Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Should ownership of cats be banned?

135

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cats would be puzzled by this thread title by the way.
    Everyone knows that people don't own cats, they just provide them with accommodation and food.:pac:


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭OpenYourEyes


    So adding 4 billion new birds per year and increasing that exponentially going forward will have no effect???



    That's not how this works! I'd love to have the time lecture you on population dynamics, but essentially if you remove cat predation as an issue, you'll likely have more songbirds, but that increase won't equal the number that are lost to cats each year. Other (natural) causes of mortality and population limitation will kick-in. The point is that there are natural ways that populations are limited and should be limited, and cat predation is not one of them.
    The kind of people who see the ecosystem in terms of pretty, cute, cuddly animals versus the nasty ugly ones are always trying to interfere with the natural order of things.

    CATS ARE NOT PART OF THE NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS IN IRELAND. THATS THE POINT! You're the one arguing for keeping the cute fluffy things - you want to allow free reign for something that shouldn't be here, because it's cute and cuddly!

    This nonsense of a songbird utopia is childish in the extreme.

    Part of my work every year is engaging with people as to why they should appreciate and look after species like large gulls, birds of prey and even corvids - species that people don't find attractive or cute or cuddly, but rather noisy and annoying and have an over-exaggerated fear of the damage they do to things like songbird populations and a lack of appreciation for the role they have in the ecosystem. I am in no way working towards a songbird utopia. Your determined arguing despite poor knowledge of the counter-points raised to you, and clearly misunderstanding some of the points you're putting forward and the examples you're using, is childish however.

    You can simply say "listen, I don't mind a few native species being reduced in number because I think cats are great, but not great enough that I'd want to keep it inside the whole time." - that's what your argument boils down to, and it's an opinion - so you're not wrong. It's just that there are lots of people who disagree with that opinion.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    CATS ARE NOT PART OF THE NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS IN IRELAND. THATS THE POINT!

    I'm afraid they are. You can't pick and choose what species to accept as natural and which to reject. How far back is your line across which a creature becomes accepted as native? 200 years? 500? 1000?
    If wolves are reintroduced would you say they are part of the natural order because they were here a certain time ago?

    Things change. Nature evolves and adapts. That's the natural order of things.

    Cats are here to stay. Best just to get used to it.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,222 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    A pet is not a wild animal. It's not a natural part of the ecosystem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 471 ✭✭badaj0z


    I hope you don't research on what humans do otherwise you'll be asking for us to be banned....

    No need, lots of evidence in the news every day plus the entire course of human history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    The OP certainly paints an apocalyptic picture, but one wonders why the emphasis was on a comparison of deaths by cat vs deaths by shooting instead of population numbers as a whole.

    I was interested to find this: https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/IWM115.pdf (COUNTRYSIDE BIRD SURVEY: STATUS AND TRENDS OF COMMON AND WIDESPREAD BREEDING BIRDS 1998-2016)

    Some quotes:

    "CBS [Countryside Bird Survey] charts the history of changes in common terrestrial bird communities in Ireland captured through annual monitoring of over 300 1 km squares documenting trends for 51 species that are associated with a variety of habitats including woodland, scrubland, farmland, heathland and bogs as well as around human sites in urban, suburban and rural areas."

    "Over the 18-year period since CBS began, population trend analyses indicate that 47% of species are increasing, 27% of species are stable and approximately 26% of our common and widespread birds are in decline. The most pronounced of these declines are those of Grey Wagtail, Stock Dove, Swift, Greenfinch and Kestrel."

    On the reasons for worst declines in population:

    Grey Wagtail: "...the dramatic decline in Grey Wagtail numbers likely due to cold-weather impacts from the successive winters of 2009/10 and 2010/1"

    Stock Dove: "The pattern and scale of decline is thought to be due to the loss of mixed farming in the west and midlands"

    Greenfinch: "Trichomonas gallinae parasite linked to the severe decline in Greenfinch numbers." N.B. The report also mentions that "There is also an increased risk predation for Greenfinches feeding in gardens, with cat-related mortality one of the leading causes of death reported by observers (Pavisse et al., 2019)" This is the only reference to cats in the 145-page report.

    Kestrel: "Causes for the decline of Kestrel in Ireland in recent years are likely centred around prey availability, agricultural changes and reduced feeding opportunities"

    Swift: "...loss of traditional nesting habitats."

    Regarding the species mentioned in the OP, the reports figures show:

    Blue Tit: +13% population change 1998-2016
    House Sparrow: +82% population change 1998-2016
    Blackbird: +18.3% population change 1998-2016
    Starlings: -7.1% population change 1998-2016

    Not quite the holocaust hinted at in the OP.

    Regarding pressures and threats, the report listed the following:
    • Climate change in and outside Ireland
    • Agriculture and Forestry including use of pesticides and loss of hedgerows
    • Urbanisation and development
    • Plant and animal pathogens and pests (this does not include predation by other animals)
    • Hunting, shooting and accidental killing
    • Illegal shooting, killing and poisoning
    • Loss of habitat
    • Severe weather
    "The report concludes with an assessment of the current pressures and threats facing Ireland’s common and widespread breeding birds. Relevant to the current Article 12 reporting period of 2013 – 2018, only one high level pressure and threat was identified and relates to the Trichomonas gallinae parasite linked to the severe decline in Greenfinch numbers since it was first recorded in Ireland over 10 years ago. Additional pressures and threats determined to be at the moderate scale, were identified in relation to: agriculture and forestry, which include inter alia changes to grazing and grassland management and the use of pesticides; development (e.g. loss of traditional nesting habitats of Swift), and climate change."

    Note the lack of emphasis on cat predation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 288 ✭✭mattcullen


    storker wrote: »
    The OP certainly paints an apocalyptic picture, but one wonders why the emphasis was on a comparison of deaths by cat vs deaths by shooting instead of population numbers as a whole.

    I was interested to find this: https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/IWM115.pdf (COUNTRYSIDE BIRD SURVEY: STATUS AND TRENDS OF COMMON AND WIDESPREAD BREEDING BIRDS 1998-2016)

    Some quotes:

    "CBS [Countryside Bird Survey] charts the history of changes in common terrestrial bird communities in Ireland captured through annual monitoring of over 300 1 km squares documenting trends for 51 species that are associated with a variety of habitats including woodland, scrubland, farmland, heathland and bogs as well as around human sites in urban, suburban and rural areas."

    "Over the 18-year period since CBS began, population trend analyses indicate that 47% of species are increasing, 27% of species are stable and approximately 26% of our common and widespread birds are in decline. The most pronounced of these declines are those of Grey Wagtail, Stock Dove, Swift, Greenfinch and Kestrel."

    On the reasons for worst declines in population:

    Grey Wagtail: "...the dramatic decline in Grey Wagtail numbers likely due to cold-weather impacts from the successive winters of 2009/10 and 2010/1"

    Stock Dove: "The pattern and scale of decline is thought to be due to the loss of mixed farming in the west and midlands"

    Greenfinch: "Trichomonas gallinae parasite linked to the severe decline in Greenfinch numbers." N.B. The report also mentions that "There is also an increased risk predation for Greenfinches feeding in gardens, with cat-related mortality one of the leading causes of death reported by observers (Pavisse et al., 2019)" This is the only reference to cats in the 145-page report.

    Kestrel: "Causes for the decline of Kestrel in Ireland in recent years are likely centred around prey availability, agricultural changes and reduced feeding opportunities"

    Swift: "...loss of traditional nesting habitats."

    Regarding the species mentioned in the OP, the reports figures show:

    Blue Tit: +13% population change 1998-2016
    House Sparrow: +82% population change 1998-2016
    Blackbird: +18.3% population change 1998-2016
    Starlings: -7.1% population change 1998-2016

    Not quite the holocaust hinted at in the OP.

    Regarding pressures and threats, the report listed the following:
    • Climate change in and outside Ireland
    • Agriculture and Forestry including use of pesticides and loss of hedgerows
    • Urbanisation and development
    • Plant and animal pathogens and pests (this does not include predation by other animals)
    • Hunting, shooting and accidental killing
    • Illegal shooting, killing and poisoning
    • Loss of habitat
    • Severe weather
    "The report concludes with an assessment of the current pressures and threats facing Ireland’s common and widespread breeding birds. Relevant to the current Article 12 reporting period of 2013 – 2018, only one high level pressure and threat was identified and relates to the Trichomonas gallinae parasite linked to the severe decline in Greenfinch numbers since it was first recorded in Ireland over 10 years ago. Additional pressures and threats determined to be at the moderate scale, were identified in relation to: agriculture and forestry, which include inter alia changes to grazing and grassland management and the use of pesticides; development (e.g. loss of traditional nesting habitats of Swift), and climate change."

    Note the lack of emphasis on cat predation.
    Cheers for posting that information. Must check out that report. Interested not so much with regards to the subject matter of the thread but on the population status of the species. I didn't realise sparrow populations had increased so much. I was under the impression they had declined. Maybe that's just the UK.

    Seems a lot of our garden birds are actually doing quite well.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭OpenYourEyes


    storker wrote: »
    Note the lack of emphasis on cat predation.

    Disregarding the OPs post, but speaking on this more generally, just because cat predation might not be limiting species at population level doesn't mean it's not something we should be trying to address or improve on. Obviously we'll never ban cats, and we'll likely never even bring in a licensing system like we have for dogs, but it's worth highlighting to cat owners the problems associated with free-roaming cats and encouraging behaviours to reduce those problems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭Grolschevik


    Disregarding the OPs post, but speaking on this more generally, just because cat predation might not be limiting species at population level doesn't mean it's not something we should be trying to address or improve on. Obviously we'll never ban cats, and we'll likely never even bring in a licensing system like we have for dogs, but it's worth highlighting to cat owners the problems associated with free-roaming cats and encouraging behaviours to reduce those problems.

    That's possibly a point we could all agree on. Even/given if cat predation is negligible and not problematic on a population level, that doesn't necessarily mean that it is a good thing. But we're into ethics there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭Antares35


    We live rural. Any small animals caught by my cats (and I'd be hesitant to applaud their abilities to be honest) is a drop in the ocean here.

    Ban the prícks coming around trampling on private property shooting deer for fun.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭Feisar


    Antares35 wrote: »
    We live rural. Any small animals caught by my cats (and I'd be hesitant to applaud their abilities to be honest) is a drop in the ocean here.

    Ban the prícks coming around trampling on private property shooting deer for fun.

    I never shoot deer where I don’t have permission. You should report poachers to the Gardaí.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Feisar wrote: »
    Neighbours cats shít in my garden so yea they should be banned. It’s cruel that I will have to trap them and drown them now. Can’t risk the young lad going blind because of them.

    Hopefully he grows up with better sight than his Daddy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 761 ✭✭✭GSBellew


    Water John wrote: »
    A person can own a dog, nobody can claim to own a cat.

    Domestic cats have maimed how many children?

    Domestic dogs have maimed how many children?

    Answer away there as you are inferring owning to controlling.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭OpenYourEyes


    mattcullen wrote: »
    Seems a lot of our garden birds are actually doing quite well.

    Urban habitats are under-represented in that report, so it would be interesting to examine population trends in urban environments and specific towns/cities to see if the trend differs. Something that should be possible from the Irish Garden Bird Survey dataset in the future.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,222 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Urban habitats are under-represented in that report
    cf:
    "A high proportion of 1kmsquares surveyed in CBS are entirely or at least partly within farmland habitats"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭Storm 10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 471 ✭✭badaj0z


    Let us ban dog ownership as well or just allow dogs that do not defecate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Storm 10 wrote: »
    There are already laws in place to cover this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Scotty # wrote: »
    There are already laws in place to cover this.

    And did you ever see them being applied, dogs together where sheep are involved are a killers even your quite home dog gets involved.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Storm 10 wrote: »
    And did you ever see them being applied, dogs together where sheep are involved are a killers even your quite home dog gets involved.

    Yes, it's applied all the time.

    Not all dogs will kill sheep just the same as not all cats will kill birds.


  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Stihl waters




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Eddie B


    Storm 10 wrote: »

    Perfect! Now should the owners of these dogs defend their actions by saying, they have a right to roam and kill whatever they want? They are free souls, and its just in their nature.


    P.s They also have a right to p**s and s*it on your doorstep lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    1874 wrote: »
    I think you're incorrect, found a good article recently that showed cats dont actually catch rats,


    I think feral cats should be trapped, neutered and allowed to not breed, they are a nuisance.

    Cats catch and kill rats. OK? OK? I have witnessed this. So that was not a good article.

    Maybe support financially the many groups who are doing the TNR work? They need all the help they can get.

    Ferals catch and kill rats too.

    The Black Death spread because the eejits killed all the cats who were controlling the rats that were spreading the plague.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    [QUOTE=OpenYourEyes;115553519



    CATS ARE NOT PART OF THE NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS IN IRELAND. THATS THE POINT! You're the one arguing for keeping the cute fluffy things - you want to allow free reign for something that shouldn't be here, because it's cute and cuddly!"

    They have been here thousands of years so are valid and a part of our ecology now.

    How do you feel about mink?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭OpenYourEyes


    Graces7 wrote: »

    They have been here thousands of years so are valid and a part of our ecology now.

    How do you feel about mink?


    That's your opinion, which you're entitled to, but it goes against everything we know from ecology, zoology and conservation. All of those disciplines agree that they cats are not a valid part of our ecology. Their presence here is artificial in every sense.

    Similarly, Mink are an invasive species that should not be here and do a huge amount of farm - more harm than cats, because they cause huge amounts of damage to rare breeding species in many parts of the country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    [QUOTE=OpenYourEyes;115658119]That's your opinion, which you're entitled to, but it goes against everything we know from ecology, zoology and conservation. All of those disciplines agree that they cats are not a valid part of our ecology. Their presence here is artificial in every sense.

    Similarly, Mink are an invasive species that should not be here and do a huge amount of farm - more harm than cats, because they cause huge amounts of damage to rare breeding species in many parts of the country.[/QUOTE]

    Theoretical non-sense. You have no faith in nature 's vast ability to adapt and survive.

    As we have seen most of the "articles" and " theories" etc in this thread are inaccurate and out of touch with reality. Nature grows and evolves and adapts to whatever we do. It is a living force not a dry academic theory.

    Nature is our life force. And has accepted and assimilated cats long ago. If she did not do that nature would die. She knows that. The cat belongs centuries ago.
    Nature is a sheer miracle of survival and evolution.

    Be more concerned about the species we have destroyed and lost; and how nature has adapted and changed to accommodate change as all living forces have to do. eg wolves are gone which were predators. . Nature is a life force and not a rigid tyrant

    Please excuse me now; cats to feed etc. And they are a vital part of ecology here. There is no other local predator against the rats. nature knows that. They are welcomed and vital. For all they contribute.

    And my six are all rescued strays. dumped by folk, and of course neutered and well fed. They do a wonderful job and are worth their weight in gold. All living creatures to be valued and cared for in their needs.

    It has been an interesting discussion ; thank you. Blessings and peace this night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭tjhook


    I've no problem with people owning cats. But I have a problem with people's cats coming into my garden, crapping and killing things. If you can't/won't stop your cats doing that, then don't keep cats.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭OpenYourEyes


    @Graces7 - we're literally in the middle of a mass extinction event caused by humans. Species are gone from Ireland and indeed the world that will never return. The "nature bouncing back/adapting" argument has no basis in reality, no matter how much 'faith' you have in it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,250 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    @Graces7 - we're literally in the middle of a mass extinction event caused by humans. Species are gone from Ireland and indeed the world that will never return. The "nature bouncing back/adapting" argument has no basis in reality, no matter how much 'faith' you have in it.
    Based on some reading I'm doing now nature does adapt but more often than not at the expense of species.
    Cats can never be considered part of our ecology. They are pets or feral at best and neither of those categories fit in a natural ecology.
    Cat owners who allow their cats free reign usually make every excuse under the sun for their behaviour but it still doesn't make it right.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,222 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Graces7 wrote: »
    Nature grows and evolves and adapts to whatever we do.
    uh, have you seen much news about nature over the last few years or decades?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,404 ✭✭✭1874


    So you're telling me the 30 plus rats that have ended up outside my door in the last 3 years have been dreamt up by me all along, just 2 weeks ago 2 were lying side by side on my front step like trophy kills, also no more rats sitting on my washing machine or freezer when I go into the shed, I have a jack Russell dog who would try and play with a rat rather than kill it, I've tried everything from poisoning, high frequency transmitters, live bait cages and the rats kept coming back until I got my cats


    Didnt see this, 30 rats in 3 years, is negligible in terms of the rats that reproduced. What you have basically said is that cats have not even caught 1 rat per month.


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Before we got our first cat we had mice. We saw just the one but could hear them in the walls. Within a few weeks of the cats arrival they were gone and haven’t been back. No mouse lives lost - just knowing the cat was there was enough


    Mice are a different thing altogether, I never said cats wouldnt go for them

    Lets go one further. Should birds be banned as they kill insects??


    They are both more part of the natural order and balance of things, insects serve many purposes.

    _Brian wrote: »
    Cats provide essential control of rodents. On our farm for example they are a great natural way of keeping mice and rats under control.

    Cities and towns would quickly be overrun with rodents without the multitude of cats roaming about cleaning up.


    Rats and mice would be less prevalant if there were less sources of food and places for them to nest. Based on how I see people manage food waste, which should be reduced/limited for other reasons, its down to laziness, lack of concern, ignorance.


    2 species on this island should be removed with certainty, Mink and Grey squirrels, after that domestic Cat owners should be either obliged to neuter/spay their cats or pay to allow them to breed/pay for cleaning up the mess, ie pay to trap, neuter and release feral cats in their council area, cats that are apparently domesticated and arent chipped that are caught while catching ferals, should be neutered/spayed and rehomed.
    There are and have been recently around 20 feral cats near us in our suburban area and they will continue to multiply as long as people are over feeding them at the same time I have seen an increase in rat droppings which is caused by how people dispose of food waste and how and where they are feeding feral cats, where they are less likely to deal with rodents IMO, At the same time, over the past few years, I have seen a noticeable decline in the amount of small birds.

    I believe it is anecdotal or incidental where cats are deemed to have caught or even have caught rats. Even the poster in my reply unintentionally admits to this when they say their cat/s caught 10 rats per year (ie 30 over 3yrs), that is negligible, when 2 rats can breed over a 1000 rats alone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Stihl waters


    1874 wrote: »
    Didnt see this, 30 rats in 3 years, is negligible in terms of the rats that reproduced. What you have basically said is that cats have not even caught 1 rat per month.

    .

    I don't care how fast rats reproduce, what I care about is that they're not living in my shed or sitting on my washing machine when I go into the shed, the cats keep the vermin away and that's what they're here for, rats are welcome to do whatever they want as long as they're not invading my space, so yes my cats don't seem to be doing much rat catching at the moment but their very presence is enough of a deterrent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Graces7 wrote: »
    There is no other local predator against the rats. nature knows that.
    Rats have several natural predators, fox, stoat, pine marten, heron, owl, several other species of birds of prey...
    Graces7 wrote: »
    And they are a vital part of ecology here.
    Domestic cats are not in the least bit vital to our ecology!

    They're responsible for 1000's of our wild bird population being killed every year. They might keep rats from your back door but they have no significant impact on the overall rat population.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭Jizique


    badaj0z wrote: »
    The Biggest Bird Killers
    I found the figures below with simple Google searches. They are both from the UK and from publications that support the lead ban in shooting. Look closely. You will soon note that the figures show that cats kill 270 times as many birds than are killed by lead shot. It is time to look at banning cats.

    https://www.birdguides.com/news/uk-s...public%20alike.


    The decision comes despite the well-known negative impacts of lead poisoning in both humans and wildlife. More than 6,000 tonnes of lead ammunition are fired over the UK countryside every year in areas where birds feed, and are left behind strewn on the ground. Birds often mistake tiny shot pellets for grit or seeds, and ingest them. Up to 100,000 waterbirds in the UK die every year through ingesting poisonous lead shot. Dead and dying birds are usually taken quickly by predators – making their deaths unseen and 'invisible' to shooters and the wider public alike.

    https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wi...0been%20caught.

    The most recent figures of how many creatures are killed by cats are from the Mammal Society. They estimate that cats in the UK catch up to 100 million prey items over spring and summer, of which 27 million are birds.
    This is the number of prey items which were known to have been caught. We don't know how many more the cats caught, but didn't bring home, or how many escaped but subsequently died.
    The most frequently caught birds, according to the Mammal Society, are probably:
    • house sparrows
    • blue tits
    • blackbirds
    • starlings
    badaj0z is offline Report Post

    I would have less of a problem with cats if they would tackle the magpie and seagull infestation rather than sparrows, tits and blackbirds


  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭jelem


    Scotty # wrote: »
    Rats have several natural predators, fox, stoat, pine marten, heron, owl, several other species of birds of prey...


    Domestic cats are not in the least bit vital to our ecology!

    They're responsible for 1000's of our wild bird population being killed every year. They might keep rats from your back door but they have no significant impact on the overall rat population.
    another whom fails to see the rat problem that is somewhat held back by cats


  • Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Graces7 wrote: »
    [QUOTE=OpenYourEyes;115553519



    CATS ARE NOT PART OF THE NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS IN IRELAND. THATS THE POINT! You're the one arguing for keeping the cute fluffy things - you want to allow free reign for something that shouldn't be here, because it's cute and cuddly!"

    They have been here thousands of years so are valid and a part of our ecology now.

    How do you feel about mink?

    There's no mink killing birds or ****ting in my garden


  • Registered Users Posts: 371 ✭✭larchill


    Meeow!


  • Registered Users Posts: 125 ✭✭Godeatsboogers


    It's too late now to ban cat ownership, I'm not giving up my cats. Banning ownership doesn't stop cats being around, it's just makes more homeless cats, of which we already have plenty. It's easy to own cats and let them outside without them having a seriously detrimental affect on other wildlife. A little mental stimulation at home, if you do let them out, dont let them out early in the morning or late at night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,974 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Over the last 20-30 years there is one major change that has happened in Irish birdlife. I do not think the number of cats has increased drastically. In that time. If anything there are less cats around. Feral cats may be an issue in towns and cities but not in the countryside. I see nowhere the number of stray cats that were around 20 years ago.

    The real problem that is attacking smaller Bird numbers are crows and magpies. There numbers have swelled over the last 20+ years. There are a few new rookiers near me. Crows and magpies raid nest along hedge rows during spring and early summer. 20+ years ago farmers and gun clubs generally controlled crow populations. Not no longer. Another problem in urban areas especially is gulls there numbers have exploded as well but in rural Ireland its Crow numbers that is effecting the smaller Bird populations

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    jelem wrote: »
    another whom fails to see the rat problem that is somewhat held back by cats
    What rat problem are you referring to?

    Cats will kill rats but they by no means control the rat population. It's estimated there are over 10.5 million rats in Ireland. Rats can reproduce and recover their numbers faster than the cats can kill them.

    But they're also killing some of our rarer species like voles, shrews, and birds like gold crests, warblers, and buntings.

    There's estimated to be 700,000 cats in Ireland. If only 1 in 10 of them kill one bird per week that's 3,640,000 wild birds killed per year. I'd imagine the true figure is much much higher but how many of that figure is made up of rare and endangered birds?

    Do you not think their owners should be held accountable??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,404 ✭✭✭1874


    Scotty # wrote: »
    What rat problem are you referring to?

    Cats will kill rats but they by no means control the rat population. It's estimated there are over 10.5 million rats in Ireland. Cats kill maybe a few thousand each year. Completely insignificant.

    But they're also killing some of our rarer species like voles, shrews, and birds like gold crests, warblers, and buntings.

    There's estimated to be 700,000 cats in Ireland. If only 1 in 10 of them kill one bird per week that's 3,640,000 wild birds killed per year. I'd imagine the true figure is much much higher but how many of that figure is made up of rare and endangered birds?

    Do you not think their owners should be held accountable??


    By the sounds of some of the replies, people dont think they have any responsibility, dont see, dont care, cats are nice pets, we had one years ago, they can be affectionate, they are less obvious than a dog, ie they dont bark that might bother the neighbours, but unlike a dog, they requires less effort.
    You dont have to scoop up their crap and they will look after themselves a lot of the time.
    The main way to control the cat population (and if cat lovers/keepers cared) would be to neuter all domestic cats, but especially Tomcats, OR pay not to, because ferals are coming from somewhere and their lives can be brutal and short, they reproduce rapidly, they are a reservoir for fleas, and other creatures.
    Councils really need to have active programs to capture ferals, the only way to bring people on board is make this capture/neuter and release, but with a laissez faire attitude from councils and cat owners, its likely there will be no plan, no end plan, feral cats will live brutal short lives and have uncontrolled population and eat all around them.


    Would it be accepted if dog owners were allowing large breeds (or any breed) to roam freely, $hit where they please, lets just say aggressive dogs that were going around attacking other dogs, no, because it is easier to deal with and even that isn't working out.
    People need to see and accept their responsibility in these things,

    Rats are attracted by poor management of food sources and waste/disposal and of having places they can stay out of the weather and nest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    irish_goat wrote: »
    It would be near impossible to enforce a ban on cats.

    A ban wouldn't eliminate cats but it would reduce their number substantially.

    The keeping of cats should be banned unless they are declawed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    1874 wrote: »
    By the sounds of some of the replies, people dont think they have any responsibility, dont see, dont care, cats are nice pets, we had one years ago, they can be affectionate, they are less obvious than a dog, ie they dont bark that might bother the neighbours, but unlike a dog, they requires less effort.
    You dont have to scoop up their crap and they will look after themselves a lot of the time.
    The main way to control the cat population (and if cat lovers/keepers cared) would be to neuter all domestic cats, but especially Tomcats, OR pay not to, because ferals are coming from somewhere and their lives can be brutal and short, they reproduce rapidly, they are a reservoir for fleas, and other creatures.
    Councils really need to have active programs to capture ferals, the only way to bring people on board is make this capture/neuter and release, but with a laissez faire attitude from councils and cat owners, its likely there will be no plan, no end plan, feral cats will live brutal short lives and have uncontrolled population and eat all around them.


    Would it be accepted if dog owners were allowing large breeds (or any breed) to roam freely, $hit where they please, lets just say aggressive dogs that were going around attacking other dogs, no, because it is easier to deal with and even that isn't working out.
    People need to see and accept their responsibility in these things,

    Rats are attracted by poor management of food sources and waste/disposal and of having places they can stay out of the weather and nest.

    Bit like people attracting birds with bird feeders to dump all over their neighbours.

    "People need to see and accept their responsibility in these things"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Wishing all here peace for Christmas.

    Off a while for peace here now from all this after getting some very bad news.

    Stay safe! Stay well! Stay strong!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,931 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Does anyone really "own" a cat OP?

    A cat will go anywhere it gets the most food and a reasonable bed at the end of the day.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Scotty # wrote: »
    What rat problem are you referring to?

    Cats will kill rats but they by no means control the rat population. It's estimated there are over 10.5 million rats in Ireland. Rats can reproduce and recover their numbers faster than the cats can kill them.

    But they're also killing some of our rarer species like voles, shrews, and birds like gold crests, warblers, and buntings.

    There's estimated to be 700,000 cats in Ireland. If only 1 in 10 of them kill one bird per week that's 3,640,000 wild birds killed per year. I'd imagine the true figure is much much higher but how many of that figure is made up of rare and endangered birds?

    Do you not think their owners should be held accountable??

    No. RSPB do not agree with you anyways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    A ban wouldn't eliminate cats but it would reduce their number substantially.

    The keeping of cats should be banned unless they are declawed.


    Why ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    It's not a good point.

    One of the many subheadings under "creatures killed by humans" would be "creatures killed by animals that humans introduced to places they shouldn't be", and cats would be one of those animals! It's not that humans are worse than cats, it's that the whole cat thing is one of the problems humans have caused that we've made little attempt to rectify.

    Without cats we would be overrun with rats. Literally. Cats are stars. There is no problem to rectify thus. .

    Bolded ; odd idea. Cats are where they are needed and cared for. where I live cats had bred too freely . They sorted that and as a result with only a couple of cats around, rats increased and increased. Since I came with my now-six cats, rate are under control again. It is a balance in nature that is wise and good. maybe when there were wolves to deal with prey? But they have gone and cats help to redress that need.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Graces7 wrote: »
    Without cats we would be overrun with rats. Literally.

    This is not true, not even a little bit.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement