouldn't win). Denise's chance mostly comes from her speaking ability and how she can support it with moves against Sandra and like her season surviving so long on the bottom.

    I hope that the former winners don't fall into the same EoE trap and respect more the difficulty of playing within the game, rather than surviving outside it on EoE and arriving back in with cheat codes. I nearly expect at least one of the jury to make some sort of speech to their fellow jury members that playing in the game deserves to be rewarded, in the same way Spencer told the jury not to be bitter against Tony.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Apparently the finale will be the longest ever. Hard to tell if that is just marketing and it is longer because they'll merge the reunion and game itself, rather than what they usually do and have the game over the first 2 hours or so and follow it by the reunion. I really hope they don't break up the gameplay for constant interviews


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Three episodes and the last 10 minutes of episode 3 was the winner announcement on Zoom.

    Hands down the deserving winner.


    Three people who had a real genuine friendship for each other was great to see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,534 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Jesus that finale was far too long. I was losing the will to live towards the end, and there wasn't even a reunion (for obvious reasons)

    The right person won though, absolutely.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Delighted with the winner. Once Tony made the final 3 I would have been very annoyed if they gave it to anyone else. His style at the final tribal was amazing, generally not answering their questions, turning everything into a story and connecting with the jury through making them laugh.

    Disappointed with Ben's decision but I think what Natalie said about the jury impacted him and he didn't see himself beating either Tony or Sarah (or maybe even Natalie) and thought he'd do a nice thing for her. In the end, it probably was key in getting Tony the win, as Ben would have beaten him in making fire.

    Think the final vote count was fair - Tony outclassed the others, Natalie deserved some acknowledgement for dominating EoE but not more as she never survived a tribal without playing an idol, and for Michele with her late immunity run I was fine with her getting to final tribal but her play didn't deserve a vote when compared to what the other 2.

    I will never complain about too much survivor but they really could have split this week and last week over three or four episodes. Interesting that Jeff said that they are committed to having a new season in the fall. It sounds ambitious but more doable target here than with a lot of shows. Not overly keen on his push to have more teenagers register, the odd one is fine but having a tribe of that age doesn't seem like a great idea and would be more drama than game play.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,534 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Teenagers would push it in a love island direction, I think. Lots of horny singles on the island. :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Mr E wrote: »
    Teenagers would push it in a love island direction, I think. Lots of horny singles on the island. :o

    There is that but so many other potential problems. There's the general physical, mental, and emotional impact of the game which increases the chances of kids breaking down and dropping out, along with longer term impacts of those on young minds and bodies. Then there is the grim fall out from last season (and many other seasons), where you are now putting grown stranger adults sleeping, washing, changing in tight quarters with kids.

    It seems like a disaster waiting to happen, with little to no viewer benefit aside from maybe freakshow advertising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭tvercetti


    Delighted with the winner but I watched most of it in dread, had a horrible feeling Natalie would pull off. The edit over the past few weeks made it almost inevitable that she was the one returning. Once Tony made final 3, I knew that was it.

    Really not a fan of extinction, someone who never even survived through a tribal council can come into the game at final 6 with an idol in there pocket having lived with the jury. Rob summed it up best, she had to play a perfect game when she returned but she failed to take Tony out. She didn't have the Chris Underwoods to go to fire against him.

    Great performance by Tony overall, the timing of taking out Sophie and Kim, the using Jeremy when he needed him, the relationships he built with Ben and Sarah. And even when the final episode revolved alot around Natalie, you'd forget he had an Idol at 6, Immunity at 5 and Firemaker at 4. King of Survivor!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Also Starring LeVar Burton


    Yeah a deserving winner for sure. Solid season overall.

    I think I'd prefer if they weren't back in the fall though and waited until mid-season for the next run. A little break would do no harm and whet the appetite for more if there wasn't another season until next February. I feel a lot of us in the thread this season (and the past few seasons) have mentioned a bit of Survivor fatigue. This season being Winners At War helped it a bit, but I definitely don't look forward to new episodes of Survivor as I once did, which is unfortunate. The Challenge on the other hand I get excited for every week at the moment, as they took a bit of a longer break between this season and the last.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭seligehgit


    Well done to Tony as a most deserving of winner.The edit did seem to point to a Natalie win in the weeks leading up but as big a beast as she was on the edge of extinction she enjoyed an advantage in a perverse sort way coming that route.I am glad her fellow competitors on EOE were not influenced by any friendships built up.

    Perplexed by Ben's decision,don't buy the whole argument that he was influenced by reported opinions re Tony Natalie brought back.

    Firmly believe he'd have beaten Tony at a fire making challenge.I'm of the opinion Tony downplayed his fire making ability pre the challenge lulling any possible opponents into a false sense of security.His observations of Michelle were invaluable.

    Adore that final 4 IC.

    Disappointed Michelle did not get any votes,certainly believe she was deserving of same.I've a lot of respect for her as a player.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭kingtut


    Woohoo! I had predicted that Natalie would return and Tony would win. Glad I got something right for a change!

    Definitely far too long of an episode and far too much crying but an enjoyable season overall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,144 ✭✭✭stargazer 68


    kingtut wrote: »
    Woohoo! I had predicted that Natalie would return and Tony would win. Glad I got something right for a change!

    Definitely far too long of an episode and far too much crying but an enjoyable season overall.

    Way too long. I skipped over a lot of bits! I'm obviously getting mu US and Australia confused but I thought natalie was the one who had the arranged marriage - clearly not - so who was that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭tvercetti


    Dovies wrote: »
    Way too long. I skipped over a lot of bits! I'm obviously getting mu US and Australia confused but I thought natalie was the one who had the arranged marriage - clearly not - so who was that?

    I think you're mixing her up with Karishma from the previous season.

    Natalie won season 29, her twin sister was voted out first. They were also on 2 seasons of the Amazing Race prior to Survivor. Jeremy also played that season so not sure if that influenced his vote as he voted for her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,004 ✭✭✭thefa


    That moment when Sarah’s fire shot up early on and was singeing the rope had me on tenterhooks for Tony.

    Would have been nice to see Michelle get a vote but felt her game was too much of a scramble to be considered win worthy and she was the biggest non-threat for Natalie to bring along.

    Natalie’s resilience was impressive and I had a feeling it was leaning towards her but had hope when the jury question in the outwit stage made it sound like she hadn’t taken advantage of the opportunity to make many close friends on EoE. Tony had a better rapport with many of them.

    Episode felt a bit bloated at stages such as after the redemption challenge but in that specific case, we probably won’t see many of those big characters again. Overall a satisfying ending.


  • Registered Users Posts: 140 ✭✭TimeUp


    Good winner, the season did drag a bit towards the end IMHO.

    I know it may sound kind of random, but I'd like to see Yul return at some point.


  • Registered Users Posts: 941 ✭✭✭cyberhog


    Tony was great this season, his antics were hilarious but he was also a very clever player. Sarah and Ben should have listened to him about Natalie having another idol. Sarah was very dismissive of the idea and I think that was her downfall and it seemed like Ben lost his self belief after that.

    Tony was definitely the best player this season and I'm glad he won.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    Don't have too much to add to what's been already said

    - far too long an episode
    - tony is a deserved winner, for a guy that was such an obvious threat not to get a vote against him all game is phenomenally impressive. 4 IC wins helped i guess, a part of his game that went from non existent to close to record equalling
    - i think tony owes sarah a few quid, i do think her social game played a big hand in his win. i was happy to see her cathartic moment
    - michelle is not a bad player whatsoever, was never in a position to win this season but did reasonably well with the hand she was dealt, two big IC wins towards the end


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 646 ✭✭✭kaji


    Tony definitely played the best game and deserved to win. It's bizarre how people let him get to the end when it was so obvious to the viewer and jury- how did his alliance not realise it? What kind of game was Denise playing? Ben realising he had no hope of winning then after Natalie said that everyone knew Tony was running the show. And Sarah claiming it was gender inequality that people didn't consider her game equal to Tony's- Tony played a far superior game to Sarah. It's laughable that she brought up gender inequality when Survivor is one of the few places where it doesn't matter if you're male/female/straight/gay/black/white etc. Look at the winners- 1st winner a middle aged gay man, 2nd winner a middle aged white woman, 3rd winner a young Jewish male, 4th winner a black woman, etc. I really don't enjoy watching Sarah play- she played the same stunt last season on Troyzan in a hidden scene (on Youtube) where she claimed that she couldn't afford to have another kid and was crying saying that if he doesn't bring her to the end, she won't be able to have any more kids. I thought that was pretty disgusting.

    Another thing- Michele has said online that 4 people came up to her and told her that they wanted to vote for her to win but felt like they had to vote for Tony to ensure that Natalie didn't win. She said it was Danni, Adam, Wendell and Nick. It makes sense, those people knew if Natalie won this season, it would be a nail in the coffin of Survivor and it's credibility.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭seligehgit


    kaji wrote: »
    Tony definitely played the best game and deserved to win. It's bizarre how people let him get to the end when it was so obvious to the viewer and jury- how did his alliance not realise it? What kind of game was Denise playing? Ben realising he had no hope of winning then after Natalie said that everyone knew Tony was running the show. And Sarah claiming it was gender inequality that people didn't consider her game equal to Tony's- Tony played a far superior game to Sarah. It's laughable that she brought up gender inequality when Survivor is one of the few places where it doesn't matter if you're male/female/straight/gay/black/white etc. Look at the winners- 1st winner a middle aged gay man, 2nd winner a middle aged white woman, 3rd winner a young Jewish male, 4th winner a black woman, etc. I really don't enjoy watching Sarah play- she played the same stunt last season on Troyzan in a hidden scene (on Youtube) where she claimed that she couldn't afford to have another kid and was crying saying that if he doesn't bring her to the end, she won't be able to have any more kids. I thought that was pretty disgusting.

    Another thing- Michele has said online that 4 people came up to her and told her that they wanted to vote for her to win but felt like they had to vote for Tony to ensure that Natalie didn't win. She said it was Danni, Adam, Wendell and Nick. It makes sense, those people knew if Natalie won this season, it would be a nail in the coffin of Survivor and it's credibility.

    Totally agree,I thought Tony simply played a superior game.He was the instigator and she was the follower in large part.Her vote for Ben was IMO a token gesture in the hopes of demonstrating to the jury she was capable of a big move.Gender played no part.

    Very interesting re Michelle.

    Any link to that conversation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 646 ✭✭✭kaji


    I read it on Reddit, but I can't remember where.. sorry. It was in an interview Michele gave. There's also this on Reddit which makes VERY interesting reading, especially about what happened on 1 tribe in the early days and all the drama from the Edge- seems like it wasn't all lovey dovey like it was portrayed.

    FROM DANNI'S LIVE

    - Parvati and Danni were an instant duo and Parvati initially wanted to vote out Michele, changed her mind to Natalie.

    - Ben told Jeremy that Danni was the one who came up with the Natalie vote when it was Parvati. Parvati then leapt onto this to save herself and painted Danni as the mastermind.

    - Jeremy went off on Danni after the Natalie vote and accused her of going through his bag (when she didn't).

    - Rob, Parvati and Ethan were the ones who flipped on Danni. Adam, Jeremy, and Tony texted Danni after the episode saying how unfair the edit was and how Danni had no choice in that situation.

    - Adam told her that her only option was to try and get Parvati out.- The paranoia came from people who were calling her out about the false Jeremy-bag accusation and spreading rumours.

    - Natalie, Amber and Danni were amazing friends on the start, Natalie completely excluded them later in the game.

    - Amber and Danni are very close friends.

    - Parvati bought two jars of peanut butter with the 4 tokens from the 50/50 challenge. One jar was to be shared between Parvati, Ethan, and Danni, and the other jar was to be shared between Rob, Amber and Natalie. Natalie and Rob ate all of theirs and they barely gave Amber anything. They then stole Danni, Ethan, and Parvati's peanut butter and ate all of what was left (these three were rationing it fairly). Natalie also had her own jar during this time. *THIS PART WAS NOT IN THE LIVE* but I think the rules got broken here and production either didn't know about it or didn't do anything about it. The peanut butter was purchased under the same premise of an idol or advantage, and it's not fair that Parvati and Danni's fire tokens were effectively stolen by Rob and Natalie.

    - Is incredibly respectful of Tony's game.

    - Yul caught a fish for Danni because she was so skinny and he felt bad because Natalie and Rob stole her peanut butter.

    - Thinks Sarah deserved a better edit than what she got

    - YUL AND NATALIE HAD A MAJOR FIGHT. Yul went to get the rice from the mountain when Adam got voted out, he offered to take Adam to get the rice and it took forever. Natalie was SO mad that they took too long to get the rice and when he came back she screamed at him calling him selfish, saying that all he ever does is stay by himself and go fishing all day. Got so bad to the point where Wendell stepped in and told Natalie to drop it. This is what caused Natalie to lose those 3 votes and probably lose the game.

    - People on EOE said a ton of bad things about Sarah.

    - There was a "mean girls" clique on Edge who spoke down to so many people.

    - Was really upset with Wendell's edit.

    - Was bitter towards with Michele at the time because she didn't believe Danni's plea to keep her being that Parvati initially wanted Michele out.

    - Gave her fire token to Denise because she was the only one who listened to Danni.

    - Yul had to go toilet in the middle of tribal council for 20 minutes.

    - Natalie probably would have won if she made fire against Tony.

    - It was actually Tyson, Parvati, and Danni who were the closest in the first returnee challenge - it was edited to be Rob though.

    It seems like Natalie was rude to people on the edge and that was kinda alluded to when Rob mentioned it during the final tribal council. It seems like more of the edge people would have voted for Natalie had she been nicer which shows that the edge completely breaks the game. They really need to get rid of it for good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,004 ✭✭✭thefa


    I hadn’t watch survivor in years and had mixed feelings on the edge. It was good as a break from the main game at points as there are episodes where the themes are quite repetitive and I also found the fire token challenges almost replaced the reward challenges I used to enjoy on older seasons.

    That said, the editing focused on a few key characters on it and you I didn’t really get a feel for how people were getting on. People being kept around for up to almost 5 weeks in some cases with not one, but two opportunities to get back in the game felt a little cheap. Factor in the cast who got voted out later usually were disadvantaged by those who had a significant amount of opportunities to gather fire tokens for advantages. I would’ve preferred only one opportunity to return with those who lost to Tyson not getting another shot.

    Natalie was a bit of an outlier I say in terms of dominance of the edge challenges which the produces probably hadn’t factored in but the amount of advantages she gathered, to the point of a necklace away, was overpowered.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭seligehgit


    It appears the edit may have been kind to Natalie.Her gesture vis a vis Tyson was nice but her near cut throat will to win did shine through.

    I was really shocked when Rob referenced her isolation of certain players on EOE in the weeks leading up to the final return challenge.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    kaji wrote: »
    Tony definitely played the best game and deserved to win. It's bizarre how people let him get to the end when it was so obvious to the viewer and jury- how did his alliance not realise it?

    It was incredible positioning and reading by Tony. He built his alliance of 'lions' so they didn't turn on each other, constantly highlighting that if they let the 'hyenas' take out one then they'd all fall. Tony is also great at reading people, he turned on Sophie, Kim, Nick just as they were beginning to make moves against him. His core alliance was a player he was playing with for the third time and has a relationship with outside the game and Ben who came into the game with the mindset of being loyal this time.
    What kind of game was Denise playing?

    Same game as last time, playing from the bottom. I'd argue she played a much better game than Michele, making big moves early like taking out Sandra and then played from the bottom much better than Michele - building relationships with the main alliance, ending up on the right side of most votes, actually outwitted folk (pretending she wanted to go home so others wouldn't suspect). She was 1 IC win away from likely making final tribal.
    Another thing- Michele has said online that 4 people came up to her and told her that they wanted to vote for her to win but felt like they had to vote for Tony to ensure that Natalie didn't win. She said it was Danni, Adam, Wendell and Nick. It makes sense, those people knew if Natalie won this season, it would be a nail in the coffin of Survivor and it's credibility.

    I really dont buy that at all, it really sounds like what you say to someone when you feel bad for someone because they're embarrassed. 'If there were no repercussions to my vote then I would have voted for you to make you feel better'. If I remember right, Wendell wrote GOAT all over Tony's card so if he actually voted for Michele it would have been due to their relationship, not gameplay.
    seligehgit wrote: »
    It appears the edit may have been kind to Natalie.Her gesture vis a vis Tyson was nice but her near cut throat will to win did shine through.

    I dont see that as a nice gesture, it was pure gameplay. She was either taking the fire tokens back a souvenirs or giving an advantage to someone to help them later and potentially secure a vote at final tribal. Tyson is generally quite vocal and his word holds some sway so a good person to have in your corner, though from the edit he was very quiet this time. If she wanted to give him a selfless gesture she could have given him an advantage in the final challenge but chose an idol instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    Not sure why Tyson has such little input last night.

    Two additional things.

    I really didn't think that EoE worked at all, and not just from a 'spoiling the game' perspective. The idea of holding onto these big characters who were likely to get voted out early made sense to me but in practice I had no interest in hearing what they had to say as the season went on. I adore Parvati and Tyson, Yul and Ethan really grew on me given I hadn't seen their individual seasons but whenever the camera cut to an establishing shot of the edge, I was far from engaged. That's what Ponderosa is for, no idea why they don't do more with all the additional footage they have as we've all moved away from the traditional way of consuming media over the 40 seasons.

    I knew an all winners season was going to be full of great players and characters but I was surprised with how the manner of their previous win played such a major role in this season. So many of those players are carrying major baggage around with them for years and this season seemed quite cathartic. You may disagree that Sarah suffered from gender bias this season or during game changers but there's no denying that her 'victory' came with a price. The same applies to quite a large number of this cast.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,964 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    Nothing else to add myself, good season, Jeff could have done with a sound check before it went out, I have better acoustics on Skype on a laptop in my attic. Cant believe Michelle didnt get a single vote, she played well, also she looked fecking stunning on the conference call.

    Bring on the season full of teenagers I say, could be absolutely hilarious.

    EDIT: Oh yeah and dump the Godawful gamebreaking Edge of Extinction now please, its poison. And dump whoever came up with fire tokens aswell.

    EDIT2: Did anyone feel that last immunity idol that Natalie found was fake as fcuk? It looked like the cameraman had just stuck it in a crack of abranch when Natalie was nearby then stood over it until she came over to see, it just seemed so dodgy to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭upupup


    kaji wrote: »

    FROM DANNI'S LIVE


    - It was actually Tyson, Parvati, and Danni who were the closest in the first returnee challenge - it was edited to be Rob though.

    I noticed something odd about the end of that challenge,They had no footage of rob's face in the "exciting battle" which i thought was so strange.
    Its edited to make it exciting so can't trust it to be real anymore.
    Its like watching a big budget Action film now and the "reality" is gone.I understand that some bit of editing is required but to change the end of a huge challenge like that is wrong.
    I was hoping for Tyson to win Survivor.....maybe he did!:D

    Hopefully the teenagers will bring some realness back to the show


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 4,664 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hyzepher


    i would to see a season where there are 4 tribes, 2+2. They play individually and then only get told of the orthers existance when they merge


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    S.M.B. wrote: »
    Not sure why Tyson has such little input last night.

    Two additional things.

    I really didn't think that EoE worked at all, and not just from a 'spoiling the game' perspective. The idea of holding onto these big characters who were likely to get voted out early made sense to me but in practice I had no interest in hearing what they had to say as the season went on. I adore Parvati and Tyson, Yul and Ethan really grew on me given I hadn't seen their individual seasons but whenever the camera cut to an establishing shot of the edge, I was far from engaged. That's what Ponderosa is for, no idea why they don't do more with all the additional footage they have as we've all moved away from the traditional way of consuming media over the 40 seasons.

    I knew an all winners season was going to be full of great players and characters but I was surprised with how the manner of their previous win played such a major role in this season. So many of those players are carrying major baggage around with them for years and this season seemed quite cathartic. You may disagree that Sarah suffered from gender bias this season or during game changers but there's no denying that her 'victory' came with a price. The same applies to quite a large number of this cast.

    I agree with the difference between the concept and what happened in practice with having the contestants on the edge. The problem is that despite how much we may like them, when they're on the edge they simply aren't playing the game. They are in purgatory, where we see them struggling to survive and do the odd challenge or solve a clue but they arent forming alliances or strategizing or facing decisions to vote someone out.

    Like island of the idols, having players we like there is no substitute for them in the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,964 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    Survivor pulled from Fall schedule, producers only starting to negotiate with Fiji, nothing on the ground for filming yet :(

    https://deadline.com/2020/07/survivor-pulled-fall-schedule-swat-moves-from-midseason-1202985760/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    Surprised they were so optimistic they were going to have something up and running in time, never felt achievable to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    S.M.B. wrote: »
    Surprised they were so optimistic they were going to have something up and running in time, never felt achievable to me.

    I thought they'd get away with it by having the crew and contestants isolate for 2 weeks in a hotel on arrival to Fiji, with all the associated testing, and then they'd be good to go.

    From that point on they could have a pretty tight bubble, as there is minimal interactions with the crew from outsiders. It isn't like the camera men and producers are going back to their families each night. They could also pay any locals that are required to also stay inside the bubble during filming

    With Fiji only having 26 cases and the US being a such a mess, I can see why they aren't welcoming them in with open arms.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement